Cook Park Plan of Management - Rockdale City Council

3. BASIS FOR MANAGEMENT 25VALUES AND SIGNIFICANCE4. management principles 265. sTRATEGIES 27IntroductionFormatRoles and Responsibilities 28PrioritiesTimeframeENJOYING THE PARK AND BAY 29GETTING TO AND AROUND THE PARK 32CONSERVING THE PARK’S ENVIRONMENT, 36HERITAGE AND CHARACTERLooking after the park and buildings 396. DETAILED strategic plans 417. IMPLEMENTATIONTARGETS AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 47POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES 51REVIEWING THE PLAN 518. COUNCIL OWNED COMMUNITY LANDS 53STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS 53CATEGORY OF LAND 53NATURE AND USE 53LEASE DETAILS 54OBJECTIVES, PERFORMANCE TARGETS, MEANS 54OF ACHIEVEMENT AND METHOD OF ASSESSMENT9. BIBLIOGRAPHY 60APPENDICESAPPENDIX 1 - LEASES AND PLANS OF LEASED PREMISESAPPENDIX 2 - COMPARATIVE ISSUES TABLEAPPENDIX 3 - COMMUNITY INFORMATION SESSIONATTENDANCE LISTAPPENDIX 4 - NORTH COOK PARK CONCEPT PLANAPPENDIX 5 - LETTER FROM RTAAPPENDIX 6 - SUMMARY OF SUBMISSIONS FOLLOWINGPUBLIC EXHIBITIONclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 20106

1. introductionthe need for a plan of managementCook Park stretches for six suburbs along the northern and western edges of Botany Bay.Along its length the Park plays an important and extensive recreational and environmentalrole. The Park’s recreational functions include swimming, boating, children’s play, cycling,walking and picnicking to name a few. The Park also forms the central section of theproposed Botany Bay Trail linking La Perouse and Botany Bay.The Park’s environmental function lies not only with its terrestrial and aquatic habitat, butalso in its connections to other open spaces along the Cooks and Georges rivers and tothe nearby Rockdale Wetlands.A Plan of Management for the Park was prepared in 1998 under the Crown Lands Act(1989) to identify and address the many issues that arise from and affect the reserve.This Plan also defined objectives, recommended strategies and suggested methods ofimplementation.In 2002 a review of the Plan was undertaken in the form of community consultationsessions identifying new issues that had arisen. This review also assessed the abilityof the existing Plan to deal with these new issues or to assess whether a change to thePlan was required.In the 12 years since this first plan was prepared there have been many changes in andaround the Park that require the previous Plan to be substantially updated in order for itremain a valid and useful document. These include:• Future anticipated population increases (7,000 extra dwellings in Rockdale by2031).• The creation of the Metropolitan Trails link, with Cook Park being a key link betweenthe Cooks and Georges rivers.• The future reconstruction of the northern section of the Park where desalinationinfrastructure has recently been installed.• Ongoing proposals for boating facilities including a marina and boat launchingramp.• Ongoing concerns over the extent, distribution and scale of car parking requiredto service the Park.• Likelihood of significant increase in number of park usersThis Plan identifies and addresses these new issues in conjunction with those stillunresolved from the previous 1998 Plan and its 2002 review.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 20108

This Plan sets out the details of all existing leases on Crown Land and Community Land inAppendix 1. The description of the lease on Community Land in this document expresslyauthorises the lease as required by the Local Government Act (NSW) 1993.SITE DESCRIPTIONThe Park is an 8.5 km long foreshore public open space bounded on the east by BotanyBay, on the north by the Cooks River, on the south by the Georges River and on the westby a number of major roads, the longest being General Holmes Drive and The GrandParade (refer Figure 01).The study area begins at the Endeavour Bridge in the north and passes through thesuburbs of Kyeemagh, Brighton Le Sands, Monterey, Ramsgate Beach, Sans Souci,Dolls Point, and Sandringham to the St George Sailing Club in the south. The foreshoreboundary of the study area extends only to the beach above the mean high water markalthough reference is made to constructed elements which extend into the water beyondthis mark. Below the high water mark is the jurisdiction of NSW Maritime and beyondthe scope of this Plan.The Park is an important environmental and passive recreational resource for the localand broader regional population. Features of the Park include opportunities for land andwater based recreation, an important recreational and commuter cycle link, access tothe beach and connections to sailing and other boating facilities. Environmental valuesinclude proximity to coastal and marine habitat and the Rockdale Wetlands.The entire length of the Park affords panoramic views of Botany Bay south to the KurnellPeninsula with the northern section in Kyeemagh offering views to Kingsford Smith Airportand aircraft movements.As can be seen in the following plans, Crown and Community Land do not form acontinuous strip from Kyeemagh at the mouth of the Cooks River to Sandringham at themouth of the Georges River. As there is still a physical connection by way of a cycle pathor public road in the gaps, the study area is considered to be continuous.CROWN RESERVE DETAILSIn the following pages a series of aerial photographs illustrate the extent of CrownReserve Lands (with DP Nos.) that categorise the majority of Cook Park. The extent ofCommunity Lands is also illustrated.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201010

CROWN RESERVE DETAILSLot 9, DP 31742

CROWN RESERVE DETAILS

CROWN RESERVE DETAILSclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201013

CROWN RESERVE DETAILSclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201014

CROWN RESERVE DETAILS15

Community land DETAILS

METHODOLOGY AND FORMATThe following summary sets out the methodology adopted in achieving the objectivesof the Plan and the format chosen for its presentation. The approach to the project hasinvolved four principal stages as outlined below.Document reviewA key component of this Plan has been the review and evaluation of previous reports andstudies in conjunction with current planning policies. As several of the reports and someof the planning instruments had not been written or gazetted on adoption of the previousPlan, review was critical in considering the Park and its issues in the current context.FieldworkNumerous site visits were undertaken by foot, bicycle and car at different times of theday and week throughout the study period to understand how the Park is used, whereuser issues arise and improvements that might be made.ConsultationConsultation has been undertaken in three tiers and two stages. In the first stageorganisational stakeholders (forming a Reference Group) and community stakeholderswere consulted separately in a workshop format to ascertain issues that may have arisensince the writing of the original Plan and its 2002 review. Organisational stakeholdersconsisted primarily of government bodies such as the RTA and Sydney Water and privateorganisations that may be affected by the Plan such as Sydney Airport Corporation Limited.Community stakeholders consisted of groups who hired or booked any part of the Park forprivate use, leaseholders, and organisations or groups/individuals who were consideredregular users but whose use did not require registration or payment.In the second consultation stage, the key elements of the Plan were presented atCommunity Information Sessions in the form of ten panels for review and comment priorto exhibition. These panels were displayed between 11.00 and 2.00pm on Saturday 28thNovember, 2009 at the Ramsgate Lifesaving Club and between 6.00pm and 9.00pm atthe Novotel Hotel on Thursday 3rd December, 2009. At both these Information Sessions,members of the project team from CLOUSTON Associates and Elton Consulting wereon hand to discuss the issues and strategies with the attendees. Attendees were alsoinvited to fill out feedback forms and provide any extra input on the issues and strategiesthey felt had not been covered.To advertise this second round of consultation, 4,800 flyers were dropped in letter boxes,advertisements were taken out in the St George Leader and the consultation events wereadvertised on the Rockdale City Council (RCC) and LPMA websites. Flyers were alsodropped in cafes, shops and kiosks in the Park and in the immediate proximity to the Park.Following the events, the ten panels used for display were uploaded to the RCC andLPMA websites for further public comment and feedback.Preparation of the planOver a period of several months the plan was drafted by the team, reviewed by LMPAand Council before being placed on public exhibition.ABBREVIATIONS Used in This PlanLocal Environmental Plan (Rockdale) LEP - 2000Crown Lands Act CLA - 1989Local Government Act LGA - 1993 (amended 1998)Land and Property Management Authority LPMARockdale City CouncilRCCclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201017

LOCAL CONTEXTBeverley ParkGolf ClubGeorgesRiverKendallStreetReserveBANKSIAROCKDALERockdaleWetlandsCorridorEquestrianParkSt George Sailing ClubSt George Sailing ClubMuddy CreekSANDRINGHAMCooks RiverKYEEMAGHBotany BayBRIGHTON LE SANDSMONTEREYRAMSGATE BEACHPine ParkDOLLS POINTLe Beach Hut restaurantPeter Depena ReserveGeorges River Sailing ClubSandringham BathsC Side restaurant,Happy SnapperLady Robinsons BeachBrighton BathsLe Sands Restaurant,Royal Coastal Patrol,Brighton Baths Athletic Club,Millennium CentreRamsgate Beach BathsRamsgate Life SavingClub, Omeros Restaurantclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 2010LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • URBAN DESIGNERS • LANDSCAPE PLANNERSSite ofdesalinationworksCook Park site boundary• 6A WETHERILL STREET • PO BOX 44 • LEICHHARDT • NSW 2040 • sydney@clouston.com.au • TELEPHONE (02) 9569 3388 • FACSIMILE (02) 9569 3523Key facts about Cook Park• The Park is located within the DarugAboriginal tribal area.• The Park is 8.5 km long and consists of bothCrown Land and Community Land.• The Park is named after Samuel Cook, whoensured that the land along the westernshore of Botany Bay was acquired for publicuse in 1883.• The majority of Cook Park was dedicatedon the 30th March 1886 with the remainderdeclared public reserve on 25th September1931.• The Park is of regional significance due toits location, size, regional cycle and walkingconnections and frontage to Botany Bay.• There are significant environmental andrecreational links with Rockdale Wetlands,Cooks River and Georges River.•Park useMajor uses and activities within the Parkinclude:• Cycling and walking on shared and dedicatedcycle and pedestrian paths from the CooksRiver to the Georges River.• Historical large scale events such as circusesnorth of Bestic Street.• Kiosks and restaurants.• Boating, swimming, windsurfing / kiteboarding.• Picnicking and barbecueing.• Children’s play.• Existing permitted commercial leases andlicenses under the Crown Lands Act andLocal Government Act include restaurants,kiosks, clubs and community organisations(see adjacent plan).Environment and Heritage• Ecologically significant sand dunes anddune vegetation along the foreshore northof Brighton.• Culturally significant plantings such as pinesin Pine Park, Coral Trees and Norfolk IslandPines at Dolls Point and Norfolk island Pinesalong The Grand Parade.• Swathes of open grassland with scatteredtrees providing recreation facilities andhabitat for birds.• Key heritage sites and features includingcannons at Brighton and Sandringham.cook park plan of management • rockdaleCONTEXT PLANFigure 0118May 2010

2. issuesCook Park is an extensive area of open space in a multi-cultural local government areawith access to a variety of facilities and natural features, including the beach. It caters tolocal users of all ages, including visitors from further afield who enjoy the Park’s uniquecharacter and features and transitory users who pass through the Park on its system ofpathways and cycleways. With such a broad user base and variety of possible activities,issues and conflicts inevitably arise.The following section summarises issues raised to date which have been ascertained fromfield evaluation, reference group input, community feedback and liaison with managinggroup interests. The issues have been outlined in the following table format:Topic HeadingsTopic headings were established as a framework for discussion of specific issues relatingto the study area. These are as follows:• Enjoying the Park and Bay.• Gettting To and Around the Park.• Protecting the Park’s Environment, Heritage and Character.• Looking after the Park and its Buildings.TopicsEach of these topic headings has subtopics that relate to that issue such as ‘Swimming’in ‘Enjoying the Park and Bay’.IssueThe issues as ascertained by the process / discussions indicated above. Comments andsuggestions raised by stakeholders are included as stated, without commentary or priority.LocalityMany of the Issues raised relate to a specific geographic or site within the Park. Wherethis is the case, the area or locality has been identified.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201019

issuesENJOYING THE PARK AND BAYTOPIC ISSUE LOCALITYGeneral • Interest expressed in ‘tourist attraction’ in the Park. Large Ferris wheel among the suggestions • KyeemaghPicnicking • Barbecues broken, or in need of renovation and replacement• Peter Depena Reserve• Not enough bins in high use areas and many are in poor condition• Throughout park• No disposal facilities for ash from private barbecues• Peter Depena Reserve• Not enough shade in parts of the Park• North of Bestic St.• More and better furnished playgrounds are needed throughout the Park• Throughout park• Concerns about child safety in playgrounds close to roads• Banks St. Monterey• Littering signage is clear in Peter Depena Reserve but needs to be more extensive• Throughout parkSwimming • Baths considered in poor condition and in need of repair• Sandringham, Brighton• Quality and number of toilets and showers inadequate• Vicinity of baths• Sedimentation in some baths is a problem causing an unsatisfactory swimming experience• Ramsgate, Kyeemagh• Conflicts exist between wind surfers, jet skiers and swimmers• Between Brighton Le Sandsand Kyeemagh• Wharf is popular for diving but dangerous because of changing sand levels• Dolls Point• No distinct areas for swimming, jet ski landing or wind surfing / kite boarding along the beach• All along beachFishing • Not enough facilities for fishermen such as cleaning, gutting tables or wharfs from which to fishBoating • No facilities for launching of rescue vessels for beach swimmers and windsurfers / kite boarders• Mixed opinion about improved boating facilities. General opposition to large marinas and boating facilities near mainswimming areas• Concerns about boat traffic and jet ski conflict with swimmersWindsurfing andKite Boarding• No facilities for boats to shelter if caught in storms• No facility for storage for windsurfing and kite boarding equipment.• Narrow access to beach with high posts causes windsurfers and kite boarders to short cut through dunes and overrocks• Length of park• Ramsgate• Height of dune protection fencing posts at beach damages beach sports equipment• Ramsgate, Kyeemaghclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201020

