Shook Kelley - Town of Londonderry

Submitted toMr. Andre L. Garron, AICPCommunity Development DepartmentThe Town of Londonderry268B Mammoth RoadLondonderry, NH 03053Proposal for Planning andEngineering Review ServicesWoodmont CommonsPlanned Unit DevelopmentLondonderry, NHJanuary 04, 2012Submitted ByIn Conjunction With

Table of ContentsA. Cover Letter Pg 4B. Executive Summary Pg 5C. Team Overview Pg 9D. Qualifications & Experience Pg 12E. Outline of Services Pg 40F. Team Organizational Chart Pg 42G. Summary Matrix Pg 43H. AppendicesPersonnel Resumes Pg 44Fees For Services Pg 83

2151 Hawkins StreetSuite 400Charlotte NC 28203T 704 377 0661 F 704 377 0953www.shookkelley.comCharlotte / Los Angeles04 January 2012Mr. Andre L. Garron, AICPCommunity Development DepartmentThe Town of Londonderry268B Mammoth RoadLondonderry, NH 03053RE: Woodmont Commons - Londonderry, New HampshireThe Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire Request for Proposals:Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesDear Mr. Garron,In response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the The Town of Londonderry andreferenced above, I am pleased to submit to you this Proposal for Services on behalf of ShookKelley and our consultant team. When we became aware of the Request for Proposals that youput forth, and after reviewing the scope of services involved, we immediately knew that our firmspossess the experience, the key personnel and, indeed, the fortitude to assist with guiding thePlanning and Engineering Review Services for Woodmont Commons.We believe that our experience is particularly relevant to your Project.Our firm has a long history of engagement with local communities in order to address potentiallycontentious issues, and to chart a course shared among elected officials, developers and citizens.Shook Kelley has master planned, re-positioned and branded over 30 mixed-use communities in thepast 13 years, with a combined market value in excess of $10 billion. And, we bring a process to projectsthat recognizes that each project – and indeed each collection of stakeholders – is quite different.These are but a few of the primary reasons that Shook Kelley is well-qualified to provide you with theservices you desire. To be sure, there are also the intangibles such as those that have to do with thequality of our service, and the commitment of our principals and staff. In recognition of this quality andservice, Shook Kelley was fortunate to be chosen in 2008 as Firm of the Year by the American Instituteof Architects’ North Carolina Chapter.We have attempted to be as clear and concise in the preparation of our Proposal, indeed as the RFPstipulates, and trust that we have included all pertinent information. We at Shook Kelley are excited bythe prospect of working with you on this Project. Thank you for your time and consideration.Respectfully,Shook Kelley Inc. d/b/a Shook KelleyCharles Terry Shook, FAIAPrincipalc. Michael Dunning Shook KelleyBrenda Lally Shook Kelley

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesB. Executive SummaryThe Consultant Team, led by Shook Kelley, has national and international experience in working withdevelopers to create land use proposals which we then champion through the entitlement process.We have served on the opposite side as well, working in various capacities with municipalities ontheir behalf to adjudicate proposals proffered by applicants. To be sure, the process of project andland use entitlement is usually an extremely long and complex one. The timeframe from inceptionto entitlement can be measured in terms of years, and the timeframe from inception to the actualcompletion of a project can sometimes take a decade or more. We find that there are very fewprofessional consultants available to developers and/or municipalities that truly understand, havepatience with and can navigate the entitlement process for the mutual benefit of all concerned.This is particularly true for large scale mixed-use projects, and particularly so for those that havea large retail component, as does Woodmont Commons.We are proud to have a very strong record of successful project entitlements and built projects.We are steeped in design processes that value the input of all stakeholders and the collective effortof many. Often, we serve as arbiter’s and managers of personalities as much or more than we doas planners and urban designers. However, it is our background as architects, urban planners, brandmanagers and keen observers that prepares us to look comprehensively at complex problems (likeland use planning and entitlement), and, to craft a way to solve them.As outlined further in our Proposal, we intend to get up to speed very quickly with regard to not onlythe written language governing Planned Unit Developments in the Town of Londonderry but alsowith regard to the mindsets and opinions of all of the stakeholders. We will be a quick study when itcomes to digesting and internalizing the intent and letter of the ordinances, regulations, policies andlong range plans that are applicable and we will be equally adept at discerning the political, economic,social and historical context in which we will be working. Having experience in New England whereland-use policies and procedures are typically more stringent, we are keenly aware of the importanceof the peer review process and why the Town of Londonderry has solicited its Request for Proposal.The Role of Shook Kelley and The Consultant TeamThere are the three important areas in which Shook Kelley proposes to provide both leadership andcreative services for The Town of Londonderry. In accordance with the RFP, there are essentiallythree tasks that we would provide to you. They are:1. First and foremost, we will review the Woodmont Common’s PUD Application, and commentupon whether or not the Application has fulfilled your stated requirements for submission. This isa rather straight-forward process, and in and of itself is not one that addresses the planning, urbandesign, transportation or market issues associated with the development.2. Once the above review is completed, and the Town of Londonderry has accepted the Applicationfor Review, on behalf of the Town Shook Kelley will provide an encompassing review of the designand technical issues associated with the project. This review will be have two interlockingcomponents. On the one hand, Shook Kelley and the consultant team will utilize in depth ofexperience and familiarity with the range of planning, design, technical and market-based issues tocomment upon the merits of the proposal, in a “best practices” approach, and to make suggestionsthat might improve the proposal for the mutual benefit of all concerned. On the other, the team willreview the proposed development regarding relevant laws, regulations, and policies at both the local,state and federal level and offer an opinion as to whether the proposed development is in generalcompliance, and to offer suggestions as to how the development may be either modified at the levelof the submission, or how implementation of the proposed plan should address certain issues ifapproved. This review shall be in the form of a written document.5 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

3. Both of the above tasks are defined in nature, leading to a specific outcome, and are ones whereShook Kelley and the consultant team can bracket its cost for services. Obviously, as contemplatedby the RFP, there will be numerous other activities that the Town will wish to engage the selectedconsultant team. These activities include, but are not limited to, public meetings, consulting to clarify/expand our opinions rendered, meetings including the Applicant, responses to those that theApplicant may provide and a host of others geared toward providing a clear understanding of theissues in advance of approval(s). By definition, the time involvement for these and other unnamedactivities is unknowable at this time.A more detailed exploration of the above may be found in Section E. Outline of Services in thisproposal.The Culture, Values and Process of Shook KelleyShook Kelley employs an open and engaging community assessment and planning process.As early as the late 1970s, Terry Shook employed market study techniques and planning strategiesin master planning of the Charleston Visitor Reception/Transportation Center within the City of Charleston,S.C., a landmark project that received multiple awards, including an Honor Award from the NationalEndowment of the Humanities. Similar early techniques were employed in Greenville, S.C. for assessingand planning the famous Greenville Greenway and Reedy River Falls - arguably one of the mostimportant public space developments in the United States.At Shook Kelley, the community assessment process has evolved to encompass not only traditionalmarket surveys but a creative public visioning process. This kind of process, in fact, led to thecreation of Charlotte’s Historic South End District, where developer-driven projects responded toa forward-looking market assessment.We at Shook Kelley believe that our creativity and effectiveness are exemplified by the following:We Establish Clear Roles and ResponsibilitiesThe key is to carefully organize talent inside and outside the assessment and planning team. Problemsthat arise in public-private planning partnerships most often result from just a few organizationalmistakes made at the very beginning. The first is ambiguous definition of who does what and when.This becomes obvious after the fact - once things are off track and multiple professionals havedropped the ball. Not everyone needs to be engaged at every moment, but every player must havea clear sense of what is expected. As important, is the identification of what we refer to as “ProcessPartners,” those people or entities in the community, within the Consultant Team or other stakeholdersthat can add skills and value to the Project. This can include providing useful design and developmentinformation; removing barriers or expediting critical decision and approval points.Ironically, our experience in identifying and managing a professional planning team and working withstrong Process Partners is much like that of a political campaign.We Aggressively Seek The Very Best IdeasIn a community venture, many parties have information and new ideas for successful development.Large-scaled, urban mixed-use projects are not formulaic, whether at the program development stageor in terms of design issues. This is why the Principal in Charge of planning needs to function as a“sponge.” Observations from individuals or groups that often come out of left field may have thepower to enhance a project - if followed. Open and inquisitive minds, along with the ability toassimilate information and move on, are basic team requirements. We state this need for realflexibility in the beginning of every public assessment and planning process because it’s the keyto effectiveness. Everyone involved needs to realize this is critical because engaging the public inplanning can be a bit like handling dynamite. Reacting inflexibly and imposing design will surely causea blow-up or perhaps even complete failure. Unlike many of our peers, we are not of the opinion thatuncharted, open-ended public sessions are in anyone’s best interest - even that of the public, who willJanuary 4, 2012 6

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review Servicesbe the ultimate benefactor of a well-conceived, planned, designed and developed project. Unfocusedand open-ended exercises can often frustrate a community, leading to “stakeholder and citizenfatigue” and creating something less than good will as an unintended consequence.Shook Kelley will work to establish proper procedures, protocols, and venues that will constitute theformal exchanges with the stakeholders, the community, within the Consultant Team and with TheTown of Londonderry.We Construct and Help Judge Imaginative and Innovative Alternative Futures and IdeasCommunity design is more than a “take it or leave it” proposition. While many professionals practiceas though this proposition were true, clients, communities and new residents all want and deserveas many choices as possible. With complex projects, there are often many proper planning and designresponses that meet the intent of the program. The mere fact that there are multiple programelements means that there are multiple options that meet the fundamentals of the program, andyet may yield significantly different responses as to development costs and phasing. Sometimes,important economic considerations such as Tax Increment Financing (TIF), Synthetic TIF, New MarketTax Credits, operating costs and other factors may influence approach and direction. These are but afew of the factors, of course. Understanding this complex “soup” of options and alternatives—indesign, management and operation - is a skill as critical to success as planning and aesthetic mastery.Shook Kelley takes an “eyes wide open” approach to community assessments and master planning.We employ financial modeling concepts that define highly sensitive and subtle market opportunities,such as powerful “branding” considerations.We Establish BrandEffective design is about more than good luck.Rarely does one think of real estate as being a brand, say, in the same sense that Nike, Apple,BMW and, yes, Fort Monroe are brands. In fact, real estate has, on occasion, risen to the level ofan enduring brand of secure and increasing economic value. When it does, it is usually a result of aseries of unconscious factors that fall under the general category of “luck.”But what if one consciously approached real estate development as brand creation, with thesame rigorous research and insight demanded by consumer products development? Within thatframework of product branding, aesthetic decisions are not based upon whim or individual taste,but upon an in-depth understanding of the values and aspirations of the marketplace. A hugerange of design decisions, particularly about how public space is shaped, formed and detailed,needs to be based upon real, observed human perception and specific desired outcomes, notsimply current aesthetics and fashion. The success of true community development partnershipswith the surrounding communities for private investments and participation can be stronglyinfluenced by these subtle, often subliminal, design considerations.Brands are very important to Shook Kelley and constitute an important dimension of our business.While many architects use terms like “brand” as if they describe simply a sticker to be applied—we are actually brand developers and managers for some the world’s most noteworthy: Harley-Davidson, Kraft Foods, SeaWorld, Cadbury-Schweppes and dozens of successful restaurants, smallbusinesses and, yes, great places.At the core of our urban practice lie the skills and attitudes required to excel in the most competitiveof all businesses: the cut-throat and competitive world of business branding. In fact, our attraction tothis fine-edged discipline is a natural growth of our passion for great ideas, precision and refinementin design and the very most effective forms of communication.7 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

We Focus On CommunicationsSkillfully coordinating the planning team, the Process Partners, civic leaders and relationships with thegeneral public is critical to success.Simply put, we will encourage the development among the Consultant Team a formalized protocol forsharing and documenting information. This process is characterized as being deep in content,but narrow in scope. With the public stakeholders, the sharing of information may be just theopposite, depending upon the audience and timing. Baseline tools, such as a website and a BrandBook, are essential elements of the public communication program. Websites being the firstcommunication effort, gain in strength and grow over time, giving out information on an as-requiredbasis. They also are great harvesters of information, opinions and beliefs from the general public.Alternative media, such as Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and other social networking tools may beemployed. The Brand Book is a specific offering that will be developed only at the end of the masterplanning process in order to document the good work produced by the team and the ProcessPartners for the public and other officials having an interest in or jurisdiction over the Project.Much of Shook Kelley’s practice is based upon branding and communication design. This reflects ourbelief that perception can become reality, and hopefully towards transforming the world for the better.We Demand A Collaborative ApproachShook Kelley and its team of consultants have worked together variously on numerous projects.Because of our familiarity with each other, we have an easy working relationship that facilitates bettercommunication. We at Shook Kelley believe that useful, functional places cannot be designed in avacuum. The people for whom we design buildings as well as create master plans for have a uniqueperspective regarding the needs for a facility or a place. It is fundamental that we—as architects, andas planners—and you, as managers, tap into the reservoir of knowledge and perception if we are tocreate places that contribute to– rather than simply contain– the process.Without question, the most straightforward and successful way to integrate this knowledge intodesign is through participatory programming, planning and design processes. The reality is thatsuccessful participatory design is easier said than done. In fact, only a small handful of firms canhonestly claim to integrate client participation into design. Since each project can vary, the extentand nature of the exercises will vary with the uniqueness of the program and the goals for the project.Where the program is very defined and the delivery model standard, participatory exercises may bevery limited. However, if the goal is to respond to a “break-the-mold” model, the techniques canbe both extensive and diverse.January 4, 2012 8

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesC. Team OverviewBelow, you will find brief biographies of the following members of the Consultant Team we proposefor this Project. Personnel resumes and relative work experience are included in the AppendicesSection of this RFP.Shook Kelley, Inc.Greenman Pedersen, Inc.Cushman & WakefieldMaster Planning, Urban DesignCivil Engineering, Traffic Engineering, Transportation PlanningRetail ConsultingShook Kelley, Inc.Master Planning, Urban Designwww.shookkelley.comShook Kelley, Inc. d/b/a Shook Kelley is a multi-disciplinary firm with offices in Charlotte, NorthCarolina and Los Angeles, California. Our company provides an array of creative services, rangingfrom master planning and urban design to architecture, interior design and brand development/communication services. It is within our Charlotte headquarters that our architectural, masterplanning, urban design and mixed-use practice resides. This practice is led by Terry Shook, FAIA,and supported by five other principals of the firm: Michael Dunning, AIA, LEED AP; Tom Goodwin,AIA; Greg Long, AIA, LEED AP BD+C; Frank Quattrocchi, LEED AP; and Stan Rostas, AIA, IIDA,LEED AP BD+C.The architectural, master planning and urban design practice of the firm is a direct reflection of thevalues, experiences and accomplishments of Terry Shook over his 30-year professional career.Beginning with a 1975 design workshop that transformed Charlotte’s inner-city, Fourth Wardneighborhood from a haven for drugs and prostitution into one of the city’s most notable addresses,Shook has focused his academic preparation, professional career and volunteer efforts uponrestoring existing communities and designing new ones. He is a regular contributor to national-levelprograms for the Urban Land Institute, the International Council of Shopping Centers, the Congressfor the New Urbanism, the International Downtown Association and The Seaside Institute. The firm’slatest project, the redevelopment of Charlotte’s former, low-income housing project of Double Oaks,represents the state-of-the-art in the planning and design of mixed-use and mixed-income inner citycommunities for the 21st century.As a result of Terry Shook’s passion and leadership, Shook Kelley is in the vanguard of communityplanning according to neo-traditional design principles. The firm can claim a variety of notableprofessional commissions in the service of making new urban mixed-use communities, a number ofrepeat clients, and a range of regional and national awards. Our most recent award is one that we aremost proud of: The American Institute of Architects’ North Carolina Chapter bestowed it’s FIRM OFTHE YEAR award to Shook Kelley in 2008. The award is given to a firm that has consistentlyproduced quality architecture with a verifiable level of client satisfaction for a prolonged period oftime. Only one firm is selected each year from among many qualified nominees, making this thehighest honor the Chapter can bestow upon a firm. This recognition would not have occurredwithout the partnerships we have been able to form with our clients and, in many cases, citizens atlarge, in the joint pursuit of new places in the service of mankind.Shook Kelley has a staff that comes from a variety of fields, ranging from business, science anddesign. Over the past 19 years, the firm has garnered a national and international reputation forpioneering a new field of study and consulting services that merges seemingly disparate disciplinessuch as brand strategy, architecture, urban planning, human behavior, consumer psychology andcommunication design into one integrated approach we call Perception Design. This process seeks9 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

to better understand how our environment affects, shapes and influences behavior. Instead of justdeveloping clever environmental solutions in search of a problem, we start first by understanding, inelaborate detail, the behavior of the people that are supposed to inhabit a certain place. We want toknow things like precisely how many times a certain audience thinks about a place, why they thinkof this place, what this place means to them and their lives, what other alternative places they mightthink about and, most importantly, how they use, feel, act and behave in this place. Put simply, wewant to know more about the emotional relationship and bond people have may have with a place,as well as how to keep that relationship alive and vibrant for years to come.Although we utilize a variety of interview and survey techniques, our most profound insights comefrom just merely observing, watching, listening and talking to users and organizations in a less formalstructure. We have an extensive and well-refined observational research process and interviewingstyle that is non-invasive, yet yields significant breakthrough insights in terms of perceptionmanagement issues. Our brand research, brand discovery and brand strategy capabilities havebeen tested, influenced, honed and strengthened by our many years of working with successfulconsumer brand entities such as Whole Foods, Harley-Davidson, Coca-Cola, Kraft, Cadbury, Bankof America and many other well-known brands.Over the years, Shook Kelley has continually perfected its Perception Design process by utilizing acase study approach that measures a broad range of criteria such as financial results, competitivedifferentiation, consumer loyalty (frequency of visits, engagement times), body language and, yes,physical smiles. Many years of studying how humans relate to brands and behave in places hasallowed us to be able to provide our clients with the necessary tools, confidence and intuitive logicto make better decisions affecting development decisions, the quality of their places, and the futuredirection of their place brands. More importantly, our process has provided clients with the ability toincrease the awareness, attraction, meaning and potential reach of their place brands.Charles Terry Shook, FAIAJames M. Dunning, AIA, LEED APThomas S. Goodwin, AIAJeffrey CamilloPrincipal in ChargeLead PrincipalUrban Design & PlanningCommunication GraphicsGreenman-Pedersen, Inc.Civil Engineering, Traffic Engineering Transportation Planningwww.gpinet.comGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. (GPI) is a consulting engineering, planning, survey, mapping, andconstruction management and inspection firm that specializes in the innovative development,design and construction of infrastructure and building systems. Originally founded by A. BeecherGreenman and Herbert M. Pedersen, GPI has grown from a two-person endeavor to a consultingfirm included among ENR’s top 100 national design firms. GPI provides services to a wide varietyof government agencies, municipalities, institutions, industries, architects and developers. Theirlong-lasting relationships with their clients can be attributed to the talented, responsive, serviceorientedprofessionals employed throughout the GPI organization. It is their people that set theirfirm apart from other consultants and is what truly makes this company unique. GPI takes pridein the many projects they have successfully completed and enjoy the challenge of new and difficultengineering issues requiring innovative, yet practical, cost- effective solutions.Jason Plourde, PE Project DirectorJohn W. Diaz, PE, PTOE V.P./Technical AdvisorJoseph Johnson, PE, PTOE Lead Traffic EngineerHeather Monticup, PE - Transporation EngineerGeoff Howie, PE - Lead Civil EngineerJim Noyes - Civil EngineerJanuary 4, 2012 10

