10.07.2015 Views

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It was the discovery <strong>of</strong> the touchstone that paved the way for metal-based commodity money and coinage.Any s<strong>of</strong>t metal can be tested for purity on a touchstone, allowing one to quickly calculate the total content <strong>of</strong> a particularmetal in a lump. Gold is a s<strong>of</strong>t metal, which is also hard to come by, dense, and storable. For these reasons gold as amoney spread very quickly from Asia Minor where it first gained wide use, to the entire world. Using such a system stillrequired several steps and some math. The touchstone allowed you to estimate the amount <strong>of</strong> gold in an alloy, which wasthen multiplied by the weight to find the amount <strong>of</strong> gold alone in a lump. To make this process easier, the concept <strong>of</strong>standard coinage was introduced. Coins were typically minted by governments in a carefully protected process, and thenstamped with an emblem that guaranteed the weight and value <strong>of</strong> the metal. It was however extremely common forgovernments to assert that the value <strong>of</strong> such money lay in its emblem and to subsequently debase the currency bylowering the content <strong>of</strong> valuable metal. Although gold and silver were commonly used to mint coins, other metals could beused. Ancient Sparta minted coins from iron to discourage its citizens from engaging in foreign trade. In the earlyseventeenth century Sweden lacked more precious metal and so produced "plate money," which were large slabs <strong>of</strong>copper approximately 50cm or more in length and width, appropriately stamped with indications <strong>of</strong> their value.Metal based coins had the advantage <strong>of</strong> carrying their value within the coins themselves — they induced on theother hand manipulations: the clipping <strong>of</strong> coins in attempts to get and recycle the precious metal. The bigger problem wasthe simple co-existence <strong>of</strong> gold, silver and copper coins in Europe's nations. English and Spanish traders valued gold coinsat a higher rate <strong>of</strong> silver coins than their neighbors would do, with the effect that the English gold-based guinea coinbegan to rise against the English silver based crown in the 1670s and 1680s and with the consequence that silver wasultimately pulled out <strong>of</strong> England for dubious amounts <strong>of</strong> gold coming into the country at a rate no other European nationwould share. The effect was worsened with Asian traders not sharing the European appreciation <strong>of</strong> gold altogether — goldleft Asia and silver left Europe in quantities European observers like [ http://www.pierremarteau.com/currency/ed/newton-1717-09-25.html] Isaac Newton, Master <strong>of</strong> the Royal Mint observed with uneasiness.Stability came into the system with privately owned disguised as national banks guaranteeing to change money into goldat a promised rate. The privately owned Bank <strong>of</strong> England (whose owners also owned the colonial East-IndiaCompany) risked a national financial catastrophe in the 1730s when customers demanded their money to bechanged into gold in a moment <strong>of</strong> crisis. Eventually London's merchants saved the bank and the nation with financialguarantees. See also: Roman currency, coinage metal, for conversions <strong>of</strong> the European coins before the introduction <strong>of</strong>paper money: The Marteau Early 18th-Century Currency Converter (http://www.pierremarteau.com/currency/converter.html) .The system <strong>of</strong> commodity money in many instances evolved into a system <strong>of</strong> representative money. In this system, thematerial that constitutes the money itself had very little intrinsic value, but none the less such money achieves significantmarket value through being scarce as an artifact. Representative money such as paper currency and non-preciouscoinage was backed by a government or private bank's promise to redeem it for a given weight <strong>of</strong> preciousmetal, such as silver. This is the origin <strong>of</strong> the term "British Pound" for instance; it was a unit <strong>of</strong> money backedby a Tower pound <strong>of</strong> sterling silver - hence the currency Pound Sterling. For much <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth and twentiethcenturies, many currencies were based on representative money through the use <strong>of</strong> the gold standard.Because money is the fruit <strong>of</strong> power and can be used for wielding or gaining more power, the one whoaccepts gold as legitimate money gives power to the people who own gold's stocks. Gold has been stable overthousands <strong>of</strong> years and has survived the test <strong>of</strong> time. All the other materials have become less important as gold hasproved itself the superior unit <strong>of</strong> account. Basically, price fluctuations <strong>of</strong> gold are not because the value <strong>of</strong> goldhas changed, but because the value <strong>of</strong> the currency has changed. The same happens with some other materials,like food or energy or transport or accommodation. A plate <strong>of</strong> food has always the same value, whatever its priceis. It is possible for privately issued money to be backed by any other material, although some people argue aboutperishables materials. After all, gold, or platinum, or silver, have in some regards less utility than previously (theirelectrical properties notwithstanding), while currency backed by energy (measured in joules) or by transport (measured inkilogramme*kilometre/hour) or by food [3](http://www.economist.com/markets/bigmac/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3503641 ) is also possible and may be acceptedby the people, if legalised. It is important to understand though that as long as money is above all an agreement to usesomething as a medium <strong>of</strong> exchange, its up to the community (or to the minority elite who hold the power and politiciansin their grip) to decide whether money should be backed by whatever material or should be totally virtual.Credit/Floating/Fiat <strong>Money</strong>Fiat money refers to money that is not backed by reserves <strong>of</strong> another commodity. The money itself is givenvalue by government fiat (Latin for "let it be done") or decree, enforcing legal tender laws, previously knownas "forced tender", whereby debtors are legally relieved <strong>of</strong> the debt if they (<strong>of</strong>fer to) pay it <strong>of</strong>f in thegovernment's money. Note that the Government is controlled by the private Banking Dynasties who actuallycontrol the issue <strong>of</strong> fiat money. By law, the refusal <strong>of</strong> "legal tender" money in favor <strong>of</strong> some other form <strong>of</strong> payment isillegal, and has at times in history (Rome under Diocletian, and post-revolutionary France during the collapse <strong>of</strong> theassignats) invoked the death penalty.Governments and private bankers through history have <strong>of</strong>ten switched to forms <strong>of</strong> fiat money in times <strong>of</strong> need such aswar, sometimes by suspending the service they provided <strong>of</strong> exchanging their money for gold, and other times by simplyprinting the money that they needed. When governments produce money more rapidly than economic growth, the moneyThe Hidden <strong>History</strong> Of <strong>Money</strong> & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!