MGT 7-1.indd - KMI Media Group
MGT 7-1.indd - KMI Media Group
MGT 7-1.indd - KMI Media Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
There are also important analytic challenges facing us in how<br />
we plan for postcombat stability operations. These plans must be<br />
focused around the people, taking into account culture, environment,<br />
existing facilities and filling any gaps created during the<br />
military conflict. This part of the mission must follow the guidance<br />
laid out in the recently released Army Field Manual 3-07, Stability<br />
Operations. We, in turn, must respond with systems that can sift<br />
through vast amounts of data to yield information that is relevant to<br />
the situation at hand. We also must put in place those informationsharing<br />
processes that will help our warfighters leverage extant intelligence<br />
and analysis.<br />
Q: A while back the Missile and Space Intelligence Center [MSIC]<br />
won an award for its innovative development and deployment of<br />
GEOINT-enabled analysis architecture. Can you give us an update<br />
of this effort?<br />
A: Within the last few months, MSIC began an initiative to improve<br />
and build upon the Foreign Missile Test Range Analysis architecture,<br />
which is the program for which it won the U.S. Geospatial Intelligence<br />
Foundation Intelligence Achievement Award. This follow-on<br />
effort will include more extensive training for all-source analysts,<br />
more interaction between all-source analysts and tool developers,<br />
utilization of state-of-the-art analytical tools and network appliances,<br />
ingestion and display of additional intelligence data sources<br />
and improved modeling of geospatial scenes. All of these efforts are<br />
expected to expand and improve this highly successful GEOINT-enabled<br />
tool and increase its utilization by MSIC’s all-source analysts.<br />
Q: How are analysts using collaboration tools to enhance information<br />
sharing, and thus, all-source intelligence?<br />
A: In an effort to broaden our information horizons, it’s important to<br />
realize that not all of the perspectives we need for our analysis reside<br />
in the intelligence community. We are continually looking for ways<br />
to engage non-IC specialists to leverage their unique knowledge,<br />
nontraditional views and the varied experience and contacts they can<br />
bring to bear. The days in which the IC has a monopoly on information<br />
are long since over. The challenge now is to access the abundance<br />
of information, rationalize it and make a more informed future<br />
projection. Thus, we need to engage much more broadly and apply<br />
classified added value to provide decision advantage to our leaders.<br />
The director of national intelligence issued Intelligence Community<br />
Directive [ICD] 205 on Analytic Outreach, which directs us<br />
to tap into outside expertise as part and parcel of how we do business.<br />
With security concerns, access and funding issues and priorities,<br />
however, this is easier said than done. In response to this need, we’ve<br />
created an outreach-coordination function to help our analysts find<br />
and engage subject-matter experts, whether it be attending a conference<br />
or networking informally. We’ve also stood up an Open Source<br />
Program Office to help analysts access and use information already<br />
existing in the public domain that can be used to provide further<br />
context to their analysis. We hope that as our analysts participate<br />
more fully and systematically in these activities, they will begin to<br />
take on leadership roles and organize outreach activities or special<br />
events that they deem worthwhile.<br />
In terms of technology or applications, we’ve found that in<br />
today’s dynamic environment, where responses to emerging threats<br />
are often time-critical, our traditional work practices and technol-<br />
22 | <strong>MGT</strong> 7.1<br />
ogy applications are not enough to create the collaborative analysis<br />
required for continued success. In September 2007, the Office of<br />
the Director of National Intelligence [ODNI] designated DIA as the<br />
executive agent to develop and implement A-Space.<br />
A-Space, enhanced by Web 2.0 technology, provides a completely<br />
new classified environment for leveraging social networking capabilities<br />
similar to those made widely available and popular by such<br />
Websites as Facebook, LinkedIn and Google Docs. The essence of<br />
A-Space is quite simple: It is a venue for all analysts to discover<br />
one another and new information sources. That accomplished, new<br />
teams will come into existence organically. These new teams are then<br />
able to discuss, debate and produce analysis within a highly secure<br />
online environment. When leveraged against larger mission challenges,<br />
A-Space becomes more than just social software.<br />
A-Space is just one initiative under the ODNI’s Analytic Transformation<br />
[AT] program. AT works to shift longstanding agency-independent<br />
intelligence operations and encourages greater<br />
collaboration. Enabling analysts to collaborate early in the analytic<br />
process, A-Space will provide the shortest, fastest path to IC expertise<br />
and emerging intelligence insights. The accumulation of peer-reviewed<br />
analysis will allow the IC to manage its collective knowledge<br />
about key intelligence topics without constraints.<br />
Q: The ODNI has made several issuances over the past few years,<br />
including setting analytic and sourcing standards. How have you<br />
implemented these standards, and are you seeing a benefit?<br />
A: Yes, we are seeing a benefit. The quality of our analysis and<br />
production has improved over the last year and a half. Our flagship<br />
product, the Defense Intelligence Digest [DID], has been very well<br />
received by the broader community, including recent kudos from<br />
Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell. A little over a year<br />
old, the DID has grown in both stature and breadth and now includes<br />
collaboration not only beyond DIA to the service intelligence centers,<br />
combatant commands and other combat support agencies, but further<br />
still to include our Commonwealth partners. We have instituted<br />
checks and balances to improve the quality of our analysis. All DID<br />
articles are reviewed for strict adherence to Intelligence Community<br />
Directive [ICD] 203: Analytic Standards. We’ve also instituted a highlevel<br />
peer review process called the Product Evaluation Board. This<br />
board consists of senior analysts who review and evaluate randomly<br />
selected products totaling approximately 3 percent of our production.<br />
Results from this process show significant improvement across<br />
the tradecraft standards set forth in ICD 203 and ICD 206: Sourcing<br />
Requirements for Disseminated Analytic Products.<br />
Q: With a constant stream of current intelligence demands, such as<br />
the events in Russia/Georgia and most recently the events in India,<br />
how do you ensure your analysis is not getting entirely bogged<br />
down by the daily customer requirements?<br />
A: There is no doubt that we are filling an unprecedented number<br />
of customer requirements for analytical products. But to effectively<br />
meet our customers’ needs for predictive analysis, we absolutely<br />
have to step back and take time to look at bigger regional<br />
and functional pictures; we need to consistently raise our analytic<br />
eyesight. In DI, we’ve embarked on an effort to develop strategic<br />
research plans, looking out over the next two to seven years, which<br />
will guide our long-term analytic efforts against the most impor-<br />
www.<strong>MGT</strong>-kmi.com