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesCushman & WakefieldRetail Consultingwww.cushwake.comJ. Clydesdale Cushman and Bernard Wakefield founded Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. (C&W) as aproperty management company in New York City in 1917. C&W has consistently expanded itsservices and geographic reach for the past 88 years. Today, C&W is the world’s largest privatelyheld real estate services firm. The firm represents multinational corporations, pension funds, REITs,developers, entrepreneurs, government entities, nonprofits, small and mid-size companies, andfinancial institutions worldwide. As the market leader in each core business, C&W integrates eacharea of expertise effecting knowledge transfer and real-time communications, ensuring the mostcomprehensive and strategic portfolio approach. With 231 worldwide offices in 58 countries andmore than 11,000 employees, no other firm has the reach and experience of C&W.C&W’s current strategic direction focuses on globalization, technological advancement, and theconstant improvement of customer service. As a private firm, C&W is capable of anticipating changein the corporate real estate markets while maintaining the flexibility and agility to adjust to changingconditions without the concerns inherent in being responsive to the public financial markets. C&W’swide presence enables us to provide service globally with sensitivity to local market conditions andcustoms. C&W can serve clients with real estate needs in a single market as well as those withexpansive national or international real estate portfolios. In all markets, C&W’s resources support afull complement of services.Cushman & Wakefield Global CoverageC&W’s broad presence gives us a deep understanding of local real estate markets throughout theworld. C&W provides the same level of service throughout the globe with sensitivity to local marketconditions and customs C&W can serve clients with real estate needs in a single market as well asthose with expansive national or international real estate portfolios. Cushman & Wakefield ServiceLines C&W’s property type expertise includes office, industrial, retail, multi-family, hotels and resorts,and specialty types. Core services include:– Capital Markets – Offers equity, debt, investment banking, and valuation services to optimizethe most creative and tax-advantaged capital alternatives.– Brokerage Global Services – Creates value, provides real estate counseling services,identifies opportunities, and negotiates transactions.– Client Solutions – Designs a real estate platform that enhances performance and costsavings by exploring effective workplace and operating environments, customer access, andprocurement efficiency.– Global Consulting – Conducts relevant analysis to uncover the critical knowledge needed toalign a real estate portfolio with business goals.C&W is able to create, optimize, and protect business value because of the depth of knowledgewithin the firm and the individual knowledge, expertise, and broad experience of each professional.Every C&W service team excels in its specialization, which is demonstrated by concrete results andrepeat business. C&W’s vast array of services can be accessed directly for specific requirements orthey can be strategically assembled to fit a client’s needs. Our mutually supportive services cover thefull spectrum of real estate requirements.Matt WinnCharles Warren, PhDJalna Silverstein11 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

D. Qualifications & ExperienceProfileShook Kelley, Inc. d/b/a Shook Kelley is a multi-disciplinary firm with offices in Charlotte, North Carolina and Los Angeles, California.Our company provides an array of creative services, ranging from master planning and urban design to architecture, interior designand brand development/ communication services. It is within our Charlotte headquarters that our architectural, master planning, urbandesign and mixed-use practice resides. This practice is led by Terry Shook, FAIA, and supported by five other principals of the firm:Michael Dunning, AIA, LEED AP; Tom Goodwin, AIA; Greg Long, AIA, LEED AP BD+C; Frank Quattrocchi, LEED AP; and Stan Rostas,AIA, IIDA, LEED AP BD+C.The architectural, master planning and urban design practice of the firm is a direct reflection of the values, experiences andaccomplishments of Terry Shook over his 30-year professional career. Beginning with a 1975 design workshop that transformedCharlotte’s inner-city, Fourth Ward neighborhood from a haven for drugs and prostitution into one of the city’s most notableaddresses, Shook has focused his academic preparation, professional career and volunteer efforts upon restoring existingcommunities and designing new ones. He is a regular contributor to national-level programs for the Urban Land Institute, theInternational Council of Shopping Centers, the Congress for the New Urbanism, the International Downtown Association and TheSeaside Institute. The firm’s latest project, the redevelopment of Charlotte’s former, low-income housing project of Double Oaks,represents the state-of-the-art in the planning and design of mixed-use and mixed-income inner city communities for the 21st century.As a result of Terry Shook’s passion and leadership, Shook Kelley is in the vanguard of community planning according toneo-traditional design principles. The firm can claim a variety of notable professional commissions in the service of making new urbanmixed-use communities, a number of repeat clients, and a range of regional and national awards. Our most recent award is one thatwe are most proud of: The American Institute of Architects’ North Carolina Chapter bestowed it’s FIRM OF THE YEAR award toShook Kelley in 2008. The award is given to a firm that has consistently produced quality architecture with a verifiable level of clientsatisfaction for a prolonged period of time. Only one firm is selected each year from among many qualified nominees, making this thehighest honor the Chapter can bestow upon a firm. This recognition would not have occurred without the partnerships we have beenable to form with our clients and, in many cases, citizens at large, in the joint pursuit of new places in the service of mankind.Shook Kelley / Office Headquarters2151 Hawkins Street, Suite 400Charlotte NC 28203-4927Tel 704-377-0661Fax 704-377-0953Shook Kelley / Los Angeles Office5735 Melrose AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90038Tel 310-659-9482Fax 310-659-9528Services for The Town of Londonderry will be performed within Shook Kelley’s Charlotte office location. Shook Kelley has additionalarchitectural and planning staff on hand in both its Charlotte and Los Angeles offices, and are available as needed for this project.Type of BusinessShook Kelley is a corporation registered and authorized to practice Architecture in the State of North Carolina.Registration number: 50631Number of registered architects: 6Other Personnel: 5Note: We have reciprocity with the licensing board for the State of Maine vis a vis the National Council of Architectural RegistrationBoards (NCARB).Professional AffiliationsAIA, CNU, ULI, IIDA, ICSC, USGBCAuthorized AgentCharles Terry Shook, FAIA, PresidentTel 704-377-0661tshook@shookkelley.comJanuary 4, 2012 12

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesPrimary Firm ProfileAs the Principal in Charge of the project, Terry Shook will bring a broad range of experience and capabilities to bear upon the effort.Below are a few the relevant qualifications and capabilities of both Terry and the firm of Shook Kelley as a whole:InternationalCouncil ofShopping Centers(ICSC)Harvard UniversityGraduate School of DesignShook teaches “New Urban andSmart Growth Retail Planning andDesign Principles” as a part of theProfessional Development Series,one of the most successful of theprogram offerings. 2011 markedbe the 13th year for the class.Shook is a:- Frequent speaker at ULI’s Placemaking Conferencefocusing upon retail, mixed-use and town centerenvironments.- Contributor to ULI groundbreaking book “Placemaking:Developing Town Centers, Main Streets and UrbanVillages”- Contributor to the “Ten Principles for DevelopingSuccessful Town Centers”- Contributor to “Creating Walkable Places: CompactMixed Use Solutions”- Frequent member of ULI’s Technical Assistance PanelsShook is a speaker at the ICSCsLeading Edge Conference, wheretrends are presented and explored.He has seerved as Co-chair for pastConferences.Consulting for Main Street retail environmentsin over 300 towns and cities.Past FMI Lectures:· Solutions for Growth:Re-Making theSupermarket Experience· Shopping In StyleOver 10,000,000 SF of “Main Street” and “Town Center”retail environments master planned.Master Planning and design of Birkdale Village, one of the most heralded and successful New Urbanist retail environments in the U.S.SERVICES FOR OVER 100RESTAURANT, SUPERMARKETAND RETAIL CONCEPTSBrand development forcompanies as diverse asKraft Foods, Nabisco,Coca-Cola, Harley Davidsonand Cadbury Schweppes.13 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.rban Designltmore ParkThe plan for Biltmore Park balances the needfor incorporation of contemporary developmentProject Experiencerequirements with the natural beauty of theland, The and plan Neo-Traditional for Biltmore Park design balances elements. the needThe plan for Biltmore Park balances the needUrbanUrbanDesignDesign2011 ICSC U.S. Designfor incorporation The plan for of Biltmore contemporary Park balances development the& Development Awardseville, NCforrequirementsincorporation need for with incorporation ofthecontemporarynatural of beauty contemporary developmentof therequirements with the natural beauty of theBiltmoreBiltmoreParkParkBiltmore Parkland, and development Neo-Traditional requirements design elements. with theICSC Innovative Design & Developmentland, and Neo-Traditional design elements.viewSILVER of a New Project (Retail projects natural beauty of the land, and Neo-Asheville, NCed in the Western Asheville, Mountains NC of North The Project, containedAWARDwithin between a 735 150,001 acre and tract, 500,000 With Traditional these principles design in elements. mind and in response tosq. ft. of total retail space)ina, Biltmore Park, represents a continuation is densely wooded, on a gently sloping terrace the mountain topography, the design of the towngant placemaking Overview in the Biltmore tradition. between a mountain and a creek. The site is plan evolved featuring elements of good towns ofloped by the Located Overview heirs of in George the Western W. Vanderbilt, Mountains of North The Project, contained within a 735 acre tract, With these principles in mind and in response toadjoined by three schools and is in closethe past while recognizing the forces conditioningenefactor of Located Carolina, architect in Biltmore Richard the Western Park, Morris represents Mountains Hunt’s a of continuation North The is densely Project, wooded, contained within a gently a 735 sloping acre terrace tract, With the mountain these principles topography, in mind the and design in response of the townCarolina, of elegant Biltmore placemaking Park, in represents the Biltmore a continuation tradition. proximity toisanbetween denselyairporta wooded,and a majormountain on and a gentlymall.a creek. slopingThe the future in order to create a unique sense ofThe site terrace is the mountain topography, the design of the towndible Biltmore House, Biltmore Park is aplan evolved featuring elements of good towns ofof Developed elegant placemaking by the heirs in of the George Biltmore W. Vanderbilt, tradition. conceptual between adjoined plan for by Biltmore a mountain three schools Park and balances place.a and creek. is in The close site is plan the past evolved while featuring recognizing elements the forces of good conditioning towns ofmixed use project providing for theDeveloped the benefactor by the of architect heirs of George Richard W. Morris Vanderbilt, the Hunt’s need for adjoined proximity incorporation by to three an airport of schools contemporaryand and a major is in mall. close Thethe past future while in order recognizing to create the a unique forces sense conditioninglopment of multi-familyofthe incredible benefactor Biltmore residential,of architect House, business Biltmore Richard Morris Park is Hunt’s aProject Teams and Disciplinesdevelopment proximity conceptual requirements to plan airport for with Biltmore and the a natural major Park balances mall. The the place. future in order to create a unique sense ofpace, and office incredible new mixed commercial Biltmore use project sites. House, providing Biltmore for Park the is aTown Planningconceptual plan for Biltmore Park balances place.new development mixed use of project multi-family providing residential, for the business beauty of the land, need and for incorporation Neo-Traditional of contemporary designMaster Project Planning Teams and Disciplinesdevelopment flex space, and of office multi-family commercial residential, sites. business elements. the development need for incorporation requirements of with contemporary the naturalProject Town Planning Teams and Disciplinesflex space, and office commercial sites.development beauty of the requirements land, and Neo-Traditional with the natural ArchitecturedesignTown Master Planningbeauty elements. of the land, and Neo-Traditional designMaster Architecture Planningelements.ArchitectureJanuary 4, 2012 14