issuesGETTING TO AND AROUND THE PARKTOPIC ISSUE LOCALITYPublic Transport • Use of a shuttle bus service suggested to move people to central points and help reduce traffic congestion• Brighton Le Sands,Ramsgate, Kyeemagh• Positioning of bus stops in locations more appropriate to park use and potential for bus slip lanes for safety proposed• Kyeemagh, Monterey• Public transport to park from neighbouring suburbs considered inadequateCars and Parking • Car parking not considered to be responsive to function of individual areas• Monterey• Access to Cook Park for vehicles heading north is difficult• Throughout park• Extra car parks within the Park were mostly opposed however parking problems in Brighton were acknowledged• Throughout park• Closed off car parks in need of review• Pine Park• Street based car park is noted by some as a venue for anti-social behaviour at night• Vehicle access to the Park immediately south of Endeavour Bridge dangerous due to sudden change in vehicle speed• Ninety degree road entries to Park noted as being dangerous for cars• Lack of signage where pedestrian / cycle paths enter car parks creates major safety concerns• Significant amount of redundant asphalt in some car parks• The outstanding DA for the car park south of Le Sands Restaurant remains unresolved• Vanston Parade, DollsPoint• Kyeemagh• Monterey• All car parks• MontereyCycling • Many consider that the path system will be inadequate for growing local and wider community use• Throughout park• There is significant community support for separate pedestrian and cycle paths where possible• Ramsgate Beach,Monterey, Brighton LeSands• Current cycle speed control devices cause problems for pedestrians• Ramsgate Beach• No defined cycle / pedestrian priority path in car parks• Throughout park• Sand on path is a cycle hazard• Sandringham, Monterey• Steep ramps at various locations are a cycle hazard• Blind corner along the foreshore path between Riverside Drive and Lena Street at Sandringham is a safety issue• S-bends in cycle paths create shortcuts across grass and thereby potential conflict with park users• Access to the Park by bicycle on the local roads is considered dangerous• Brighton Le Sands• North Brigton,Ramsgate Beach• Sandringham• North Brightonclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201021

issuesGETTING TO AND AROUND THE PARKTOPIC ISSUE LOCALITYWalking • Pedestrian crossing of The Grand Parade presents safety issues due to speed and amount of vehicular traffic• All along The GrandParade• Larger pedestrian groups have problems in narrow areas of the path• South of Peter Depenaand at Brighton• Access paths to the beach are considered too narrow and dune protection fence posts too high• Ramsgate Beach,Kyeemagh• There are insufficient pedestrian crossings on The Grand Parade• Ramsgate Beach,Monterey, north Brighton• Pedestrian / cycle conflicts at pinch points such as Ramsgate Life Saving Club and the roadside footpath at Le Sands• R a m s g a t e B e a c h ,Brighton• The bridge across the canal in Peter Depena Reserve considered too narrow for shared use by pedestrians and cyclists• South of Peter DepenaReserve• Pedestrians have been regularly knocked over on The Grand Parade• South of Bay Street• An interpretive board walk on the foreshore between President Avenue and the existing boardwalk considered appropriate• North of Teralba Road• Many dog walkers believe that off leash opportunities exist for dogs to enter the water without inconvenience to other usersat the northern and southern ends of the Park• West of St George SailingClub• North of Kyeemagh Bathsnetted areaclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201022

issuesCONSERVING THE PARK’S ENVIRONMENT, HERITAGE AND CHARACTERTOPIC ISSUE LOCALITY• Throughout ParkAboriginal and non-Aboriginal Heritage• Interpretation of the Park’s heritage is under represented in the Park. Many considered this should be addressed acrossall aspects of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal heritage• Heritage features in the Park such as the cannons at Brighton and Sandringham are highly valued• Brighton, Sandringham• Pine Park has a known history but this is not reflected in signage or other interpretation. Previous proposal for peace parkin this location was not widely supported• Dolls PointNatural Heritage andEnvironment• A heritage trail, an interactive self-guided audio tour and educational signage were options proposed.• Interpretation of natural heritage and environment of the Park has been neglected. Examples of possibilities cited includeongoing consideration and interpretation of sand dunes, and their vegetation• Peter Depena Reserve• Kyeemagh• Dunes are blown out in southern areas where weeding has been undertaken but no consequent re-planting with nativespecies has been undertaken• SandringhamCharacter • The Parks character as a green space is highly valued and there is a strong desire for this to be retained.• Throughout Park• There is little definition at the key entrances to the Park and no definite sense of entry• Pine Park, Brighton,Kyeemagh• Some views to the Bay from seats at the top of the dunes are being obscured by vegetation growth• Throughout Park• Many in the community have registered strong opposition to extra car parks, buildings or commercial premises in the Park• Foreshore areas are poorly integrated with their surroundings and appear to have inappropriate and left over infrastructuresuch as kerbs and metal barriers, especially around closed car parks• Dolls Point andSandringhamclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201023

issuesLOOKING AFTER THE PARK AND BUILDINGSTOPIC ISSUE LOCALITYLeases and Licensed • Community opposition to further commercial activity in new buildings• Throughout parkPremises• Desire to define and verify all public access requirements and rights in relation to leased premises• All leased premises• Several leased properties in need of repair or upgrade• Throughout park• Le Beach Hut is generally considered in need of renovation / reconstruction - an architectural competition suggested bystakeholders• Peter Depena ReserveToilets • Toilet buildings were considered to be dark and unsafe with personal security issues• Throughout park• Toilets were considered not open early enough in the mornings• Throughout park• Toilet buildings were generally considered in need of replacement• Throughout parkLighting • Lights throughout park are inconsistent in design and light provided• Throughout park• Lighting bulb replacement is considered to take too long creating safety concerns at night• Car parks specificallyPark and Street Furniture • Community would like to see more unity throughout park with elements such as lighting and furniture • Throughout parkWaste • There are no recycling bins in the Park• Throughout park• There is no facility for disposal of ash from barbecues• P e t e r D e p e n a ,Kyeemagh• Litter is a major problem on weekends and many considered there was a need for policing of this issue and education ofcommunity• Throughout park• Litter collection is considered inadequate particularly after busy periods and major events• Throughout parkFacilities andinfrastructure• Much of the existing infrastructure, fixtures and fittings in park are ageing and in need of replacement • Throughout parkclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201024

3. basis for managementValues and significanceThe requirements of Section 11 of the Crown Lands Act (1989) outlines managementprinciples for Crown Land and the Local Government Act (NSW) 1993 specificallyaddressing the needs for Plans of Management to identify the value and significance ofthe subject site for a range of criteria.Set out below are the assessments of values and significance which are based on anoverview of the key issues and objectives described in the previous sections.Heritage valueRegional and State Significance:The area has significance based on evidence of pre-European Aboriginal use.National SignificanceThe arrival of Captain Cook in Botany Bay is nationally significant for all Australians.Regional and Local SignificanceHistorical significance of Lady Robinsons Beach, Brighton le Sands and the Cook Parkarea in general as a major seaside resort destination from the turn of the century.Social valueRegional and Local SignificanceRecreational and wellbeing values to a wider urban residential catchment.Visual qualityRegional and Local SignificanceExtensive regional views across the Bay to Kurnell and north to the CBD.Natural valueState, Regional and Local SignificanceSignificant habitat on the foreshores play a major ecological role in the health of the Bay.Recreational valueRegional and Local SignificanceExtensive recreational opportunities for visitors from across the city are a drawcard forvisitors to Botany Bay.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201025

STRATEGIESGETTING TO AND AROUND THE PARKPRIORITYPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION/ INSTALLATIONMANAGEMENTRESPONSIBILITYSTRATEGY TYPICAL LOCATIONSOverarching PrincipleImprovement of access and circulation in the Park with minimum conflict, maximum utility and minimum hard surface footprint.Public TransportReview locations of bus stops to ensure ease of access for all users of thePark at key locations● STA / RCCCars and ParkingUndertake a comprehensive carpark review throughout the Park torationalise, simplify and better focus parking for park users.Resolve the outstanding DA for previously proposed car parking area southof Le SandsRe- align entry roads to car parks to eliminate 90 degree access from TheGrand Parade and thereby avoid traffic hazardsAll car parksHHM / H●●● ●L M PA / R TA /RCCRCC/LMPARCC/RTAEstablish cyclist / pedestrian priority points at path entries to car parks or carpark access roadsReview phasing of traffic lights to reduce danger to pedestrians (see RTAletter Appendix 5)Remove vehicle access to park immediately south of Endeavour bridge andretain entry created during desalination worksAll car parks H ● ● RCCThe Grand Parade, General Holmes Drive ● RTA / RCCSouth of Endeavour Bridge ● RCC / SWReview all car park layouts to remove surplus road surface areas intoparkland wherever practical (consider need for major event overflow parking)Review layout of car parks to discourage anti-social behaviour during the day All car parks H ● RCC / COMM/ LPAll car parks ● ● RCCReview closure of all car parks at night to reduce anti social behaviour All car parks especailly in southern parts of the Park H ● RCC/ COMM/LPReview options for upgrading existing car park in town centre to service Parkand restaurantsBrighton Le Sands M / H ● RCCclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201032

STRATEGIESGETTING TO AND AROUND THE PARKPRIORITYPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION/ INSTALLATIONMANAGEMENTRESPONSIBILITYCyclingSTRATEGY TYPICAL LOCATIONSUndertake comprehensive review and prepare cycle and footpath upgradefor the full extent of the ParkSeparate pedestrian and cycle paths at conflict pointsEntire length of the ParkRamsgate, MontereyWiden narrow paths to minimise conflict Adjacent to car park south of Georges River SailingClub at Sandringham●● ●HRCCH / MRCCH ● RCCUpgrade cycle path under Endeavour Bridge Kyeemagh M ● RCCUrgently address all cycle paths entering car parks to remove cycle hazard All car parks H ● RCCH / M ● RCCImprove visibility at blind spots along path through review of plantedtreatmentResolve hazards of sand on paths and ensure all access paths to beach arestabilisedAlong the foreshore path between Riverside Driveand Lena Street at Sandringham; at the toilet blocknear the intersection of The Grand Parade andGeneral Holmes DriveSandringham, Monterey H ● ● RCCProvide more bike racks in park focal points Near playgrounds, Brighton Le Sands, near RamsgateBaths, near Sandringham baths, all playgroundsRe-align paths to remove S-bends to avoid short-cutting and conflicts Smooth at the toilet block near the intersection of TheGrand Parade and General Holmes DriveM / L ●M ●Review potential for bike hire facilities to improve park use Rockdale Railway Station, Brighton Le Sands kiosk L ● RCC / SRAEstablish on-road cycle network connecting with park and key local nodessuch as the railwayM / L ● ● RCC / RTACreate pedestrian/cycle priority lanes through car parks where paths connectwith the car parkRationalise park to place cycle path on road in northern part of the Park (BesticStreet)Grand Parade between Bestic Street and GeneralHolmes DriveRedesign path to allow cycles to rejoin footpath in park travelling south Near intersection of The Grand Parade and GeneralHolmes DriveM ● ● RCCH ● RCCM / H ● ● RCCclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201033

GETTING TO AND AROUND THE PARKPRIORITYPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION/ INSTALLATIONMANAGEMENTRESPONSIBILITYWalkingSTRATEGY TYPICAL LOCATIONSIncrease width of access paths to the beach. Lower dune protection fenceposts to prevent damage to water based sports equipment. Review potentialof switchback access rather than direct access for all pointsInstall access paths made of chain linked wooden slat to beach with possibleswitchbacks in key locations to reduce sand deposition on pathsInstall median fencing for pedestrian safety Brighton Le Sands between Bay Street and nextpedestrian lights southAll beach access through dunes H / M ● ● LPMA / RCCSandringham, Monterey H / M ● ● LPMA / RCCH / M ● RTA/ RCCEnhance connections to the Botany Bay Walk Sandringham near the St George Sailing Club M ● ● LPMA / RCCContinue consultation with RTA to seek new pedestrian traffic lights to ensureease of access along the entire length of The Grand ParadeInstall signage to indicate shared status of car parks for vehicles, pedestriansand bicycles wherever paths are directed into car parksThe vicinity of Bruce Street, Kyeemagh; SolanderStreet Monterey; Emmaline Street, RamsgateBeachCar parks in Monterey M ● RCCM ● ● RTA / RCCRedesign paths to beachfront to reduce steepness North and south of Brighton boardwalk M / L ● ● RCCReview pedestrian / cycle pinchpoints on streetfront and boardwalk with a viewto minimising danger and conflictEnsure consistency of all paths entering car parks with clear safety featuressuch as signage, bollards etcReplace cycle barriers with more pram friendly optionsReview all paths to ensure universal access is optimised (AS 1428)Explore opportunities for additonal interpretive boardwalks on foreshoreReview opportunity for dog off leash entry to water in appropriate locationswhere few other beach usersAround Le Sands restaurant building H ● RCC / RTAAll car parks in line with paths H / M ● ● RCCNorth of Ramsgate BathsNorth of President Avenue to north of Teralba RoadWest of St George Sailing Club and north ofKyeemagh netted bathsH / MM/HMM●●●● RCCRCCRCCRCC/LMPAclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201034

