10.07.2015 Views

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

England to issue an order that the US dollars were not to be accepted any more and their British money had to be used.By issuing only 1 British dollar for 2 US dollars, they cut the amount in 1/2 per person in circulation and then through highinterest rates and calling in loans, cut that amount in circulation to 1/4 from the previous amount. In a short 2 or 3 yearsthere was 25 to 30% unemployment, drinking, crime, divorces, debtors prison, forced child work etc. Benjamin Franklinsaid we would have gladly borne the tax on the tea if we could have kept our own money which very few people knowabout as it would not do to have the people learn anything valuable about the real history in school <strong>of</strong> the 1776revolution. There is a reason that the Rockefellers related to the Rothschilds and originally borrowers <strong>of</strong> in the past boughtup controlling interest in the five major text book companies and Encyclopedia Britannica. There is a reason for theconstant change in text books <strong>of</strong>ten times for the worse in ease <strong>of</strong> real understanding as there is not much pr<strong>of</strong>it in textbooks that are used for 50 years like the McGuffy readers.US and Canada by having partial control and issuing their own money built up their countries until 1913 with roads,bridges, buildings etc. with very little debt until the Federal Reserve Act in the US (the name carefully chosen to deceivethe people from knowing that it is a privately owned corporation with most <strong>of</strong> the ownership European) and a similarBanking Act creating the Bank <strong>of</strong> Canada in Canada. Despite parliamentary hearings in England in the 1930's, they stilldon't know who the owners <strong>of</strong> the Bank <strong>of</strong> England are, i.e. the Rothschilds.A Democracy is easiest for the International Bankers to run as then the people believe they are free but it only takesabout 200 out <strong>of</strong> 300 people bribed, blackmailed or brain washed congressmen to make laws and legislation for 300million people. USSR was too inefficient as too many people were rebelling or just putting in time against the elitedictatorship. A plan was conceived wherein there was a resemblance <strong>of</strong> a democratic revolution to over throwcommunism. National industries were privatized and sold for cents on the dollar to Rothschild front men. Medical,pensions and other programs to help people were cut back or out and now there is approximately 50% unemployment.In countries like Africa and South America it was less costly to finance terrorist movements to overthrow semi-corruptgovernments that were not handing enough mines, assets or interests in the countries wealth to the bankers and/orbanker controlled transnational corporations. The war for Kosovo was planned & told to others in the 1991 Builderbergermeeting as the not compliant enough president Slobodan Milosevic needed to be removed so the oil and mineral wealthcould be extracted for outside companies, a pipeline be built to carry the oil from the Caspian Sea through to Afghanistanand then from there to China to supply the growing energy demands <strong>of</strong> 1.1 billion people. A destroyed country isalways easier to negotiate with. It is also a good example to show other obstinate countries to bring themback in line.There are people that remember the supposed gas oil shortage when prices spiked up in 1973 in the US. An oil executivein Lybia said there were oil tankers loaded with oil sitting <strong>of</strong>fshore but the 30 year oil leases had expired with the middleeast countries. The terms <strong>of</strong> the new agreement were such that with the increased oil royalties to 20% minus capital costsand with greater tax right <strong>of</strong>fs from the US government, the oil companies were actually making more money than before.For a simple math question, if OPEC countries get 20% royalty from every barrel <strong>of</strong> oil sold from their country, who getsthe other 80% <strong>of</strong> each dollar from oil sold? Who benefits more from oil going to $60 dollars per barrel from $20 perbarrel? What is the amount <strong>of</strong> government taxes on each gallon <strong>of</strong> gas sold? What percentage <strong>of</strong> the government budgetgoes to pay just interest on the debt owing and why is that the richest countries have the highest debt load? Who getsmost <strong>of</strong> the blame for the high prices in the mass media? Why is it that OPEC is blamed first, the oil companies next andnever a word about the bankers benefiting? Did the banks/government get even with the oil companies on the Alaskapipeline through red tape and delays so that the price <strong>of</strong> the pipeline went from 2 Billion to over 12 Billion nearlybankrupting the oil companies and forcing them to borrow their net worth. They also blocked them from tapping enoughoil reserves and enough natural gas for 200 years supply. Did they not want the US to be self sufficient and able to pay alltheir debt <strong>of</strong>f? http://www.reformation.org/energy-non-crisis.html How easy is it to bamboozle the average citizen? Ifthere are 30 year contracts with the middle east countries, what is 30 years plus 1973? When did the war break out withIraq? 30 years ago, Iraq did not have the knowledge and skilled work force to operate and maintain the oil fields andequipment. Now they do and have the money to maybe operate & receive 100% <strong>of</strong> the revenue. What kind <strong>of</strong> terms areIran & Saudia Arabia going to agree to after seeing what happened to Iraq? Which companies transported and receivedthe first ship loads <strong>of</strong> oil from Iraq after the last war was over? Which oil pipeline was started up again that had been shutdown after the 1967 Israeli war? Those answers lead to who was behind the war and who are benefiting from it. SaddamHussein was a pussy cat compared to Bush & company and those against him directing the counter revolution attemptingto get more <strong>of</strong> a cut on oil revenues.Most people think that a bank lends money out that it has set aside from savings or some ratio <strong>of</strong> that. Banks actuallycreate money. A person signing a note or mortgage <strong>of</strong> $100,000 creates paper wealth that the bank can then set up as anasset in a numbered account to create a loan <strong>of</strong> $100,000 from which that person can write checks to disburse money(actually debt backed fiction money) to other people or stores. For the bank, it was just a matter <strong>of</strong> electronic digits tocreate & keep track <strong>of</strong>, but for the person to repay the interest on top <strong>of</strong> the principle, he has to repay with blood, sweat& tears. For a 30 year mortgage on his house, he can repay twice the principle in interest. That is why third and fourthgeneration farms are foreclosed on by bank managers. The only work the bankers do is type some numbers on thekeyboard in air conditioned <strong>of</strong>fices. There is a misconception that governments need to pay down the debt as a solution tothe problem. When 10% <strong>of</strong> the debt is paid down, that reduces the money in circulation by approximately 10% as nearlyall money in circulation is debt created money except a small amount <strong>of</strong> coinage. When the average dollar isexchanged 5 to 6 times a year, a $100 dollar debt payment dollar reduction can mean $550 loss <strong>of</strong> goods and servicesThe Hidden <strong>History</strong> Of <strong>Money</strong> & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!