Environmental Impacts of Multi-Storey Buildings Using Different ...
Environmental Impacts of Multi-Storey Buildings Using Different ... Environmental Impacts of Multi-Storey Buildings Using Different ...
New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited trading as ScionGreenStar Assessment - Peer reviewThis document has been prepared for the benefit of New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited trading asScion . No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respectto its use by any other person.This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for anapplication for permission or approval to fulfil a legal requirement.MWH New Zealand LimitedTower 2, Deans Park7 Deans AvenueAddingtonP O Box 13-249Christchurch 8141New ZealandPhone : 64-3-366 7449Fax : 64-3-366 7780Quality Assurance StatementProject Manager:Gabrielle TorkingtonPrepared by:Gabrielle TorkingtonReviewed by:Jonathan FosterApproved for issue by:Tom Burkitt……………………………………………………Revision ScheduleRev No Date Description Prepared By Reviewed By Approved ByStatus Draft 16.07.2008Project NumberOur Ref − MWH Scion GreenStar Assessment PeerReviewFINAL.doc
New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited trading as ScionGreenStar Assessment of Different Building Options - Peer reviewContentsExecutive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 41 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 61.1 Background to the Project ........................................................................................................... 61.1.1 Introduction to the GreenStar NZ Building Performance Rating Framework................ 91.1.2 Principles of Life Cycle Assessment1.1.3 MWH Commission1.2 Peer Review of LCA and GreenStar NZ Office Design V1 Comparison .................................... 131.3 Discussion and Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 141.4 Further Work.............................................................................................................................. 181.5 References ................................................................................................................................ 19List of TablesTable 1-1-1 Weightings in GreenStar New Zealand Rating Tool........................................................................10Table 1-2-1 Results of LCA Vs GreenStar NZ from base scenario comparison.................................................13Table 1-2-2 Results of LCA Vs GreenStar NZ from re-utilisation scenario comparison .....................................14List of FiguresFigure 1-1-1 GreenStar Building Rating Tool Generic Framework:.....................................................................10Figure 1-1-2 Life Cycle Assessment Framework:................................................................................................11Status Draft 16.07.2008Project NumberOur Ref − MWH Scion GreenStar Assessment PeerReviewFINAL.doc
- Page 129 and 130: - 129 -• What is the ranking of t
- Page 131 and 132: - 131 -• What is the comparison i
- Page 133 and 134: - 133 -Connell Wagner (2007): Combu
- Page 135 and 136: - 135 -Suzuki, Michiya, and Tatsuo
- Page 137 and 138: - 137 -C O N C R E T E B U I L D I
- Page 139 and 140: - 139 -S T E E L B U I L D I N Gm m
- Page 141 and 142: - 141 -T I M B E R B U I L D I N Gm
- Page 143 and 144: - 143 -T I M B E R B U I L D I N G
- Page 145 and 146: - 145 -T Exterior Wall Cladding 581
- Page 147 and 148: - 147 -Appendix B. Life times of bu
- Page 149 and 150: - 149 -Appendix D: Transport scenar
- Page 154 and 155: - 151 -Appendix F: Warren and Mahon
- Page 156 and 157: Timber Plus ProjectSummary of the T
- Page 158 and 159: Timber Plus ProjectGreen Star Ratin
- Page 160 and 161: Timber Plus ProjectVolatile Organic
- Page 162 and 163: Timber Plus ProjectThe Forest Stewa
- Page 164 and 165: Timber Plus ProjectStain and Clear
- Page 166 and 167: Timber Plus ProjectINTERIOR WALL CL
- Page 168 and 169: Timber Plus ProjectWINDOW REVEALSMa
- Page 170 and 171: Timber Plus ProjectSOFFIT FRAMINGMa
- Page 172 and 173: Timber Plus ProjectEXTERIOR WALL CL
- Page 174 and 175: Timber Plus ProjectAdditional Oppor
- Page 176 and 177: Appendix AResene Expected Paint Sys
- Page 178 and 179: - 152 -Appendix G: Green Star Asses
- Page 182 and 183: Executive SummaryA common building
- Page 184 and 185: 1 IntroductionA common building des
- Page 186 and 187: Timber pluso The same assumptions a
- Page 188 and 189: Table 1-1-1: Weightings in Green St
- Page 190 and 191: The science behind LCA is still dev
- Page 192 and 193: In comparison the LCA results have
- Page 194 and 195: All four buildings in this research
- Page 196 and 197: 1.4 Further WorkThe difficulty in m
New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited trading as ScionGreenStar Assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Different</strong> Building Options - Peer reviewContentsExecutive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 41 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 61.1 Background to the Project ........................................................................................................... 61.1.1 Introduction to the GreenStar NZ Building Performance Rating Framework................ 91.1.2 Principles <strong>of</strong> Life Cycle Assessment1.1.3 MWH Commission1.2 Peer Review <strong>of</strong> LCA and GreenStar NZ Office Design V1 Comparison .................................... 131.3 Discussion and Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 141.4 Further Work.............................................................................................................................. 181.5 References ................................................................................................................................ 19List <strong>of</strong> TablesTable 1-1-1 Weightings in GreenStar New Zealand Rating Tool........................................................................10Table 1-2-1 Results <strong>of</strong> LCA Vs GreenStar NZ from base scenario comparison.................................................13Table 1-2-2 Results <strong>of</strong> LCA Vs GreenStar NZ from re-utilisation scenario comparison .....................................14List <strong>of</strong> FiguresFigure 1-1-1 GreenStar Building Rating Tool Generic Framework:.....................................................................10Figure 1-1-2 Life Cycle Assessment Framework:................................................................................................11Status Draft 16.07.2008Project NumberOur Ref − MWH Scion GreenStar Assessment PeerReviewFINAL.doc