STRATEGIESPLEGENDThe following symbols identify typicallocations in the park where strategiesshould be appliedCARS AND PARKINGReduce pedestrian and cycle conflicts withcars by separating paths and car parks.- Close car parks at night to reduce antisocialbehaviourInvestigate off park options for car parkingin high use areasCYCLINGInvestigate methods to overcome dangerto cyclists caused by sand on pathPEDESTRIANSImprove connections and pedestriansafety across The Grand Parade with extrapedestrian lights or overhead bridgesImprove pedestrian safety by usingmedian street barriers between pedestriancrossing lightsGENERALImprove signage to clearly define accessopportunitiesExplore options for smallberth sheltering locationsfor yachts caught insoutherliesEnsure car parks in post desalinationworks upgrade do not conflict withcyclists or pedestriansConsider alternative locations of bus stops tofacilitate easy access to park by mobility impairedusersAdjust path to eliminate blind spotcaused by toilet blockResolve pedestrian cycle conflicts on footpathbeside The Grand ParadeResolve potential for injury to to cyclists andpedestrians due to steep rampReview opportunity for bicycle hire facilities inthe Park with possible links to the stationResolve outstanding car park DAResolve conflict between cycles, pedestrians and cars wherepaths meet car parks such as at Banks StreetResolve illegal parking on grass opposite Solander StreetResolve cycle hazard cause by sand on path opposite ScarboroughStreetUpgrade toilets opposite Emmaline StreetWiden existing beach access to make provision forwindsurfers and kite boarders carrying equipmentResolve pinch point on path around RLSCIncorporate unused car park into parkland. Keep option for overflowparking on grass or similarReduce pedestrian / cycle conflictsand group walker inconvenience bywidening pathReview benefits of road spikes in Carruthers RoadReview potential to open Carruthers Street for parkingInstall viewing aids such as convexmirrors to avoid blind spots.Upgrade paths south of Sandringham baths toprevent trip hazards and clearly mark as shared pathcook park plan of managementGETTING TO AND AROUND THE PARK35NS 1075MAY 2010Figure 03LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • URBAN DESIGNERS • LANDSCAPE PLANNERS• 6A WETHERILL STREET • PO BOX 44 • LEICHHARDT • NSW 2040 • sydney@clouston.com.au • TELEPHONE (02) 9569 3388 • FACSIMILE (02) 9569 3523

STRATEGIESCONSERVING THE PARK’S ENVIRONMENT,HERITAGE AND CHARACTERPRIORITYPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION/ INSTALLATIONMANAGEMENTRESPONSIBILITYOverarching PrincipleSTRATEGY TYPICAL LOCATIONSSignificant improvement in the representation of the Park’s heritage, increased public awareness and restoration of the naturalenvironment and greater integration and improvement of the general aesthetic qualities of the Park.Aboriginal and non- Aboriginal heritageInstall or improve heritage interpretation in high use areas. Review optionsfor signage, interactive displays and self-guided audio toursPeter Depena Reserve, Pine Park; RamsgateBeach, Monterey opposite Emmaline Street; BrightonLe Sands, Kyeemagh north of Bestic StreetProtect and interpret existing heritage features Cannons at Sandringham and Brighton Le Sands,interpret change of Cooks River for original airportconstructionNatural Heritage and Environment● RCCM ● ● ● RCCContinue ongoing dune conservation. Ensure planting at top of bank doesnote obscure views of bayInterpret natural systems in current and historical context Dune formation and vegetation at Kyeemagh, thestorm water canal west of Peter Depena ReserveBeachfront from Kyeemagh to Brighton Le Sands ● LPMA / RCC /CMAM ● ● RCCProvide more shade through tree planting for amenity and habitat South of Bestic Street H / M ● RCCContinue tree succession planting Pine Park H / M ● RCCReview likely impacts of climate change in low lying areas of Park Sandringham foreshore, Dolls Point foreshore H /M ● LPMA / RCCReview planting alternatives to netting and corrugated fencing for dunecontrol and sand incursionSandringham foreshore and park beach interfacebetween Brighton Le Sands and KyeemaghM / L ● LPMA / RCC /CMAReview condition of stormwater outlets and evaluate installation of grosspollutant trapsThorughout park H ● SW / NM/ RCC /DECCWExplore options for consolidating sand on south side of groynes All groynes ● LPMA / RCC/ NMUndertake dune restoration planting to secure vulnerable areas. Sandringham south of Georges Rive Sailing Club H ● LPMA / RCCclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201036

STRATEGIESSHLEGENDThe following symbols identifytypical locations in the Park wherestrategies should be appliedENVIRONMENTInstall interpretive signage fornatural systemsEstablish links to surroundingenvironmental resources suchas Rockdale Wetlands using treecanopyReview condition of stormwateroutlets and evaluate installation ofgross pollutant controlsHERITAGEInstall or improve Aboriginaland non-Aboriginal heritageinterpretation in high use areas andsignificant historic locations asextensive views across the Bay.Protect / interpret existing heritagefeaturesLANDSCAPE CHARACTEREnsure new upgrades do notcompromise viewsUse planting as a less visuallyintrusive methods of dunemovement control rather thanplastic and corrugated metalCreate definition to the Park frontageusing street tree plantingCreate distinctive precinct characterfor the main recreation areasAddress narrow low level beachareas possibly affected by sea levelriseOngoing dune conservationon the foreshoreProvide / allow for a coastal interpretive boardwalkMaintain view corridor to Bay fromPresident AvenueContinue dune conservation on theforeshoreMaintain view corridor to Bay fromBarton StreetInterpret change in course ofCooks River for constructionof airportMaintain views to airport in northPark upgradeInterpret dune formation andecology.Retain open parkland character of Monterey foreshoreEnhance hard edged foreshore of Ramsgate.Complement with upgraded cultural plantingMaintain urban character of Brighton foreshoreMaintain view corridor to Bay from BayStreetInterpret heritage cannonContinue interpretive boardwalkAdapt car parks along Monterey foreshore to maximiseefficiency and minimise conflicts with other park usersAdjust dune protection fencing at official beach access to prevent damage towind surfers and to discourage use of alternative routesInterpret the heritage of local areaInterpret the history of Pine ParkContinue succession tree plantingprogram in Pine ParkStormwater canal (refer legend)Maintain view corridor to Taren Pointfrom Clareville RoadLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • URBAN DESIGNERS • LANDSCAPE PLANNERScook park plan of managementCONSERVING THE PARK’S ENVIRONMENT,HERITAGE AND CHARACTER• 6A WETHERILL STREET • PO BOX 44 • LEICHHARDT • NSW 2040 • sydney@clouston.com.au • TELEPHONE (02) 9569 3388 • FACSIMILE (02) 9569 3523NS 107538MAY 2010Figure 04

STRATEGIESLOOKING AFTER THE PARK AND BUILDINGSPRIORITYPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION /INSTALLATIONMANAGEMENTRESPONSIBILITYOverarching PrincipleSTRATEGY TYPICAL LOCATIONSRationalisation of buildings and improvement of infrastructure and services to maximise public amenity, safety and satisfaction andfacilitate income generation for Park maintenance and improvementLeased and licensed premisesEnsure ongoing commercial activities adhere to the Crown Lands Act, theLocal Government Act, and all other relevant statutes. Undertake communityconsultation for any proposed commercial activity requiring construction of anew buildingDefine and verify all public access requirements and rights in relation to leasedpremisesEvaluate all leased premises for structural integrity and instruct lessees toundertake the appropriate action for repair or renovationAssess potential for temporary licenses for events such as markets or fairsincluding for example temporary kiosks and stalls. Priority should be givento those that would increase the public profile of the Park and have the leastlong term impact. Licenses should also comply with Section 112 of the CrownLands Act (1989)Throughout park H ● ● RCC / LPMA /COMMAll leased and licensed premises M ● RCCAll leased and licensed premises H ● RCCKyeemagh north of Bestic Street, Peter DepenaReserveL ● RCCRationalise three buildings into one containing RLSC, toilets and storage Existing RLSC M ● ● RCCTest existing and future leases against Council Open Space Policy All leases M ● RCCToiletsEnsure toilets are opened early enough in the morning to all enable use byjoggers and walkers prior to workEvaluate all toilet buildings for immediate repair, replacement or integration withstorage or leased premisesInstigate program for medium term replacement of toilets buildings . Re-constructwith a footprint no larger than the existing building with a multiple use e.g.including community storage facilities. New toilets are to be designed to ensuresafety and security of usersClean toilets daily, and more frequently in peak times. Ensure facilities are ingood repair and adequately supplied with necessary materialsThroughout park H ● RCCH ● RCCM ● RCCH ● RCCclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201039

STRATEGIESLOOKING AFTER THE PARK AND BUILDINGSPRIORITYPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION /INSTALLATIONMANAGEMENTRESPONSIBILITYSTRATEGY TYPICAL LOCATIONSConsolidate and rationalise shelters and toilets to contemporary designstandards. Ensure heritage values are recognisedLightingPeter Depena Reserve M ● ● RCCUndertake lighting audit to establish clear guidelines for required light M / L ● RCCCheck lights regularly and ensure expired bulbs are replaced promptly H ●Park and Street Furniture H / M ● RCCRationalise street furniture for consistency through the Park. Ensure seats arelocated at frequent intervals along pathsM ● RCCWaste RCCInstall recycling bins in the Park - some can replace existing bins Wherever other bins are located H ● RCCInstall facilities for disposal of ash from barbecues in picnic areas Peter Depena Reserve, North of Pine Park H / M ● ● RCCEnsure litter is collected and bins emptied frequently on weekends, after busyperiods and after major events such as New Years EveExtend anti-litter education campaign, especially through ranger presence attime of high useThroughout park H ● ● RCCBrighton, Ramsgate Beach H / M ● RCCReview alternatives to beach rubbish stockpile South of Le Sands Restaurant H ● RCCFacilities and InfrastructureAudit and evaluate condition of all facilities and infrastructure with a view toreplacementEstablish design guidelines for Cook Park for all future works to ensure unitywithin the Park and legibilityEstablish a program and funding scheme for replacement of infrastructurewithin the design guidelinesM ● RCCM ● RCCM ● RCCVandalism and GraffitiUndertake measures to improve passive surveillance around frequently targetedfacilities and protect with graffiti resistant paint. Respond quickly to removegraffitiThoughout park H ● RCCclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201040

6. detailed strategic plansThe following plans show the entire length of park in a greater level of detail and summariseall of the strategies in the previous section.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201041

Upgrade cycle pathunder bridge.Review potential forboating and maritimeinfrastructureUpgrade vehicle accessand parking to controlaccess south ofEndeavour Bridge.Review option for off leashdog access to waterImplement restored parkland asperagreement with the Water DeliveryAlliance.Upgrade Landscape quality ofparkentrance.Provide more shade by tree plantingin this sectionRationalise parks to place cycle pathon street for this stretch to GeneralHolmes Drive.Stabilise bank behind metal screenprotection with dune planting andprogressively remove screens whenplanting is established.Continue dune restoration planting.Ensure all access paths to beach arestabilised with chained timber planking.Where there is risk of sand blowing ontostreet and park, create switchback withlong term goal of replacing metal sheetingor angled path.Prevent windblown sand problemsby increased dune restorationcook park plan of management • rockdaleDETAIL STRATEGIC PLANS - SANDRINGHAMNS 1075 Figure 05May 2010LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • URBAN DESIGNERS • LANDSCAPE PLANNERS • 6A WETHERILL STREET • PO BOX 44 • LEICHHARDT • NSW 2040 • sydney@clouston.com.au • TELEPHONE (02) 9569 3388 • FACSIMILE (02) 9569 3523

Review status of building currently lying in foreground of importantview across bay.Redesign paths to allow for cycles to rejoin footpath in parktravelling south.Redesign path to beach to reduce steepness.Pursue replacement planting strategy for pinesReview options extending existing car park in Brighton Le Sandstown centre to service park and restaurants.Prepare upgraded interpretive material for area around cannon.Evaluate construction of an in harbour jetty as an extension of the existingboardwalk to facilitate visitor interaction with the bay (fishing, viewing etc)and provide for small boat pick up and drop off.Review cycle pinchpoints on boardwalk and ensure these are clear.Reconsider cycle pinchpoints on streetfront given danger forpedestrians and building users.Reconsider suitability of beach rubbish collection stockpile.Evaluate construction of an interpretive boardwalkContinue critical dune restoration.Seek early resolution of unresolved car park DA in line with principles ofthe Plan of ManagementEnsure vista to Bay is clear from President Avenue.Where wider areas of park permit, separate cycle and pedestrianpaths; generally pedestrians should be closer to foreshore.Ensure consistency of design for all paths entering carparks withclear safety features ( Bollards, signs, surface materials).cook park plan of management • rockdaleDETAIL STRATEGIC PLANS - BRIGHTON LE SANDSNS 1075 Figure 06May 2010LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • URBAN DESIGNERS • LANDSCAPE PLANNERS • 6A WETHERILL STREET • PO BOX 44 • LEICHHARDT • NSW 2040 • sydney@clouston.com.au • TELEPHONE (02) 9569 3388 • FACSIMILE (02) 9569 3523

