10.07.2015 Views

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

That means that, in the same period, 200 times more was stolen from Germany than was given as a loan, repayable withinterest! That is the naked truth about the Marshall Plan's so-called aid! In other words, it is nothing but a despicablemockery <strong>of</strong> the Germans, which West German governments have continued to perpetuate for 50 years. As recently asMay 1997, on the occasion <strong>of</strong> the 50th anniversary <strong>of</strong> the Marshall Plan, German Chancellor Kohl wept tears <strong>of</strong> gratitude.Table 9: Possible productivity as <strong>of</strong> 1945, givenintact/undamaged capacity (GNP data[7]) WestGermany (Fed. Rep.)bill. DMbill. DM1945, GNP <strong>of</strong>19501946, GNP <strong>of</strong>19511947, GNP <strong>of</strong>19521948, GNP <strong>of</strong>195398.1120.0137.0147.71949, GNP <strong>of</strong>19541950, GNP <strong>of</strong>19551951, GNP <strong>of</strong>19561952, GNP <strong>of</strong>1957Total: 1,261.8158.6181.4200.5218.5However, West Germany didn't get its first meager hand-outfrom this Plan until two years after its inception; in otherwords, Herr Kohl wept two years too early.Economic Dimension <strong>of</strong> the Looting and Destruction: Theextent <strong>of</strong> the robbery and destruction is also shown bycomparison <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> the German NationalProducts from1945 to 1952 and 1953 to 1960. Thus, in thefour years <strong>of</strong> the Marshall Plan, the expenses associated withthe occupation alone exceeded the Marshall Plan aid by aTable 6: Gross National Product and OccupationExpenses (in bill. RM/DM Ostmark)[7] , [8]WestGermanyincl.OccupationExpensesEastGermanyincl.OccupationExpenses1945* 32.30 5.00 15.00 5.001946* 32.30 5.00 15.00 5.001947[9] 43.00 6.00 16.00 6.001948[9] 57.00 5.00 18.00 6.001949[9] 73.00 4.70 21.00 5.801950[9] 98.10 4.65 24.00 7.001951[9] 120.00 6.49 25.00 8.001952[9] 137.00 7.89 27.00 9.00Total: 592.70 47.00 161.00 41.80Total W. Germany + E. Germany: 753.70* estimate: 50% <strong>of</strong> 1939 including 88.8 bill. DM inOccupation Expensesfactor <strong>of</strong> nine! 6.4 billion DM in Marshall Plan income from the Americans, 54 billion DM in payments to the robbing andlooting occupiers. It is most noteworthy that in the four years <strong>of</strong> the Marshall Plan, the cost <strong>of</strong> the West Germanoccupation alone amounted to 24 billion DM - in other words some four times as much as the entire Marshall Plan "aid"!To put it another way, in each and every year Germany paid an average <strong>of</strong> 4 times as much to the Western occupationpowers than it received in so-called aid! If one also adds the occupation expenses paid to the Soviet occupiers, whodepopulated and looted East Germany almost out <strong>of</strong> existence with the consent <strong>of</strong> the barbaric Western Allies, then from1949 to 1952, fully 9 times as much was extorted from the German rump state in occupation costs as the entire MarshallPlan "credit" gave Germany in 4 years!Impact on Social Services: Not even compared to the expenses <strong>of</strong> German social services was the Marshall Plan <strong>of</strong> anysignificance after 1949, see table 7.Losses Due to Reduced Productivity <strong>of</strong> East Germany: The quoted sources estimate a loss <strong>of</strong> approx. 5.5 billion DM as aresult <strong>of</strong> communist mismanagement. The amount <strong>of</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> material property in East Germany due todeterioration <strong>of</strong> reproducible material wealth is estimated to be approx. 3.3 billion DM. The next table shows the loss <strong>of</strong>production capacity as a result <strong>of</strong> terror bombings and post-war dismantling in comparison with the capacity <strong>of</strong> 1936,which was considerably lower than that <strong>of</strong> 1939 as shown in table 8.If one extrapolates from European economic growth data <strong>of</strong> that period and assumes an undamaged production capacity,Germany's economy would have grown as follows in Table 9.This level <strong>of</strong> productivity, which would have been possible had there been no destruction <strong>of</strong> German economic potentialsmust be compared with the actual results achieved under conditions <strong>of</strong> looting, destruction, and suppression: 592.7 bill.DM (cf. Table 6). For the years 1945-52, this meant a loss <strong>of</strong> productivity <strong>of</strong>: 1,261.8 - 592.7 = 669,6 bill. DM(corresponding to Table 3; 580 bill. in 8 years!) This is more than 100 times the Marshall Plan credit to West Germany!Marshall Prejudices[11]: "Without the Marshall Plan Germany would have turned into one giant graveyard, into a vastplain <strong>of</strong> destruction, brutality, inhumanity, disease and death. [...] Not the USA pr<strong>of</strong>ited from it, but rather all <strong>of</strong> Europe -but most <strong>of</strong> all the German people under the occupation by the Western Allies. In the face <strong>of</strong> the humanitarian motive, themassive financial and material aid takes on an aspect <strong>of</strong> nobility. We here in Germany owe a debt <strong>of</strong> gratitude to ourAmerican supporters, for generations still to come." The West German living standard and investment opportunities werethus deliberately kept at a level <strong>of</strong> less than 50%. The effect on the other European nations was proportional; 20% onaverage, and significantly more for those such as The Netherlands, whose economy was closely interconnected withGermany.[7] To clear up the misunderstandings disseminated by the German government: Germany - before, during, andafter the War, and right to the present day - has always worked in close economic association with the rest <strong>of</strong> Europe dueto her location and history; the European share <strong>of</strong> her foreign trade amounts to approx. 70%. Thus, every increase inThe Hidden <strong>History</strong> Of <strong>Money</strong> & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 362

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!