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesProject ExperienceLEED-ND ExampleUrban DesignBiltmore Park(Neighborhood Development)Asheville, NCShook Kelley’s experience of note with LEED Certified projects is at Biltmore Park Town Square inThe plan for Biltmore Park balances the needAsheville, NC. The entire development of Biltmore Park was chosen for the LEED-ND (NeighborhoodDevelopment) pilot program and has obtained Stage for 2 Certification incorporation as a LEED of contemporary Certified Plan, the developmentfirst ofits kind in the State of North Carolina. Shook Kelley was requirements the urban designer with for the the natural entire development beauty of the aswell as the designer and/or the architect of record for land, nine of and the Neo-Traditional Phase One buildings design in the elements. development.Two buildings within the development are LEED-Certified. The Hotel above Retail building is LEED-Silverand the Office over Retail building 2B, designed by Shook Kelley, is LEED-Core and Shell-Gold.Overview One Town Square (Office/Mixed-use)Two Town Square (Office/Mixed-use)Located (Design in Architect) the Western Mountains of North (Design The Project, Architect) contained within a 735 acre tract,Carolina, Biltmore Park, represents a continuation is densely wooded, on a gently sloping terraceof elegant placemaking in the Biltmore tradition. between a mountain and a creek. The site isDeveloped by the heirs of George W. Vanderbilt, adjoined by three schools and is in closethe benefactor of architect Richard Morris Hunt’sproximity to an airport and a major mall. Theincredible Biltmore House, Biltmore Park is aconceptual plan for Biltmore Park balancesnew mixed use project providing for thedevelopment of multi-family residential, businessthe need for incorporation of contemporaryflex space, and office commercial sites.development requirements with the naturalbeauty of the land, and Neo-Traditional designelements.I. Biltmore Park Town Square - LEED-NDLEED-Neighborhood Development pilot program (developer has applied and is expecting certification). Impacting environmental benefits:• 30% reduction in water use by using low-flow fixtures and limited irrigation.• Conservation of water bodies and natural habitat through 5.5 acres of voluntary Conservation Easements, restricting use ofthose areas to education and nature trails.• Recycling of 50% of all construction waste, and required project-wide recycling program.• Solar-powered heating of water for hotel showers and pool.• Reduction of urban “heat island affect” through use of reflective material on all roofs.• Reuse of materials through mulching of tree-clearing waste and crushing of rock on site.• Recycling and rendering of grease from commercial restaurant grease traps.Building 2B (Office/mixed-use)(Core & Shell Architect)With these principles in mind and in response to*GOLD LEED Certifiedthe mountain topography, the design of the townplan evolved featuring elements of good towns ofthe past while recognizing the forces conditioningthe future in order to create a unique sense ofplace.Project Teams and DisciplinesTown PlanningMaster PlanningArchitectureII. Building 2B - LEED-CSLEED-Core & Shell: Gold Certification. Some of the environmentally responsible features used in the design of Office Building 2B include:• More efficient building envelope and HVAC equipment selected to reduce energy consumption of the building.• The building automation system will also be utilized by the specially trained building operations staff to reduce energy consumption throughoccupancy scheduling and to monitor energy consumption in real-time to reduce wasted energy through poor building systems management.• Low-flow fixtures have been designed into the Core restrooms to reduce the overall water consumption of the building.• Low VOC products have been specified for use in all Core & Shell construction of Office Building 2B in order to provide a healthier environment forbuilding occupants.• Goal in the construction of this building to reduce construction waste by over 50%, use as many products from the local region and utilize productswith high recycled content.• Tenants are not required to participate in the LEED-CI program, however we anticipate that they will be more inclined to make sustainable choiceswhen designing and constructing their interior spaces. Our inclusion in the LEED Core & Shell program will make it easier for tenants to implementmore efficient systems and to seek certification under the LEED-CI program. We also intend to encourage and educate our tenants on the LEEDprogram through our Green Education program as well as the Tenant Guidelines.Office Building 2B within Biltmore Park Town SquareBy developing Office Building 2B as part of Biltmore Park Town Square there are many overlapping sustainable aspects we were able to capitalize on.Some of the sustainable aspects include a state of the art infrastructure, best practice storm water and erosion measures, reduced vehicular dependencyas a result of a mixed use environment, pedestrian and bicycle friendly design, development wide low flow fixtures, drip irrigation or no irrigation andhighly planned structured parking. While Office Building 2B’s overall sustainability is increased as a result of these features, the most beneficial featureis the shared structured parking. By sharing a parking deck with multiple users and not having a traditional surface parking lot, the Office Building 2B hasbeen able to keep its footprint to one much smaller than a traditional mixed-use office over retail building. As a result there is a tremendous reduction inland use from comparable office buildings with traditional surface parking lots. While there are countless advantages to developing mixed-use masterplanned developments, one of the greatest rewards is conserving our existing natural resources, through the creation of urban density in areas that wouldtraditionally succumb to suburban sprawl.15 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Project ExperienceUrban DesignBirkdaleUrban DesignVillageBirkdale VillageHuntersville, NCHuntersville, NCOverviewRepresentingOverviewgenuine expressions of townbuilding and urban living, Birkdale Village is anRepresenting genuine expressions of townentertaining place, bringing together a variety ofbuilding and urban living, Birkdale Village is anuses in a main street development. In partnershipentertaining place, bringing together a variety ofwith The Crosland Group and Pappas Properties,uses in a main street development. In partnershipShook Kelley developed a concept vision andwith The Crosland Group and Pappas Properties,master plan, as well as providing architectural andShook Kelley developed a concept vision andinterior design services for this award-winningmaster plan, as well as providing architectural andproject.interior design services for this award-winningThe 52-acre, traditionally-planned communityproject.represents the first project of its kind to beThe 52-acre, traditionally-planned communitybuilt in North Carolina in which multiple housingrepresents the first project of its kind to bechoices are coupled with even more variedbuilt in North Carolina in which multiple housinglifestyle opportunities for recreation,choices are coupled with even more variedentertainment, shopping, leisure, dining andlifestyle opportunities for recreation,neighborhood services. This mix of choice,entertainment, shopping, leisure, dining andneighborhood services. This mix of choice,opportunity and sense of place created by thescale of the buildings, the streetscapes, publicopportunity and sense of place created by thegreens and merchandised storefronts result in ascale of the buildings, the streetscapes, publicpedestrian-oriented, urban environment that isgreens and merchandised storefronts result in aboth a highly-visited regional destination and apedestrian-oriented, urban environment that ishome for hundreds of people. Patterned looselyboth a highly-visited regional destination and aafter New England seacoast towns like Nantuckethome for hundreds of people. Patterned looselyand Cape Cod, the community aptly lies nearbyafter New England seacoast towns like Nantucketone of North Carolina’s largest inland lakes.and Cape Cod, the community aptly lies nearbyThe project has won numerous awards,one of North Carolina’s largest inland lakes.including a 2003 Pillars of the Industry Award, aThe project has won numerous awards,2003 Award of Excellence from the Urban Landincluding a 2003 Pillars of the Industry Award, aInstitute and First Place in the Best Lifestyle2003 Award of Excellence from the Urban LandShopping Center category in the Chain StoreInstitute and First Place in the Best LifestyleAge 2004 Retail Stores of the Year competition.Shopping Center category in the Chain StoreAge 2004 Retail Stores of the Year competition.Representing genuine expressions of townbuilding Representing and urban genuine living, expressions Birkdale Village of town isan building entertaining and urban place, living, bringing Birkdale together Village aisvariety an entertaining of uses in place, a main bringing street together development. avariety of uses in a main street development.Project Teams and DisciplinesArchitectureProject Teams and DisciplinesMaster PlanningArchitectureEnvironmental Graphic DesignMaster PlanningEnvironmental Graphic DesignJanuary 4, 2012 16© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesUrban DesignFortProjectMonroeExperienceUrban Hampton, VADesignFort Overview MonroeFort Monroe is currently a United States Armybase located in the Hampton Roads/ TidewaterHampton, VAarea of Virginia. Fort Monroe’s current boundariesencompass 570 acres, including 110 acres ofsubmerged lands and 85 acres of wetlands. InOverviewaddition to more than 180 historic structures andFort Monroe is currently a United States Armyfeatures that contribute to the Fort Monroe NHLbase located in the Hampton Roads/ TidewaterDistrict, the namesake stone fort completed inarea of Virginia. Fort Monroe’s current boundaries1834 is of particular size and import. Fort Monroeencompass 570 acres, including 110 acres ofwas built for coastal defense and housed one ofsubmerged lands and 85 acres of wetlands. Inthe Army’s first field schools of militaryaddition to more than 180 historic structures andeducation.features that contribute to the Fort Monroe NHLIn 2007, the Virginia Assembly establishedDistrict, the namesake stone fort completed inthe Fort Monroe Federal Area Development1834 is of particular size and import. Fort MonroeAuthority or FMFADA. The FMFADA is a politicalwas built for coastal defense and housed one ofsubdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia andthe Army’s first field schools of militaryserves with the Department of Defense as theeducation.In 2007, the Virginia Assembly establishedthe Fort Monroe Federal Area DevelopmentAuthority or FMFADA. The FMFADA is a politicalsubdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia andserves with the Department of Defense as theShook Kelley worked with the Fort MonroeFederal Area Development Authority (FMFADA) asurban design consultant for the future transition ofan historic, pre-Civil War-Era Federal military baseinto Shook a redeveloped Kelley worked site with for the public/private Fort Monroe use.Federal Area Development Authority (FMFADA) asurban design consultant for the future transition ofan historic, pre-Civil War-Era Federal military baseLocal Redevelopment Authority for the site. are intended to provide the FMFADA with aIn accordance with the Base Realignment into anda redeveloped summary site document for public/private that depicts this use. future inClosure (BRAC) Commission’s plan, the U.S. a concise yet meaningful way to both theArmy intends to close and abandon it’s base at Department of Defense as well as to potentialFort Monroe on 14 September 2011. It is the future development partners, stakeholders andFMFADA’s responsibility to guide the process of the public.Local Redevelopment Authority for the site. are intended to provide the FMFADA with atransitioning the ownership, operation and fiscalIn accordance with the Base Realignment and summary document that depicts this future inresponsibility of the property from the Federal toClosure (BRAC) Commission’s plan, the U.S. a concise yet meaningful way to both thethe State level.Army intends to close and abandon it’s base at Department of Defense as well as to potentialThe Project consists of assisting the FMFADAFort Monroe on 14 September 2011. It is the future development partners, stakeholders andwith the process of envisioning the future of theFMFADA’s responsibility to guide the process of the public.property and creating a reuse strategy for it. Thetransitioning the ownership, operation and fiscalprincipal goals of this process is leveraging andresponsibility of the property from the Federal tosecuritizing the value inherent both the property’sthe State level.historic components as well as it’s broadProject Teams and DisciplinesThe Project consists of assisting the FMFADAdevelopment potential. According to the RFP, the Master Planningwith the process of envisioning the future of thefirst phases of the Project (Phase 1 and Phase 2) Graphic Designproperty and creating a reuse strategy for it. Theprincipal goals of this process is leveraging andsecuritizing the value inherent both the property’shistoric components as well as it’s broadProject Teams and Disciplinesdevelopment potential. According to the RFP, the Master Planningfirst phases of the Project (Phase 1 and Phase 2) Graphic DesignClockwise, from top left: Aerial photograph of existing base; Conceptual views of the reuse.Clockwise, from top left: Aerial photograph of existing base; Conceptual views of the reuse.© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.17 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Project ExperienceUrban DesignThe Urban Town Design of PalmerThe Town of PalmerPalmer, MAPalmer,OverviewMAThrough Strategic Vision Planning, Shook Kelleywas able to develop and demonstrate a pro-activeThrough Strategic Vision Planning, Shook Kelleyplan for future development and stewardship inwas able to develop and demonstrate a pro-activethis small, historic Massachussetts town.plan for future development and stewardship inthis small, historic Massachussetts town.Shook Kelley was hired Northeast Realty to assistwith Overview vision planning for this historic Town ofcasino, should casino gaming become legal.Shook Kelley participated in a public forumhelp enhance the visitor experience, as wellas the lifestyles of Palmer’s residents.Palmer, Shook Kelley located was in central hired Northeast Massachusetts, Realty to whichassist hosted casino, by should the developer, casino gaming identifiying become six legal. locationshelp The enhance second the poster visitor was experience, designed toas wellfound with vision itself planning at a crossroads. for this historic The question Town of was, for Shook redevelopment Kelley participated opportunities in a and public gatewayforum communicate as the lifestyles the of need Palmer’s to bring residents. back passengerwhether—citizens Palmer, located in central and businesses Massachusetts, alike—canwhich projects, hosted by some the developer, being the identifiying establishment six locations of a railThrough The service secondStrategicto the poster historicVision was town—oncePlanning, designedShook knownKelleyasprogress found itself and at build a crossroads. in a manner The that question Urban not onlywas, Designtown for redevelopment square, and having opportunities new businesses and gateway such the communicate “Town of Seven the need Railroads”—as to bring back a passenger beacon forwas able to develop and demonstrate a pro-activerespects whether—citizens and preserves and businesses the past but alike—can also gifts as projects, a boutique some hotel being downtown.the establishment of a future rail service development to the historic and growth.town—once known asgenerations progress and to build come in with a manner a “new” that history not onlyworthytown Shook square, Kelley and delivered having new a two-part businesses series such oftheplan “Townfor future of Sevendevelopment Railroads”—asand stewardship a beacon forinThe Town of Palmerof respects future preservation. and preserves Northeast past but Realty also is gifts leasing vision as a boutique posters hotel to document downtown. the vision. Part onefuture Projectthis small, development TeamshistoricandMassachussetts and Disciplinesgrowth. town.land generations across from to come the Massachusetts with a “new” history Palmer, Turnpike worthy MA to dealt Shook with Kelley identifying delivered opportunities a two-part for series infill,of Vision Planning / Public EngagementConnecticut-based of future preservation. Mohegan Northeast Sun Realty for a resortis leasing redevelopment, vision posters to and document gateway the projects vision. that Part wouldone Graphic Project DesignTeams and DisciplinesOverviewland across from the Massachusetts Shook Turnpike Kelley to was hired dealt Northeast with Realty identifying to assistopportunities casino, should for casino infill, gaming become legal.Vision Planning help enhance / Public the Engagementvisitor experience, as wellConnecticut-based Mohegan Sun for with a resort vision planning for this redevelopment, historic Town ofand gateway Shook projects Kelley participated that would in a public forumGraphic Design as the lifestyles of Palmer’s residents.Palmer, located in central Massachusetts, which hosted by the developer, identifiying six locations The second poster was designed tofound itself at a crossroads. The question was, for redevelopment opportunities and gateway communicate the need to bring back passengerwhether—citizens and businesses alike—can projects, some being the establishment of a rail service to the historic town—once known asprogress and build in a manner that not only town square, and having new businesses such the “Town of Seven Railroads”—as a beacon forrespects and preserves the past but also gifts as a boutique hotel downtown.future development and growth.generations to come with a “new” history worthy Shook Kelley delivered a two-part series ofof future preservation. Northeast Realty is leasing vision posters to document the vision. Part one Project Teams and Disciplinesland across from the Massachusetts Turnpike to dealt with identifying opportunities for infill,Vision Planning / Public EngagementConnecticut-based Mohegan Sun for a resort redevelopment, and gateway projects that would Graphic DesignAbove, left and right: The first double sided posterdeveloped by Shook Kelley, to document the visionfor Palmer. Right: Second double sided poster tocommunicate Above, left and the right: need The for first passenger double rail sided Above,as poster left and right: The first double sided posterdeveloped beaconby Shook Kelley, to document the visionfor developed growth.by Shook Kelley, to document the visionfor Palmer. Right: Second double sided poster tofor Palmer. Right: Second double sided poster communicate to the need for passenger rail as beaconcommunicate the need for passenger rail as for beacon growth.for growth.January 4, 2012 18

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesUrbanProjectDesignExperienceTwinbrook Urban DesignUrban Rockville,TwinbrookMDesignUrban OverviewTwinbrook DesignTwinbrook can become the place where the District of Columbia’s legacyof great urbanism and nature, in all of its manifestations, are woventogether Twinbrook into can one become interlocking, the place supportive where the proposition. District of Connected Columbia’s to legacy thegreat of great Rock urbanism Creek Park and in nature, both real in all and of its symbolic manifestations, ways, Twinbrook are woven will beTwinbrookknowncantogether asbecomeinto the one placetheinterlocking, whereplaceEcologywhere thesupportive MattersDistrictproposition. InofAllColumbia’sThings.legacyConnected to theof great urbanism and nature, in all of its manifestations, are wovenTwinbrook great can Rock become Creek the Park place in where both the real District and symbolic of Columbia’s ways, legacy Twinbrook will betogether into one interlocking, supportive proposition. Connected to theof greatRockville, MDknown urbanism as and the nature, place where in all of Ecology its manifestations, Matters are In All wovenWashington, DC is unique among the greatShook great Kelley Rock is working Creek Park closely in with both The real JBG and symbolic those across ways, the Twinbrook income Things. spectrum will bethat seek aAmerican cities. Planned from it’s inception to be Companies togetherRockville,OverviewMDknown in into Rockville one interlocking,as the place to develop where a brand supportiveEcology vision proposition. healthy, active Connected and/or multicultural to the lifestyle.TwinbrookMatters In All Things.both practical and beautiful, it pairs human-scaled and great master Rock plan Creek for Twinbrook, Park a both presently real and symbolic Twinbrook ways, Twinbrook will be the will place bethat offers bothurbanism Washington, and DC nature is unique in it’s among many forms— the great isolated Shook and Kelley underdeveloped is working closely area of with land The in theJBG those security across and the lifestyle income of spectrum a small community, that seek aRockville, Overview squares, American greens, MDknown as the place where Ecology Matters In All Things.cities. Planned malls and from parks—to it’s inception create to be Rockville Companies served in Rockville by the METRO to develop Rail a Red brand line— alongvision healthy, with active excellent and/or rail multicultural and auto connections lifestyle. toWashington, DC is unique among the greatShook Kelley is working closely with The JBG those across the income spectrum that seek aneighborhoods both practical and that beautiful, appeal to it man’s pairs human-scaledsocial and into and a master complex, plan genuine, for Twinbrook, distinctive, a presently known, and the Twinbrook greater Washington will be the metropolitan place that offers area. bothOverview American cities. Planned from it’s inception to be Companies in Rockville to develop a brand vision healthy, active and/or multicultural lifestyle.contemplative urbanism and nature needs. in Coursing it’s many throughout forms— the highly isolated valued and underdeveloped place—and one with area of the land addition in of To the become security this and place, lifestyle Twinbrook of small must community, beWashington, both practical DC and is beautiful, unique among it pairs the human-scaledgreatand Shook master Kelley plan is working for Twinbrook, closely with a presently The JBG those across Twinbrook the income will be spectrum the place that seek offers a bothdistrict squares, is greens, the Rock malls Creek and Park, parks—to a flowing create green great Rockville employment served by opportunities, the METRO Rail better Red transit wrappedline— along with within, excellent and orchestrated rail and auto through,American connections tourbanism cities. and nature Planned in it’s from many it’s inception forms— to be Companies isolated and in Rockville underdeveloped to develop area a brand of land vision in healthy, the active security and/or multicultural lifestyle of a lifestyle. small community,wildernesssquares, neighborhoods the likesgreens, that malls appeal of whichand parks—to is man’s not foundcreate social in and any connections,Rockville into served a complex, retailby the genuine, and housingMETRO distinctive, formatsRail Red line— known, in tune aand along with the brand-specificexcellent greater rail Washington businessand auto connections metropolitan model that isboth practical and beautiful, it pairs human-scaled and master plan for Twinbrook, a presentlyTwinbrook will be the place that offers both to area.urbanism neighborhoodscity, contemplative anywhere. and nature that needs. In ourappeal in it’s day Coursing many toandman’s forms— age, throughout socialthisandunlikely the isolated intowith highly and complex, underdeveloped target valued genuine,markets’ place—and distinctive, area expectations—can of one land known, with in the andaddition become the security the ofgreater and community To lifestyle Washington become of based a this small metropolitan place, and community, owned. Twinbrook area. must besquares, contemplative combination district is greens, the is Rock needs. widely malls Creek Coursing and sought parks—to Park, throughout and a flowing create highly the valued green Rockville highly agreat fortress valued served employment place—and by real the estate METRO one opportunities, proposition. Rail with Red the line— alongaddition better of transit To with become excellent Project wrapped this rail place, Teams and within, auto Twinbrook and connections Disciplines orchestrated must be to through,neighborhoods district by wilderness many. is the And, the Rock that there likes Creek appealof is only which Park, to man’s one a is flowing socialnot place andfound green in the intoin any great a complex,connections, employment Employment genuine, opportunities, retail in distinctive, the and sciences known,housing better formats transit andrelated thein tune fields greater wrapped WashingtonBrand within, a brand-specific Strategymetropolitan orchestrated businessarea. through, model that iscontemplativewilderness greater city, anywhere. metropolitan theneeds.likes In our ofCoursing area which day where and isthroughoutnot age, this found this dynamic thein unlikely anyhighlyconnections,valued will with be place—andtarget blended retail markets’ and in onehousing a genuine, with theexpectations—can formatsaddition urban in tune manner of Tobecome withbecomea brand-specificthis place,Vision community businessTwinbrookPlanning based modelmust/ Master and thatbeowned. Planning isdistrictcity, exists combination anywhere.is untapped: the Rockis In widely ourCreek Twinbrook. dayPark,sought andaage,flowingand thisgreenhighly unlikelygreatvalued withemployment housing, atarget fortress markets’ retail opportunities,real and estate expectations—can entertainment better transit wrappedproposition. become choices–for communitywithin, andGraphic basedorchestratedand owned.through,Project Design Teams / and Environmental Disciplines Graphic Designwilderness the likes of which is not found in any connections, retail and housing formats in tune a brand-specific business model that iscombination by many. And, is widely there sought is only and one highly place valued in the a fortress Employment real estate proposition.city, anywhere. In our day and age, this unlikely with target markets’ expectations—can in the sciences become and related community fields Project based Teams Brand and Strategy owned. Disciplinesby many. And, there is only one place in theEmployment in the sciences and related fieldscombination greater metropolitan is widely sought area where and highly this valued dynamic a fortress will real be estate blended proposition. in a genuine, urban manner with Brand StrategyProject Teams Vision and Disciplines Planning / Master Planninggreater metropolitan area where this dynamic will be blended in a genuine, urban manner withby exists many. untapped: And, there Twinbrook. is only one place in theEmployment housing, in retail the sciences and entertainment and related fields choices–forVision Planning / Master PlanningBrand Strategyexists untapped: Twinbrook.housing, retail and entertainment choices–forGraphic Design / Environmental Graphic DesignGraphic Design / Environmental Graphic Designgreater metropolitan area where this dynamicexists untapped: Twinbrook.will be blended in a genuine, urban manner withhousing, retail and entertainment choices–forVision Planning / Master PlanningGraphic Design / Environmental Graphic DesignTop Concept Master Plan view for Twinbrook by Shook Kelley. Above Excerpts from the Brand Vision Book for Twinbrook, written and designed by Shook Kelley.Top Concept Master Master Plan Plan view view for for Twinbrook Twinbrook by Shook by Shook Kelley. Kelley. Above Above Excerpts Excerpts from the from Brand the Vision Brand Book Vision for Book Twinbrook, for Twinbrook, written and written designed and by designed Shook Kelley. by Shook Kelley.© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. Inc. All All rights rights reserved.Top 19 Concept Master Plan view for Twinbrook by Shook Kelley. Above Excerpts from the Brand Vision Book for Twinbrook, written and designed by Shook The Kelley. Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Project ExperienceUrban DesignTwinbrookRockville, MD(continued)Twinbrook can become the place where the District of Columbia’s legacyof great urbanism and nature, in all of its manifestations, are woventogether into one interlocking, supportive proposition. Connected to thegreat Rock Creek Park in both real and symbolic ways, Twinbrook will beknown as the place where Ecology Matters In All Things.OverviewWashington, DC is unique among the greatAmerican cities. Planned from it’s inception to beboth practical and beautiful, it pairs human-scaledurbanism and nature in it’s many forms—squares, greens, malls and parks—to createneighborhoods that appeal to man’s social andcontemplative needs. Coursing throughout thedistrict is the Rock Creek Park, a flowing greenwilderness the likes of which is not found in anycity, anywhere. In our day and age, this unlikelycombination is widely sought and highly valuedby many. And, there is only one place in thegreater metropolitan area where this dynamicexists untapped: Twinbrook.Shook Kelley is working closely with The JBGCompanies in Rockville to develop a brand visionand master plan for Twinbrook, a presentlyisolated and underdeveloped area of land inRockville served by the METRO Rail Red line—into a complex, genuine, distinctive, known, andhighly valued place—and one with the addition ofgreat employment opportunities, better transitconnections, retail and housing formats in tunewith target markets’ expectations—can becomea fortress real estate proposition.Employment in the sciences and related fieldswill be blended in a genuine, urban manner withhousing, retail and entertainment choices–forthose across the income spectrum that seek ahealthy, active and/or multicultural lifestyle.Twinbrook will be the place that offers boththe security and lifestyle of a small community,along with excellent rail and auto connections tothe greater Washington metropolitan area.To become this place, Twinbrook must bewrapped within, and orchestrated through,a brand-specific business model that iscommunity based and owned.Project Teams and DisciplinesBrand StrategyVision Planning / Master PlanningGraphic Design / Environmental Graphic DesignTop Concept Master Plan view for Twinbrook by Shook Kelley. Above Excerpts from the Brand Vision Book for Twinbrook, written and designed by Shook Kelley.January 4, 2012 20

