10.07.2015 Views

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

6139008-History-of-Money

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Secretary was deeply perturbed by my attitude, almost angrily refuting the reasons I gave for my quick conclusions."Source: The White House Years: Mandate for Change: 1953-1956: A Personal Account, New York: Doubleday, 1963, pp.312-313.)What is the hidden history behind the former Bank <strong>of</strong> England director Lord Stamp’s statement?: “Banking wasconceived in iniquity and born in sin. Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them with the power tocreate credit, and with a flick <strong>of</strong> the pen they will create enough money to buy it all back again. Take this power awayfrom them, and all the great fortunes like mine would disappear, and they ought to disappear, for then this World wouldbe a happier and better World to live in. But if you wish to remain the slaves <strong>of</strong> Bankers and pay the cost <strong>of</strong> your ownslavery, then continue to let Bankers control money and control credit.”President Kennedy Nov. 12, 1963 said: About 2 weeks prior his assassination on Nov 22, Kennedy had a meeting inNew York with the International Bankers. There is evidence that he learned that he had been lied to about Cuba and manyother issues. In fact, there is substantial evidence that Kennedy was beginning to uncover an "international effort" to usethe <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the President <strong>of</strong> the United States against America, and had threatened to expose this movement. "The greatfree nations <strong>of</strong> the World must take control <strong>of</strong> our monetary problems if these problems are not to take control <strong>of</strong> us.""The high <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave<strong>of</strong>fice, I must inform the citizen <strong>of</strong> this plight." There is a debate on the exact date JFK said this. On Nov. 22 nd , he wasassassinated. On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, had been signed with theauthority given to the Treasury to directly issue silver certificates without going through the private Federal Reserve,however others claim he merely gave away the nation’s silver reserves amending a Truman Executive Order 10289 withhis EO-11110. Some claim that those Silver Certificates were debt free money that by-passed control by the FederalReserve System. Others call it a silver give-a-way.http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=jfkmyth&refpage=issuesbyThe Federal Reserve System threatened to "veto" President Kennedy. Controlled by the NY Fed Bank, the Fed keeps thepublic misinformed and uninformed. The banks have a stranglehold on America. This very informative document isreprinted in <strong>Money</strong> Is Unreal. The original can be found in the Congressional Record, Vol 110 - Part 13, August 3, 1964,pages 17837 through 17846 (8 pages.) The veto threat is on page 17846 (the last page) near the bottom <strong>of</strong> the firstcolumn. It is much easier to order the ABCs in booklet form from Peter Cook, Monetary Science Publishing, Box 86,Wickliffe, OH 44092. You will find the veto statement on page 19 <strong>of</strong> that edition.President Kennedy also threatened to reveal the CIA’s Majestic MJ-12/Jason Society drug running scheme (later known asthe 50 Committee and then as PI-40 Committee). It seems that Kennedy's tendency to end the Vietnam War, to curtailthe CIA, to bypass the Federal Reserve, and reign in Israel's nuclear program were the major reasons for hisassassination. In Al-Wassat, recently released Israeli imprisoned citizen Mr. Vanunu said according to "near-certainindications", Kennedy was assassinated due to "pressure he exerted on then head <strong>of</strong> government, David Ben-Gurion, toshed light on the Dimona nuclear reactor". Kennedy is quoted as having said: "We do not know whichirresponsible Israeli Prime Minister will take <strong>of</strong>fice and decide to use nuclear weapons in the struggleagainst neighboring Arab countries,", adding "what has already been exposed about the weapons Israel isholding can destroy the region and kill millions”. Kennedy's comptroller <strong>of</strong> the currency, James J. Saxon,had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broaderinvestment and lending powers for banks that were not part <strong>of</strong> the Federal Reserve System. Saxon alsohad decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, againweakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks. JFK was moving towards weakening the Fed’sstranglehold on money. When these United States <strong>of</strong> America "went <strong>of</strong>f the Silver Standard" in 1964 after John F.Kennedy’s assassination, the Government again repudiated the Redemption <strong>of</strong> Federal Reserve Notes in silver coin (thelast lawful money) and replaced the lawful money with cupro-nickel tokens. In a very real sense, the United Statesbecame insolvent. We then had Federal Reserve Notes which were "redeemable" only in other Federal Reserve Notes and"token" coinage having little intrinsic value, and also not redeemable in anything <strong>of</strong> value.We now have a "Federal Reserve Note" which does not Promise anything, is not Redeemable on Demand in anything <strong>of</strong>intrinsic value, and which has been deemed (unilaterally proclaimed) to be "legal tender", but which is not and cannotever be lawful money <strong>of</strong> the United States. While the current "Federal Reserve Notes" are not valid promissory notes; theymay be "bills <strong>of</strong> credit". Legally, such currency is called "scrip" or "fiat money". In slang, such currency is called"worthless", "bogus", "fake", "funny money", etc. What "obligation" could possibly attach to such a "Note" or to the use <strong>of</strong>such a "Note"? I believe that, since no obligation [<strong>of</strong> Redemption in Value] can attach to the purported Issuer [the FederalReserve Banks] or to the purported co-signers [the Treasurer <strong>of</strong> the United States and the Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Treasury] <strong>of</strong>such a "Note", no obligation could possibly attach to the first, nor to any subsequent, holder or user <strong>of</strong> such a pseudo-"Note". And if it costs only 3-4 cents to make such a "Note" [no matter what the actual "face" denomination], isn't thatproduction cost [paper, ink, and "security" strip] the only intrinsic value <strong>of</strong> the "Note"?Congressional Report on <strong>Money</strong> (1964): “In other words, every the Federal Reserve System purporting to issue these"Federal Reserve Notes" as money to its member Banks and every member Bank issuing them to its customers is legallyinsolvent, because they cannot ever redeem such a "Federal Reserve Note" in lawful money <strong>of</strong> these United States <strong>of</strong>America. Further, they are also willfully committing Fraud upon their customers, because they know (even if theircustomers do not know) that they cannot redeem those "Federal Reserve Notes".The Hidden <strong>History</strong> Of <strong>Money</strong> & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!