Ensure planting at top of bank does not obscure views of bay.Install switchback or angled path access to beach to minimisesand wind drift, especially addressing southerly winds.Review all carpark layouts to ensure no surplus road surface areasprovidedCreate pedestrian/cycle priority lanes through car parksExplore options for consolidating sand adjoining groynes.Replace steps to beach ramp to ensure continuity of existing switchbackramps from street level.Provide more shade through new tree plantings.Separate pedestrian and cycle paths in width restricted area.Install signage to indicate shared status of car park for vehicles,pedestrians and bicycles wherever paths are directed into through carparks.Rationalise car park layout to remove large areas of surplus asphalt.cook park plan of management • rockdaleDETAIL STRATEGIC PLANS - MONTEREYNS 1075 Figure 07May 2010LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • URBAN DESIGNERS • LANDSCAPE PLANNERS • 6A WETHERILL STREET • PO BOX 44 • LEICHHARDT • NSW 2040 • sydney@clouston.com.au • TELEPHONE (02) 9569 3388 • FACSIMILE (02) 9569 3523

Upgrade vista to Bay from Florence Street.Replace cycle barriers with pram friendly options.Rationalise three buildings to one new building containing the RamsgateLifesaving Club, Cafe, toilets and storage.In short term revise car park entry and cycle path to reduce hazard.Upgrade foreshore area and entrance to baths. Remove de-commissioned pipeExtend shade in this part of the park through new tree planting.and improved access to the Park across Grand Parade.Review option to demolish existing car park and return to parkland incorporating cycle pathFormalise surface of ninety degree parking off the Grand Parade.Upgrade street address of park to Grand Parade with planting.Review options for artwork locations amongst Pines.Rationalise cycle and footpath with pedestrians only on foreshore. Removebarriers which are deterring pedestrians as well as cyclists.Build on the quality of recently installed lookout platform by upgrading carpark and removing temporary kerbs and road engineered railings etc.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • URBAN DESIGNERS • LANDSCAPE PLANNERS • 6A WETHERILL STREET • PO BOX 44 • LEICHHARDT • NSW 2040 • sydney@clouston.com.au • TELEPHONE (02) 9569 3388 • FACSIMILE (02) 9569 3523cook park plan of management • rockdaleDETAIL STRATEGIC PLANS - RAMSGATE/DOLLS POINTNS 1075 Figure 08May 2010

cook park plan of management • rockdale NS 1075 Figure 09Consolidate foreshore dune to reducewindblown sand on pathsReview option off leash area for dog access towaterUndertake complete area redesign toSandringham Beach to increase greenspace, reduce cycle clashes, provideramped access to baths and to reduceinappropriate behaviour at night. Reviewvehicles access and parking as part of redesignReview hedge boundary treatment toavoid path width reduction and to improvenatural surveillanceConsolidate andrationalise shelters andtoilets to contemporarylighting and designRedesign separate cycleand footpath in PeterDepena Park to improvesafetyProvide more structuredspaces to Park with newtree plantingWiden path to be suitalbefor cycle / pedestrainsharewayUndertake dunerestoration planting tosecure this area andprevent erosion.Provide standing areasand stabilised access tobeach for out riggerscook park plan of management • rockdaleDETAIL STRATEGIC PLANS - SANDRINGHAMNS 1075 Figure 09May 2010LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS • URBAN DESIGNERS • LANDSCAPE PLANNERS • 6A WETHERILL STREET • PO BOX 44 • LEICHHARDT • NSW 2040 • sydney@clouston.com.au • TELEPHONE (02) 9569 3388 • FACSIMILE (02) 9569 3523

7. Implementationtargets and performance indicatorsIn establishing a programme of implementation, LMPA and Council requires a means todemonstrate that the program for the strategies outlined has been achieved. These areidentified as performance indicators. For detailed performance targets and indicators forCouncil owned Community Land as required under the Local Government Act NSW (1993)refer to the following chapter on Council Owned Community Lands.Success in the implementation of some strategies can be more easily measured in quantitativeways than others, but all must be measured by some means if performance is to be evaluatedand strategies refined over time.In particular, the following are considered practical and useful survey methods that may covera number of targets and performance measuresExit and user surveys:• A questionnaire carried out at 5 year intervals accompanied by a survey of usernumbers in parts of the Park; qualitative and quantitative in nature. This survey/questionnaire will cover such diverse matters as measures of changes in park usage,visitor experience and perceptions, etc.Specific Web surveys:• Surveys on Council’s website; these can be designed as questionnaires requestingfor example input on the implementation of particular programs and feedback onreview in management strategies.Log of letters:• Review of letters, emails etc. received each year (positive and negative) onvarious subjects in the Park indicating changes in praise and criticism of the Park’smanagement according to performance. Some care must be exercised in specificinterpretation and this method should be used to measure general trends and commontopics rather than letter by letter.Photographic survey:• Taken at key and consistent locations every 5 years to establish degrees of change,either positive or negative. This should be compared with aerial photographs reviewedevery 5 years.Enjoying The Park And BayEnjoyment of the Park can be to some extent measured by the number of visitors to the Parkand the extent to which the Park is cared for and appreciated. This is also a measure ofhow much the local people and visitors believe that it is genuinely a shared public resource.Due to its size, the variety of experiences within the Park and also it’s foreshore location,simple usage may not be an adequate measure. Length of stay and satisfaction level shouldalso measured.General Target:To ensure that there is equity in public access within the Park.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201047

General Performance Indicator:Measure by a park user survey indicating numbers in the Park , measured every 2years and questionnaire that establishes peoples perceptions of restrictions on publiclyaccessible land.Target:Increased local use of the site.Performance Indicator:Measure Park use by user number survey every two years.Target:Increased satisfaction with the Park usagePerformance Indicator:As measured by exit survey and local resident survey establishing origin of visitor lengthof stay and satisfaction level etc.Getting To and Around The ParkThe shared pedestrian and cycle path system has seen an increase in regular use of thePark, improving appreciation, casual surveillance and security but also creating potentialconflicts between different types of users. Ease and safety of access to the Park fromacross the Grand Parade is also in need of improvement. The test for increased use mustbe to increase the carrying capacity of the path system but minimise conflicts.Pedestrian or Cycle AccessPerformance Target: Increased daily destination use of path system.Performance Indicator: As measured by user survey every 2 - 5 years at consistentlocations at start and end of day and at weekends. Consider seasonal influences.Performance Target: Reduced conflict, accidentsPerformance indicator: As measured by user surveys every 2 years particularly usersof the path system and log of police record accidents. A preliminary survey should beundertaken to establish a base line of of conflicts or incidents in the previous 12 months.Performance Target: Increased diversity in use type, ease of accessibility and increasednumbers.Performance Indicator: Measured by a Park user and local resident survey addressinga range of issues, but in particular, issues such as impacts of street parking, sport uses,unstructured recreational facilities, etc.Performance Target: Improve accessibility for cyclists. Improved amenity and comfortfor pedestrians and cyclists.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201048

Performance Indicator: Conduct bi-annual counts of cyclists at access points to the studyarea. Monitor requests from cyclists for improved or additional facilities. Review safetyand accident reports.Parking Targets:Rationalisation of parking in the Park. Review overflow parking rather than permanentparking in some areas. Reduction of anti-social behaviour in the Parking areas.Performance Indicators: Parking numbers count and carpark occupancy rates at keylocations over a period of years. Review complaints received or interview nearbyresidents.Target:Improve safety along foreshore roads at carpark entry and exits.Performance Indicators:Review safety and accident reports to monitor reduction in accidents.Protecting The Park’s Environment, Heritage And CharacterPerformance Indicator: Measured by a quantitative exit survey every 5 years establishingvisitor experience, that identifies (without prompting) satisfaction with and support forbeach restoration works, increased acknowledgment/appreciation of historical/culturalfeatures of the Park , and awareness of improvements in the Park’s visual character.EnvironmentTarget:Establish clear conservation and management priorities for the Park.Performance Indicator:Park and resource allocation priorities established and adopted.Target:Continuation of dune restoration work in accordance with generic targets and contemporarymanagement techniques.Performance Indicator:Collect data. Monitor generic targets. Photograph dunes from a series of locations at 6monthly intervals to determine success of stabilisation.HeritageThis aspect of the experience of open space is often under-emphasised but has thecapacity to significantly increase the appreciation of the history and evolving culturallandscape of the Park for the local resident and visitor alike. Interpretive design and signinformation, are two examples of interpretation that would aid in increasing awarenessof the Park’s heritage.Target: Increased appreciation of the site and its cultural and historical significance tothe area.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201049

Performance Indicator:Measured by a quantitative exit survey every 2 years establishing visitor experience,that identifies increased acknowledgment and /or appreciation of historical, cultural andnatural features of the Park .CharacterMany of the cues to visual appreciation of the landscape are subtle and difficult for mostpeople to express in words.Target:Increased appreciation of the site and its aesthetic qualities.Performance Indicator:Measured by exit survey as above and photographic survey at ten year intervals of keyviews and features to ensure consistent visibility and landscape quality.Looking After the Park and it’s BuildingsMeasuring the effectiveness of the administrative processes and maintenance programis essential to ongoing review and amendment of the management structures andimplementation programme.Target:Ongoing program of upgrading or replacement of buildings and structures.Performance Indicators:Public satisfaction with toilets and facilities and reduced complaints as measured by exitsurveys of Park users.Target:Improved services such as litter collection, toilet maintenance etc.Performance Indicator:Measured by exit surveys to determine public satisfaction.Target: Cost reduction and minor increase in revenue required for maintenance andmanagement.Performance Indicator:Measured by Council’s annual accounts.Target:A smooth running and well integrated management structure. Consistent progress onachieving strategic outcomes on the ground.Performance Indicator:Measured by monitoring such factors as changes in degree of unanimity of decisionsamongst the management body (minutes), success with achieving funding for initiativesetc.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201050

potential funding sourcesListed below are some of the relevant available grants indicated in the State Parliament’sweb site guide to Community Grants. Other grants shown on this website could be appliedfor as a joint venture with community groups and local businesses.Dept. of PlanningDept. Environment, ClimateChange and WaterArts NSWNSW HeritageClubs NSWMetropolitan Greenspace ProgrammeEnvironmental Restoration and Rehabilitation grantsThe Arts Funding Program:* Sustainable arts and cultural organisations, servicesand infrastructure* Increased access to arts and cultural activities* A creative and diverse arts sector.Local government heritage management programAboriginal heritage projectsCommunity Development Support ExpenditureThe Council must also consider terms that ensure that legitimate costs of upgrading ofthe Park are recouped wherever possible by equitable rental. Public hiring fees shouldalso be set at a realistic and equitable level.Potential for metered car parking should also be examined but consideration should begiven to local rate payers being exempted.reviewing the planIf this Plan is to remain relevant in the coming years it will be essential that some degreeof consistent review be carried out in a logical order.The Plan has been set up in such a manner that the separate elements can be readilyreviewed and updated on differing time spans.In line with the targets and performance indicators set out in a previous section it isrecommended that the Plan be reviewed in the following sequences and time spans,starting from the most frequent review requirement.EVERY YEAR• Review progress of programme prepared after this Planclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201051

EVERY TWO YEARS• Review progress on all strategies• Review Management and Administration structures• Review prioritiesEVERY FIVE YEARS• Major Review of all Strategies• Review of all Objectives• Review and update Resource and Issues• Review/update Statutory Controls (DCPs )• Review Targets and Performance IndicatorsEVERY TEN YEARS• Review of Strategies and Objectives• Review and update all background Issues• Review and update The Values and Significance if external circumstancesrequire or community values change markedlyclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201052

8. Council owned community landsstatutory requirementsCook Park comprises Crown land dedicated for public recreation, of which Rockdale CityCouncil is the Reserve Trust Manager, and incorporates a number of parcels of communityland owned and managed by Rockdale City Council.The parcels of community land contained within the Crown land are as follows:• Peter Depena Reserve which includes the leased site occupiedby the restaurant and kiosk premises known as Le Beach Hut(Land title : Lot 2 in DP733218, Lot 3 in DP 733218, Lot 66 in DP 2237, Lot 67in DP 2237, Lot 68 in DP 2237, Lot 69 in DP 2237, Lot 70 in DP 2237, Lot 71 inDP 2237, Lot 72 in DP 2237, Lot 73 in DP 2237, Lot 74 in DP 2237, Lot 75 inDP 2237, Lot 76 in DP 2237 and Lot 77 in DP 2237)• a section of public footpath in the vicinity of Sandringham Bay (Land title: Lot 27in DP 15280, Lot 2 in DP 418083 and Lot 16 in DP 270045)In order for this Plan of Management to meet the specific requirements of the LocalGovernment Act (NSW) 1993 the following information for two of the three parcels ofCouncil owned community land is set out in this chapter:• category of land• nature and use of the land• objectives and performance targets• means of achievement• methods of assessment• Lease detailsCATEGORY OF LANDThe category of all parcels of the Council owned community land is ‘Park’.NATURE AND USEThe following describes the nature and use of the Council owned community land withinCook Park. Nature and use of community land within Peter Depena Reserve is describedfor the whole of this parcel as well as specifically for the leased area currently occupiedby the Le Beach Hut premises. This section provides information which expresslyauthorises the lease as required by the Local Government Act (NSW) 1993 on Councilowned community land.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201053