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesUrban Project Design ExperienceEast Beach VillageUrban DesignNorfolk, VAEast Beach VillageOverviewNorfolk, East Beach is VA rising upon land that once was,by any metric, a slum. Once the single-familyresidential portions (master planned by AndresOverview Duany of DPZ) neared completion, attention wasEast focused Beach upon is rising the retail/mixed-used upon land that once quadrants. was,by Prior any to metric, Shook Kelley’s a slum. Once involvement, the single-family three otherresidential architects (including portions (master DPZ) had planned been retained by Andres toDuany solve a of design DPZ) riddle neared that completion, required: 1) attention maintaining wasfocused the high, upon neo-traditional the retail/mixed-used design standards quadrants.Prior established to Shook by Kelley’s the single-family involvement, neighborhood; three otherarchitects 2) designing (including a variety DPZ) of for-rent had been and retained for-sale tosolve housing; a design and 3) riddle incorporating that required: conventional 1) maintaining officethe and high, retail neo-traditional formats, particularly design that standards of a 35,000 SFestablished supermarket, by without the single-family compromising neighborhood; the scale2) and designing pedestrian a variety nature of for-rent the place. and All for-sale threehousing; architects and were 3) incorporating judged by the conventional owner to have officeand retail formats, particularly that of a 35,000 SFsupermarket, without compromising the scaleand pedestrian nature of the place. All threearchitects were judged by the owner to have2011Charter AwardsAward of ExcellenceEast BeachNeighbrohood, District & Corridorfailed on at least one of the above. Shook Kelleysuccessfully accomplished the task. And, in theprocess, we added a fourth item that will becrucial to realizing the goal that East Beachfailed become on a at socially-responsive least one of the above. community. Shook Kelleysuccessfully Shook Kelley accomplished led the development the task. And, teamin theprocess, through a we branding added exercise, a fourth item one that will focused becrucial upon establishing to realizing East the goal Beach that as East a national Beach modelbecome for sustainability—in a socially-responsive both the narrow community. metricsidentified Shook Kelley through led building the development technology, team andthrough a the branding broader exercise, construct one of community that focusedupon form. establishing The missing East piece Beach was clearly as a national the provision modelfor of workforce sustainability—in housing both to serve the narrow the approximately metricsidentified 500 service-based through building people who technology, will be a and part ofthrough the daily the life broader of future construct East Beach. of community This newform. focus, The as expressed missing piece within was a comprehensiveclearly the provisionof workforce housing to serve the approximately500 service-based people who will be a part ofthe daily life of future East Beach. This newfocus, as expressed within a comprehensiveA new town center village adjacentto one of the nation’s premier NewUrbanist communities.A new town center village adjacentto one of the nation’s premier NewUrbanist communities.brand strategy along with a number of otherspecific actions, has the potential to leveragecommunity support for infrastructure fundingand other initiatives.brand strategy along with a number of otherspecific Project actions, Teams and has the Disciplines potential to leveragecommunity Master Planning support / Urban for infrastructure Design fundingand Brand other Development initiatives.Project Teams and DisciplinesMaster Planning / Urban DesignBrand DevelopmentEast Beach LogoDesigned by othersEast Beach LogoDesigned by othersThe Mid-Atlantic’s Most Heralded New Urbanist CommunityThe Mid-Atlantic’s Most Heralded New Urbanist CommunityThe Mid-Atlantic’s Most Heralded New Urbanist CommunityThe Mid-Atlantic’s Most Heralded New Urbanist CommunityTrue North True NorthPlan NorthPlan North(top) View of the mixed-use village center; (bottom right) View towards the grocery concept with surrounding mixed-use from the villagegreen; (bottom left) Master Plan of East Beach Village (shown in color). At right of Site Plan of East Beach (shown in black & white) is theEast Beach Residential Community Master Planned by Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company.(top) View of the mixed-use village center; (bottom right) View towards the grocery concept with surrounding mixed-use from the village© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.green; (bottom left) Master Plan of East Beach Village (shown in color). At right of Site Plan of East Beach (shown in black & white) is the21 East Beach Residential Community Master Planned by Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company.The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Urban DesignThe Project Vineyards ExperienceLewes, DEUrban DesignOverviewThe VineyardsToday, densely settled towns and cities areThe Vineyards is a place that will be asustainable, livable and meaningfulcommunity with a vibrancy and vitalitythat is unparalleled on the DelmarvaPeninsula.The Vineyards is a place that will be aThe Vineyards is place that will be sustainable, livable and meaningfulsustainable, livable and meaningfulcommunity with a vibrancy and vitalitycommunity with vibrancy and vitalityenvironment takes place that is paramount. that is Project unparalleled Teams on and the Disciplines Delmarvastill few and far between in Sussex County,Luckily, for Sussex County, its concerned that is Conceptual unparalleled and on Master the Delmarva Planning / Urban DesignLewes, Delaware. Opportunities DE to enjoy outdoorcitizens and elected and appointed leaders have Peninsula.Lewes, DEPeninsula.Architecture The Vineyards / Environmental is a place that Graphics will be aactivities and interact with Urban wonderful natural Design been working hard to make ordinances designedsustainable, livable and meaningfulsettings still abound. However, according to the to guide and shape the built environment for theOverviewcommunity with a vibrancy and vitality2000 Census figures, SussexOverviewThe County Vineyardshasbetter. The master plan of The Vineyards, byToday, experienced densely a settled 38% increase towns and in population cities are in environment virtue of takes what place it will that do for is paramount. the built environment, Project that Teams is unparalleled and Disciplines on the DelmarvaToday, still densely settled towns and cities are environment takes place that is paramount. Project Teams and Disciplinesten few years. and Most far between of the in Sussex County,Luckily, for Sussex County, its concerned Conceptual and Master Planning / Urban Designstill few and far between Lewes, growth hasin Sussex DEbeen in the will benefit the natural environment as well. Peninsula.Delaware. County,Luckily, for Sussex County, its concerned Conceptual and Master Planning / Urban Designeastern beach Opportunities communities, to enjoy thanks outdoor to the many citizensDelaware. Opportunities to enjoy outdoorBy combining and elected fresh and appointed attitudes leaders towards have appropriateArchitecture / Environmental Graphicsactivities citizens and elected and appointed leaders have Architecture / Environmental Graphicsactivities baby boomersand interactand interact that havewith wonderfulwith wonderful decided tonaturalnatural retire to thisbeenbeen densitiesworkingworking andhardhard combinationsto make ordinancesto make ordinances of uses,designeddesigned throughsettings still abound. However, Overview according to the to guide and shape the built environment for thesettings beautiful still place. abound. As the However, population according of the to United the to better. guide criticalThe and attentionmaster shape plan the paid built toof The environment the fabric ofVineyards, for the2000 Census figures, Sussex Today, County densely settled has towns and cities are environment takes place that is byparamount.theProject Teams and Disciplines2000 States Census now grows figures, beyondexperienced a 38% increase Sussex still few 300in County population and million, far has between no placein in Sussex better. virtue County, landscapeof The what master andit will Luckily, plan patternsdo for of for The the Sussex ofbuilt Vineyards, settlement, County, environment, by its concerned and with Conceptual and Master Planning / Urban Designexperienced tenis safeyears.fromMost a the 38% ofonslaughtthe increase growth Delaware. of in has population development. Opportunities been in in theto No enjoy outdoor virtue willabenefittimelessness of what the it natural will citizens do imbuedenvironment and for the elected in built the and environment,architecture,as appointed well. leaders ThehaveArchitecture / Environmental Graphicsten eastern place years. is beach safe Most from communities, of the change. growth activitiesthanks has and been interactto the withmany the wonderful will naturalBy combining Vineyards benefit the fresh will natural been establish workingattitudes environment hard a towards benchmark to make as appropriate well. ordinances for similar designedsettings still abound. However, according to theeastern baby boomers beach communities, that have decided thanks to retire to the to manyto guide and shape the built environment for theIt can said though, and perhaps rightly this By densities combining endeavors and combinations fresh that attitudes will inevitably of towards uses, follow. through appropriate2000 Census figures, Sussex County hasbetter. The master plan of The Vineyards, bybaby beautiful proven, boomers that place. the that As growth the have population experienced decided of the human to of a retire the 38% United habitat increase to this is in population densities critical in Properly attention and combinations planned, paid virtue to of the what designed fabric of it will uses, of do and the for through the executed, built environment,beautiful States one that now place. is as grows important As the beyond population ten as 300 years. the million, preservation Most of the of no United the place growth of has critical landscape been The in attention the Vineyards and patterns paid will will benefit to the of one the settlement, fabric day natural pass of environment the and into with the as realm well.States is that safe of now from the other grows onslaught species beyond eastern of with 300 development. million, beach which communities, no we place share No thanks landscape a to timelessness the of great many and places patterns imbued By combining that of exalt the settlement, fresh architecture, both attitudes the and man-made towards with The appropriate andis place safe is from safe the from onslaught change.baby of boomers development. that have Nodecided to a retireVineyards timelessness to thisthe natural will establish imbued densitiesfeatures a in andwithin benchmark the combinations architecture, themselves–placesforofsimilaruses, The throughthe earth. It is the manner in which this growthplace It can is safe be said from though, change. beautiful place. As the population ofand perhaps rightly Vineyards the Unitedendeavors that will will that endure establish critical attentionoccurs and the manner in which the builtwill inevitably for a future benchmark paid to thefollow. generations. for fabric similar of theVision Book for The Vineyards,States now grows beyond 300 million, no place landscape and patterns of settlement, and with written and designed by Shook Kelley.proven, It can that be said the growth though, of and the perhaps human rightly habitat is endeavors Properly that planned, will inevitably designed follow.is safe from the onslaught of development. No a timelessness imbued and executed, in the architecture, Theproven, one that that is as the important growth of as place the is human preservation safe from habitat change. ofisThe Properly Vineyards planned, will Vineyards one designed day will pass establish and into executed, a the benchmark realm for similarone that that of the is other as important species as with It the can which preservation be said we though, share ofand perhaps The of rightly great Vineyards places will that endeavors one exalt day both that pass will the into inevitably man-made the realm follow. andthat the earth. of the It other is the species manner proven, with in which which that the this we growth share of the human of the great habitat natural places is features that Properly exalt within both planned, themselves–placesdesigned man-made and and executed,This Page (clockwise, from top left) Conceptual view of street with mixed-use; Conceptual aerial View of The Vineyards village center; Vision Mixed-use Book elevations; for The Vineyards, Conceptual ground level view along the water.the occurs earth. and It the is the manner manner onein which in that which is asthe this importantbuilt growth as the preservation the that natural ofwill endure features Thefor future within Vineyardsgenerations. themselves–placeswill one day pass into the realmwritten Vision Book and designed for The Vineyards, by Shook Kelley.occurs and the manner in that which of the the other built species with which that we will share endure for of great future places generations. that exalt both the man-made andwritten and designed by Shook Kelley.the earth. It is the manner in which this growth the natural features within themselves–places Vision Book for The Vineyards,occurs and the manner in which the builtthat will endure for future generations.written and designed by Shook Kelley.This Page (clockwise, from top left) Conceptual view of street with mixed-use; Conceptual aerial View of The Vineyards village center; Mixed-use elevations; Conceptual ground level view along the water.This Page (clockwise, from top left) Conceptual view of street with mixed-use; Conceptual aerial View of The Vineyards village center; Mixed-use elevations; Conceptual ground level view along the water.This Page (clockwise, from top left) Conceptual view of street with mixed-use; Conceptual aerial View of The Vineyards village center; Mixed-use elevations; Conceptual ground level view along the water.© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.January 4, 2012 22© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesProject ExperienceUrban DesignThe VineyardsLewes, DE(continued)The Vineyards is a place that will be asustainable, livable and meaningfulcommunity with a vibrancy and vitalitythat is unparalleled on the DelmarvaPeninsula.This Page Shook Kelley’s Design TeamOverview developed the Urban Guideline documentsToday, (top right) densely as well settled as both towns a Master and cities Signage arestill Guidelines few and and far Tenant between Criteria in Sussex Document County, forDelaware. The Vineyards, Opportunities (bottom, right) to enjoy enabling outdoor theactivities developer and with interact the ability with to wonderful implement naturalsettingsmultiplestillvariousabound.hardscapeHowever,standardsaccordingandto the2000uniformCensusapplicationsfigures,toSussexmasterCountywayfindinghasand all business tenant sign applicationsexperienced a 38% increase in population inwithin The Vineyards site.ten years. Most of the growth has been in theeastern beach communities, thanks to the manybaby boomers that have decided to retire to thisbeautiful place. As the population of the UnitedStates now grows beyond 300 million, no placeis safe from the onslaught of development. Noplace is safe from change.It can be said though, and perhaps rightlyproven, that the growth of the human habitat isone that is as important as the preservation ofthat of the other species with which we sharethe earth. It is the manner in which this growthoccurs and the manner in which the builtenvironment takes place that is paramount.Luckily, for Sussex County, its concernedcitizens and elected and appointed leaders havebeen working hard to make ordinances designedto guide and shape the built environment for thebetter. The master plan of The Vineyards, byvirtue of what it will do for the built environment,will benefit the natural environment as well.By combining fresh attitudes towards appropriatedensities and combinations of uses, throughcritical attention paid to the fabric of thelandscape and patterns of settlement, and witha timelessness imbued in the architecture, TheVineyards will establish a benchmark for similarendeavors that will inevitably follow.Properly planned, designed and executed,The Vineyards will one day pass into the realmof great places that exalt both the man-made andthe natural features within themselves–placesthat will endure for future generations.Project Teams and DisciplinesConceptual and Master Planning / Urban DesignArchitecture / Environmental GraphicsVision Book for The Vineyards,written and designed by Shook Kelley.This Page (clockwise, from top left) Conceptual view of street with mixed-use; Conceptual aerial View of The Vineyards village center; Mixed-use elevations; Conceptual ground level view along the water.23 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Urban Project Design ExperienceDarrow PondUrban DesignEast Lyme, CTDarrow PondOverviewEast Shook Kelley Lyme, was hired CT by Vespera to develop avision plan for a new active adult community—a project that will be a prime example of themovement Overview known as Placemaking, throughShook its planning, Kelley design was hired and by execution. Vespera Typical to develop asubdivisions plan for appeal a new to active a customer adult community—base whereaprice project is usually that will the be most a prime important example concern. of themovement Places appeal known to customers as Placemaking, at many through levels.its A typical planning, subdivision design and layout execution. for the property Typicalsubdivisions would most likely appeal erase to a the customer many natural base whereprice characteristics usually of the the most site, important and not deliver concern. anyPlaces new ones appeal of aesthetic to customers value. at Most many of levels. the majorAtrees typical and subdivision forested areas layout would for the be property eradicated.would In its place most would likely erase be a collection the many of natural unconnectedcharacteristics houses uniformly of the perched site, and upon not the deliver hillside. anynew Beauty ones is not of aesthetic a term one value. would Most normally of the apply majortrees to subdivisions. and forested areas would be eradicated.In its place would be a collection of unconnectedhouses uniformly perched upon the hillside.Beauty is not a term one would normally applyto subdivisions.Darrow Pond will appeal to a broad spectrumof people who do indeed place a high value uponboth natural beauty and significant architecture.As a result, the planning of Darrow Pond will, atevery Darrow juncture, Pond be will focused appeal upon to a broad creating spectrum a placeof that people “fits” who into the do indeed landscape place as a it high exists, value anduponboth that improves natural beauty upon and the natural significant world architecture. for theAs future. a result, the planning of Darrow Pond will, atevery Shook juncture, Kelley be prepared focused visual upon presentation creating a placethat documents “fits” into and the participated landscape in as public it exists, hearings/ andthat presentations improves to upon The the Town natural of East world Lyme for the Zoningfuture. Commission, helping to get approval of theproposed Shook Kelley zoning prepared regulation visual amendment presentation indocuments order for the and project participated to move in forward public hearings/ towardspresentations the next phase to of The entitlement. Town of East Lyme ZoningCommission, helping to get approval of theproposed zoning regulation amendment inorder for the project to move forward towardsthe next phase of entitlement.A project focused upon creating aplace that “fits” into the landscape asit exists, and that improves upon theAnatural project world focused for the upon future. creating aplace that “fits” into the landscape asit exists, and that improves upon thenatural world for the future.Project Teams and DisciplinesTown PlanningMaster PlanningArchitectureProject Graphic Teams Design and DisciplinesTown PlanningMaster PlanningArchitectureGraphic DesignAerial view of Darrow PondVision Book (below) and logomark (right) for Darrow Pond,written and designed by Shook KelleyAerial view of Darrow PondVision Book (below) and logomark (right) for Darrow Pond,written and designed by Shook KelleySite PlanSite PlanConceptual birdseye view of the Village Center.© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.January 4, 2012Conceptual birdseye view of the Village Center.24

