6139008-History-of-Money

employment to your populated cities. The goods manufactured in England were sold back into the Indian market. It madeeveryone wealthy, except the Indian population who owned those resources in the first place.Likewise, in South Africa, all the Gold and Diamond mines has effectively been stolen, this naturally made your ancestorsvery rich but left the native Africans very poor. Then the missionaries tried to sugar-coat the grand theft by selling themthe Bible. Those who resisted British Imperialism physically, like the Zulus were no doubt the 'terrorists' of that time, intheir own lands, and those who opposed using political means must been the preachers of 'hate'!Many of the indigenous members who personally benefited from your rule, naturally argued in favour of BritishImperialism, there are always profiteers selling their loyalties in every society. However, the Muslim power was stillseething, and in 1857, an all-out war of independence broke out. Few know that the British beheaded the sons of the LastMughal emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar and presented their heads to him on platters! Bahadur Shah was later exiled toBurma where he spent the remainder of his life in a 4'x4' windowless jail cell. Afterwards, there was a grand ball held atthe Red Fort.The Rothschilds ensured that the original solid gold coated spires of the Taj Mahal were shipped off to Britain and replacedwith brass ones. Instrumental in the success of the British were rail, telegraph and certain princely states. However, theMuslim power was still seething, and in 1857, an all-out war of independence broke out. Instrumental in the success ofthe British were rail, telegraph and princely states like the Nizam of Hyderabad. India serves as a great example of howliterature and language can be exploited and created for furthering Illuminati interests. Wilkie Collins of the IlluminatiCollins bloodline started publishing imaginary tales of Muslim atrocities against Hindus and temple trashing by Muslimrulers in his famous novel, the Moonstone. Hindus who were a non-cohesive group living peacefully with Muslims for yearswere suddenly pitted against Muslims. An Englishman (from the Jesuit secret society) started the original controversy ofthe Babri mosque being built on the birthplace of Hindu god Ram. To further distance Muslims from their Persian languageand therefore Islamic roots, the British popularized the Urdu language as a mass language for Muslims. The reason wasthat Urdu while sharing the script of Persian happened to be littered with native Indian words, making it more localized inits nature; and inheriting all the class bias of Indian language as well. Then the British created the Hindi language out ofthin air as a national language for Hindus. Hindi was spoken like Urdu but had the script of Sanskrit, a Hindu script whichhad gone extinct centuries ago. Hindi would make Hindus antagonist to Muslims' and Muslims would be encouraged toabandon Urdu for Hindi, breaking complete contact with the Islamic script. A certain John Gilchrist of Fort William College,Calcutta, directed these language politics. Mr. Gilchrist can be aptly called the father of Hindi language.For example today, the likes of Khalid Mahmood (Birmingham MP) who passionately supports 'your' (or the US) foreignpolicies; he supports the actions of your armies that are helping the larger US armed forces to invade nations that havenot attacked or threatened the UK or US, consequently, men, women and children in Iraq and Afghanistan have beenmurdered in their tens of thousands. The latest reports from Iraq, confirmed by humanitarian organisations, [1] highlightthat even children are being imprisoned, raped and tortured at the hands of foreign forces, including at Abu-Ghraib, thelatest new pictures of which the Pentagon has refused to release. So now you are 'liberating' Iraqi children to deliver theminto the clutches of sadists and paedophiles that fill that ranks in your armies, something you can't deny, as the world hasseen the Abu Ghraib evidence. From Abu-Ghraib to children, surely you have now excelled Saddam Hussein.The self-serving individuals in our midst are like the coolies that served your forefathers in the British Raj. They argue incollusion with some of the Muslim “moderates” in favour of deportation, desperately trying to preserve their self-interest.How is it that immigrants are now behaving like those on the far right, by using a language that is racist? Too often, I getasked the same question by those so-called 'free' thinkers with a coolie mindset - why do you live here if you oppose thepolicies of the British government. Am I obliged to agree with the government on every issue or leave? I thought allcitizens were equal and had right to disagree, the right to speak freely against wrongs, which is also an evidence of a freedemocratic society? In reality questions of "what are you doing here then?" are posed in desperation when they areunable to intellectually answer the arguments posed to them. It would be far more accurate to call such people nonthinkers,the neo-coolies of today who believe the only legitimate view, is that of "their masters."The so-called 'golden' Dutch 17th century was after Jews expelled from present Portugal and Spain arrived in the presentNetherlands. Jews had money and knowledge of trade to the far East and the Americas, the Dutch had the best ships, thatis fast, they were built in a short time, and they needed the lowest crew number. For ordinary Dutch the century was notvery golden, ships leaving for what now is Indonesia left with some 350 men aboard, IF (not when) they returned theywere lucky if 100 had survived. But pepper was so precious at the time when meat rotted soon that it was sold per grain.Overseas trade from W Europe to present Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka and such regions made the overland trade throughthe Middle East superfluous. The decline of the Ottoman empire thus began.The second factor in the relative decline of the ME is the absence of coal and iron ore, one needs these substances tomake cannon. Churchill in his first book, on the British genocide in 1897 in what now is NE Afghanistan, defined 'superiorcivilisation' as 'having the most effective weapons. A book on the history of the British empire states that after the Britishrobber trade company had beaten Indian princes in the 17th century 'the local population paid for their own occupationthrough taxes'. It is not that the British were worse than other European robber nations, they just were more effective,being an island at the time made it possible not to have an army, the navy could be used anywhere, close to home, andfar away. Transport over the sea at the time was ten times as cheap as transport overland. The British also were moreruthless, as far as I know there never was a British Multatuli, a man who in a famous novel written at the end of the 19thcentury that described Dutch colonial brutality. Multatuli, his real name was Eduard Douwes Dekker, is buried in Venice,The Hidden History Of Money & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 242