10.07.2015 Views

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

embodied that mighty divinity (Kybele) was conveyed to Rome. In the very next year Hannibal embarked for Africa. ThePhrygian Goddess’ sanctuary was established on Palatine Hill. Some have argued that the cultic success in ridding Italy <strong>of</strong>Hannibal threw open the gates <strong>of</strong> Rome to a variety <strong>of</strong> Eastern cults. But the warfare had already helped bring down themoney system and Roman justice with it."The ‘commodization’ <strong>of</strong> Rome’s money system dramatically accelerated the emergence <strong>of</strong> a plutocracy – a ruling orderbased on wealth. ‘By the time <strong>of</strong> the 2nd Punic War there were already significant accumulations <strong>of</strong> capital in the handsnot only <strong>of</strong> the Roman Establishment, but <strong>of</strong> a non-Senatorial business class. This capital may have been the fruits <strong>of</strong> thepr<strong>of</strong>its made during the 1st Punic War. Contractors commanded sufficient reserves to make deliveries to the Governmenton credit from 215 BC onwards."Our hypothesis that silver was provided to the mint at a six-fold overvaluation can help explain where the money camefrom. And the timing also works. "For the loans were being repaid even before the war was over. Then immediately upondefeating Hannibal, there was a political thrust to start a new war with Macedon. Apparently those benefiting from warfaredidn’t want any interruption to their pr<strong>of</strong>iteering."This eventually brought on a revolt on behalf <strong>of</strong> the small farmers led in turn by two aristocratic brothers, the Gracchi,inspired by Stoic philosophy. Both were martyred, and the era <strong>of</strong> Julius Caesar and his dictatorial successors took over.Each <strong>of</strong> these, while still striving for power, minted his own gold coins. This had a double purpose – financing theirattempt to seize supreme power and advertising the extent <strong>of</strong> power already attained. Under Augustus the ratio <strong>of</strong> gold tosilver was raised to 12:1, and an end was put to coining by patrician families. Julius Caesar had directed his conquest togold sources, that amongst much else would allow him to handle his huge personal debt. With every new colony founded,a new coining was launched under the Roman stamp to take care <strong>of</strong> its monetary needs. Despite Rome’s Easternconquests gold and silver drained <strong>of</strong>f to the east, largely because <strong>of</strong> the luxury imports by the high-living new rich <strong>of</strong>Rome. Slaves replaced free labourers on the vast latifundia that took over as usury ruined the small farmers. All thisechoes strangely familiar in the claim <strong>of</strong> central banks to be independent <strong>of</strong> their government, no matter what theircharters may say. That is notably the case even in Canada and the United Kingdom, where the central governments are infact the sole shareholder <strong>of</strong> its central bank with the explicit ultimate responsibility for its basic policy. Moreover, the<strong>of</strong>ficial goal <strong>of</strong> "zero inflation" is unrealizable in a pluralistic urbanized high-tech society, in which ever more indispensableinfrastructures are provided by the state. The coining <strong>of</strong> gold was considered the ultimate sign <strong>of</strong> sovereignty. Stripgovernment <strong>of</strong> that prerogative, and what is left is no longer a truly sovereign power.For a later period, after the Roman Empire had declined, it worked like this: The gold/silver ratio in the West was kepthigh, ranging over millennia, between 9 and 16 to 1. However, the ratio in India and Asia was kept low – usually around 6or 7 to 1. This meant that silver taken from Europe to India was exchanged for nearly twice as much gold in India as inEurope. The nexus <strong>of</strong> this trade was the land bridge above the Middle East. Whoever controlled that area usuallycontrolled the trade."If it was controlled from the West, they got 100% more gold for their silver than the local value. It worked just as wellfrom the East. If they controlled the trade they received 100% more silver for their gold. If control was shared, tradewould probably have been at a 9 to 1 ratio, giving each establishment a pr<strong>of</strong>it on exchange. "The existence <strong>of</strong> thisdichotomy and its significance is almost unknown (Jacobs, William, The Precious Metals, 1831, reprinted NY, A.M. Kelley,1968). Alexander Del Mar also discovered it. While the mechanism is still [generally] unrecognized, we can identify itstraces in the work <strong>of</strong> modern historians such as M. Rostovtzef’s Social and Economic <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Hellenistic World: ‘ThePtolemies [Macedonian successors to Alexander the Great in Egypt] ‘for reasons unknown to us but probably dictated byeconomics...separated themselves and their Kingdom from the rest <strong>of</strong> the Hellenized World. It seems to have been anaccepted fact that they derived an enormous reserve <strong>of</strong> gold from the Arabian caravan trade. "Pliny [the Elder] wrote that100 million Sesterces <strong>of</strong> silver, equivalent to one million gold Aurei, was annually exported to India and China from Rome.He had been appointed Procurator in Spain and entrusted with managing the Revenue. But the secrecy <strong>of</strong> the mechanismis underscored by the fact that its workings were not known to him, for he couldn’t understand why his countrymenalways demanded silver and not gold from conquered races."Banking in the Ancient Roman World 318 BCBanking and Business in the Roman WorldSeries: Key Themes in Ancient <strong>History</strong> by Jean Andreau Ecole des HautesEtudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris Translated by Janet Lloyd Hardback (ISBN-13: 9780521380317 | ISBN-10:0521380316) DOI: 10.2277/0521380316 Published October 1999 . In the first century BC lending and borrowing by thesenators was the talk <strong>of</strong> Rome and even provoked political crises. During this same period, the state tax-farmers werehandling enormous sums and exploiting the provinces <strong>of</strong> the Empire. Until now no book has presented a synthetic view <strong>of</strong>Roman banking and financial life as a whole, from the time <strong>of</strong> the appearance <strong>of</strong> the first bankers' shops in the Forumbetween 318 and 310 BC down to the end <strong>of</strong> the Principate in AD 284. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Andreau writes <strong>of</strong> the business deals <strong>of</strong>the elite and the pr<strong>of</strong>essional bankers and also <strong>of</strong> the interventions <strong>of</strong> the state. To what extent did the spirit <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it andenterprise predominate over the traditional values <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> Rome? And what economic role did these financiers play?Julius Caesar Strips <strong>Money</strong> Changers <strong>of</strong> Their Powers & is Murdered by Them (48BC)The Hidden <strong>History</strong> Of <strong>Money</strong> & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 213

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!