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesProject ExperienceNew Milford, CT25 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Project Experience(continued)This Page One of Shook Kelleys core specialtieswithin the discipline of its New Urban Planning Groupis creating and implementing Pattern Books for itsvarious Master Planning Projects. At right is one createdfor Dunham Farm, an active-adult communityIn almost every community in the United States,traditional neighborhoods made upof properlydesigned and innately detailed houses and buildingscan be found arranged upona comfortably scalednetwork of streets and sidewalks. Some of theseneighborhoods have survived intact over the yearswhile others are solely remnants of what they oncewere. The character, individuality and charm of theseneighborhoods and places is unmistakable. Whileeach house and building is indeed different, there isalways a thread of continuity and a consistently highlevel of craft and quality evident in the construction.Each and every town or city in the United States has,throughout its history, followed both the written andunwritten tenets guiding the proper act of building.The Pattern Book guides designers, developersand builders in creating building designs andassociated landscapes and hardscapes for a particularcommunity that draw upon particular precedents. ThePattern Book establishes the minimum standards ofdesign and construction and is based upon extensiveresearch and documentation by the design teamof local and regional precedents and patterns. Itfocuses primarily upon the exterior and massing ofthe buildings, their relationship to the street and theirrelationship to each other. The Pattern Book servesas confirmation to the elected officials and citizenry ofthe surrounding area where project will be built,according to the concept and intent set forth in thePlanning documents and in myriad public meetingsin which the character and quality of the project wasdescribed and presented. The Pattern Book will haveutility throughout the design and construction of adevelopment, and it will ultimately become partof the by-laws of the community so that theprinciples espoused herein may be enforced inperpetuity.January 4, 2012 26

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesUrban DesignVerideaProject ExperienceVeridea aims to become a 21stversion of the Research Trianglewhere living, working, and playicoexist—sustainably.Veridea aims to become a 21st centuryUrban Apex, NC Designversion Veridea of aims the to Research become Triangle a 21st century Park—where living, working, and playing canVeridea Urban Designversion of the Research Triangle Park—Overviewcoexist—sustainably.where living, working, and playing canVerideaVeridea will be a new, sustainable, mixed-use communities and regionally-focused commercialApex, NCcoexist—sustainably.with clean air, soil and energy economicurban community constructed on 1,000 acres space, will ultimately be developed, along with a equitably, ecologically and elegantly enjoApex, within the NCTown of Apex in Wake County, North host of community-oriented spaces. Given its Through planning, design, construction aOverview Carolina. It will offer almost all things one would size and aspirations, Veridea will be a model and management, Veridea will showcase theVeridea find in will a development be a new, sustainable, of such mixed-use prominence, communities a catalyst and regionally-focused in the and commercial beyond. with clean air, soil and practices energy of economically, living in harmony with the nOverviewurban community constructed on 1,000 acres space, will ultimately be developed, along with a equitably, ecologically Veridea aims and to elegantly become a enjoyed.” 21st centurywithinVeridea includingthewill aTownbe range aofnew, ofApexsustainable, housingin WakeUrban choices,County,mixed-use placesNorthDesigntohostcommunities Inof community-orientedand its regionally-focused very name, Verideaspaces.commercial embodies itsGiven its Throughwith cleanplanning,air, soil andenvironment.design,energyconstructioneconomically,This balance will be manifversion of the Research Triangle and Park—Carolina.urban shop, community many employmentIt will offerconstructed opportunities,almost all thingson 1,000oneacres and awould sizespace,andwill principles:aspirations,ultimatelyVerideabe Truth, developed, Green,will be aalong Idea.modelwith Veritas…anda management,equitably, Latin forecologically manyVerideaand levels—energy,willelegantlyshowcaseenjoyed.” economics, rationthe bestfindwithininthea developmentTown of Apexof suchin Wakeprominence,County, Northahostcatalystof community-orientedin the region and beyond.spaces. Given its practicesThrough planning,where living,of living indesign,working,harmonyconstructionand playingwith the naturalandcanhost of entertainment and Veridearecreation options. Truth. Verdant… for Green. Idea for …well… transportation patterns, water, open spaincludingCarolina. Itawillrangeofferof housingalmost allchoices,things oneplaceswouldtosizeInandits veryaspirations,name, VerideaVerideaembodieswill be a modelitsand environment.management, coexist—sustainably.Veridea, however, will be more than a large, Ideas!!! Truthfully Green Ideas!!!ThisVeridea community balancewill showcasewill be structure. manifestthe bestat Veridea will be a mshop,find inmanya developmentemploymentof suchopportunities,prominence,and a principles:a catalyst inTruth,the regionGreen,andIdea.beyond.Veritas… Latin for manypracticeslevels—energy,of living in harmonyeconomics,withrationalthe naturalexceptional, mixed-use development Apex, NC in theVeridea is being designed around five guiding anticipatory design, meaning that it will bhostincludingof entertainmenta range of housingand recreationchoices,options.places toTruth.In itsVerdant…very name,forVerideaGreen. Ideaembodiesfor …well…itstransportationenvironment.patterns,This balancewater,willopenbe manifestspace andatheart of a thriving region. Veridea is beingprinciples: 1) Create economic value; 2)shop,Veridea,manyhowever,employmentwill beopportunities,more than aandlarge,aIdeas!!!principles:TruthfullyTruth, Green,GreenIdea.Ideas!!!Veritas… Latin for communitymany Eliminate to accommodate future sustainable praclevels—energy,structure. Verideaeconomics,will berationala model ofexceptional,hostdevelopedof entertainmentto becomemixed-useanddevelopmentrecreationthe next-generationOverviewoptions.in theTruth.VerideaVerdant…the conceptis beingfordesignedGreen.of waste;Ideaaroundfor3)…well…Insist on a renewable they become available, all within an envifive guiding anticipatorytransportationdesign,patterns,meaningwater,thatopenit willspace plannedandVeridea will be a new, sustainable, mixed-use communities and regionally-focused commercial with clean air, soil and energy economically,extensionheartVeridea,of a thrivinghowever, of Northregion.will Carolina’s beVerideamoreisthan world-renownedbeinga large,principles:Ideas!!! Truthfully future; 4)1) CreateGreen CreateeconomicIdeas!!! delightful urban places;value; 2) Eliminate tocommunity andaccommodate5) structure. thatfutureVeridea deliverssustainablewill the bepracticesa benefits modelasof of the Southerurban community constructed on 1,000 acres space, will ultimately be developed, along with a equitably, ecologically and elegantly enjoyed.”developedexceptional, Research Triangletomixed-use Parkbecome thedevelopment (RTP.)next-generationwithin Over the in the Town time, of Apex it will in Wake theVerideaconcept County, Integrate is North ofbeingwaste;designed nature host 3) of Insist community-oriented throughout aroundon a renewablefive guiding the spaces. community.Given theyanticipatory its become Through design,available, planning, ence meaningall design, andwithinthat quality construction an will ofenvironmentbe life and planned for which the Triaextensionheart of a thrivingof Northregion.Carolina’sVeridea Carolina.world-renownedis being It will offer almost allfuture;principles: things one would4) Create1) Createdelightfuleconomic size and aspirations,urbanvalue;places;2) Veridea Eliminate will be a modeland 5) thatto and accommodate management,delivers the benefitsfuture Veridea sustainable will showcaseof the Southernpractices the bestbe home to a forward-thinking community that Veridea will be an icon of sustainable design known.ambienceasResearchdevelopedTriangleto becomeParkthe(RTP.)next-generationfind in a development of such prominence,Over time, it will Integratethe conceptnatureof waste; a catalystthroughout3) Insist in thetheon regioncommunity.a renewable and beyond. they become practicesand qualityavailable, of livingof life forall in within harmonywhichan withtheenvironmentthe naturalseeks to accomplish objectives including similar a range of to housing those choices, places and to construction In its very because name, Veridea the embodies developer its is acting environment. This balance will be Triangle manifest is atbeextensionhome toofaNorthforward-thinkingCarolina’s world-renownedcommunity thatfuture;Veridea4) Createwill bedelightfulan icon ofurbansustainableplaces;designand 5) known.that delivers the benefits of the Southern ambienceand quality of life for which the Triangle isof the existing park, within shop, the many context employment of a opportunities, and with a purpose principles: to create Truth, Green, a sustainable Idea. Veritas… Latin community. for many levels—energy, Project economics, Teams and rational DisciplinesseeksResearchto accomplishTriangle Parkobjectives(RTP.) Over host similartime, of entertainment toitthosewill and recreation andIntegrateconstruction options. nature throughoutbecause Truth. Verdant… thethedevelopercommunity.for Green. is Idea acting for …well… transportation patterns, water, open space andofbecontemporary,thehomeexistingto a forward-thinkingecologicallypark, within thecommunityfriendly,Veridea, however,sustainablecontext of athat will be morewithVeridea than aAslarge,purposewillarchitecttobecreatean Ideas!!! iconanda sustainableof Truthfully sustainablesustainableGreencommunity.design Ideas!!!design pioneer Brand Developmentknown. community structure. Veridea will be a model ofProject Teams and Disciplinescontemporary,seeks mixed-use to accomplish development.ecologicallyobjectives A exceptional,friendly,similar significantsustainableto those mixed-use office development andAsandarchitectconstruction in the Williamand sustainablebecause McDonough Veridea the isdesigndeveloper being says, designedpioneeris “We acting around seek five guiding aanticipatory Conceptual design, meaning and that it Master will be planned Planningheart of a thriving region. Veridea is beingprinciples: 1) Create economic value; 2) Eliminate Brand Developmentto accommodate future sustainable practices asmixed-useof corporate the existing environment,development.park, withinAthe includingsignificantcontextofficeof residential aand Williamwith purpose delightfullyMcDonoughto create diverse,says,a sustainable safe,“We seekcommunity. healthy and justaConceptualProject world Teamsandand FormMasterDisciplines Based Codingdeveloped to become the next-generationthe concept of waste; 3) Insist on a renewable they become available, Planning all within an environmentcorporatecontemporary,environment,ecologicallyincludingfriendly, extension residentialsustainable of North Carolina’s delightfullyAs world-renowned architectdiverse,and sustainablesafe, future; healthy 4) Create designand delightful pioneerjust world urban places; and FormBrand 5) BasedDevelopmentthat Coding delivers the benefits of the Southern ambienceand and Master quality of Planning life for which the Triangle ismixed-use development. A significant Research office Triangle and Park (RTP.) William Over time, McDonough it will Integrate says, “We nature seek throughout a the community. Conceptualcorporate environment, including be residential home to a forward-thinking delightfully community that diverse, safe, Veridea healthy will be and icon just of world sustainable design Form Based known. Codingseeks to accomplish objectives similar to those and construction because the developer is actingof the existing park, within the context of awith purpose to create a sustainable community. Project Teams and Disciplinescontemporary, ecologically friendly, sustainable As architect and sustainable design pioneer Brand Developmentmixed-use development. A significant office and William McDonough says, “We seek aConceptual and Master Planningcorporate environment, including residential delightfully diverse, safe, healthy and just world Form Based CodingClockwise, from top: Conceptual massing models of theVeridea town center; Sustainable energy plan; VerideaClockwise, from top: Conceptual Planning massing Prospectus, models written of theand designed by Shook Kelley.Veridea town center; Sustainable energy plan; VerideaPlanningClockwise,Prospectus,from top:writtenConceptualand designedmassing modelsby ShookofKelley.theVeridea town center; Sustainable Left: energy Logo plan; for Veridea, Veridea designed by Shook Kelley;Planning Prospectus, written and designed by Shook Kelley.Clockwise, from top: Conceptual massing models of theLeft: Logo for Veridea, designed by Shook Kelley;Veridea town center; Sustainable energy plan; Veridea27© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.Left: Logo Planning for Veridea, Prospectus, designed by written Shook and Kelley; designed by Shook Kelley.The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Urban Project Design ExperienceUrban RiverfallSeymour, CTDesignSeymour, CTSeymour, CTRiverfallOverviewRiverfall Overviewis a new village proposed for a smallSeymour,town Riverfall Overviewin Connecticut is a new villageCTthat proposed will be nestled for a small in a riverRiverfall valley. town in This Connecticut a river new is village a tributary that proposed will to be the nestled for Naugatuck a small in a rivertown River valley. and in This Connecticut has river been is a the tributary that lifeblood will to be the nestled of the Naugatuck town in a rivervalley. since River This river is a tributary to the NaugatuckRiverOverviewand the industrial has been age. the lifeblood Numerous of mills the town andfactories since and the utilized industrial has been the age. the hydraulic lifeblood Numerous power of mills the of town the and riverRiverfall since the is industrial a new village age. Numerous proposed for mills a smallfor factories manufacturing utilized the and hydraulic processing power purposes. of the and rivertown factories in Connecticut utilized the hydraulic that will be power nestled of the in a river riverMany for manufacturing of the millraces and and processing spillways purposes. still exist asvalley. for manufacturing This river is and a tributary processing to the purposes. NaugatuckMany of the millraces and spillways still exist asRiver Many and of the has millraces been the and lifeblood spillways of the still town exist assince the industrial age. Numerous mills andfactories utilized the hydraulic power of the riverfor manufacturing and processing purposes.Many of the millraces and spillways still exist asdo vestiges of the old mill buildings. The projectincludes do vestiges redevelopment of the old mill of buildings. the site with The mixeduseincludes vestiges buildings redevelopment of that the will old include mill of buildings. the retail, site with restaurant, The mixed-projectprojectdoincludes residential, use buildings redevelopment office, that hospitality will include of the and retail, site civic with restaurant, uses. mixeduseriver residential, buildings banks office, and that certain hospitality will include natural and retail, and civic historic restaurant, uses. areas TheTheresidential, within river banks the site office, and will certain hospitality be preserved natural and and as civic historic part uses. of areasaThedo river vestiges banks and of the certain old mill natural buildings. and historic The projectpublic within park the site that will be serve preserved as the as starting part of point areas aincludes within the redevelopment site will be preserved of the site as with part of mixedusepublic buildings park that that will will serve include as the retail, starting restaurant,for public a new park greenway that will serve and trail as the system. starting point afor a new greenway and trail system. pointresidential, for a new greenway office, hospitality and trail and system. civic uses. Theriver banks and certain natural and historic areaswithin the site will be preserved as part of apublic park that will serve as the starting pointfor a new greenway and trail system.A redevelopment and preservation of aA redevelopment and preservation of ariverside redevelopment area once and utilized preservation by mills of andriverside area once utilized by mills andriverside factories area since once the Industrial utilized by Age mills into andafactories since the Industrial Age into afactories mix of uses. since the Industrial Age into Amix redevelopment of uses. and preservation of amix of uses.riverside area once utilized by mills andfactories since the Industrial Age into aProject Teams and Disciplinesmix of uses.Master Project Planning Teams and / Urban Disciplines DesignProjectMaster PlanningTeams and/ UrbanDisciplinesDesignMaster Planning / Urban DesignProject Teams and DisciplinesMaster Planning / Urban DesignConceptual aerial View of RiverfallConceptual aerial View of RiverfallConceptual aerial View of RiverfallConceptual aerial View of RiverfallEast ViewEast ViewEast ViewSoutheast ViewSoutheast ViewSoutheast ViewWest ViewWest ViewWest ViewSouth ViewSouth ViewSouth View© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.© 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.East © 2011 View Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved. Southeast ViewWest ViewSouth ViewJanuary 4, 2012 28

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesProject ExperienceUrban DesignChesterfield Town CenterDowntown Chesterfield, MO, Phase II29 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Project ExperienceJanuary 4, 2012 30

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesProject ExperienceUrban DesignScaleybarkCharlotte, NCShook Kelley, under the aegis of the Charlotte-MecklenburgPlanning Commission, to act as the area master planner/planning co-coordinator for the entire station area, establishinga joint agenda among the developers, developing shared urbandesign standards, and in sorting out a number of infrastructureissues that impacted all involved.There is a stop along the new Charlotte Lynx Bluelight rail line that the City of Charlotte designatedto become the city’s new, special, mixed-use,mixed-income neighborhood. Much attention waslavished upon this area in the process, includinga massive rebuilding of South Boulevard. Asa result, this area attracted the attention of noless than five national and regional developers.Sensing that development within the area couldquickly become uncoordinated, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission convinced thedevelopers to retain Shook Kelley, under the aegisof the Planning Commission, to act as the areamaster planner/planning co-coordinator for theentire station area. All agreed, even though four ofthe five developers were clients of Shook Kelley,and Shook Kelley was the master planner at thissite for two of the properties. Through a seriesof charrettes, Shook Kelley was successful inestablishing a joint agenda among the developers,developing shared urban design standards, andin sorting out a number of infrastructure issuesthat impacted all involved. The first phase of eachdevelopment component is underway.Project Teams and DisciplinesVision PlanningPublic EngagementGraphic DesignAbove, Clockwise from top left: Aerial perspective of Scaleybark site in context to Center City Charlotte; Portions of the Scaleybark Vision Book, written anddesigned by Shook Kelley; Master Plan for Scaleybark; Images of the charrette sessions for Scaleybark, hosted and conducted by Terry Shook of Shook Kelley.31 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Project ExperienceUrban DesignScaleybark (continued)Charlotte, NCShook Kelley has completed a comprehensive master plan and infrastructure assessment for the station area. These began with an inventoryof existing buildings and street connectivity proposals as well as an understanding of the TOD requirements and each developer’s program.The master plan calls for a mix of uses including: retail, restaurant, office, multi-family residential, affordable housing, a neighborhood grocery,a library and multiple public spaces all within a quarter mile of the station. A number of buildings to be built as part of the first phase of theproject have been designed. Notably, the first mixed-use building, which will be built on the southwest corner of Whitton Street and SouthBoulevard, will contain an office use above groundfloor retail. It has been designed to perform at the highest levels of sustainability and to actas the first piece of urbanism for the project anchoring the corner closest to the station platform and adjacent to a new public park.Shook Kelley coordinated with developers and others todefine the streetscape along South Boulevard. This gaveconsideration to the way in which travel lanes, bike lanes,onstreet parking, sidewalks, gateway elements andlandscaping needed to work together. The construction ofthe southbound side of this corridor and a new public park isunderway and is scheduled for completion by February 2012.The old marquee sign for what was the former QueenparkTheater will remain as a Landmark Sign not only to makesure it continues to resonate as a historic symbol for thearea, but also serves as a brand beacon for the newdevelopment. Shook Kelley designed several aestheticand functional improvements and has coordinated apreliminary structural assessment of the structure.Combined with the initiative of the developers, theguidance of the Planning Department and the leadershipof Shook Kelley, the physical urban components areindeed falling into place in accordance with the masterplan and towards the making of a transit-based placethat will prove to be exemplary.January 4, 2012 32

