- 120 -Embodied energy.Embodied energy would be calculated from a building-specific listing <strong>of</strong> the major building materials,converted into gross quantities (for instance, as documented in a Quantity Surveyor’s report) and crossreferenced with an appropriate, simplified LCI with data applicable to NZ.Note that only the major building materials would be considered – this could be defined as those materialswhich contribute to more than a specified percentage <strong>of</strong> the building by mass or volume. It would mostlikely, in most instances, consider at least concrete, steel, timber, glass, aluminium, paint,particleboard/fibreboard, gypsum board, masonry and insulation.This recognises the environmental impact <strong>of</strong> producing / manufacturing building materials. Results wouldhighlight materials which have a significant embodied energy “cost”.Initial embodied CO 2 would be calculated by cross-referencing appropriate LCI data for the significantmaterials listed above (for instance, VUW data sets).Recurrent embodied energy.This recognises the environmental impact <strong>of</strong> maintenance, refurbishment and replacement <strong>of</strong> buildingmaterials. Results would highlight materials which have a significant embodied energy “cost” over the lifetime<strong>of</strong> a building beyond the initial construction, due to the need for frequent maintenance or replacement(but possibly demonstrating less initial environmental impact).Recurrent embodied CO 2 would be calculated by cross-referencing data on maintenance and replacementcycles for the most commonly used materials.Net embodied CO 2 .Overall net embodied CO 2 would be calculated from initial embodied CO 2 , plus any chemical release <strong>of</strong>CO 2 during the manufacturing process, less CO 2 sequestered and then combined with recurrent embodiedCO 2 . Initial and recurrent embodied CO 2 could be detailed separately.Net CO 2 – that is an emission to the atmosphere or a sequestration with removal <strong>of</strong> CO 2 from theatmosphere – is the primary focus <strong>of</strong> both national and international initiatives to address climate change.Measurement <strong>of</strong> net embodied CO 2 recognises those materials and processes that remove CO 2 from theatmosphere on a permanent (sustainable) basis.Utilising Victoria University LCI data for building materials <strong>of</strong>fers a “CO 2 footprint” for most common NZbuilding materials and captures the effect <strong>of</strong> CO 2 emissions during the manufacturing process (for instancein cement production), as well as sequestration (for instance in timber products).________________________________________________________________________9.7 Timber used in the <strong>Buildings</strong>.Structural LVL dominates the quantity <strong>of</strong> timber used in the buildings. Other timber andtimber components are used throughout all the buildings but much more so in the Timber andTimberPlus designs.9.7.1 Laminated Veneer LumberThe Engineered Wood Products Association <strong>of</strong> Australasia provides excellent information onmany <strong>of</strong> the engineered wood products currently available commercially in New Zealand (andAustralia) (http://www.paa.asn.au).LVL is a hugely versatile timber product <strong>of</strong> known and consistent physical and mechanicalproperties, able to be manufactured to chosen specifications, including large dimensions.
- 121 -The LVL specified for the structural components <strong>of</strong> the Timber and TimberPlus buildings isavailable as a product, in appropriate dimensions and quantities, from a number <strong>of</strong> companiesin NZ. There is, undoubtedly, a large resource <strong>of</strong> plantation grown P. radiata in NZ toprovide the raw product for the manufacture <strong>of</strong> LVL.However, it is acknowledged that the fabrication facilities, machinery and techniques forproducing key structural components – in large quantities and in large piece sizes - is not yetcommercially available in NZ. These structural components must be