6139008-History-of-Money

Myron Fagan (1960s): "The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those twoso-called ideologies [Marxism/fascism/socialism v. democracy/capitalism/Fabianism] to enable them [the Illuminati] todivide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and thenbrainwashed into fighting and destroying each other."U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917: "In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, andpowder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper World and employedthem to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally thepolicy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers… Anagreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished foreach paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financialpolicies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers."Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, 1992: "In the nextcentury, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereigntywasn't such a great idea after all."Experts, Economists, Media (THE NEO-PRIESTS) Mislead Us On The Globalized Economy“The great struggle of history has been for the control over money. It is almost tautological to affirm that to control theproduction and distribution of money is to control the wealth, resources, and people of the world.” — JackWeatherford, anthropologist and author.[2]“The control of money and credit strikes at the very heart of national sovereignty.” — A.W. Clausen, President of Bankof America, in a response to the suggestion of a global central bank. [Clausen later became the President of the WorldBank].[3]“Once a nation parts with control of its currency and credit, it matters not who makes that nation’s laws.” — W.L.Mackenzie King, [former Prime Minister of Canada].All of this brings up an interesting question: Does the world need a global central bank? If you want a single worldcurrency, it requires an international banking structure armed with a monetary policy on a planetary scale. Essentially, therequirement for a single global currency is a bank that has power over all countries, kindred, and tongues. FormerCanadian Member of Parliament, Paul Hellyer, criticized this development in 1994, saying that under such a globalcurrency/banking system “the interests of citizens, of individual countries must be subordinate…to the interests ofinternational finance.” “…[countries] would no longer be able to pursue any kind of independent policy. Sovereignty overthe most powerful of all economic tools would be turned to an international monster…A world bank run by a worldkingship of international appointees collectively not accountable to anyone? Heavenly days!”Richard Stimson (Playing with the Numbers: How So-called Experts Mislead us about the Economy”Westchester Press, 1999): “The trade deficits started modestly in 1975,” and here are some late figures on the tradedeficits: 1995 $180 Billion, 1996 $184 B, 1997 $198 B, 1998 $298 B, 1999 $372 B, 2000 $409 B, ...This is financed by printing Federal Reserve dollars or issuing US Dollar accounts which other countries are willing to holdin their reserves. To date the US has now bought a modest 15 trillion dollars worth of the World's finest commodities withmoney conjured up with the help of a magic wand, i.e. created from nothing by the privately owned Federal ReserveBank.Nowadays the US is buying the globe at the rate of over a billion dollars a day. And the best part is that you can conjureup and lend US dollars from nothing, but you get paid back in uranium, gold, diamonds, copper, oil, grains, vegetables...all sorts of nice things. The question remains unanswered: why do other countries fall for this stuff? This link may helpexplain things: In Focus: Multilateral Debt Burden by Soren Ambrose “Key Point: The IMF and the World Bank are'preferred creditors' who gain power over impoverished countries as the amounts owed to them increase.” (Also, see:Predatory Lending above) And what will happen when the poor suckers figure it out? Well, then we go to Plan B: StarWars. “The U.S. Space Command, set up by the Pentagon in 1985, describes itself in ‘Vision for 2020’ this way: ‘US SpaceCommand dominating the space dimension of military operations to protect US interests and investment’.” You gotta lovethat word “investments.” From Karl Grossman, professor of journalism at the State University of New York College In thepast 30 years the US has bombed or attacked Syria, Lebanon, Nicaragua, Sudan, Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Iraq,Guatemala, Japan, East Timor, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Somalia, Haiti, Yugoslavia,Panama, Afghanistan, etc.. What do these countries have in common? They are all non-members of the World TradeOrganization. Since the invention of the WTO only Japan has joined willingly; the South American countries have been“persuaded” by friends such as Mr. Pinochet. As Gore Vidal observed: “The United States is always at war; perpetual warfor perpetual peace.” And it looks like the wars of the future will be fought against non-WTO members. Poor countriesproducing commodities cannot possibly compete against rich countries producing credit money.Alan Greenspan, 17 February 2000 Congressional testimony: “... We have a problem trying to define exactly whatmoney is...the current definition of money is not sufficient to give us a good means for controlling the money supply...”The Hidden History Of Money & New World Order Usury Secrets Revealed at last! Page 114