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesProject ExperienceUrban DesignThe Town of CorneliusCornelius, NCIn conjunction with the Town of Cornelius, NC and The McAdamsCompany, Shook Kelley designed a master plan to provide a truetown center. Through the completion of Main Street, this projectsingle-handedly transformed a deteriorating town core with nosense of place into a center of activity for the whole town.The project is the result of a public-privatepartnership directed towards the developmentof the eastern side of the Town of Cornelius,which single-handedly transformed a town corewith little sense of place into a center of activityfor the whole town.For this 100-year-old town, Shook Kelley anddeveloper Jud McAdams created a master planand provided the architectural design for a newdowntown that consists of a new town hall andcommunity center, “B” street retailing in the formof a modified food-anchored open center, and“A” street retail on the main vehicular way. As areturn to “Main Street America,” the master plandelineates a new town infrastructure that predictsthe locations of building types and amenitiesinherent to a self-sustainable community and forthe invigoration of public life. Replacing derelictbuildings and championing careful and gradualdevelopment, this new district combines retailbusinesses, office space, single and multi-familyresidential units, open/ green space, and civic/municipal uses. Located at the intersection of twomain thoroughfares and a future rail transportationline, the first phases replaced more than tenacres of old mill buildings and occupies land thatis bordered on all sides by existing residentialcommunities.The Cornelius Town Hall project is a 24,000 SFfacility built in a public-private relationshipbetween The McAdams Company and the Townof Cornelius. It was designed to accommodatea number of functions and tenants including thePlanning Department, Mayor’s Office, PublicWorks, Parks and Recreation, CommunityRooms and adjunct spaces for the PoliceDepartment pending the design and constructionof a permanent facility. Shook Kelley was theArchitect of Record for the project and theproject cost was approximately $3,200,000.Shook Kelley most recently worked on a dualproject wayfinding sign system / sign ordinancereview and revision with the Town of Cornelius.The scope involved working closely with thetown’s planning department and other keytown leaders to develop a graphic frameworkfor new Town of Cornelius identity signageand general wayfinding sign system to serveboth the public and the business sectorsthroughout the 15 square mile area of thetown. The result of the comprehensivereview and revamp of the Town’s signordinance is due to be the first of its kind forthe area: a complete transformation from thetypical outline draft ordinance document withprovisions—into a fully illustrated user manual,typical to that development pattern booksor graphic guideline documents. Instead ofthe “thou shall not” format that mostmunicipal land development ordinances takeon, this new Cornelius Sign Ordinance willencourage businesses and organizations inthe encouraged direction of improved signssizes, proper setbacks, lighting, andaesthetically pleasing types of sign typesand materials that will, over time, whollyimprove the overall character of the townand its various zoned districts throughsimplification, unification and cohesive usesof signs types, reducing the pre-existing signclutter, and enhancing the overall sense ofplace for the town.33 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Project ExperienceUrban DesignCharlotte Historic Southend Trolley /Historic Charlotte, NC SouthEndCharlotte, NCAcross America, historic districts and downtownsOverview are back in vogue. The shift to urbanism is a trendAcross grounded America, in changes historic in the districts demographic and downtowns andare sociographic back in vogue. profile The of shift today’s urbanism society. Shook is a trendgrounded Kelley understands in changes and in the capitalizes demographic upon the andsociographicpositive andprofileimmediateof today’sreactionsociety.consumersShookhaveto a sense of history. Shook Kelley’s designersKelley understands and capitalizes upon thereplicate, emulate and sometimes reinvent history,often drawing inspiration from pop-culturepositive and immediate reaction consumers haveto a sense of history. Shook Kelley’s designersicons of the past. Shook Kelley has been widelyreplicate, emulate and sometimes reinventrecognized for creating a vision and being thehistory,brand authoroften drawingof HistoricinspirationSouth End.from pop-cultureicons The of area the past. that is Shook now South Kelley End has been was, in widely therecognized 1980’s and for early creating 1990’s, a vision best described and being as thebrand “blighted”—a author of largely Historic abandoned South End. rail In corridor, a citylonging containing for a old sense warehouse of history, buildings South that End were providesdilapidated, underutilized or vacant—separatinga gentrified Dilworth community from theworking class Wilmore neighborhood. However,the district’s close proximity to Center CityCharlotte and to prominent neighborhoodsmade the area an opportunity for rebirth, andfor celebrating a piece of Charlotte’s history.Shook Kelley led an effort to brand and planthis warehouse area as Charlotte’s Next GreatPreserving, enhancing and promoting the historic South End asa dynamic, urban community offering a diversity of options forliving, working, and entertaining—including the developmentof a vision for an abandoned rail corridor in downtownCharlotte, North Carolina – a project that has been creditedwith spurring more than $600 million in development.Neighborhood—by preserving, enhancing andpromoting historic south end as a dynamic,visitors urban community a rewarding offering glimpse a into diversity the past.The of options firmhas for living, worked working, for nearly and a entertaining—includingdozen of the district’s toprenovation the development projects, of with a vision a few for notables Charlotte such asSouthend Trolley– a Brewery, project that and has Camden been credited Square. withinitiallyBothspurringprojectsmoreare locatedthan $600nearmillion formerlyworthof development in South End. In a city longing forabandoned rail corridor that now serves thea sense of history, Historic South End providesCharlotte Trolley. Shook Kelley helped to create avisitors a rewarding glimpse into the past.vision for the economic and aesthetic rehabilitationA big challenge in creating the brand of SouthofEndthewastrolleyto convincecorridor. Thebusinessesfirm wastohiredinvesttoinleadantheurbanarea andplanninglocatecharrettethere. Theandfactdevelopthat propertya visionfor values an abandoned were low helped rail corridor attract in small downtown start-upCharlotte, businesses North and Carolina—a unique retailers, project but that with has no beencredited assets or with revenue spurring to begin more with, than creating $600 million South inEnd was much like building a start-up company.The goal was to appeal to a demographic thatcraved an urban experience which was uniqueand eclectic—something Charlotte was missing.South End was characterized by icons of the past:red brick industrial buildings, pedestrian friendlystreetscapes and the Charlotte Trolley, so thebrand was built around a notion of preservinghistory while making it new and fresh.The community of Historic South End hasseen property values increase by as muchdevelopment. as 500% in the The last project 15 years involved since the the utilization first ofa businesses volunteer based relocated vintage to the trolley area. system The success as aneconomic of the revitalized development trolley tool helped for underutilizedgain support forand/or Charlotte’s blighted first areas light within rail corridor—The the urban core LYNX ofCharlotte,Blue line—whichNC.opened two years ago, andcontinues to exceed ridership projections.The project consisted of two distinct phases:There are multiple housing and mixed-usePhase One: Vision Planning and Public Engagement,projects currently underway in the area as well,and Phase Two: Implementation of Vision Plan.as the desire to live near the light rail increaseswith rising energy costs.Project Teams and DisciplinesMasterProjectPlanningTeams and/ UrbanDisciplinesDesignArchitecture Vision Planning / Environmental / Public Engagement GraphicsBrand Architecture Development / Environmental GraphicsBrand Development / Graphic DesignClockwise from top left: Front and Back sides of a Vision poster for the trolley, prepared by Shook Kelley, to document the Vision process, and to champion the cause; South End Development Corporation timelineposter; South End newletter templates, designed by Shook Kelley; South End logo and street markers; Center: Charlotte Trolley running along the 2-mile corridor.January 4, 2012 34

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesProject ExperienceUrban DesignHistoric SouthendCharlotte, NC(continued)Shook Kelley has served as brand author and co-steward for South End (shown in gold in below area plan), from the conceptual design of the South End logomark—tobe used throughout the district in the form of trailblazing and wayfinding graphics and websites, to development of all sorts of vision planning pieces,which document and guide the placemaking process.35 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Project ExperienceUrban DesignCharlotte TrolleyCharlotte, NCThe adaptive use projects by Shook Kelley on theprevious page are all located around the formerlyabandoned rail corridor that serves the CharlotteTrolley and today, the Charlotte LYNX Blue LightRail line. Shook Kelley helped to create a vision forthe economic and aesthetic rehabilitation of thetrolley corridor as well. Beginning in 1987, a successionof volunteers, primarily history and trainbuffs, gave their time, talents and funds towardrestoring the shell of Charlotte’s last vintagetrolley car as a museum piece. In 1994, thevintage trolley (Car #85) was adopted by a realestate developer who was transforming a collectionof vacant manufacturing buildings located justoutside the center city.The mostly blighted area contained anabandoned rail spur track linking the area todowntown. The car was made operable for only alength of 600 feet, and the ride became a “must”event for school trips and family outings. TerryShook and his partner, Kevin Kelley, teamed withthe developer and other volunteers to name andform two non-profit organizations—Historic SouthEnd, Inc. and Charlotte Trolley, Inc.—to supportthe new district and its historical amenity.In 1995, Shook Kelley held a public lecturethat advanced the idea of linking South End to thecenter city by establishing full-time trolley serviceupon the abandoned rail line that connected them.More than a transportation link, this endeavorwould foster economic development along thisunique corridor. Charlotte Trolley, Inc., HistoricSouth End, and Charlotte Center City Partnerscombined their efforts to host a series of charrettes,orchestrated and led by Shook, to explorethe concept. Preparation of the resulting CharlotteTrolley Vision Plan marked the first time in thecity’s history that a number of divergentfactions—-the private and the public sectors,downtown and its adjacent neighborhoods, businessleaders and common citizens, those wholive in the center city and those who work there,and the black and the white communities—-cametogether to champion an agenda for the greaterpublic good. Through intensive community workshops,a contingent of citizens, local design professionalsand national experts forged a vision ofa new urban reality in which the diverse factionscould become stakeholders and advocates for theVision Plan’s acceptance and funding. The VisionPlan was funded by the City of Charlotte at thelevel of $17.2 Million. This success also sparkeddebate about a broader light rail initiative, whichled to the successful passage of a local referendumto impose a 1/2-cent sales tax for transit.The Vision Plan proves that grassroot efforts—with goals and a pathway clearly defined—canharness the energies of both “insiders” and “outsiders”to accomplish great and lasting things.The process of openness, inclusion, honesty andaction that typified the Trolley Vision process isone that can be useful for cities large and small,regardless of the goal at hand.Project Teams and DisciplinesVision Planning / Public EngagementGraphic DesignA two-day charrette conducted by Terry Shook of Shook Kelley among a host of consultants and Charlotteans to help shape the vision for the present day trolleydistrict; A double-sided Vision poster was prepared by Shook Kelley to document the Vision process, and to champion the cause. 5,000 were printed and distributedthroughout the community. The Vision Plan for The Trolley District. Circles indicate the proposed neighborhood centers, and therefore stops, along the path.January 4, 2012 36

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesProject ExperienceUrban DesignRevielle Urban DesignRevielleLocated in the heart of an emerging biotech corridor, Reveille is planned to become abenchmark for sustainability—for protection of the natural environment, continuationLocated in the heart of an emerging biotech corridor, Reveille is planned to become aof ruralbenchmarkways of life,for sustainability—forand for creation ofprotectionculturalofandtherecreationalnatural environment,environmentscontinuationthatnurture of and rural sustain ways of the life, human and for spirit. creation Connected of cultural richly and recreational and deeply environments with the traditions thatand patterns nurture and of life sustain of the the Tidewater, human spirit. yet one Connected clearly richly focused and upon deeply the with challenging the traditionsand opportunistic and patterns business of life of the propositions Tidewater, yet of the one 21st clearly century. focused upon the challengingand opportunistic business propositions of the 21st century.OverviewEstablishing and nurturing real and substantive gourmet dining environments, in-house day care, one is single and interested in establishingOverviewconnections among the mind, the body, the spirit gyms and personal enrichment programs. Which, personal relationships; a range of choices—notEstablishing and nurturing real and substantive gourmet dining environments, in-house day care, one is single and interested in establishingand the world connections we inhabit among in, the the support mind, the of body, a the spirit from a gyms business and perspective, personal enrichment is fine if programs. they have Which,a “one personal size relationships; fits all” approach—in a range of meeting choices—not onesbusiness model, and the is world central we to inhabit the planning in, the support and of a thousands from of a business employees perspective, in one spot, is fine and if they have daily a “one needs size is conveniently fits all” approach—in provided; meeting the onesdevelopment business of Reveille. model, At is a central personal to the level, planning and cash flow thousands to support of employees it. If this is in not one your spot, and the individual daily needs is constantly is conveniently challenged provided; to grow— themost people development will find the of offerings Reveille. At and a personal attributes level, business cash model, flow to you support are at it. a If decided this is not your intellectually individual is and constantly spiritually—as challenged a result to grow— of a hostof Reveille most very people desirable. will Which find the is offerings precisely and theattributesdisadvantage business model, this amenity-rich you are at a world. decidedof educational intellectually and cultural spiritually—as experiences a result that of a are hostpoint in the of world’s Reveille new very business desirable. environment.Which is precisely the The disadvantage good news is in that this the amenity-rich “company” world. model available. of educational One may and say: cultural “This experiences sounds like that the are lifeEmployee point motivation, in the world’s loyalty, new and business productivity environment. is is rapidly becoming The good news “old is think.” that the Being “company” locked model of a available. city.” Precisely. One may say: “This sounds like the lifedependent Employee as much motivation, upon the alignment loyalty, and of productivity the is inside four is rapidly walls—no becoming matter “old how think.” supportive Being locked the Or, of a more city.” so, Precisely. a carefully planned and managedemployeedependentwith the broaderas muchculturalupon thefocusalignmentandof thecompanyinsidemayfourbe—iswalls—noa poormattersubstitutehow supportivefor athe proposition, Or, more as so, Reveille a carefully can become. planned and managedemployee with the broader cultural focus and company may be—is a poor substitute for a proposition, as Reveille can become.offerings of the company as is a paycheck. This “real” world. In a real world: one engages theofferings of the company as is a paycheck. This “real” world. In a real world: one engages thereality is particularly true for the Milleneals as natural world in both passive and active ways;reality is particularly true for the Milleneals as natural world in both passive and active ways;they make their impact in the New Knowledge a life that engages people outside of their own Project Teams and Disciplinesthey make their impact in the New Knowledge a life that engages people outside of their own Project Teams and DisciplinesEconomy. Economy. It is why the It is larger why the technology larger technology specific world of work is readily available and Vision Planningspecific world of work is readily available and Vision Planningcompanies companies go out of their go out way of their to provide way to provide accessible—a accessible—a particularly particularly important important attribute attribute if if Graphic Graphic Design DesignVirginia Beach, VAVirginia Beach, VAPage Excerpts Page from Excerpts the Vision from Book the Vision for Reveille, Book for written Reveille, and written designed and designed by Shook by Kelley Shook KelleyConceptual Master Plan view for Reveille by Shook Kelley.Conceptual Master Plan view for Reveille by Shook Kelley.37 © 2011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Project Experienceban Urban Design DesignubleDouble Oaks OaksCharlotte, NCrlotte, NCThis new community of Double OaksThis new communityhas beenof DoubleplannedOaksto not only “fit in”has been plannedthetocommunity,not only “fitbutin”to connect to andthe community,supportbut to connectadjacenttoneighborhoods.andsupport adjacent neighborhoods.Overviewiew The redevelopment of Double Oaks—a 1950’s is the stuff that fills Charlotte’s tax coffers,moderate income people at the level currentlydevelopment community of Double Oaks—a for limited 1950’s income families—is is the stuff an that fills Charlotte’s repopulates tax it’s coffers, inner city schools, and moderate generally income people housed. at the However, level currently it will do so within a new,unity for limited opportunity income families—is to demonstrate an how market repopulates forces can it’s inner makes city schools, more efficient and generally use of all manner housed. of provided However, it expanded will do so community within a new, that spans a broad racial,unity to demonstrate be harnessed how market to achieve forces two can complimentary makes more goals: efficient but use underutilized of all manner inner of provided city infrastructure expanded community economic, that spans age a broad and family racial, defined spectrum andnessed to achieve Housing two for complimentary low to moderate goals: income but people underutilized in inner resources. city infrastructure In the wake andof this progress, economic, a nagging age and family includes defined services spectrum that cater andto people daily needs.g for low to moderate dwellings income similar in people design into high quality resources. market In the wake question of this remains: progress, Are a nagging we rebuilding includes our services that In cater the new to people Double daily Oaks, needs. the housing for those ongs similar in design rate housing; to high and quality to provide market this within question a newremains: Are communities we rebuilding so our that all people can and In the will new be Double Oaks, the way the up housing will be for undistinguishable those on from thoseusing; and to community provide this that within also a new includes substantial communities market so that residents? all people Where can and Will will These be Winds the Take way Us? up will be undistinguishable who need a leg up. from thoseunity that also rate includes housing substantial of various market price points and residents? Where Will These Charlotte Winds Take Housing Us? Partnership who believes need a leg up. In nature, wind is a powerful yet unseen force.using of various configurations price points along and with neighborhood The appropriate Charlotte Housing that it Partnership can have a believes profound effect upon In the nature, wind is The a powerful Charlotte yet Housing unseen Partnership’s force. redevelopmentrations along retail, with neighborhood office and community appropriate support that spaces. it can have a profound redevelopment effect upon of one the Charlotte’s most The sprawling, Charlotte Housing of Double Partnership’s Oaks will redevelopment be no less powerful, one thatffice and community The winds support of spaces. Change are Blowing. redevelopment Across of one forgotten Charlotte’s and most yet promise-holding sprawling, industrial of Double zones, Oaks will will be no gently less yet powerful, surely guide one that the creation of a newwinds of Change America, are Blowing. our once Across shunned and recently forgotten and yet promise-holding and associated industrial housing zones, districts. This will new gently yet surely community guide the creation that does of right a newby those who now livea, our once shunned abandoned and “down recently wind” lands are being and associated sought housing community districts. will This rise newupon the land now community occupied that does there, right and by those who from now a broad live racial, social andned “down wind” out and lands inhabited are being by those sought unfettered community by old will rise upon by the the substandard land now occupied rental project known there, as and Double those from economic a broad racial, spectrum social who and will make it their home.d inhabited by perceptions those unfettered and stereotypes. by old No where by the is this substandard rental Oaks. project The Charlotte known Housing as Double Partnership economic will utilize spectrum who will make it their home.tions and stereotypes. trend more No evident where than is this the City of Charlotte, Oaks. The NC. Charlotte the Housing best practices—and Partnership will even utilize the resources—ofore evident than Redundant the City industrial of Charlotte, zones NC. and undervalued the best inner practices—and the real even estate the resources—ofdevelopment world, while achieving Project Teams and Disciplinesdant industrial city zones neighborhoods and undervalued are being inner repopulated the real at estate a development a goal that world, is definitely while achieving not of the real Project estate Teams and Master Disciplines Planning / Urban Designighborhoods are breathtaking being repopulated rate by relatively a affluent, a goal often that young is definitely development not of the real world. estate That is, the new Master Double Planning / Urban Architecture Design / Environmental Graphicstaking rate by and relatively “creative” affluent, people often drawn young to urban development living. This world. Oaks That is, will the provide new Double high quality housing Architecture for low to / Environmental Brand Development Graphicsreative” people drawn to urban living. This Oaks will provide high quality housing for low to Brand DevelopmentClockwise, from top left: Master Plan for Double Oaks; Aerial perspective rendering of Double Oaks; Conceptual view of an entryse, from top left: Master into one Plan of the for various Double residential Oaks; Aerial offerings; perspective Views rendering of the mixed-use of Double areas. Oaks; Conceptual view of an entryof the various residential offerings; Views of the mixed-use areas.January 4, 2012 38

