10.07.2015 Views

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

loan basis with minimal interest payments that are taxed at 30% anyways. With such a simple policy to fund its deficit foranother year, it's no wonder the United States can get by without any brain power at the Treasury Department. In effect,the US and its Gulf Arab allies just pulled <strong>of</strong>f the biggest central-bank heist in the history <strong>of</strong> the World. The price <strong>of</strong> oil justwent up 60% or more, which really cuts down to size that $3.4 trillion <strong>of</strong> net foreign holdings <strong>of</strong> US financial assets. As aloyal American, one would like to cheer one's government's deft move to pick the pockets <strong>of</strong> our trading and financingpartners. Moreover, the US gets the Arabs to fund a large share <strong>of</strong> our deficit, subsidize our interest rates, and help keepour taxes low for another year. Surely I can afford to buy another gas-guzzling sport-utv, get a rifle, and wave a flag.The United States is extracting tribute on oil from the World. If the World wants Middle Eastern oil, it must pay for itthrough the US dollar. Why do the heads <strong>of</strong> Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Abu Dhabi, Bahrain, Qatar, etc, hold dollars? If theydon't buy dollars, why would the US keep them in power? It would simply not be in our interests to do so. Rememberwhen Saddam Hussein talked about pricing Iraq's oil in euros? "Shock and awe" quietly followed. This program <strong>of</strong> oil fordollars and dollars for the US Treasury deficit is the simple tribute that we, as the superpower, can expect. Unlike theVietnam era - when the US was trying to finance guns and butter - getting others to pay now for our guns allows us tomilk the oil out <strong>of</strong> the sand and turn it into butter. The next question will be how the Asians respond to a 60% hike in theprice <strong>of</strong> oil. Notice in the chart below there are some big, smart, anonymous dollar holders (such as hedge funds) locatedin the Caribbean. No one knows who they really are. Major known foreign holders <strong>of</strong> US Treasury securities(figures are much higher now after the Bush regime increased the debt from $3 Trillion to $9 Trillion, e.g.Saudi Arabia now holds nearly $4 Trillion <strong>of</strong> Treasury bills which they are not allowed to spend):Japan (in billions <strong>of</strong> dollars) 702Mainland China 194England 163Caribbean 93Korea 68Taiwan 59Hong Kong 59Total (including other countries with fewer holdings) 1,960The public debt is already projected to grow from a level <strong>of</strong> 34 percent <strong>of</strong> the Gross Domestic Product (the basic measure<strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the U.S. economy) in 2000 to nearly 70 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP by 2030. The borrowing called for under the planadvanced by the President’s Social Security Commission would raise the debt to nearly 100 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP by 2030.Under some other individual account plans, the debt would be raised to even higher levels. These elevated levels <strong>of</strong> debtwould increase the risk <strong>of</strong> a crisis in which the government faces difficulty paying the interest on this debt or issuing newdebt in the bond market. The borrowing that would create such a fiscal situation could be obscured or omitted from thefederal budget.Understanding The Meaning <strong>of</strong> GDP Gross Domestic ProductThis is an aside note about GDP or gross domestic product, but I might as well bring it up since we are talking aboutmoney. Simon Küznets (1965) pointed out that “the welfare <strong>of</strong> a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measurement <strong>of</strong>national income as defined by the GDP…goals for ‘more’ growth should specify <strong>of</strong> what and for what.“ As a gauge <strong>of</strong>economic performance and well-being, the GDP embodies at least seven major fallacies:First, the GDP regards every expenditure as an addition to well-being, regardless what that expenditure is for and theeffects. By this reasoning the nation's economic hero is the terminal cancer patient going through an expensive divorce,whose car is totaled in a twenty-car pile-up. The economic villain is the healthy person in a solid marriage that cooks athome, walks to work and doesn't smoke, gamble or spend the evening surfing Web porn. The hero borrows and spends;the villain pays cash and saves for the kids' education. What economists call "growth", in other words, is not always thesame as what most Americans would consider good.Second, the GDP ignores the crucial economic functions that lie outside the realm <strong>of</strong> monetary exchange. GDP excludesthe value <strong>of</strong> unpaid housework, child care, volunteer work, and leisure. Parents do real work. So do neighbors,communities, open spaces, rivers and oceans, the atmosphere, and trees. Anyone who doubts this might try getting alongwithout them. Such things contribute more to well being than does much that we buy from the market. Yet the GDPregards these life-sustaining functions as worthless - until the economy destroys them, and we have to buy substitutesfrom the market or from government. Then the GDP says that the economy has "grown." When parents default and kidsneed counseling or foster care, the GDP go up because money has changed hands. When a parent cares for kids at homethe GDP stagnates; when that same parent takes care <strong>of</strong> other peoples' kids at day care the GDP goes up. When the citycuts down shade trees to widen a street, and homeowners have to buy air conditioners for cooling, the GDP goes upagain. It looks like economic growth; but in reality no increase has occurred. Instead, something that used to be free nowcosts money; social and environmental decay has been transmogrified into "growth" through the myopic lens <strong>of</strong> the GDP.Third, the GDP does not account for natural resources that are required to sustain current and future economicdevelopment implying that the future has no value. The GDP excludes natural resource capital, environmental resourcesservices,human resources and research and development. All that matters is the present. The implications <strong>of</strong> currenteconomic activity for our kids and grandkids do not enter the calculation. For example, the GDP counts the depletion <strong>of</strong>The Hidden <strong>History</strong> Of <strong>Money</strong> & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!