6139008-History-of-Money

while, merely as we maintain a circulation, debt and the profit of the central banking system multiply at the faster ratespredicated by higher rates of interest. The consequence of making credit so expensive markets cannot afford rising pricestherefore, is ever greater marginalization of existent production, under the weight of greater debt.Alan Greenspan thus accelerated the demise of the system by marginalizing both consumer and producer, and multiplyingdebt at the highest rates either might tolerate. In 1996, during the campaign preceding the second Clinton Administration,I responded to an MSNBC question, Are political reporters politically biased? "Unless there is an editor or reporter with aperfectly neutral work-focus and style of presentation, then ALL reporters and editors are politically biased.Bias however, is no sensitive issue where a mature audience is apt to detect bias and account for it. The damaging aspectof 'news' coverage is its non-focus on imperative issues and qualifiable solution; and that so many citizens of all countriesof the World hold to so many irrelevant snippets as if they can be served by them. For some 20 years for instance, theprospect of a 'balanced budget' occasionally draws some focus. But, in the news, and in politics, never have we seen anexhaustive proof of whether it is even mathematically possible to balance the budget under current and ever-worseningconditions. If however, World politics will ever see the solution of ever-mounting debt, and a solution of the ever greatercosts of ever mounting debt, inevitably this will be through the eyes of a mathematic expression equivalent to conclusive,mathematic proof. Do the people even want to see or hear this, or administer to issues in conclusive terms? Only theirfocus on such a scope will tell. But certainly no news-service offers the inevitable argument. In any event, theimpertinence of the audience befits the impertinence of submitted material. If they had no equally impertinent audience...all impertinent material, and all impertinent politicians, would be equally vanished. Just something to consider, as weplunge ever deeper into insoluble debt." The Clinton-Gore Administration of course, likewise received our proof ofmathematically perfected economy. Mathematically perfected economy is a singular solution for the issues confronting us.In return for our efforts, and in sole response to our efforts, Bill Clinton sent us 8 years' of Christmas cards — without aword on economics, unless those words are in the cards we never opened. You might understand that several of thosesendings were never even opened nonetheless, as it wasn't long after my subdued 1996 expression of displeasure that BillClinton and Al Gore claimed to have accomplished something which to recently had been considered "mathematicallyimpossible." My very words. Imagine that.Clinton, known well enough for his truthfulness, claimed to have balanced the federal budget; and remarkably, this claimsurvives the mainstream press as "might" induce approval of an unapprehending populace to this very day. But weretaxes increased? Was government spending decreased? Were either taxes or spending increased or decreased asnecessary to avoid further accumulation of national debt? OR "might" he just for instance have instead relinquished hardearnedand vital assets such as the Panama Canal, and gutted social security and even other funds meant for, created bythe work of, and owned by, the American people? And can this "possibly" explain why Al Gore refused to run for 2004,saying only that he's come to realize "the old methods may not work any more?" Indeed, no more room may remain forthe old methods to "work" any more; and when and if we finally have to clean house, which "may" be very soon, neitherthe White House or Congress or Judicial system will be a comfortable place to perch, if not only did you permit this tohappen, you were a principal perpetrator. But in the mainstream press owned by the principal perpetrators, the legend ofthe balanced budget lives on, even as federal debt continued to accumulate under the purported, balanced budget — andeven as federal debt is regularly purchased by the so-called Federal Reserve, for profit, at your further expense. AsClinton took office with business across the World plummeting from profitability, "new engines of growth" were direlysought. It was necessary to dramatically increase the circulation that, if new production of some sort could survive, itmight sustain "the economy" against the accumulated debt. "One thing always particularly attractive to the banking'industry,'" is the prospect of siphoning profit from commerce in a "new" way.If you ever have to deal with "investors," you might be apprised they are in general not particularly brilliant people.Across the World they claim their role drives the system. In fact, largely they procure and distribute funds from closeproximity to the central banking system — at behest of the system, and at the direct or indirect profit of the printers andchangers of the money. One thing motivates them, and that is unearned profit. The "economy" was largely sustained bythe strength of the software industry. But in every new area and era of venture, pretenders may accumulate. Right andleft new ventures were spawned, often with no real product, or no prospect in hell of generating a profit. Huge sums ofcash were dumped into empty businesses, and on the claimed "boom," Clinton likewise claimed efficient administration ofthe "economy." A typical blunder for instance would be a proposal for the World's largest online mall. EVERYONE would beallowed to sell EVERYTHING — and everyone's store front might cost them nothing to participate. A great idea? A littlesoftware would run it all. But what were the real prospects? First of all, a formula for everyone to sell to themselveseverything they might, for profit, is to cancel all the profit. Moreover, which store front is to be presented of all so manystore fronts? And finally, how have you improved distribution or handling, when you can still pick up your bar of soap atthe store?There are no credible figures, but so few are the so-called dot-coms which ever made a profit, quitelikely all the prosperity claimed of the Clinton era is more properly represented by a negativeexpression. Nonetheless, the failure of all those dot-coms dumped huge amounts of cash into thesystem, which, against the further multiplied debt, allowed us to just sustain ourselves. Now, underall so much more debt, accumulating ever more debt everywhere about us, and without even acredible facade worthy of even greater funding necessary to sustain us against even further debt...Just exactly, where are we going to go? There is negative interest now in Japan. They are HOPINGthey can pay people to take money, that the system does not quickly deflate as we pay againstexistent debt — while we are so insolvent we can neither afford or credibly be granted further debtThe Hidden History Of Money & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 380