Environmental Impacts of Multi-Storey Buildings Using Different ...

Environmental Impacts of Multi-Storey Buildings Using Different ... Environmental Impacts of Multi-Storey Buildings Using Different ...

10.07.2015 Views

- 114 -products. For example, in the TimberPlus building, there is storage of 1,162 tonnes of CO 2(Table 6.2), whilst the total production of all of the timber in the building gives rise toemissions of only 202 tonnes of CO 2 (material in tonnes, Table 6.1 x GWP coefficient incolumn 2, Table 9.2).Table 9.3 Aggregated GWP (tonnes CO 2 equiv.) for groups of materials in the four buildingsConcrete Steel Timber TimberPlusConcrete 895 366 213 213Steel 132 665 26 26Aluminium 383 383 383 12Other 117 132 148 61Wood -28 -27 -688 -945Net total 1,499 1,519 82 -63318001600tonnes CO1400120010008006004002000-200-400-600-800-1000ConcreteSteelTimberTimberPlusWoodOtherAluminiumSteelConcreteFigure 9.1: GWP emissions for the materials in the four buildings, assuming permanent storage of carbonin wood products. Data from GWP coefficients used in Table 9.3 .tonnes CO2180016001400120010008006004002000-200-400-600-800ConcreteSteelTimberTimberPlusFigure 9.2. Net GWP emissions for the materials in the four buildings, assuming permanent storage ofcarbon in wood products. Data from GWP coefficients in Table 9.3 .

- 115 -Figure 9.2 shows that the net GWP emissions from the materials in the Timber building arejust 5% of those from the Concrete and Steel buildings. This is because the carbon stored inthe wood-based building materials balances out nearly all of the greenhouse gases emitted inthe manufacturing of all the other materials in the building.For the TimberPlus building, the net total CO 2 emissions for the materials in the TimberPlusbuilding are negative because the carbon stored in the wood-based building materials morethan cancels out all the greenhouse gases emitted in the manufacture of all the other materialsin the building. The net negative figure - or long-term carbon storage - is over 630 tonnes ofCO 2 equivalent.9.5.2 Materials only – using data from LCA assessment inChapter 6Another method of analysing the data in Chapter 6 is to take the results of the LCAassessment presented in Chapter 6. The top line in Table 9.4 is the initial embodied GWP(tonnes CO 2 equiv.) for all materials in each of the four buildings from Table 6.7. The secondline in Table 9.4 is the equivalent CO 2 sequestered in the wood materials, derived from thewood quantities in Table 6.2. The quantity of carbon in that table has been converted to CO 2equivalent by multiplying by 3.67 (the conversion factor for changing tonnes of carbon totonnes of CO 2 equivalent).Table 9.4: GWP (tonnes CO 2 equiv.) for all materials in each of the four buildingsConcrete Steel Timber TimberPlusEmbodied (CO 2 eq.) 1,576 1,615 971 566Sequestered (CO 2 eq.) -32 -31 -846 -1,162Total 1,544 1,584 125 -596The figures in Table 9.4 are plotted in Figure 9.3 (as separate figures) and Figure 9.4 (netfigures). These graphs show similar trends to Figure 9.1Figure 9.1Figure 9.1 and Figure 9.2.The actual numbers are a little different from the coefficients method - the reason for this isnot known precisely. The difference may be due to the unknown assumptions used to obtainthe coefficients presented in Table 9.1.However, the over-riding conclusion from using both methods, is that the carbon stored in thewood-based building materials of the TimberPlus building more than cancels out all of thegreenhouse gases emitted in the manufacture of all the other materials in the building.

- 115 -Figure 9.2 shows that the net GWP emissions from the materials in the Timber building arejust 5% <strong>of</strong> those from the Concrete and Steel buildings. This is because the carbon stored inthe wood-based building materials balances out nearly all <strong>of</strong> the greenhouse gases emitted inthe manufacturing <strong>of</strong> all the other materials in the building.For the TimberPlus building, the net total CO 2 emissions for the materials in the TimberPlusbuilding are negative because the carbon stored in the wood-based building materials morethan cancels out all the greenhouse gases emitted in the manufacture <strong>of</strong> all the other materialsin the building. The net negative figure - or long-term carbon storage - is over 630 tonnes <strong>of</strong>CO 2 equivalent.9.5.2 Materials only – using data from LCA assessment inChapter 6Another method <strong>of</strong> analysing the data in Chapter 6 is to take the results <strong>of</strong> the LCAassessment presented in Chapter 6. The top line in Table 9.4 is the initial embodied GWP(tonnes CO 2 equiv.) for all materials in each <strong>of</strong> the four buildings from Table 6.7. The secondline in Table 9.4 is the equivalent CO 2 sequestered in the wood materials, derived from thewood quantities in Table 6.2. The quantity <strong>of</strong> carbon in that table has been converted to CO 2equivalent by multiplying by 3.67 (the conversion factor for changing tonnes <strong>of</strong> carbon totonnes <strong>of</strong> CO 2 equivalent).Table 9.4: GWP (tonnes CO 2 equiv.) for all materials in each <strong>of</strong> the four buildingsConcrete Steel Timber TimberPlusEmbodied (CO 2 eq.) 1,576 1,615 971 566Sequestered (CO 2 eq.) -32 -31 -846 -1,162Total 1,544 1,584 125 -596The figures in Table 9.4 are plotted in Figure 9.3 (as separate figures) and Figure 9.4 (netfigures). These graphs show similar trends to Figure 9.1Figure 9.1Figure 9.1 and Figure 9.2.The actual numbers are a little different from the coefficients method - the reason for this isnot known precisely. The difference may be due to the unknown assumptions used to obtainthe coefficients presented in Table 9.1.However, the over-riding conclusion from using both methods, is that the carbon stored in thewood-based building materials <strong>of</strong> the TimberPlus building more than cancels out all <strong>of</strong> thegreenhouse gases emitted in the manufacture <strong>of</strong> all the other materials in the building.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!