Environmental Impacts of Multi-Storey Buildings Using Different ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

- 32 -lightweight timber and steel framed roof is built with metal roofing. The plant room roof isconstructed in timber and steel frame and is clad in the same material as the main roof.4.3.3.3 Structural WallsThe east wall, west wall and part of the south façade are a 310 mm thick “Thermomass” wall;a composite wall with 60 mm concrete on the exterior, 50 mm of extruded polyurethaneinsulation in the core, and 200 mm of exposed reinforced concrete to the interior of thebuilding. The service area walls are 200 mm reinforced concrete walls.4.3.3.4 Internal PartitionsThe light weight walls on the south face of the offices and the walls to the ventilationchimneys are timber framed containing 90 mm thick fibreglass insulation and a 25 mm aircavity for the exterior walls. Internally, the timber framed walls are lined with gypsumplasterboard. Acoustic insulation is required between partitions of the main body of offices.Generally, a plaster acoustic tiled ceiling is used in all office areas. The solid concreteexposed walls have a clear sealer applied; plasterboard walls have paint finish and all pre-castconcrete walls have an external finish.4.3.4 Steel BuildingFigure 4.6 shows the north-east and south-west perspective views of the Steel building.The structure of the Steel building consists of a concrete foundation supporting steel beamsand columns. Both internal and external walls are non-structural elements, being light weightsteel stud walls supported between floors. This is the only design in which the east and westend envelope walls are not part of the structural system.Figure 4.6: Steel building, north-east and south-west perspective views.Both curtain walls in the north and south façade are the same as in the Concrete and Timberbuildings.4.3.4.1 Structural SystemThe Steel building is a column and beam steel structure braced by eccentrically braced frames(EBF). Figure 4.7 (one of the drawings provided by Steel Construction New Zealand (Xiao &Fussell, pers. comm.)) sketches the proposed layout of the recommended steel structure forthe simplified Steel building. There are three frames of columns and beams running along thebuilding, one at each long edge and one internal frame. Transverse secondary beams connect
- 33 -the three longitudinal frames. The floors are braced by Eccentrically Braced Frames (EBF).There are two frames in the longitudinal direction located at the perimeter of the building.There are four frames in the transverse direction inside the building, located beside thechimney voids.Figure 4.7: Sketches of the layout of Steel building structure (right) compared with the layout of the actuallaboratory concrete structure (left).4.3.4.2 Floor and RoofThe floors and roof slab use the Comfloor system, where a 0.9 mm corrugated galvanizedsteel sheet supported by the structural beams, is topped by 150 mm of reinforced concretewith a total floor depth (floor plus beam) of typically 610 mm. The roof slab is formed usingthe same Comflor system complete with concrete topping and a 75 mm thick fibreglassinsulation layer below the steel deck. Over this structure a steel framed roof is built withmetal roofing. The roof plant room is constructed in steel frame and is clad in the samematerial as the roof (Xiao & Fussell, pers. comm.)4.3.4.3 Structural WallsThe envelope walls at each end of the building and around the service shaft have beenassumed to be non-structural elements. Walls on the east and south faces are supportedbetween floors slabs, so that the heavy steel structure is exposed inside the building, andhence not able to act as a thermal bridge. The envelope walls in the east, west and southfacades (enclosing the main body of offices) are framed in lightweight cold rolled galvanizedsteel studs and contain 90 mm fibreglass insulation. These have a 30 mm air cavity forventilation and the cladding is painted steel sheet profile.4.3.4.4 Internal PartitionsInternal partitions are framed in lightweight galvanized steel studs with gypsum board liningmaterials, and they contain 90 mm fibreglass insulation. Acoustic insulation is requiredbetween partitions of the main body of offices. Generally, a plaster acoustic tiled ceiling isused in all office areas and all plasterboard is painted.
Page 1 and 2: Environmental Impacts ofMulti-Store
Page 5 and 6: ContentsGlossary...................