1. Peter Depena Reserve, Dolls Point• Open space and recreation incorporating a food and beverage outlet on a leasedproperty2. Section of public footpath in the vicinity of Vanston Pde, Sandringham• Open space and recreation, public access routeNo changes in use for Council owned community land are expected. Any proposedchanges in nature and use for the community land parcels identified in this Plan willrequire a revised Plan of Management for that parcel of community land.LEASE DETAILSThe leased site occupied by the restaurant and kiosk premises known as Le Beach Hutis located within the community land portion of Peter Depena Reserve. The leased areacomprises the Le Beach Hut brick building, a concrete delivery area and a 1.5 m curtilagesurrounding the building.All available lease details are set out below:LeaseLe Beach HutLease expiry - August 2010Permissible uses - Refreshment Room Kiosk and RestaurantHours of operation - normal business hours of operationSeat numbers - 298 personsArea or size - No 179 and 1.5m curtilage. Refer Appendix 1 for PlanCar Park numbers - N/AThis Plan of Management expressly authorises the current lease for the restaurant andkiosk premises known as Le Beach Hut as described above.OBJECTIVES, PERFORMANCE TARGETS, MEANS OF ACHIEVEMENT ANDMETHODS OF ASSESSMENTThe objectives, performance targets, means of achievement and methods of assessmentfor the parcels of community land are set out in the following table. Details for the LeBeach Hut leased site are addressed separately.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201054

COMMUNITY LANDSPeter Depena ReserveOBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE TARGET MEANS OF ACHIEVEMENT METHOD OF ASSESSMENTEnsure that there is equity in public access within the Parkand that single interests do not obtain or retain monopolieson tenure or enjoyment.Increased access and use of the area forthe primary use of passive recreation andleisure.Increased understanding and awarenessby the community of their access rights.Absence of any physical barriers orobstructions to public access.Define or verify all public accessrequirements and rights.Ensure the public are awareof their access rights throughmeans such as signage, Councilfliers and information pamphletscontaining access and linkmaps.Maintain clear access throughor around leased premises. Forexample no siting of structuressuch as fencing or bins.M e a s u r e d b y a P a r k u s e rsurvey every two years. Assessperceptions of what is open tothe public.Review of letters received eachyear on public access to the Park.Site inspections by Council officersto monitor clear access ways.Independent evaluation of publicaccess provisions.Regular site inspections to ensurelegible path connections throughcommunity land linking to PeterDepena Reserve.Ensure that use of the community land relates to the use andenjoyment of open space.Increased use and enjoyment for a range ofrecreation and leisure activities for a widespectrum of visitors.Preserve primary function of open spacefor passive recreation and leisure.Ensure all facilities provided areavailable for use to the public.Make the public aware ofall permissible uses throughsignage.Retain existing nature or purposeof the community lands andleases.Measured by a park user surveyevery two years. Assess whypeople visit the Park and whatfacilities they utilise.Lease review and facilitiescompliance inspections as perlease terms.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201055

COMMUNITY LANDSPeter Depena Reserve continuedTOPIC PERFORMANCE TARGET MEANS OF ACHIEVEMENT METHOD OF ASSESSMENTEnsure the community lands are consistent in open spacecharacter with the whole of Peter Depena Reserve and withthe Open Space Policy of Rockdale City Council.Land ownerships are not physically evidenton the ground.Ensure that design elements(such as signage, lighting,paving, furniture etc) used on thecommunity lands are consistentwith those used in Peter Depenaand the whole of Cook Park.E n s u r e t h e m a i n t e n a n c eprogramme followed is compatiblewith that of the whole reserve.Measured by a Park user surveyevery two years. Assess peoplesperceptions of what is communityland.V i s u a l s u r v e y b y C o u n c i lLandscape Architect.Independent evaluation of methodsagainst programme.Maintain and manage in thesame manner as Peter DepenaReserve.Le Beach HutEnsure leased premises are for a purpose that promotes or isrelated to the use and enjoyment of open space for recreationand leisure.– – Increased use of Peter Depena Reservedue to range of services provided byleased premises and integration withPark activities and opportunities.Provide public informationsignage such as informationboards showing range ofservices provided and hours ofopening.Liaison between Counciland the lessee to examineopportunities for joint initiativesto promote the Park andfacilities.Provision of food and beveragefacilities to meet a range of parkuser needs.Measured by a park user surveyevery two years. Assess peoplesawareness of range of facilitiesprovided.Review of letters received on useof the Reserve and request forfacilities.Site inspections to evaluate lesseecompliance with lease terms.Evaluation of operations to ensureconformity with DoP Circular No 14(Restaurants in Open Spaces) andDECCW Policy Position.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201056

COMMUNITY LANDSLe Beach Hut continuedTOPIC PERFORMANCE TARGET MEANS OF ACHIEVEMENT METHOD OF ASSESSMENTThe leased premises do not substantially diminish public useof or access to open space.Increased use and enjoyment of the areaby a wide spectrum of local and regionalvisitors.Maintain clear access throughor around leased premises. Forexample no siting of structuressuch as fencing or bins.Measured by a Park user surveyevery two years. Assess peoplesenjoyment of the open spacefacilities.Continue to operate onlypermissible uses of kiosk andrestaurant.Inspections by the Council Managerto review the condition andmaintenance of the premises.Provide information boardsshowing pedestrian routes,opening hours and permissibleuses.Operate trading hours thatprovide a range of opportunitiesfor food and beverages withouthaving any adverse impactson both the surrounding openspace users and the adjoiningland uses.Remove or repair any defectswhich might cause injury topersons using or passing throughthe adjoining Reserve.Ensure no increase in height orbulk of existing building or signageto ensure no overshadowing ofthe Park.Keep signs directly related topromotion of Le Beach Hut toa minimum and confine productadvertising to the interior of thebuilding except where approvalhas been given for portable signsduring the hours of operation.Monitor numbers of complaintsreceived pertaining to the leasedpremises.Annual inspections to evaluatepremises to ensure curtilage,height, bulk and signage restrictionsare being adhered to.Ad hoc inspections to confirmcompliance with permissibletrading hours.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201057

COMMUNITY LANDSLe Beach Hut continuedTOPIC PERFORMANCE TARGET MEANS OF ACHIEVEMENT METHOD OF ASSESSMENTEnsure leased premises do not adversely affect the naturalenvironment, any items or areas of heritage significance ofthe existing amenity of the area.Increased appreciation of the site andits historical, visual, and natural valueswhilst maintaining the existing amenity ofthe area.Properly maintain the buildingand curtilage.Keep the premises free fromaccumulation of rubbish orwaste material.Provision of additional littercollection services as requiredto ensure amenity of openspace.Monitor premises to ensurethat no adverse impacts to thenatural environment or existingamenity are caused by thepremises operations.Ensure that the use of thepremises does not causenuisance or annoyance toadjoining owners or occupiersor to users of the adjoiningreserve.Review log of letters and accidentreports for any complaints orincidents related to the upkeep ormaintenance of the building.Inspections of premises toensure compliance with healthregulations.Monitoring by Council officerssuch as the Environment Officerof impacts caused by premisesoperations.Liaison between police andCouncil to monitor numberand nature of incidents relatedto operations in the leasedpremises.Inspections at any time byCouncil officers to review thehours or noise volume affectingadjoining occupiers.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201058

COMMUNITY LANDSLe Beach HutTOPIC PERFORMANCE TARGET MEANS OF ACHIEVEMENT METHOD OF ASSESSMENTEnsure leased premises do not adversely affect the visualquality of the area.Improved appreciation and quality of thevisual environment.Ensure that no display oradvertising signs are affixed onor to the premises without priorapproval of the Council.Ensure any renovationsrequired to keep the premisesat an appropriate standardmaintain or reduce the scale,bulk, height and floor spaceof the existing premises.Renovations must be insympathy with open spacecontext.Test any application forrenovation of premises oncommunity lands against designguidelines or DevelopmentControl Plan.Photographic survey everyyear to identify improvementsor detractions to the visualenvironment.Independent evaluation toascertain lessee conformance tothe Development Control Plan.WalkwayEnsure co-ordinated pedestrian access and links exist alongthe foreshore.Maintain and increase daily destination ofthe path system.Ensure pathways aremaintained and permit accessfor disabled and prams.Publication of access and linkmaps updated annually.Park user survey.Independent evaluation of publicaccess provisions.Ensure the community lands are consistent in open spacecharacter with the adjoining areas of open space.Land ownerships are not physically evidenton the ground.Ensure that design elements(such as signage, lighting,paving, furniture etc) installedon community land are coordinatedwith those installedalong the whole of the openspace system.Measured by a park user surveyevery two years.Independent evaluation to ensureco-ordination of design elementsEnsure maintenanceprogramme followed isconsistent with the treatment ofthe rest of the Park.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201059

ibliographyCLOUSTON Associates, 1998, Cook Park Plan of ManagementConacher Travers, April 2006, Rockdale Biodiversity SurveyConacher Travers, April 2007, Rockdale Biodiversity StrategyDepartment of Lands, Soil Conservation Service, June 2008, Cook Park Rockdale SMCMAWork Areas, Maintenance PlanDepartment of Lands, Soil Conservation Service, July 2008, Sydney Metropolitan CMA,Stage 2 Dune Restoration ProjectGeeves, P and Jervis, J 1996, Rockdale: It’s Beginning and DevelopmentFood and Beverage Outlets on Crown Reserve Policy Version 3, 2004Jamieson Foley, July 2007, Road Safety Audit, Cook Park CyclewayNSW Crown Lands Act, 1989.NSW Local Government Act 1993Retail Leases Act, 1994Rockdale Council, 2009, Rockdale City Plan, Community Strategic Plan 2009 - 2018Rockdale Council, 2003, Rockdale Environment Plan, 2003 - 2006Rockdale City Council, October 2009, Draft Open Space and Recreation StrategyRockdale City Council, 2005, Destinations RockdaleR.W. Rathbone, 2002, The Sans Souci Peninsula : A history of the suburbs of Dolls Point,Monterey, Ramsgate, Sans Souci and Sandringham.Southern Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils, 2009, Botany Bay Trail MasterplanSpackman & Mossop, April 2002, Cook Park Summary Consultation ReportSydney Water, 12/08/09 Water Delivery Alliance Section BB - Botany Bay, KyeemaghCompound, Cook Park Restoration Site Plan (Issue 2)clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201060

Appendicesappendix 1 - Leases and PLANS OF council LEASED PREMISESTenant Lessor Lease Expiry Option L a y o u tPlanCyprus Hellene RCC 30/06/2019 No YesNotesLe SandsRCC 30/08/2028 YesRestaurantLe Sands Outdoor RCC No lease N/A Yes Council formalising LicenceDiningLe Sands Kiosk 30/06/2019 No Yes To be executed to expire 30/08/28Greek Orthodox RCC No lease N/A Yes To be executed to expire 30/08/28ArchidioceseBrighton Athletics RCC 23//02/03 No Yes Month by month - hold overClubR o y a l C o a s t a lPatrolRCC No lease N/A Yes To be executed to expire 30/08/28Omeros on theBeachRCC 7/03/2016 No YesLe Beach Hut RCC 31/08/2010 1 Year YesGeorges River 16Foot Sailing ClubCo Op LtdSt George SailingClubOptus -KyeemaghNSWMaritinePerpetual No No Perpetual LeaseLPMA Unknown Unknown NoLPMA 30/06/2027 No No Equipment Shelter OnlyRamsgate SLSC No lease N/A No No Council to engage in lease processclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201061

Appendicesappendix 1 - Leases and PLANS OF LEASED PREMISESclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201062

User: griggsmDate: 3/09/2009Le Beach HutCook Park, Dolls PointScale = 1:750Metres 10 20 30While every effort has been made to ensure the highest possiblequality of data, no liability will be accepted for any inaccuracyof the information shown.Copyright Rockdale City Council, Spatial Information Services.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201063

clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201064

User: griggsmDate: 3/09/2009Cyprus Hellene Club + Optus FacilityCook Park, KyeemaghScale = 1:800Metres 20While every effort has been made to ensure the highest possiblequality of data, no liability will be accepted for any inaccuracyof the information shown.Copyright Rockdale City Council, Spatial Information Services.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201065

