6139008-History-of-Money

Amschel Bauer later changed to Rothschild, the banking power to be feared in Europe as we will see later.Mayer Amschel Bauer was born in Frankfurt-On-The-Main in Germany in 1743. He was the son of Moses AmschelBauer, an itinerant money lender and goldsmith who, tiring of his wanderings in Eastern Europe, decided to settle down inthe city where his first son was born. He opened a shop, or counting house, on Judenstrasse (or Jew Street in English).Over the door leading into the shop he placed a large Red Shield (Roth Schild in German) with a Roman Eagle andHexagram (symbol of Masonry as on the Israeli flag). In later years his name, which he had changed to Rothschild (redshield), became synonymous with wealth, power and influence. He was the first of the Rothschilds - the first trulyinternational banker! The Rothschild grew to dominate trans-Atlantic banking and now with their surrogatessuch as the Rockefeller Dynasty, the Bush Dynasty, the House of Windsor Dynasty, and others, control WorldFinances and thus World affairs, wars, monopolies, etc.Prior to the American Revolution, most nations were ruled by a single Power Group composed of those with moneyenough to buy war lords and religious and political ideologues and with knowledge of how to manipulate the people. Therewere no countervailing power groups to fight against the monolithic cabals. The American Revolution was supposed toresult in the creation of a republican form of democracy, with the various branches of government providingcountervailing powers. However, the leaders of the clandestine 1787 Constitutional Congress concocted a flawedConstitution which made it possible for a plutocratic minority to seize all the reins of power.John C. Miller. (In a 1943 book). Origins of the American Revolution: "[The Framers of the Constitution] . . . hadno wish to usher in democracy in the United States. They were not making war upon the principle of aristocracy and theyhad no more intention than had the Tories of destroying the tradition of upper-class leadership in the colonies. Althoughthey hoped to turn the Tories out of office, they did not propose to open these lush pastures to the common herd. Theydid believe, however, that the common people, if properly bridled and reined, might be made allies in the work of freeingthe colonies from British rule and that they--the gentry--might reap the benefits without interference. They expected, inother words, to achieve a 'safe and sane' revolution of gentlemen, by gentlemen, and for gentlemen." (Forget aboutgovernment of the people, by the people and for the people!)President George Washington, 1785: in a letter written to the Reverend G. W. Snyder: "Reverend, Sir, it was not myintention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati -- the principles [masqueraded as] of Jacobinism [Israelinism; Israelis the other name of Prophet Jacob] -- had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more satisfied ofthis fact than I am." Shortly before he died, President Washington was well aware that the Adam Weishaupt radical brandof Masonry (contraction of the French words “frere mason”; in secret societies, members ascend to higher degrees byproving they can keep secrets, by performing rituals and by various tests of merits which become progressively harderuntil a Mason reaches the 33 rd degree grand-master), the Illuminati, had spread its poison to America. ”They work moreeffectively against us, than the enemy's armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the greatcause we are engaged in ... It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pests tosociety and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America." -- George Washington, America's first President,Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton & Co.Shortly before his death, John Marshall, the great Chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, wrote:"The institution of Masonry ought to be abandoned, as one capable of producing much evil, and incapable of producingany good which might not be affected by open means." Marshall was himself a famous Mason and had assisted in theestablishment of two Lodges in Virginia.Rev. Charles G. Finney, the great nineteenth century evangelist and longtime president of Oberlin Collegewrites a book exposing Masonry: Pg.1 "I know something about it, for I have been a Mason myself." Pg. 8 "I came tothe deliberate conclusion, and could not avoid doing so, that my oaths had been procured by fraud andmisrepresentations, and that the institution was in no respect what I had been previously informed it was. And, as I havehad the means of examining it more thoroughly, it has become more and more irresistibly plain to my convictions that theinstitution is highly dangerous to the State, and in every way injurious to the Church of Christ."After years of agitation and maneuvering and manipulation by the trans-Atlantic Rothschild cabal, finally in 1791,Congress was induced to pass a law, after long debate and strong opposition, chartering the private bank modeled on theprivate Bank of England called the "First Bank of the United States." This marked the beginning of our money being"switched' from wealth of the State & People to debt owed to private banks. The first United States Bank was stronglyopposed by both Edmund Randolph, the Attorney General of the United States, and the Secretary of State, ThomasJefferson. Note here that the identical tactics that were used with the establishing and naming of the Bank of Englandwere again used, namely - the naming of the new bank the "Bank of the United States;" making it appear to be, withoutsaying so, a bank owned by the government, that, of course, giving it the advantage of the prestige of the government,and the belief of the people of its consequent safety for the money they were to deposit in it. More deception and makebelieve? Certainly, and as before mentioned, these are two of the main "stocks in trade" of the "money changers" orusurers. It is most unbelievable, even at this date, to find the vast number of people here in the United States actuallybelieving, and who will argue for hours that the federal Reserve Banks are "owned" by the "Government." Such, of course,is not true, as they are owned by private interests as was the Bank of the United States in 1791.The Hidden History Of Money & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 118