Page 7 and 8: 6.3.4.3 Maintenance related embodie
Page 9 and 10: - 9 -GlossaryCO 2 stored - refers t
Page 11 and 12: - 11 -Chapter 7Chapter 8Chapter 9Ch
Page 13 and 14: - 13 -An alternative end-of-life sc
Page 15 and 16: - 15 -designers and a shortage of b
Page 17 and 18: - 17 -• Ministry for the Environm
Page 19 and 20: - 19 -which it can be fashioned to
Page 21 and 22: - 21 -For fire safety, the New Zeal
Page 23 and 24: - 23 -buildings for low seismic are
Page 25 and 26: - 25 -4 The Buildings4.1 Constructi
Page 27 and 28: - 27 -the building. The basement le
Page 29 and 30: - 29 -4.3.2 Common Design Principle
Page 31: - 31 -Figure 4.5: South-west façad
Page 35 and 36: - 35 -4.3.5.2 Floor and RoofThe str
Page 37 and 38: - 37 -4.4 Multi-Storey Timber Build
Page 39 and 40: - 39 -Several different solutions h
Page 41 and 42: - 41 -5 Operational Energy5.1 Gener
Page 43 and 44: - 43 -Table 5.1: Simulation inputs
Page 45 and 46: - 45 -Table 5.3: Areas of office en
Page 47 and 48: - 47 -Modifying the design to achie
Page 49 and 50: - 49 -• Standards New Zealand (NZ
Page 51 and 52: - 51 -6 Life Cycle Assessment6.1 In
Page 53 and 54: - 53 -6.2.3.3 Impact AssessmentThe
Page 55 and 56: - 55 -6.3.2.2 System BoundariesThe
Page 57 and 58: - 57 -For more information see:http
Page 59 and 60: - 59 -6.3.3 Inventory Analysis6.3.3
Page 61 and 62: - 61 -Table 6.2: Net tonnes CO 2 eq
Page 63 and 64: - 63 -Growing timber takes up CO 2
Page 65 and 66: - 65 -6.3.4 Impact AssessmentTotal
Page 67 and 68: - 67 -8000700060005000GWP (t CO2 eq
Page 69 and 70: - 69 -As explained above, carbon st
Page 71 and 72: - 71 -Figure 6.10: Total embodied e
Page 73 and 74: - 73 -Table 6.9: Total GWP of each
Page 75 and 76: - 75 -8,0007,0006,0005,000GWP (t CO
Page 77 and 78: - 77 -45000400003500030000GWP (kg C
Page 79 and 80: - 79 -assumed to be identical for t
Page 81 and 82: - 81 -6.4.3.2 Green Star Recycling
Page 83 and 84:
- 83 -Table 6.16: Green Star result
Page 85 and 86:
- 85 -The contribution of initial e
Page 87 and 88:
- 87 -results, the reutilisation sc
Page 89 and 90:
- 89 -7.1.1 Platform and Balloon Co
Page 91 and 92:
- 91 -buildings has been analysed a
Page 93 and 94:
- 93 -Figure 7.5: Construction sche
Page 95 and 96:
- 95 -8.2 Source and Availability o
Page 97 and 98:
- 97 -It would be incorrect, howeve
Page 99 and 100:
- 99 -8.5 Additional Opportunities
Page 101 and 102:
- 101 -example, removal of CCA trea
Page 103 and 104:
- 103 -The Waste Minimisation Bill
Page 105 and 106:
- 105 -9 Discussion9.1 The Building
Page 107 and 108:
- 107 -• The buildings tend to be
Page 109 and 110:
- 109 -9.4.3 Data Sets9.4.3.1 Gener
Page 111 and 112:
- 111 -The following assessment wil
Page 113 and 114:
- 113 -Table 9.1. GWP coefficients
Page 115 and 116:
- 115 -Figure 9.2 shows that the ne
Page 117 and 118:
- 117 -placing and retaining materi
Page 119 and 120:
- 119 -Net CO 2 emissions - that is
Page 121 and 122:
- 121 -The LVL specified for the st
Page 123 and 124:
- 123 -10 ConclusionsThe following
Page 125 and 126:
- 125 -building types, instead subs
Page 127 and 128:
- 127 -In summary, reutilisation sh
Page 129 and 130:
- 129 -• What is the ranking of t
Page 131 and 132:
- 131 -• What is the comparison i
Page 133 and 134:
- 133 -Connell Wagner (2007): Combu
Page 135 and 136:
- 135 -Suzuki, Michiya, and Tatsuo
Page 137 and 138:
- 137 -C O N C R E T E B U I L D I
Page 139 and 140:
- 139 -S T E E L B U I L D I N Gm m
Page 141 and 142:
- 141 -T I M B E R B U I L D I N Gm
Page 143 and 144:
- 143 -T I M B E R B U I L D I N G
Page 145 and 146:
- 145 -T Exterior Wall Cladding 581
Page 147 and 148:
- 147 -Appendix B. Life times of bu
Page 149 and 150:
- 149 -Appendix D: Transport scenar
Page 154 and 155:
- 151 -Appendix F: Warren and Mahon
Page 156 and 157:
Timber Plus ProjectSummary of the T
Page 158 and 159:
Timber Plus ProjectGreen Star Ratin
Page 160 and 161:
Timber Plus ProjectVolatile Organic
Page 162 and 163:
Timber Plus ProjectThe Forest Stewa
Page 164 and 165:
Timber Plus ProjectStain and Clear
Page 166 and 167:
Timber Plus ProjectINTERIOR WALL CL
Page 168 and 169:
Timber Plus ProjectWINDOW REVEALSMa
Page 170 and 171:
Timber Plus ProjectSOFFIT FRAMINGMa
Page 172 and 173:
Timber Plus ProjectEXTERIOR WALL CL
Page 174 and 175:
Timber Plus ProjectAdditional Oppor
Page 176 and 177:
Appendix AResene Expected Paint Sys
Page 178 and 179:
- 152 -Appendix G: Green Star Asses
Page 180 and 181:
New Zealand Forest Research Institu
Page 182 and 183:
Executive SummaryA common building
Page 184 and 185:
1 IntroductionA common building des
Page 186 and 187:
Timber pluso The same assumptions a
Page 188 and 189:
Table 1-1-1: Weightings in Green St
Page 190 and 191:
The science behind LCA is still dev
Page 192 and 193:
In comparison the LCA results have
Page 194 and 195:
All four buildings in this research
Page 196 and 197:
1.4 Further WorkThe difficulty in m
show all

Environmental Impacts of Multi-Storey Buildings Using Different ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?