LETTABLE AREA PLAN FOR 'BRIGHTON BATHS ATHLETICS CLUB'THE GRAND PARADE, BRIGHTON-LE-SANDS, NSWINTINTINT INT INTAMENITIESBRIGHTON BATHSATHLETICS CLUBC/LC/LINTINTINTINTINTINTINTMETHOD OF MEASUREMENTAREAS HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE PROPERTY COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA (PCA) METHODOF MEASUREMENT FOR LETTABLE AREA (MARCH 1997)SCHEDULE OF AREASATHLETICS CLUBTOTAL AREA143.9 m²143.9 m²INT - INTERNAL FACEEXT - EXTERNAL FACEC/L - CENTRELINE WALLG/L - GLASS LINEGUIDELINES USEDGROSS LETTABLE AREA RETAILLETTABLE AREA012345LETTABLE AREA PLANBRIGHTON BATHS ATHLETICS CLUBTHE GRAND PARADEBRIGHTON-LE-SANDS, NSWPLAN PREPARED FOR: DATE: 19/05/2009ROCKDALE CITY COUNCILREF: 34636TB REV: 1SCALE: 1: 100 at A3sydney melbourne brisbane adelaide perthP 02 9629 9377F 02 9475 5050Real Estate Plans & Surveys www.realserve.com.auLETTABLE AREA PLAN FOR 'ROYAL COASTAL PATROL'THE GRAND PARADE, BRIGHTON-LE-SANDS, NSWINTAMEN.INTINTCOASTALPATROLINTCONC.SLAB12.7INTMETHOD OF MEASUREMENTAREAS HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE PROPERTY COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA (PCA) METHODOF MEASUREMENT FOR LETTABLE AREA (MARCH 1997)SCHEDULE OF AREASCOASTAL PATROLTOTAL AREACONCRETE SLAB74.6 m²74.6 m²4.6 m²INT - INTERNAL FACEEXT - EXTERNAL FACEC/L - CENTRELINE WALLG/L - GLASS LINEGUIDELINES USEDGROSS LETTABLE AREA RETAILLETTABLE AREA012345LETTABLE AREA PLANPLAN PREPARED FOR: DATE: 19/05/2009ROYAL COASTAL PATROLROCKDALE CITY COUNCILREF: 34636TB REV: 1THE GRAND PARADEBRIGHTON-LE-SANDS, NSWSCALE: 1: 100 at A3sydney melbourne brisbane adelaide perthP 02 9629 9377F 02 9475 5050Real Estate Plans & Surveys www.realserve.com.auclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201066

LETTABLE AREA PLAN FOR 'SABIA' EXTERIOR SEATINGTHE GRAND PARADE, BRIGHTON-LE-SANDS, NSWPBRIGHTONBATHSATHLETICSCLUBAMEN.STO.STO.AMEN.STOREKITCHENAMEN.BARKIOSKFHRLOWERSOUTHTERRACEDINING AREAG/LBAR&DINING AREATEL.FHRG/LDINING AREALOWERNORTHTERRACEEXTERIORSEATING (41.8 m²)EXTERIOR SEATING (83.8 m²)BOARDWALKOUTER EDGE OF PLANTEROUTER EDGE OF PLANTERBOARDWALKBOARDWALKLOWER FLOOR - EXTERIOR SEATINGMETHOD OF MEASUREMENTAREAS HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE PROPERTY COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA (PCA) METHODOF MEASUREMENT FOR LETTABLE AREA (MARCH 1997)SCHEDULE OF AREASEXTERIOR SEATINGTOTAL AREA125.6 m²125.6 m²INT - INTERNAL FACEEXT - EXTERNAL FACEC/L - CENTRELINE WALLG/L - GLASS LINEGUIDELINES USEDGROSS LETTABLE AREA RETAILLETTABLE AREA051015LETTABLE AREA PLANSABIA, THE GRAND PDEBRIGHTON-LE-SANDS, NSWPLAN PREPARED FOR: DATE: 25/06/2009ROCKDALE CITY COUNCILREF: 34636TB REV: 3SCALE: 1: 300 at A3sydney melbourne brisbane adelaide perthP 02 9629 9377F 02 9475 5050Real Estate Plans & Surveys www.realserve.com.auLETTABLE AREA PLAN FOR 'BRIGHTON KIOSKS'THE GRAND PARADE, BRIGHTON-LE-SANDS, NSWINTINTINTSCHEDULE OF AREASINTBRIGHTON KIOSKSTOTAL AREA110.3 m²110.3 m²C/LLETTABLE AREAC/LC/LKIOSKINTMETHOD OF MEASUREMENTC/LAREAS HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE PROPERTY COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA (PCA) METHODOF MEASUREMENT FOR LETTABLE AREA (MARCH 1997)INTINTEDGE OFROLLER SHUTTERINTGUIDELINES USEDGROSS LETTABLE AREA RETAILLOWERNORTHTERRACEINT - INTERNAL FACEEXT - EXTERNAL FACEC/L - CENTRELINE WALLG/L - GLASS LINE012345LETTABLE AREA PLANPLAN PREPARED FOR: DATE: 19/05/2009ROCKDALE CITY COUNCIL BRIGHTON KIOSKS, THE GRAND PDE REF: 34636TB REV: 1BRIGHTON-LE-SANDS, NSWSCALE: 1: 100 at A3sydney melbourne brisbane adelaide perthP 02 9629 9377F 02 9475 5050Real Estate Plans & Surveys www.realserve.com.auclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201067

LETTABLE AREA PLAN FOR 'SABIA'THE GRAND PARADE, BRIGHTON-LE-SANDS, NSWCOASTALPATROLUPPERSOUTHTERRACEMILLENIUMCENTREC/LH/CFHRLIFT0.6 m²P(EXCL.)INTINTPG/L G/LINTINTAMEN.TINTG/LLOBBY AMENINTKITCHENLOBBYINTINTINTINTG/LG/LINTINT G/L INT G/L INTRECEPTIONAREAFHR1.1 m²(EXCL.)INTINTUPPERNORTHTERRACEDINING AREAINTPG/LG/LUPPER FLOORG/LG/LG/LEDGE OF ROLLER SHUTTERBRIGHTONBATHSATHLETICSCLUBLOWERSOUTHTERRACEC/L C/LINTPINT INT INTAMEN. STO.STO.STOREKITCHENAMEN.DINING AREABAR&DINING AREAG/LG/LTEL.FHRINTINTINTINTINT INT INTBARAMEN.DINING AREAG/LG/LC/L C/LC/LC/LFHR(0.8m²) LOWEREXCL. NORTHTERRACEKIOSKLOWER FLOORG/LG/LG/LEXTERIOR SEATINGBOARDWALKBOARDWALKMETHOD OF MEASUREMENTAREAS HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE PROPERTY COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA (PCA) METHODOF MEASUREMENT FOR LETTABLE AREA (MARCH 1997)SCHEDULE OF AREASSABIA - UPPER FLOORSABIA - LOWER FLOORTOTAL AREA842.2 m²1,121.2 m²1,963.4 m²INT - INTERNAL FACEEXT - EXTERNAL FACEC/L - CENTRELINE WALLG/L - GLASS LINEGUIDELINES USEDGROSS LETTABLE AREA RETAILLETTABLE AREA051015LETTABLE AREA PLANSABIA, THE GRAND PDEBRIGHTON-LE-SANDS, NSWPLAN PREPARED FOR: DATE: 19/05/2009ROCKDALE CITY COUNCILREF: 34636TB REV: 1SCALE: 1: 300 at A3sydney melbourne brisbane adelaide perthP 02 9629 9377F 02 9475 5050Real Estate Plans & Surveys www.realserve.com.auUser: griggsmDate: 3/09/2009Le Sands + Millenium CentreCook Park, Brighton Le SandsScale = 1:1,000Metres 20 40While every effort has been made to ensure the highest possiblequality of data, no liability will be accepted for any inaccuracyof the information shown.Copyright Rockdale City Council, Spatial Information Services.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201068

Appendicesappendix 2 - comparative issues tablesUpdate of Issues and StrategiesWith changes to aspects of the government planning strategies, growing population,change in public recreation habits and more physical changes such as installation of aregional cycleway, new issues have arisen which require new strategies to manage them.To establish a basis of comparison and to ascertain which previously existing issuesremain unresolved, issues from previous consultation processes have been outlined withan overview of current issues in a tabular format overleaf.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201069

ISSUE FROM 1998PLAN OF MANAGEMENTURBAN CONTEXT, LANDUSE ANDOWNERSHIPLand UseLocal concern over impact on park visitornumbers should it develop attraction at aregional level scaleSTRATEGY RECOMMENDED NEW ISSUES - 2002 REVIEW NEW OR UNRESOLVED ISSUES 2009Establish site uses in line withcommunity expectationsProposal for Rollerblade course in Pine ParkProposal for café or amphitheatre at end of BayStreet (if existing community building removed) wasnot generally supportedConflicts exist between wind surfers, jetskiers and swimmers. 3 buoys installed atRamsgate to help alleviate the problem (S)Concerns about boat traffic and scale ofpossible future marina (S)Paths considered inadequate for cyclists,joggers and walkers (S)Concerns about child safety in playgroundsclose to roads (S)Leases and LicencesCommunity opposition to furthercommercial activityInfrastructureCommunity would like to see more unitythroughout park within elements such aslightingConstruct no new buildings for purposesof leased food or beverage outlet unlessreplacing existingLiaison between Council and theLessee to examine opportunities forjoint initiatives to promote the Park andfacilitiesDefine and verify all public accessrequirements and rights in relation toleased premisesRe-iteration of desire for no further commercialfacilities in parkDemolition and replacement of ageing Le Beach HutPotential development of marina raised but notuniversally supportedSeveral leased properties in need of repair orrenovationStakeholders have suggested that leasingshould be consistent with Council openspace policyLe Beach Hut in serious need of renovation /reconstruction - an architectural competitionsuggested by stakeholdersNew infrastructure installed as a result of thedesalination works. Negotiations in progresson final design facilitiesMuch existing infrastructure, fixturesand fittings in park aging and in need ofreplacement(S) identifies issues raised by stakeholders during consultationclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201070

ISSUE FROM 1998PLAN OF MANAGEMENTACCESS, CIRCULATION ANDPARKINGPublic TransportNeed for numerous and safe wateraccess points for both swimmers and arange of water craftSTRATEGY RECOMMENDED NEW ISSUES - 2002 REVIEW NEW OR UNRESOLVED ISSUES 2009Improve pedestrian access to beachfrom foreshore paths particularly in thecentral section of the ParkUse of a shuttle bus service suggested tomove people to central points and helpreduce traffic congestion (S)Vehicle Access and MovementTraffic hazards such as cars making leftand right turns into car parks on TheGrand Parade.Traffic congestion on The Grand Paradeis a major issue affecting residentsand visitors to the Park particularly onweekends and during peak hour trafficImprove safety of entries and exits to carparksDirectional signage removed as part of M5 upgradeneeds to be reinstatedSupport for reinstatement of loop road on southernside of Endeavour BridgeAccess to Cook Park for vehicles heading north isdifficultSafety concerns over removal of slip lane south atHasham’s RestaurantPositioning of bus stops in locations moreappropriate to park use and potential for busslip lanes for safety proposed (S)Pedestrian crossing of The Grand Paradepresents safety issues due to speed andamount of vehicular traffic (S)Vehicle access to the Park immediatelysouth of Endeavour Bridge dangerous dueto sudden change in vehicle speedGreater potential conflicts in car parks withincrease of cycle traffic through the ParkParkingConflict in car park areas between cars,pedestrians and cyclistsCar parks are seen as reducing visualamenityRecognition that inadequate parking willcause loss of amenity through parkingon grass etcConcern that parking south of BrightonBaths will become an increasingmanagement problemExamine widening of shared paths atkey conflict pointsParking should be minimised to reducevisual and environmental impact on theParkInvestigate demand for car parking alongforeshore (including peak use)Undertake a traffic and parkingmanagement studyAnti-social behaviour in car parks is still a majorconcernCar parking on southern edge of Pine Park toospace consuming. Suggestion to remove andconsolidate with existing parking to the northSuggestions for closing all car parks at nightHeavy traffic along The Grand Paradecauses safety problems for cars attemptingto access car park areas (S)Questions were asked on the change over thelast 15 years in the numbers of cars now usingcar parks and what other Councils are doingto resolve any new issues (S)Car parking not considered to be responsiveto function of individual areas (S)Car parks considered venues for anti-socialbehaviour (S)Possibility of pay car parking with week/weekend rates to control use (S)Current size, number and configuration of carparks still an issue for review(S) identifies issues raised by stakeholders during consultationclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201071

ISSUE FROM 1998PLAN OF MANAGEMENTACCESS, CIRCULATION ANDPARKINGPedestrian and CycleWider paths preferred over separatepathways due to potential loss of greenspaceNeed to improve opportunities forpedestrians crossing roadSTRATEGY RECOMMENDED NEW ISSUES - 2002 REVIEW NEW OR UNRESOLVED ISSUES 2009Combine pedestrian and cycle accesswhere possible incorporating safetyrequirementsReview traffic light phasing along TheGrand Parade to assist pedestriancrossingPedestrian safety concerns between Bestic Streetand Endeavour Bridge – few signalled crossingpointsConcerns over lack of continuity of cycleway nearRamsgate BathsShortage of paths on The Grand ParadePedestrian and cycle access to park anincreasingly important growth issuePossible pedestrian/cycleway conflict at LeSands Restaurant and other locations (S)Bottleneck currently occurs on path wayat Georges River Sailing Club. Auditingrequired to identify all bottleneck areas (S)Separate recreational and commuter sharewaysrequired in some areas but spacefrequently limited (S)A variety of path materials (eg softfall) wouldalleviate impact and injury to joggers (S)Cyclist speeds a danger to slower movingpedestrians on shareways (S)Pathway system currently too narrow insome locations to cater for pedestrians, recreationalcyclists and commuter cyclistsNeed expressed for RTA to upgrade pedestriancrossing areas to include more:• pedestrian overpasses• longer phasing on crossings• more crossings (S)(S) identifies issues raised by stakeholders during consultationclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201072