cut and glued to precisetolerances from LVL plants, with connection devices accurately positioned.9.7.2 Other Timber ProductsThe Warren and Mahoney report included in Appendix G is a very useful starting point forexploring the suitability <strong>of</strong> the specified timber used in the buildings, particularly the Timberand TimberPlus buildings. Suitability is the key word - this report acted as an importantreality check on the building designs to ensure that the timber specified in the proposeddesigns was appropriate architectural usage (including usage in any external situation andappropriate NZ architecture), could be sourced, in sufficient quantities and from where, andfrom a sustainable market. The report also <strong>of</strong>fers appropriate schedules and products for ongoingmaintenance over the life-time <strong>of</strong> the building.The report confirms that the various proposed uses <strong>of</strong> timber in the buildings are appropriate,the different timber species are available and can be sourced both locally and internationallyas necessary, and largely from a sustainable, certified forestry markets. Furthermore, thetimber products are durable, with lifetimes extending to cover the full 60-year life cycle <strong>of</strong> thebuildings.The increasing recognition <strong>of</strong> various certification systems for sustainable forestry andproducts means that an increasing amount <strong>of</strong> suitably certified timber is becoming availableboth in NZ and internationally. Indeed, it is likely that consumer demand will ensure that alltimber products will be sourced from sustainable forest markets in the not-too-distant future.9.8 The Big PictureThe popular media, scientific journals, government initiatives, and international forums, toname a few, are awash with information and debate about climate change and globalwarming. Hand-in-hand with this, has been an explosion <strong>of</strong> interest, worldwide, in all-thingssustainable.‘Sustainability’ is the ‘buzz word’ <strong>of</strong> the times.New Zealand has signed a binding international treaty, the Kyoto Protocol, which commitsthe country to reducing its emissions <strong>of</strong> those gases perceived to be responsible for globalwarming. Irrespective <strong>of</strong> the all the debate about whether climate change is anthropogenic,just a natural, cyclical climatic variation and the time frame, it can be argued, that NZ as acountry now recognises that the present way-<strong>of</strong>-doing-things is unsustainable.A major focus for change rests on the need to reduce the wasteful use <strong>of</strong> energy, especiallyfossil fuels, and the (predominantly) CO 2 emissions associated with energy usage. <strong>Buildings</strong>contribute significantly to energy usage both in NZ and worldwide and the materials that areused to construct and maintain those buildings are themselves a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> thatenergy usage. Determining exactly how important building materials are in terms <strong>of</strong>
- Page 1 and 2:
Environmental Impacts ofMulti-Store
- Page 5 and 6:
ContentsGlossary...................
- Page 7 and 8:
6.3.4.3 Maintenance related embodie
- Page 9 and 10:
- 9 -GlossaryCO 2 stored - refers t
- Page 11 and 12:
- 11 -Chapter 7Chapter 8Chapter 9Ch
- Page 13 and 14:
- 13 -An alternative end-of-life sc
- Page 15 and 16:
- 15 -designers and a shortage of b
- Page 17 and 18:
- 17 -• Ministry for the Environm
- Page 19 and 20:
- 19 -which it can be fashioned to
- Page 21 and 22:
- 21 -For fire safety, the New Zeal
- Page 23 and 24:
- 23 -buildings for low seismic are
- Page 25 and 26:
- 25 -4 The Buildings4.1 Constructi
- Page 27 and 28:
- 27 -the building. The basement le
- Page 29 and 30:
- 29 -4.3.2 Common Design Principle
- Page 31 and 32:
- 31 -Figure 4.5: South-west façad
- Page 33 and 34:
- 33 -the three longitudinal frames
- Page 35 and 36:
- 35 -4.3.5.2 Floor and RoofThe str
- Page 37 and 38:
- 37 -4.4 Multi-Storey Timber Build
- Page 39 and 40:
- 39 -Several different solutions h
- Page 41 and 42:
- 41 -5 Operational Energy5.1 Gener
- Page 43 and 44:
- 43 -Table 5.1: Simulation inputs
- Page 45 and 46:
- 45 -Table 5.3: Areas of office en
- Page 47 and 48:
- 47 -Modifying the design to achie
- Page 49 and 50:
- 49 -• Standards New Zealand (NZ
- Page 51 and 52:
- 51 -6 Life Cycle Assessment6.1 In
- Page 53 and 54:
- 53 -6.2.3.3 Impact AssessmentThe
- Page 55 and 56:
- 55 -6.3.2.2 System BoundariesThe
- Page 57 and 58:
- 57 -For more information see:http
- Page 59 and 60:
- 59 -6.3.3 Inventory Analysis6.3.3
- Page 61 and 62:
- 61 -Table 6.2: Net tonnes CO 2 eq
- Page 63 and 64:
- 63 -Growing timber takes up CO 2
- Page 65 and 66:
- 65 -6.3.4 Impact AssessmentTotal
- Page 67 and 68:
- 67 -8000700060005000GWP (t CO2 eq
- Page 69 and 70: - 69 -As explained above, carbon st
- Page 71 and 72: - 71 -Figure 6.10: Total embodied e
- Page 73 and 74: - 73 -Table 6.9: Total GWP of each
- Page 75 and 76: - 75 -8,0007,0006,0005,000GWP (t CO
- Page 77 and 78: - 77 -45000400003500030000GWP (kg C
- Page 79 and 80: - 79 -assumed to be identical for t
- Page 81 and 82: - 81 -6.4.3.2 Green Star Recycling
- Page 83 and 84: - 83 -Table 6.16: Green Star result
- Page 85 and 86: - 85 -The contribution of initial e
- Page 87 and 88: - 87 -results, the reutilisation sc
- Page 89 and 90: - 89 -7.1.1 Platform and Balloon Co
- Page 91 and 92: - 91 -buildings has been analysed a
- Page 93 and 94: - 93 -Figure 7.5: Construction sche
- Page 95 and 96: - 95 -8.2 Source and Availability o
- Page 97 and 98: - 97 -It would be incorrect, howeve
- Page 99 and 100: - 99 -8.5 Additional Opportunities
- Page 101 and 102: - 101 -example, removal of CCA trea
- Page 103 and 104: - 103 -The Waste Minimisation Bill
- Page 105 and 106: - 105 -9 Discussion9.1 The Building
- Page 107 and 108: - 107 -• The buildings tend to be
- Page 109 and 110: - 109 -9.4.3 Data Sets9.4.3.1 Gener
- Page 111 and 112: - 111 -The following assessment wil
- Page 113 and 114: - 113 -Table 9.1. GWP coefficients
- Page 115 and 116: - 115 -Figure 9.2 shows that the ne
- Page 117 and 118: - 117 -placing and retaining materi
- Page 119: - 119 -Net CO 2 emissions - that is
- Page 123 and 124: - 123 -10 ConclusionsThe following
- Page 125 and 126: - 125 -building types, instead subs
- Page 127 and 128: - 127 -In summary, reutilisation sh
- Page 129 and 130: - 129 -• What is the ranking of t
- Page 131 and 132: - 131 -• What is the comparison i
- Page 133 and 134: - 133 -Connell Wagner (2007): Combu
- Page 135 and 136: - 135 -Suzuki, Michiya, and Tatsuo
- Page 137 and 138: - 137 -C O N C R E T E B U I L D I
- Page 139 and 140: - 139 -S T E E L B U I L D I N Gm m
- Page 141 and 142: - 141 -T I M B E R B U I L D I N Gm
- Page 143 and 144: - 143 -T I M B E R B U I L D I N G
- Page 145 and 146: - 145 -T Exterior Wall Cladding 581
- Page 147 and 148: - 147 -Appendix B. Life times of bu
- Page 149 and 150: - 149 -Appendix D: Transport scenar
- Page 154 and 155: - 151 -Appendix F: Warren and Mahon
- Page 156 and 157: Timber Plus ProjectSummary of the T
- Page 158 and 159: Timber Plus ProjectGreen Star Ratin
- Page 160 and 161: Timber Plus ProjectVolatile Organic
- Page 162 and 163: Timber Plus ProjectThe Forest Stewa
- Page 164 and 165: Timber Plus ProjectStain and Clear
- Page 166 and 167: Timber Plus ProjectINTERIOR WALL CL
- Page 168 and 169: Timber Plus ProjectWINDOW REVEALSMa
- Page 170 and 171:
Timber Plus ProjectSOFFIT FRAMINGMa
- Page 172 and 173:
Timber Plus ProjectEXTERIOR WALL CL
- Page 174 and 175:
Timber Plus ProjectAdditional Oppor
- Page 176 and 177:
Appendix AResene Expected Paint Sys
- Page 178 and 179:
- 152 -Appendix G: Green Star Asses
- Page 180 and 181:
New Zealand Forest Research Institu
- Page 182 and 183:
Executive SummaryA common building
- Page 184 and 185:
1 IntroductionA common building des
- Page 186 and 187:
Timber pluso The same assumptions a
- Page 188 and 189:
Table 1-1-1: Weightings in Green St
- Page 190 and 191:
The science behind LCA is still dev
- Page 192 and 193:
In comparison the LCA results have
- Page 194 and 195:
All four buildings in this research
- Page 196 and 197:
1.4 Further WorkThe difficulty in m