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesProject ExperienceUrban DesignUrbanMagnoliaDesignMagnoliaCharleston, SCCharleston, SCCharleston, SCOverviewBetween Overviewthe cities of Charleston and NorthCharlestonOverviewlies an approximately 3,000 acre,Between the cities of Charleston and Northignored and abandoned industrial sector. KnownCharleston Between the lies cities an approximately of Charleston 3,000 and Northacre,as "The Neck," the area is split down the middleignored Charleston and lies abandoned an approximately industrial 3,000 sector. acre,Knownby Interstate 26 by underutilized rail lines andas ignored "The Neck," and abandoned the area is industrial split down sector. the middle Knownmarginalized city streets. The land use consistsby as "The Interstate Neck," 26 the by area underutilized is split down rail lines the and middleof petroleum depots and other similar facilitiesmarginalized by Interstate city 26 by streets. underutilized The land rail use lines consists andalong the Cooper River, with the Ashley Riverof marginalized petroleum city depots streets. and other The land similar use facilities consistsside being home to a collection of brownfieldalong of petroleum the Cooper depots River, and with other the similar Ashley facilitiesRiverproperties polluted with a host of contaminant's.side along being the Cooper home to River, a collection with the of Ashley brownfield RiverSprinkled among this industrial wasteland areproperties side being polluted home to with a collection a host of of contaminant's.brownfieldsmall remnants of dilapidated neighborhoods.Sprinkled properties among polluted this with industrial a host wasteland of contaminant's.areThe communities have survived despite thesmall Sprinkled remnants among of this dilapidated industrial neighborhoods.wasteland areignobility (and the environmental assault) of theirThe small communities remnants of have dilapidated survived neighborhoods.despite theneighbors, and the debilitating effect of havingignobility The communities (and the environmental have survived despite assault) theof theirI-26 bisect them. Despite recent history, this areaneighbors, ignobility (and the environmental debilitating effect assault) of havingoffers great promise for redevelopment. Locatedof theirI-26 neighbors, bisect them. and the Despite debilitating recent effect history, of havingthis areaalong the storied Ashley River (includingoffers I-26 bisect great them. promise Despite for redevelopment. recent history, Locatedsaltwater marshes in various states ofthis areaalong offers the great storied promise Ashley for redevelopment. River (includingenvironmental stress), it harbors elementsLocatedofsaltwater along the marshes storied Ashley in various River states (includingofCharleston's past in the form of unkept Civilenvironmental saltwater marshes stress), in various it harbors states elements ofofCharleston's environmental past stress), in the it form harbors of unkept elements Civil ofCharleston's past in the form of unkept CivilAn endeavor that embraces the existing communities,An restores endeavor the environmental that embraces and the historic existing resources communities, ofAn endeavor that embraces the existing communities,restores the area, the and environmental engages every and level historic of the resources publicofrestores the environmental and historic resources ofprocess the area, to and serve engages as a "sprawl every level buster" of the for public the entirethe area, and engages every level of the publicprocess region of to Charleston, serve as a SC."sprawl buster" for the entireprocess to serve as a "sprawl buster" for the entireregion of Charleston, SC.region of Charleston, SC.War-era cemeteries, along with traces of the Environmental and historic resources would becity's defensive wall that was erected during the elevated, remediated and restored, to form theWar-era cemeteries, along with traces of theEnvironmental and historic resources would beCivil War. Hope, however, has been present in nucleus of both the physical form and theWar-era cemeteries, along with traces of the Environmental and historic resources would becity's defensive wall that was erected during theelevated, remediated and restored, to form thethe form of the Greater Charleston"story" of this new place; 5. The transportationCivil city's War. defensive Hope, however, wall that was has been erected present during thenucleus elevated, of both remediated the physical and restored, form and to the form theEmpowerment Corporation, which for years had infrastructure can be both a blessing and a curse,the Civil form War. of Hope, the Greater however, Charleston has been present in"story" nucleus of this of both new the place; physical 5. The form transportation and theadvocated change.and the current interstate, rail lines and city streetEmpowerment the form of the Corporation, Greater Charlestonwhich for years hadinfrastructure "story" of this can new be place; both a 5. blessing The transportationand a curse,Recognizing the intrinsic value of the area, a paradigm exist as a major stumbling block toadvocated Empowerment change. Corporation, which for years hadand infrastructure the current can interstate, be both rail a blessing lines and and city a street curse,large environmental REIT, along with its local realizing the area's potential; 6. Once the currentadvocated Recognizing change.the intrinsic value of the area, aparadigm and the current exist as interstate, a major stumbling rail lines block and city to streetpartner, is continually purchasing significant infrastructure is sorted out, the development planlarge Recognizing environmental the intrinsic REIT, along value with of its the local area, arealizing paradigm the exist area's as potential; a major stumbling 6. Once the block current tobrownfield properties along the Ashley River. could catalyze a rail-based transit initiative longpartner, large environmental is continually REIT, purchasing along significant with its localinfrastructure realizing the is area's sorted potential; out, the 6. development Once the currentplanThese purchases were based upon the following envisioned for the entire Charleston Peninsula; 7.brownfield partner, is properties continually along purchasing the Ashley significantRiver.could infrastructure catalyze a is rail-based sorted out, transit the initiative development long planbeliefs: 1. While "The Neck"—in both name and Public process and engagement.These brownfield purchases properties were along based the upon Ashley the following River.envisioned could catalyze for the a rail-based entire Charleston transit initiative Peninsula; long7.perception—separates the cities of Charlestonbeliefs: These purchases 1. While "The were Neck"—in based upon both the name followingandPublic envisioned process for and the engagement.entire Charleston Peninsula; 7.and North Charleston, a new initiative—dubbedperception—separates beliefs: 1. While "The Neck"—in the cities of both Charleston name and Public process and engagement.the "Upper Peninsula"—could encompass landand perception—separates North Charleston, a the new cities initiative—dubbedunder both cities' jurisdiction to bringof Charlestonthe citiesthe and "Upper North Peninsula"—could Charleston, a new encompass initiative—dubbedlandtogether; 2. Communities could be developed to Project Teams and Disciplinesunder the "Upper both cities' Peninsula"—could jurisdiction to encompass bring the citiesbe extensions of the historic city of Charleston,land Town Planningtogether; under both 2. Communities cities' jurisdiction could to be bring developed the citiestoProject Teams and Disciplinesand the adjacent neighborhoods of NorthMaster Planningbe together; extensions 2. Communities of the historic could city of be Charleston, developed toTown Project Planning Teams and DisciplinesCharleston; 3. The existing neighborhood would Architectureand be extensions the adjacent of neighborhoods the historic city of of North Charleston,Master Town Planningbe embraced and nurtured in every way; 4. Graphic DesignCharleston; and the adjacent 3. The neighborhoods existing neighborhood of NorthwouldArchitecture Master Planningbe Charleston; embraced 3. and The nurtured existing in neighborhood every way; 4. wouldGraphic ArchitectureDesignbe embraced and nurtured in every way; 4. Graphic Design33 232211146446767Siteplan Key: 7 (above)Siteplan 1. Rosemont Key: Community(above)2. I-26 Realignment1.Siteplan RosemontKey: Community3. Biotechnology District (above)2. I-26 Realignment4. 1. Commercial Rosemont CommunityCore3. Biotechnology District5. 2. Magnolia I-26 Realignment Cemetery4. Commercial Core6. 3. Union Biotechnology Cemetery District5. Magnolia Cemetery7. 4. Monrovia Commercial Cemetery Core6. Union Cemetery5. Magnolia Cemetery7. Monrovia Cemetery6. Union Cemetery7. Monrovia Cemetery555Clockwise from top left: Aerial Rendering of Site; Aerial Satellite perspective of Site Area (Highlighted in yellow); Site Plan of Magnolia; Photos of the existing community of Rosemont; Birds-eye perspective of theconceptual town center area for Magnolia.Clockwise from top left: Aerial Rendering of Site; Aerial Satellite perspective of Site Area (Highlighted in yellow); Site Plan of Magnolia; Photos of the existing community of Rosemont; Birds-eye perspective of theconceptual town center area for Magnolia.Clockwise from top left: Aerial Rendering of Site; Aerial Satellite perspective of Site Area (Highlighted in yellow); Site Plan of Magnolia; Photos of the existing community of Rosemont; Birds-eye perspective of the©conceptual 392011 Shook Kelley, Inc. All rights reserved.town center area for Magnolia.The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons©20112011ShookShookKelley,Kelley,Inc.Inc.AllAllrightsrightsreserved.reserved.

E. Outline of ServicesThe scope of services we propose to provide is as suggested in Section III. Scope of Service onpage 4 of the RFP and as further described, as follows:We understand from the RFP that the state statutes of New Hampshire allow for a third-party,non-biased peer review of all land use applications. Accordingly, the Planning Board of the Townof Londonderry, NH is soliciting for consultants to perform such a review. It is understood fromthe RFP that there will be a review of the PUD application for Woodmont Commons that willoccur in two stages:First, there will be a review of the application with regard to completeness and fitness as it standsagainst the requirements of all ordinances, regulations and policies having jurisdiction over theapplication which was submitted on October 14, 2011. The Consultant Team will, based uponthese governing documents, perform what we will call a Technical Review of the applicationwhich will be objective in nature. This review will make sure that such things as the requireddrawings, studies, submittal forms, schedules, data summaries etc. have been included andproperly submitted. We understand this review to be more of a “checklist” review which willculminate in a written recommendation by the Consultant Team to the Planning Board as to thelevel of completeness and fitness of the application. It is assumed that there will be no publicinput or meetings, workshops or hearings during this stage as the application has been submittedand is awaiting application acceptance by the Planning Board.Second, upon ascertaining and verifying the completeness and fitness of the application and uponthe Planning Board’s acceptance of same, the Consultant Team will undertake a more subjectiveDesign Review of the application. This review will examine the various merits, design and technicalaspects of the PUD for Woodmont Commons at a more in-depth level and shall be based upon thebest practices and standard of care that is espoused by the Planning and Urban Design professionincluding those concepts, tenets and rules-of-thumb associated with New Urbanism and TraditionalNeighborhood Development (TND). Third, Shook Kelley recognizes that Woodmont Commons is ahuge event in the life of the Town of Londonderry. As such, much debate, review, discussion withinthe public arena will accompany this application. It is understood that, during this Design Reviewstage, there will be input from residents, property owners and other stakeholders of Londonderryand other regional interests, including the Applicants. It is assumed that this input will be given vis avis public meetings, workshops and hearings and that the Town of Londonderry will coordinate, facilitateand schedule these events and consolidate the public input for review by the Consultant Team.Therefore, our proposed Scope of Services is as follows:Stage One: Acceptance ReviewA. Review of the Woodmont Commons’ PUD application as submitted on October 14, 2011.B. Review of all Planning Board minutes from all workshop meetings and other recordeddiscussions held with regard to the Woodmont Commons PUD application.C. Review of all ordinances, regulations, policies, long range plans and other governingdocuments associated with the Planned Unit Development ordinance and having jurisdictionover the application.D. Examination of previous successful Town of Londonderry PUD applications, if any.E. Provision of a written recommendation report* to the Planning Board regarding thecompleteness of the Woodmont Commons PUD application.(continued)January 4, 2012 40

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesStage Two: Application ReviewA. Review and comment upon the architecture, planning and urban design merits of theapplication.B. Review and comment upon the civil engineering, traffic, pedestrian, parking and municipalservices components of the application.C. Review and comment upon the economic, financial, funding and phasing strategies andmechanisms established by the application.D. Provision of a comprehensive written, annotated and illustrative commentary report*synthesizing all comments, opinions and recommendations from the Consultant Team.Stage Three: Ongoing ServicesA. Attendance and participation at all meetings at which the Woodmont Commons PUDapplication will be heard or discussed, if required by the Board.B. Assimilate all public input recorded by agents of the Planning Board during Stage Two.C. Respond to queries posed by the Town of Londonderry, or from the Applicant or otherparties as received through the Town of Londonderry.*These reports shall be provided to the Planning Board in both hard copy and electronic(PDF) format.41 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

F. Team Organizational ChartThe Town of Londonderry, MEWoodmont CommonsPRIMARY FIRMShook Kelley, Inc.Master Planning/ Urban Design/ PlacemakingTerry Shook, FAIA - Principal-In-ChargeMichael Dunning, AIA, LEED AP - Lead PrincipalTom Goodwin, AIA - Urban Design & PlanningJeff Camillo - Communication Graphics2151 Hawkins Street, Suite 400Charlotte, NC 28203Tel. 704-377-0661CONSULTANTGreenman Pedersen, Inc.Civil Engineering, Traffic Engineering,Transportation PlanningJason Plourde, PE - Project DirectorJohn W. Diaz, PE, PTOE - V.P./Technical AdvisorJoseph Johnson, PE, PTOE - Lead Traffic EngineerHeather Monticup, PE - Transporation EngineerGeoff Howie, PE - Lead Civil EngineerJim Noyes - Civil EngineerCONSULTANTCushman & WakefieldRetail ConsultingMatthew WinnCharles Warren, PhDJalna Silverstein55 Allen Plaza, 7th FloorAtlanta, GA 30308Tel. 404-853-5309105 Central Street, Suite 4100Stoneham, MA 02180Tel. 781-279-5500January 4, 2012 42

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesG. Summary MatrixAs requested, the following matrix demonstrates the proposed Shook Kelley personnel involvement per project of codifying workablesolutions for clients, towns and cities.Terry Shook, FAIAShook Kelley, Inc.Principal-in-ChargeMichael Dunning, AIA,CNU, NCARB, LEED APShook Kelley, Inc.PrincipalTom Goodwin, AIA, CNUShook Kelley, Inc.PrincipalJeff CamilloShook Kelley, Inc.Communication GraphicsBiltmore Park Asheville, NCBirkdale Village Huntersville, NCFort Monroe Hampton, VATown of Palmer Palmer, MATwinbrook Rockville, MDEast Beach Norfolk, VAThe Vineyards Lewes, DEDarrow Pond New Milford, CTDunham Farm East Lyme, CTVeridea Apex, NCRiverfall Seymour, CTChesterfield Town Center Chesterfield, MOStreets of SouthGlenn Denver, COScaleybark Charlotte, NCTown of Cornelius Cornelius, NCHistoric Southend Charlotte, NCCharlotte Trolley Charlotte, NCRevielle Virginia Beach, VADouble Oaks Charlotte, NCMagnolia Charleston, SC43 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