ISSUE FROM 1998PLAN OF MANAGEMENTCULTURAL AND NATURALHERITAGEAboriginal HeritageAboriginal heritage acknowledged asan extremely important aspect of CookPark’s cultural heritageSTRATEGY RECOMMENDED NEW ISSUES - 2002 REVIEW NEW OR UNRESOLVED ISSUES 2009In consultation with original traditionalcustodians establish where there areaboriginal sites or relics in the Park toprotect and interpret, where possibleAboriginal rock carvings located near Captain CookBridge – possible other sites or artefacts locatedwithin Cook Park – should be protectedGeneral appreciation of Aboriginal heritageby community acknowledged. Interpretationand representation still not adequatelyexpressed or evident.Non -Aboriginal HeritageNeed for a more comprehensiveapproach to European heritageconservation and interpretationNeed to protect European heritage itemse.g. canon from vandalism.Carry out co-ordinated oral historybased on interviews with long term localresidents. Incorporate appropriateelements into the public interpretationprogrammeMonitor conditions and impact on historicelements and establish a programme forconservationNeed for increased interpretation of layeredEuropean heritage e.g. ‘humpies’ along Cook Parkduring depression yearsConnections to other Aboriginal sitesin around the Bay absent. Lack ofcomprehensive heritage interpretationstrategyInterpretation of European heritage stillconsidered inadequate - plaques in pavingsuggested to represent timeline or individualhistorical events (S)Review and research history of area. RonRathbone has written about the local historyof the area (S)Natural HeritageConcern that natural character offoreshores prior to European settlementare lost or in poor conditionConcern that natural character offoreshores are lost or in poor conditionEstablish tree planting strategy forthe entire park. Ensure that plantingacknowledges different landscapecharacters within park.Conserve natural landform and dunevegetationHistory Walk suggested that may includeviewing of migratory visiting Terns fromRussia (S)Educational/Environmental/Interpretivesignage proposed to cover informationshortfall (S)Potential for Park as educational resourcefor schools, colleges and universitiesundervalued.(S) identifies issues raised by stakeholders during consultationclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201073

ISSUE FROM 1998PLAN OF MANAGEMENTSITE CHARACTER AND VISUALQUALITYLandscape CharacterNeed for street trees to improve visualamenityNeed for planning controls which dealspecifically with preserving scenic/cultural heritageSTRATEGY RECOMMENDED NEW ISSUES - 2002 REVIEW NEW OR UNRESOLVED ISSUES 2009Publicly exhibit large scale tree plantingto general public. Involve all relevantparties when planning and executingtree planting strategiesInclude protection of visual qualityof heritage value or character in theDevelopment Control PlanMore shade needed - trees preferred due tocharacter (S)Ramsgate noted with a particular need forshade trees (S)Lack of definition in varying character of park(see suggested precincts in the 1998 Plan)Views and VistasResidents and proprietors keen to retainexisting viewsEngineered solutions such as retainingfences along beach seen as a majorvisual impact issueEstablish principal views to and throughsite and ensure no new structures orplanting obscures these viewsFormulate a DCP for the Park whichincludes addressing visual quality toprotect visual integrity of the foreshoreRecognised need for management of tree plantingsalong the bay balancing views with tree style andcharacterShade structures not always popular ifviews of water are obstructed. Criticalview corridors are along streets runningperpendicular to the Park and from widerareas of the Park where visitors are likely tospend more timeDesign CharacterPlacement of amenities, facilities,fixtures and fittings thought of as not wellconsidered and not consistent in designVisual impact of some built environmentsuch as car parks seen as visuallyunappealingNeed to provide visual cues, landmarksInclude visual impact of all builtenvironment elements in a Cook ParkDCPEstablish a program and brief for builtelements in the Park maintaining atheme and palette for materialsEstablish visual character zones tocreate distinctive and easily identifiedareas(S) identifies issues raised by stakeholders during consultationEntries to park indistinct - no definite senseof arrivalFixtures and fittings in park are stillinconsistent and placement has no overallcohesionNeed for clear design language that alsoaddresses changing contextStyle of all garbage bins should beconsistent throughout the site, convenientlylocated with clear signage indicating wastetype (S)clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201074

ISSUE FROM 1998PLAN OF MANAGEMENTRECREATION, LEISURE ANDTOURISMLand BasedNeed to address local residents use andappreciation whilst balancing needs ofvisitorsSTRATEGY RECOMMENDED NEW ISSUES - 2002 REVIEW NEW OR UNRESOLVED ISSUESPrepare a program for the Park asa recreation and tourist destinationincluding promotion of Cook Park to thelocal communityUtilise existing liaison structure to coordinateand manage special eventswithin the ParkPositive response from Peter Depena Reserve –residents feel this is a good model for future worksNeed to recognise overall change in recreationtrends across Park and manage opportunitiesaccordinglyPlaygrounds need to be safe and isolatedfrom trafficThe Park is used more frequently by morepeople - planning needs to consider currentuse and likely increased use (S)Large numbers of people in high useareas such as carnival location createproblems such as litter and increasedwear and tear on facilitiesImprove pedestrian access to beachfrom foreshore paths particularly in thecentral section of the ParkWater BasedNeed to prevent use of baths for sailingand motor boatingNeed for numerous and safe wateraccess points for both swimmers and arange of water craftEnsure users are aware of appropriateforms of recreation permissible withinthe ParkCommunity desire to improve look ofswimming baths (S)Netted baths becoming shallower thoughdeposition (S)Suggestion for a marine studies centre putforward (S)Boating / Water AccessPotential for water commuting around baywith connections to park (S)Boat ramp proposed by NSW Maritime innorthern area of the Park. Stakeholdersgenerally consider boating facilities in thenorth should be avoided.Boating considered acceptable but only inthe south and with small scale facilities (S)(S) identifies issues raised by stakeholders during consultationclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201075

ISSUE FROM 1998PLAN OF MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT AND PLANNINGOpen Space and TrafficTraffic planning affecting current use is amajor issueBay Street precinct as a focus for activityand is seen as logical hub for newdevelopmentSTRATEGY RECOMMENDED NEW ISSUES - 2002 REVIEW NEW OR UNRESOLVED ISSUESEstablish conduit for consultationbetween all stakeholders andgovernment agenciesEnsure comprehensive consultation withall sections of the community as part ofmajor planning proposals within the ParkPerceived need for Council to develop anoverall Open Space policy to achieve consistentmanagement across all Council owned and managedopen spaceSome areas have sand deposits building up on pathsand footpathsTraffic strategy needs to be in placeBoating strategy needs to be in placePine Park is deteriorating and in particularneed of attention (S)Amenities and ServicesNeed to address existing managementand maintenance issues which affectrecreational amenityEstablish a strategic and coordinatedapproach to the management of the ParkQuestions over management of garbage bins andfrequency of being emptiedNo recycle bins available on site andgarbage bins not close to where peoplepicnic (S)Garbage bins not emptied frequentlyenough (S)Maintenance after large functions isconsidered inadequate - litter continues tobe a problem (S)Consider sustainable practice by theplacement of water bubblers that enablerefilling of water bottles to help reduceplastic bottle waste (S)(S) identifies issues raised by stakeholders during consultationclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201077

Appendicesappendix 3 - COMMUNITY INFORMATION SESSION ATTENDANCE LISTSThe following lists are the attendees to the two Community Information Sessions held onthe Saturday 28th November, 2009 at the Ramsgate Life Saving Club and Thursday 3rdDecember, 2009 at the Novotel Hotel, Brighton Le Sands. Contact details have been removedto maintain the attendees privacy.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201079

clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201081

clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201082

This page has been left blank intentionallyclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201085

Appendicesappendix 4 - NORTH COOK PARK LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLANIn conjunction with the Cook Park Plan of Management, a Landscape Concept Plan wasprepared for the area of the Park north of Bestic Street, Kyeemagh. Almost half of thisarea is the site of infrastructure works relating to the future desalination plant and as suchhas been closed to the public for the duration of these works.The approved Development Application for the infrastructure works requires SydneyWater or their agents, the Water Delivery Alliance to, as a minimum, return the Park to itsprevious condition which includes planting, dune restoration and path re-establishment.The Landscape Concept Plan overleaf has been prepared to act as a design guidelinefor first stage landscape works in the Park and act as a further guideline for landscapeworks incorporating a variety of terrestrial and maritime recreational activities and services.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201086

This page has been left blank intentionallyclouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201088

clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201091

Appendicesappendix 6 - Summary of submissions following publicexhibitionIn this section the issues raised in all of the submissions received during and followingthe public exhibition of the Plan have been summarised in the table format.The table identifies the general topic, the nature of the issue raised, the numbers of timesmentioned and the numbers of responses in support or disagreement with the proposal.The ‘Response’ column identifies whether the issue was addressed in the final Plan oris a matter that the Plan cannot cover or which can be addressed in later design andplanning stages.clouston associates • landscape architects • urban designers • landscape planners JUNE 201092

Date: 12.10.2010 Cook Park Plan of Management Public Exhibition SummeryCOMMENTS # TIMESMENTIONEDAGREE DISAGREE ResponseENJOYING THE PARK AND THE BAYGENERALProhibit the construction or addition or more shops/commercial activities from serving the park. 3 2 1 Plan addresses thisProvide more open space areas for activities (sporting/ball games/kite flying etc, particularly between Ramsgate 2 2 0 Where Masterplan Development PermitsRd & Alice St).Provide fenced enclosures around playgrounds. 0 Design IssueReduce the height of fences and widen access points to beaches/foreshore by 3 metres. 2 2 0 Addressed in planPICNICKINGMake picnic shelters wheelchair (universally) accessible. 1 1 0 Plan Addresses AccessProvide more modern playground equipment and shade structures in Cook Park. 1 1 0 Plan addresses thisProvide new BBQ facilities and designated picnic areas in Cook Park. 1 1 0 Plan addresses thisRemove the paved tar area between Alice Street and Sandringham Streets and replace with grassed parklandand put in picnic shelter sheds.SWIMMINGOld technology swimming enclosure to be dismantled and replaced with ocean bath construction; and walkwayaround bathing facility at existing site in front of Le Sands Pavilion. (Similar at Ramsgate Beach).1 1 0 Plan addresses this1 1 0 For review in design development phaseConcrete construction ocean baths type swimming enclosure at Ramsgate Beach. Support beach front amenityimprovements in Cook Park Ramsgate Beach. Doyles restaurant Watsons Bay type development in Cook Parkand Peta Depena Reserve.1 1 0 No change requiredProvide a new rock pool at Dolls Point. 1 1 0 No changeFISHINGResolve walkway obstruction resulting from 'fishing activities' on Carruthers Drive, Dolls Point. 1 1 0 Design DevelopmentProvide fish cleaning stations and dedicated fishing structures. 2 1 1 Problem of maintenanceEncourage fishing activities, particularly from Lady Robinson's beach. 2 2 0 Opportunity existsBOATINGIntroduce designated areas for jetski activities away from swimmers and beach-goers (particularly when1 1 0 Management issue addressed by planlaunching and landing).Develop a large scale marina (and pier) at Brighton-Le-Sands. 4 0 4 Not generally supportedProvide more boat launching ramps. 4 4 0 Plan addressesProvide short-term mooring facilities for boats inside the mouth of the Cook River. 1 0 1 Plan addressesWINDSURFING AND KITE BOARDINGDesignate Ramsgate Beach as the formal location for windsurfing and other water based activities in Cook Park. 11 0Plan addresses eventProvide multi-purpose facilities capable of hosting National/State/International windsurfing events. 11 0Management issue with LPMA/councilProvide storage facilities by modifying existing toilet facilities and toilet blocks. 1 1 0 Plan addressesModify the metal fence along the eastern/beach side of the footpath at Ramsgate beach to enable better access. 11 0Plan addressesProvide windsurf/kiteboard access from the Scarborough Street car park. 1 1 0 Access available02-023F:\01_NS PROJECTS\NS1075_COOK PARK POM\05_STATUTORY_STAKEHOLDER\EXHIBITION PERIOD FEEDBACK\NS1075_SUMMARY TABLE_100528 1

