6139008-History-of-Money

orrowers during the boom was then transferred to the central bank during the bust. And you always wondered how thebig guys ended up with all the marbles.Now, who do you think is responsible for all of the ups and downs in our economy over the last 85 years? Think about thedepression of the late '20s and all through the '30s. The FED could have pumped lots of debt/money into the market tostimulate the economy and get the country back on track, but did they? No; in fact, they restricted the money supplyquite severely. We all know the horrible results that occurred from that action. Why would the FED do this? During thatperiod asset values and stocks were at rock bottom prices. Who do you think was buying everything at 10 cents on thedollar? I believe that it is referred to as consolidating the wealth. How many times have they already done this in the last85 years? Well, let’s move on and see.Where There's War There's Money, Debt & DependencyWar uses up more materials more quickly than most anything else on earth. In war expensive equipmentdoesn't wear out slowly, it gets blown up. And the victor gets to buy the best assets of the enslaved defeatedat a rock bottom price. It's interesting to note that during the 119 year period from the founding of the Bank of Englandto Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo, England had been at war for 56 years, while the rest of the time preparing for it. In theprocess the money changers had been getting rich. So there it was, the newly formed privately owned FederalReserve poised to produce any money the U.S. Government might need from thin air with each dollarstanding to make a healthy interest. The FED owners have the power to issue currency and loans without anycollateral of their own, i.e. by using the taxpayers’ wealth as a guarantee!Nine days after its formation the Federal Reserve founders were wishing each other a Happy New Year. What good fortunemight 1914 bring? In 1829, a New York Illuminati meeting was addressed by a British Illuminist named Wright. Heinformed those present that Atheist groups were to be united with Russian Nihilist and other subversive groups into aninternational movement called "Communism" which would be used to foment wars. "Clinton Roosevelt (a direct ancestorof FDR),..." and others were appointed to raise funds which "... financed Karl Marx and Engels when they wrote 'DasCapital, and the 'Communist Manifesto, in Soho, England." ("Pawns In The Game", page XIV) Economic power was nowcentralized to a tremendous extent and it was time for a Rothschild war - a really big war - in fact, the first World War. Asthe central bankers knew, nothing enriches them and creates debts like warfare. England was the best example up to thattime. During the 119-year period between the founding of the Bank of England and Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo,England had been at war for 56 years. And much of the remaining time, she'd been preparing for war. In World War I, theGerman Rothschilds loaned money to the Germans, the British Rothschilds loaned money to the British, and the FrenchRothschilds loaned money to the French, again creating it from nothing as credit issues. It was all highly profitable. InAmerica, J.P. Morgan was the sales agent for war materials to both the British and the French. In fact, six months into thewar, Morgan became the largest consumer on earth, spending $10 million a day. His offices at 23 Wall Street weremobbed by brokers and salesmen trying to cut a deal. It got so bad that the bank had to post guards at every door and atthe partners' homes as well. Other Rothschild allies in the United States made out as well from the war. President Wilsonappointed Bernard Baruch to head the War Industries Board. According to historian Jarnes Perloff, both Baruch and theRockefellers profited by some $200 million during the war.But profits were not the only motive. There was also revenge and power. The Money Changers never forgave the Czarsand the Germans for their opposition to the Rothschilds and the central bankers nor for supporting Lincoln during the CivilWar. Also, Russia was the last major European nation to refuse to give in to the privately-owned central bank scheme.Three years after World War I broke out, the Russian Revolution toppled the Czar. Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Companybragged on his deathbed that he had spent $20 million towards the defeat of the Czar. But the truth was that much ofthat money funded the communist coup d'etat replacing the democratically elected Kerensky regime, which had replacedthe Czar months earlier. The bankers were not so much enemies of the Czar, as they were intent on seizing power inRussia, through the Bolsheviks. Three gold shipments in 1920 alone, from Lenin to Kuhn, Loeb & Company and MorganGuaranty Trust repaid the $20 million to the bankers, and this was just a small down payment. But would some of therichest men in the World financially back communism, the system that was openly vowing to destroy the so-calledcapitalism that made them wealthy? Communism, like plutocracy, is a product of capitalism.Researcher Gary Allen explained it was this way: "If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealthprogram, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich menpromoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead, it becomes logical, even the perfect tool for power-seekingmegalomaniacs. Communism or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of theeconomic elite."As W. Cleon Skousen put it in his 1970 book The Naked Capitalist: "Power from any source tends to create anappetite for additional power... It was almost inevitable that the super-rich would one day aspire to control not only theirown wealth, but the wealth of the whole World. To achieve this, they were perfectly willing to feed the ambitions of thepower-hungry political conspirators who were committed to the overthrow of all existing governments and theestablishment of a central World-wide dictatorship."But what if these revolutionaries get out of control and try to seize power from the Money Changers? it was Mao Tsetungwho in 1938 stated his position concerning power: "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." TheLondon/Wall Street axis elected to take the risk. The master-planners attempted to control revolutionary communistThe Hidden History Of Money & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 287