Date: 12.10.2010 Cook Park Plan of Management Public Exhibition SummeryCOMMENTS # TIMESMENTIONEDAGREE DISAGREE ResponseGETTING TO AND FROM THE PARKGENERAL COMMENTSRe-instate (or rather complete) previous 12 year old strategy to "undertake a comprehensive traffic and parkingmanagement study for Brighton-Le-Sands to 'identify demand for car parking' and 'alternative locations for carparks away from Cook Park'.2 2 0 Council and LPMA to review planaddresses principlePUBLIC TRANSPORTProvide bays for the bus to stop between President Avenue and Ramsgate Road and correspond these withpedestrian crossings.Provide shuttle buses from Council property (e.g. from the Rockdale commuter car park; the Bryant St Councilcar park and the Police Boys Club near West Botany Street) to reduce vehicles needing to park at Brighton andalong the Cook Park area.1 1 0 Part of transport plan no change1 1 0 Council to reviewCARS AND PARKINGProvide additional traffic lights to slow traffic. 2 1 1 RTA consulted and reviewingImprove safety exiting the wharf at Dolls Point.Improve traffic problems caused by parking near Bay Street 1 1 0 Outside ParkIntroduce paid 'ticket' parking system (pay and display), but exempt local residents. 3 3 0 For council/LPMAInstall median strip from Ramsgate Rd to Alice St, & Alice St to Sandringham St. 1 1 0 RTA to consider, not in parkInstall 3 "No Stopping " signs at Sandringham Street (near Council gate). 1 1 0 Council action as part of Sandrington St.ReviewInstall "No Parking or stopping in front of this gate at anytime " signage on gates at Sandringham St;1 1 0 Council action as part of Sandrington St.Sandringham Council and Carruthers Drive.ReviewInstall "No through road " sign at the Sandringham Street Gate. 1 1 0 Council action as part of Sandrington St.ReviewAnti-social behaviour still prevalent in Vanston Parade/Lena Street area. Complete design review of area2 2 0 Part of design plan suggested in the planrecommended.Install bollards near Council gate at Sandringham Street to stop cars from driving over the footpath into1 1 0 Part of design plan suggested in the planSandringham Street.Install bollards near to prevent cars gaining access to Carruthers Drive from Sandringham Street (over the1 1 0footpath).Prevent dangerous and/or illegal parking in the grass area. 1 1 0 Part of design plan suggested in the planDo not provide additional car parks in Cook Park. 1 1 0 Addressed in planConstruct car park at southern end of existing boardwalk at Brighton-Le-Sands to President Avenue. 1 1 0 Part of car park reviewProhibit cars from parking in green spaces. 1 1 0 Part of car park reviewRe-view the design/layout for the large car park south towards Ramsgate. 1 1 0 Part of car park reviewConsider 'deceleration' lanes into the car parking areas accessed from The Grand Parade. 1 1 0 RTA/council reviewingInstall mirrors to assist blind spots. 1 1 0 Detail DesignOpen Carruthers Street for parking. 1 1 0 Part of car parking review02-023F:\01_NS PROJECTS\NS1075_COOK PARK POM\05_STATUTORY_STAKEHOLDER\EXHIBITION PERIOD FEEDBACK\NS1075_SUMMARY TABLE_100528 2

Date: 12.10.2010 Cook Park Plan of Management Public Exhibition SummeryCOMMENTS # TIMESMENTIONEDAGREE DISAGREE ResponseGETTING TO AND FROM THE PARK (continued…)Review benefits of road spikes in Carruthers Road. 1 1 0 Part of car parking reviewMake Vanston parade (and Lena) a one-way thoroughfare, but make an exit for residents on SandringhamEstate and Lena Street.2 2 0 Plan identifies need for wholesale review ofthis areaInstall a barrier (removable bollard/gate) at Vanston Parade and Lena Street car park entrances to prohibitaccess at night time.5 5 0 Plan identifies need for wholesale review ofthis areaCYCLINGProvide cyclist pinch points between St George Sailing Club to Georges River Sailing Club. 1 1 0 Plan addresses need for cycle path reviewCycle paths through carparks to be separated. 2 2 0 Plan promotes thisResolve cyclist/pedestrian access across Canal Bridge. 1 1 0 Part of wider reviewAllow for two types of cyclists, the "recreational" cyclist and the "commuter". 1 1 0 Part of wider reviewSpeed humps a challenge/obstacle to mountain bikes. Resolve. 1 1 0 Part of wider reviewSignage needed to warn cyclists of "sand" both at Monterey and Sandringham. 1 1 0 Part of wider reviewProvide bells/horns to cyclists as part of a protection campaign. 1 1 0 Management issue as part of reviewProvide a dedicated cycleway along Vanston Parade. 2 2 0 Plan addresses thisWiden or duplicate the bridge over the creek near Peter Depena to accommodate cycleway. 2 2 0 Part of cycle path reviewWALKINGProvide pedestrian pinch points between St George Sailing Club to Georges River Sailing Club. 1 1 0 Part of cycle reviewSeparate pedestrian paths throughout carparks. 2 2 0 Part of cycle reviewIncrease number of pedestrian crossings at Ramsgate Road & Barton Street. 3 1 2 RTA reviewing crossingsImprove both pedestrian and wheelchair access across Grand Parade. 4 4 0 RTA reviewing crossingsImprove universal access routes to the Beach. 1 1 0 Plan addresses thisProvide a wheelchair (universally) accessible boardwalk to the waters edge. 1 1 0 Longer term optionSeparate pedestrian paths from cycleways. 7 7 0 Part of cylce reviewSeparate fishing activities from paths (Introduce fishing designated areas). 2 2 0 Part of cylce reviewProvide Pedestrian bridges/overpassess/tunnels 2 2 0 Tunnels problematicProvide pedestrian crossings between Bestic and Bay Streets; and between Presidents Avenue and Ramsgate Road (at Banks Street).1 1 0 Supported in traffic/pedestrian review02-023F:\01_NS PROJECTS\NS1075_COOK PARK POM\05_STATUTORY_STAKEHOLDER\EXHIBITION PERIOD FEEDBACK\NS1075_SUMMARY TABLE_100528 3

Date: 12.10.2010 Cook Park Plan of Management Public Exhibition SummeryCOMMENTS # TIMESMENTIONEDAGREE DISAGREE ResponseCONSERVING THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, HERITAGE AND CHARACTERABORIGINAL AND NON-ABORIGINAL HERITAGEProhibit demolition of "Le Beach Hut" due to its 1950's local heritage value. 1 1 0 Subject to heritage reviewProvide signage (in different languages) to indicate places of significance (flora/fauna/indigenous/historical)throughout Cook Park itself.3 3 0 Detail in signage developmentProvide interpretive signage highlighting what's across the bay in terms of social, economic, cultural,environmental values e.g. Botany Bay National Park at North and South Head; Towra Point Nature Reserve andaquatic reserves at Towra Point and Cape (i.e. particulary from the viewing deck at the eastern end of PeterDepena Reserve where there are existing binoculars but no signage)2 2 0 Plan supports this alreadyOppose war memorial in Pine Park. Replace with aquatic facilities and restaurants and associated supervisedparking.1 1 0 Subject to council/LPMA consultationNATURAL HERITAGE & ENVIRONMENTInstall tree protection measures around Fig tree at Sandringham Baths. 1 1 0 Detail designProvide "migratory bird" signage at Scotts Park. 1 1 0 Detail designConservation of "wetlands" to retain existing (migratory) birdlife. 3 3 0 Plan supports thisWetland or dune revegetation should use only native plant species. 2 2 0 Plan supports thisRevegetation heights to not obscure resident views to the bay. 1 1 0 Supported if no impact on dunesConcentrate dune conservation/revegetation on the foreshore south of Brighton (as opposed to north of Brightonwhere dune system is relatively narrow).1 1 0Continue dune conservation to the beachfront at Teralba Road and Bank Street. 1 1 0Treat algae in ponds particularly at Scarborough Park wetlands. 1 1 0 Management issueProvide barriers to prevent vehicle access to wetlands. 1 1 0 Design resolutionReplace all dead/dying trees/vegetation in the area with native vegetation. 1 1 0 Part of revegetationAddress Indian Myna Bird infestation. 1 1 0 Management strategyRetain the 50's and 60's heritage style of the area. 2 2 0 Plan supports all heritage conservationCHARACTERApply a 'retro' colour scheme to any new structures in Cook Park (e.g. diamonds and angles) to match theheritage style of the area.1 1 0 Design resolution issue02-023F:\01_NS PROJECTS\NS1075_COOK PARK POM\05_STATUTORY_STAKEHOLDER\EXHIBITION PERIOD FEEDBACK\NS1075_SUMMARY TABLE_100528 4

Date: 12.10.2010 Cook Park Plan of Management Public Exhibition SummeryCOMMENTS # TIMESMENTIONEDAGREE DISAGREE ResponseLOOKING AFTER THE PARK AND BUILDINGSGENERALIncrease the number of skilled Park Rangers, and patrols in the Cook Park area during high use times. 4 4 Plan suppports/addresses thisCouncillors need to take more responsibility for issues. 1 1 Not in scope of this planCouncillors need to hear/acknowledge public complaints. 1 1 Not in scope of this planRevenue from leased and licensed premises should be re-directed to funding strategies that deliver benefits to 1 1 Plan supports thisbroader users of Cook Park.Private BBQ's should be restricted to gas only. 1 1 Management issueLEASED AND LICENSED PREMISESTOILETSConstruct new/additional toilet facilities throughout Cook Park. 3 3 Plan addresses thisEnsure all toilet blocks are accessible by wheelchair. 1 1 Plan supports universal accessEnsure all toilet blocks are accessible without the need for a key. 1 1 Plan supports universal accessUpgrade Toilet block at Sandringham Baths to ensure adequate floor treatment installed can withstand sand andconstant moisture.3 3 Detail design and ManagementUpgrade Toilet Block facing South onto Riverside Drive. 1 1 Part of next design phaseImprove the quality and regularity of cleaning to Toilet Blocks. 2 2 Management issueProvide more dressing sheds/shower blocks (similar to the ones that were removed for the Le Sands extension). 1 1 Park of park's building reviewProvide disabled toilet at Brighton. 1 1 Plan supports disability accessProvide additional shower blocks at Brighton. 1 1 Part of next phaseRemove the unsightly 'Heritage' toilet block at the corner of Lena and Vanston Parade (entrance to Lena Street). 1 1 Part of next phaseLIGHTING02-023F:\01_NS PROJECTS\NS1075_COOK PARK POM\05_STATUTORY_STAKEHOLDER\EXHIBITION PERIOD FEEDBACK\NS1075_SUMMARY TABLE_100528 5

Date: 12.10.2010 Cook Park Plan of Management Public Exhibition SummeryCOMMENTS # TIMESMENTIONEDAGREE DISAGREE ResponseLOOKING AFTER THE PARK AND BUILDINGS (continued…)PARK AND STREET FURNITURERe-fitting of all existing taps with push-button controls to conserve water. 1 1 Pan supports water conservationWooden gazebos and seating areas along the foreshore should all be attractive but essentially uniform inappearance and design.1 1 Plan addresses design languageWASTEProvide (more) large rubbish bins (or facilities for litter) in the centre section of the park and the far northernend of the promenade for weekend rubbish overflow.Incorporate signage in a number of languages around the park and beach to enforce penalties for the improperdisposal of waste (particularly at Ramsgate Baths).Impose heavy fines for discarded waste; particularly along beach & picnic areas and at Peter Depena Reserveand Russell Ave & Malua Rd opposite Primrose House.6 4 2 Plan addresses litter management3 3 0 Part of signage/ordinance strategy5 5 0 Part of signage/ordinance strategyResolve disposal of waste retrieved by the surf rake/sand cleaner. 1 1 0 To be reviewed by councilMacdonalds/KFC/Pizza Hut to sponsor cleanup for free advertising on vehicles. 1 1 0 LMPA/council to considerResolve "nappies" in Georges River carpark on Sundays. 1 1 0 Management IssueProvide "dog waste bags and dispensers". 1 1 0 Management IssueProvide cleaners for the Sandringham Baths (Vanstone Parade) section where surf rake cannot access. 1 1 0 Management IssueRemove the rubbish that is collected in nets throughout the wetland area. 1 1 0 Management IssueResolve smell from Rockdale Waste and Management Depot. 1 1 0 Management IssueFACILITIES & INFRASTRUCTURERepair tear in the shark nets at Ramsgate Baths. 1 1 Management issueRetain existing (and well used) showers at Sandringham Baths. 2 2 Paln supports retentionProvide designated dog friendly/off-leash areas and signposts indicating times of use for the beach area 3 3 Plan addresses this issueWest of the Bado-Berong Creek.Remove stormwater outlet next to Ramsgate Baths. 2 2 Water quality reviewAmend steep ramp/footpath at Ramsgate Beach. 1 1 Plan addresses accessProvide shark warning signage. 1 1 Management issueConstruct a new community facility and restaurant complex at Ramsgate Beach to include the extention of the carpark.1 1 Plan does not support significant newfacilitiesProvide more Kiosks across the park. 1 1 Reveiw as part of leases/licensesReview stormwater outlets and install GTS. 1 1 Water quality reviewProhibit use of the boardwalk at Brighton-Le-Sands from outdoor dining. Plan supports clear public access zonesVANDALISM & GRAFFITICOMMENTS # TIMESMENTIONEDAGREE DISAGREE Response02-023F:\01_NS PROJECTS\NS1075_COOK PARK POM\05_STATUTORY_STAKEHOLDER\EXHIBITION PERIOD FEEDBACK\NS1075_SUMMARY TABLE_100528 6

Date: 12.10.2010 Cook Park Plan of Management Public Exhibition SummeryGENERAL COMMENTS REGARDING PLANCore funding to support implementation not identified. Broad capital estimates should be identified 1 1 Beyond the scope of the POMPOM to be more specific about the link between time-frames (in years) and priority ratings (i.e. high/medium/low)of actions.1 1 LPMA require this structure02-023F:\01_NS PROJECTS\NS1075_COOK PARK POM\05_STATUTORY_STAKEHOLDER\EXHIBITION PERIOD FEEDBACK\NS1075_SUMMARY TABLE_100528 7