AppendiceJanuary 4, 2012 44

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesPersonnelPrincipal-in-ChargeTerry Shook, FAIA - Shook Kelley, Inc.Charles Terry Shook, FAIA, is a founding partner and principal of Shook Kelley. In serving as principal-in-charge, Shook runs a New Urban planningand design group with an emphasis upon the creation of new communities in both the suburbs and within urban cores. Currently, Shook is leadinghis team with the duties of master planning, sustainable criteria development, form-based coding and brand development for Veridea, a new,sustainable, mixed-use urban community constructed on 1,000 acres within the Town of Apex in Wake County, North Carolina. Veridea aims tobecome a 21st century version of the Research Triangle Park area—where living, working, and playing can coexist—sustainably. It will offer almostall things one would find in a development of such prominence, including a range of housing choices, places to shop, many employment opportunities,and a host of entertainment and recreation options.Three of Shook’s most notable projects include Birkdale Village (Charlotte, NC), Magnolia (Charleston, SC) and Charlotte’s South EndDistrict (Charlotte, NC). Representing a genuine expression of town building and urban living, Birkdale Village, selected as a finalist in the UrbanLand Institute’s 2003 Awards For Excellence competition, combines shopping, dining, apartments and entertainment venues within a 52-acremixed-use development. The Magnolia project is a benchmark for urban progress, and will transform a 300-acre brownfield section of waterfrontproperty, as part of larger area north of Charleston’s Historic District, into a vibrant destination where members of the community will work, shop,play and live. Hired to lead an urban planning charrette and develop a vision for an abandoned rail corridor in downtown Charlotte, NC, ShookKelley, Inc. led the public charrette for Charlotte’s South End District. Included was the establishment of vintage trolley service and, ultimately,light rail service which has been credited with spurring more than $600 million in development along the rail line. The project was also selected asa finalist in the Urban Land Institute’s 2003 Awards For Excellence competition.An annual lecturer at the Executive Education Program at the Harvard University Graduate School of Design (GSD), Shook also serves in an advisorycapacity to the Dean of the College of Architecture at UNCCharlotte, from which he graduated cum laude in 1976. He is a memberof the International Downtown Association and the Urban Land Institute. He has received numerous awards, and is a frequent guest lecturer fornational organizations such as the Urban Land Institute, The Congress for the New Urbanism, The Seaside Institute, National Trust for HistoricPreservation, and the International Council of Shopping Centers, among others. Shook has also been very involved in historic preservation activities.He served for many years as president of Berryhill Preservation Society, a non-profit revolving fund that saved and renovated historic housesin Charlotte’s Fourth Ward neighborhood. He is past president of Charlotte Trolley, Inc., dedicated to reviving vintage street car service. He has alsobeen an Architect for over ten national registered properties in his career.BackgroundEducationBachelor of Arts/ArchitectureUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCum Laude 1976Graduate StudiesNorth Carolina State University1977–78Past Professional ExperienceDalton Moran Shook ArchitectureCharlotte, NCPrincipal/Design, 1976–1992Relevant ActivitiesContributor and Faculty Member for“Planning and Design Principles,”a course offered for Harvard University’sGraduate School of DesignAffiliationsCharlotte Trolley, Inc.President 2005-2006Board Member 2003-2004AIA Charlotte ChapterPast President 2004President 2003AIA North CarolinaBoard Member (2002–2004)American Institute of Architects (AIA)MemberNCARBCertificate No. 37933Urban Land Institute (ULI)MemberHistoric Rosedale, Inc.Past DirectorTheatre CharlottePast President (1992–93)Board of DirectorsBoard of AdvisorsUniversity of North Carolina atCharlotte/College of Architecture(1983–1990)Berryhill Preservation, Inc.Past President (1987–89)45 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

PersonnelRecent ProjectsPrincipal-in-ChargeTerry Shook, FAIA - Shook Kelley, Inc. (Continued)Triangle TransitRetained as part of a team to providestrategic guidance and planning related toTransit Oriented Development (TOD) forthe Triangle Transit Authority (TTA), whichincludes Wake, Orange and Durhamcounties in North Carolina, as a part oftheir effort to seek a 1/2 cent sales taxfor transit, and to apply for New Startsfunding.Raleigh, NCThe MillsArchitectural Renovations and Planningfor The Community Builders, Inc.Charlotte, NCTwinbrookRetained as part of a team to providestrategic guidance and planning related toTransit Oriented Development (TOD) forthe Triangle Transit Authority (TTA), whichincludes Wake, Orange and Durhamcounties in North Carolina, as a part oftheir effort to seek a 1/2 cent sales taxfor transit, and to apply for New Startsfunding.Rockville, MDVerideaVision Planning and Master Planning ofa new, sustainable, mixed-use urbancommunity constructed on 1,000 acreswithin the Town of Apex in Wake County,North Carolina. It will offer almost all thingsone would find in a developmentof such prominence, including a range ofhousing choices, places to shop, manyemployment opportunities, and a host ofentertainment and recreation options.Apex, NCDouble OaksVision Planning, Master Planning andarchitecture of a sustainable communitythat reaches across a broad spectrum ofincome and housing choices.Charlotte, NCRiverfallMaster Planning of a redevelopmentand preservation of a riverside areaonce utilized by mills and factories sincethe Industrial Age into a mix of uses.Seymour, CTEast BeachVision Planning and Master Planning of theretail/mixed-used quadrants of East Beachwhile maintaining the high, neotraditionaldesign standards established by theexisting single-family neighborhood.Norfolk, VAScaleybarkIt will be one of the first Transit OrientedDevelopments along a new rail corridor.Consisting of a great mix of uses, theproject will test the limits of the TODzoning districts sponsored by the City ofCharlotte and will attempt to incorporateother civic and municipal uses into theplan. The development model is boldand complex, but flexible enough torespond to market opportunities.Charlotte, NCEpiscopal Epiphany SchoolMaster Planning & Architecture for aSchool CampusDanville, VAIversonAssisted with the rezoning of theproperty from an industrial zone to aTransit Oriented District (TOD) zoneallowing for a mix of uses, a myriadof building types and a host of publicopen spaces.Charlotte, NCWinslow ParkMaster Planning & conceptualdesign for the creation of a collegiate focusedcommunity.Athens, GAKanawhaThis project holds the promise ofbecoming one of America’s foremostgreen communities. It also incorporatesa significant archeological siteassociated with the native AmericanCatawba Nation dating to the time ofthe French & Indian war.Fort Mill, SCTributaryMulti-phased village center for aresidential community.Atlanta, GAMcCulloughPlanning for a TND connected via bus tothe CATS light rail line of Charlotte, NC.Charlotte, NCFremeauxVision & master planning for a 400 acrenew town on the edge of LakePonchetrain.Slidell, LAThe FountainsThe proposed development will be amodel of Place Sensitive Planning,focused on creating a place that “fits”into the landscape, enhances the needsof the community, and improves uponthe natural world for the future.Fort Myers, FLBlenheim ParkVision Planning and Master Planning fora mixed use community that bordersthe Virginia Beach, VA and Chesapeake,VA town lines.Leigh VillageTown planning for a 350 acre denseTransit Oriented Development (TOD)focused upon the proposed Chapel Hilllight rail stop of the Triangle TransitAuthority.Chapel Hill, NCJanuary 4, 2012 46

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesPersonnelPrincipal-in-ChargeTerry Shook, FAIA - Shook Kelley, Inc. (Continued)Recent Projects (Continued)MagnoliaConcept vision and master planningto reclaim and redevelop an environmentallychallenged land tract between theAshley and Cooper rivers. Magnolia is anendeavor that will serve as a “sprawlbuster”for the entire region of Charleston,SC. Via a public process, a vision wascrafted that will embrace existingcommunities and restore environmentaland historic resources.Charleston, SCCharleston MidtownA development study based on a conceptof interconnected alleys and courtyardsintended as a gateway development intothe historic district of Charleston, SC.Charleston, SCCharlotte Trolley District /Trolley Vision PlanRetained by the City of Charlotte,Charlotte Center City Partners and Bankof America to lead an urban planningcharette and develop a vision for anabandoned rail corridor in downtownCharlotte—a project that has beencredited with spurring more than $600million in development.Charlotte, NCHearst Tower PlazaWorked in collaboration with TrammellCrow and The Keith Corporation forclient Bank of America. The project,which serves as the entryway to the46-story Hearst Tower, is a triumph ofcorporate responsibility in a developmentarena known more for monumentalitythan urban sensitivity.Charlotte, NCSt. Lawrence SquarePublic/ private, mixed-use developmentAsheville, NCCuretonVision planning and master planningbased on local historic precedents,cultural traditions, and a commitment tostewardship of the natural landscape.Waxhaw, NCEndviewConcept vision and master planningfor a project that represents a uniqueopportunity to preserve the historicpast while simultaneously growinginto the future.Newport News, VAColonial WilliamsburgStrategic Brand DevelopmentWilliamsburg, VABusch Entertainment CorporationSeaWorld OrlandoMaster Planning, Branding andVenue DesignOrlando, FLBerewickMaster Planning and ArchitectureCharlotte, NCBrown FarmMaster Planning and ArchitectureVirginia Beach, VAMonteithVision Planning and Public Engagementfor Arvida and the town of Huntersville,NC, to pull together a unified conceptualmaster plan for a TraditionalNeighborhood Development.Huntersville, NCDC RanchMaster planned community featuringover 4 million s.f. of a new towncenter, in conjunction with Mr. LaurenB. Askew, FAIA.Scotsdale, AZBirkdale VillageA 52-acre, mixed-use project, consistingof housing, office and retail. More thana shopping center designed as a MainStreet, the streets of Birkdale actuallygo somewhere, connecting at everyjuncture to large, adjacent housingcommunities.Huntersville, NCBiltmore ParkA master-planned community featuringresidential neighborhoods, businesslocations and recreation, shopping,dining, entertainment and recreation.Asheville, NCSouth End Development Corp./Historic South EndThe co-creation and branding of SouthEnd, a mixed-use Charlotte communitycreated within an area of underutilizedand abandoned warehousesCharlotte, NCTown of Cornelius, NCA new town center for the 100 yearold municipality of Cornelius, NC,a project which includes a uniqueapplication of North Carolina law tomerge public and private developmentCharlotte Shopping DistrictA 1.2 Million square foot shoppingdistrict (proposal only) for The RouseCompany, within downtown Charlotte.Consulting ServicesInfill project design and new towndevelopment in AustraliaVirginia Beach3,000 acre vision plan for a newcenter of the city.Park SouthMixed-Use redevelopmentCharlotte, NC47 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

PersonnelLead PrincipalMichael Dunning, AIA, CNU, NCARB, LEED AP - Shook Kelley, Inc.PrincipalMichael’s experience will large and complex mixed-use projects began with the Cornelius Town Center and Cornelius Town Hall in 1996 and hascontinued to involve ever-larger and more meaningful placemaking. As Principal-in-Charge of the Birkdale Village project in Huntersville, NorthCarolina, Michael led not only the design team through the design process, but also oversaw the construction of the entire project. Michael’sexperience includes the preparation of over 100 master plans and several design guidelines, vision books and pattern books associated with theseprojects. As an architect and urbanist, Michael’s skills are paramount when it comes to placemaking. He is a LEED Accredited Professional, andserves on the review committee for the pending LEED ND (Neighborhood Development) rating system.BackgroundEducationBachelor of Architecture,The University of North Carolina atCharlotteCum Laude 1993Bachelor of Arts in Architecture,The University of North Carolina atCharlotte1992Minor in EnglishMinor in PhilosophyCollege of ArchitectureSummer Program 1990,The University of North Carolina atCharlotte,Cappanole, ItalyProfessional RegistrationRegistered Architect in North CarolinaNCARB Certification 1998Publications2002 Realtor ReflectionsAffiliationsAmerican Institute of Architects (AIA)MemberFounder and Chair, Charlotte AIAMentorship Program CommitteeChair, Charlotte AIATraveling Fellowship Committee 2007The University of North Carolina atCharlotte, College of ArchitectureAdvisory CouncilFounding MemberAffiliations (Continued)University of North Carolina at Charlotte,College of Architecture Design Studiosand Graduate Program Invited Instructor/Guest Critic1998 Graduate School of Design, HarvardUniversity with Mr. Charles Terry Shook,AIA Presentation of ProfessionalDevelopment ProgramThe Congress for New Urbanism (CNU)MemberDesign Forum, co-founderCharlotte AIA and University of NorthCarolina at Charlotte, College ofArchitectureNorth Carolina Downtown DevelopmentAssociation (NCDDA)Architects, Designers, Plannersfor Social Responsibility (ADPSR) MemberCharlotte Habitat for Humanity CrewLeader1991 Spring Lecture Series, University ofNorth Carolina at Charlotte-COA “SouthernVoices, Southern Visions” LecturerUniversity of Tennessee, KnoxvilleDepartment of ArchitectureInvited Speaker/Guest CriticAndrews University2007 Design Charrette for Michigan CityProject ConsultantRecent Selected ProjectsTwinbrookMaster Planning, Strategic Vision PlanningRockville, MDVeridea (TOD)Master Planning, Sustainable Criteriaand Regulations OrdinanceApex, NCEast BeachMaster Planning of the retail/mixed-usedquadrants of East Beach.Norfolk, VAIversonMaster Planning of a Transit OrientedDevelopment (TOD)Charlotte, NCScaleybarkMaster Planning of a Transit OrientedDevelopment (TOD)Charlotte, NCThe Vineyards at Nassau ValleyMaster Planning and ArchitectureLewes, DEThe Village at LeesburgMaster Planning and ArchitectureLeesburg, VABerewickMaster Planning and ArchitectureCharlotte, NCDarrow Pond VillageMaster Planning and ArchitectureEast Lyme, CTDunham Farm VillageMaster Planning and ArchitectureNew Milford, CTJanuary 4, 2012 48

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesPersonnelDesign & PlanningTom Goodwin, AIA, CNU - Shook Kelley, Inc.PrincipalWithin the firm, Tom has become the principal that has invested the time and energy through course work and through project experience inbecoming highly proficient in the application and calibration of the Smart Code, the premier form-based zoning code. Beyond the acceptedpractice parameters of the Smart Code, Tom, through projects of the firm, has taken the code’s basic tenets for T5 and T6 commercial zonesand greatly expanded it, in the manner required by this RFP. Tom also has extensive experience in the preparation of Design Guidelines andPattern Books required in order to implement mixed-use projects.BackgroundEducationBachelor of Architecture, 1980The Pennsylvania State UniversityBachelor of Science in Architecture, 1979The Pennsylvania State UniversityAffiliationsAmerican Institute of Architects (AIA)MemberRegistered Architect in North CarolinaNCARB Certified MemberCNU MemberSmart Code ProDavidson Comprehensive PlanningCommitteeDavidson Griffith Street Charrette TeamRiver Run Architectural StandardsCommitteeRecent Selected ProjectsThe MillsArchitectural Renovations and Planningfor The Community Builders, Inc.Charlotte, NCVeridea (TOD)Master Planning, Sustainable Criteriaand Regulations OrdinanceApex, NCDouble OaksArchitecture, Pattern Book& Sustainable CriteriaCharlotte, NCKanawhaMaster Planning, Pattern Bookand Sustainable CriteriaFort Mill, SCStreets of SouthGlennMaster Planning and ArchitectureMixed-Use DevelopmentDenver, COMasseyMaster PlanningFort Mill, NCEdenmoorMaster PlanningLincon County, SCKapalua Land Company, Ltd.Planning and Design,Kapalua Town CenterKapalua Maui, HIMillbridgeMaster Planning and ArchitecturePattern BookWaxhaw, NCMonteith ParkProject Manager/Urban DesignerHuntersville, NCManchesterMixed-Use DevelopmentProject ManagerCharlotte, NCCamden Square Master PlanProject Architect1930 CamdenCharlotte, NCPreface to the Trolley Vision PlanningProject ManagerCharlotte, NCLeigh Village (TOD)Master PlanningDurham, NCAshetonMaster Planning, Architectural, andRetail GuidelinesNewport News, VAMidtown Mixed-Use DevelopmentPlanningCharleston, SCEDS-Dulles Mixed-Use DevelopmentMP & Retail Design GuideFairfax, VABirkdale VillageProject TeamHuntersville, NC49 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

PersonnelCommunication GraphicsJeff Camillo - Shook Kelley, Inc.Senior Graphic DesignerObviously, the task you have identified is in large measure a visual one that will live in many forms. Jeff has been with Shook Kelley for over 15years, and is responsible for many of the brand-centric deliverables that support the Brand Development and Vision Planning portions for the firm’sUrban Planning clients. An important thing to know about Jeff is that he is both a 2-dimensional and a 3-dimensional graphic designer. This isimportant in that signage—a keystone of a good placemaking presentation—is 3-dimensional. Standards established by a graphic designer withoutthis capability—and without the actual hands-on experience of having his own 3-D work fabricated and installed—can be very problematic. Jeff isskilled in all levels of detail from planning, development and implementation with Brands and Identities.BackgroundEducationBachelor of Science, Studio ArtConcentration in Graphic DesignNazareth CollegeRochester, NYMay 1995Recent Selected ProjectsTwinbrookDesign and Presentation team memberCommunication GraphicsBrand DevelopmentRockville, MDThe Town of CorneliusDesign and Presentation team memberBrand Identity DevelopmentEnvironmental Wayfinding ProgramCornelius, NCVerideaDesign and Presentation team memberCommunication GraphicsBrand DevelopmentApex, NCThe Vineyards at Nassau ValleyDesign and Presentation team memberEnvironmental GraphicsLewes, DEScott Fischer EnterprisesBrand Identity DevelopmentFort Myers, FLIversonDesign and Presentation team memberPrint Graphic DesignCharlotte, NCJust Fresh Kitchen CafeDesign and Presentation team memberPrototype DevelopmentEnvironmental GraphicsBrand IdentityCharlotte, NCKraft Foods/NabiscoConceptual DevelopmentBrand Packaging IdentitySanta Rosa Railroad SquareDesign and Presentation team memberPrint Graphic DesignSanta Rosa, CACharlotte Trolley, Inc.Brand/Concept Identity DevelopmentDesign and Presentation team memberPrint Graphic DesignCharlotte, NCBuehler’s Family MarketsConceptual DevelopmentBrand IdentityWooster, OHKapalua, MauiBrand/Concept IdentityPrint Graphic DesignMaui, HIMaui Land & Pineapple Co.Brand/Concept IdentityMaui, HIDarrow Pond VillageBrand/Concept IdentityPrint Graphic DesignEast Lyme, CTDunham Farm VillageBrand/Concept IdentityPrint Graphic DesignEast Lyme, CTMagnoliaBrand/Concept IdentityPrint Graphic DesignCharleston, SCBusch Entertainment Corp.Brand/Concept IdentityEnvironmental GraphicsOIrando, FLThe New York JetsBrand/Concept IdentityMerchandising StrategyPackaging DesignNew York, NYGenuardi’s Family MarketsConceptual DevelopmentPrepared Foods CategoryBrand IdentityEnvironmental GraphicsPackaging DesignPhiladelphia, PAThe Coca-Cola CompanyConceptual Development forIn-Store Environmental DesignAtlanta, GASalsarita’s RestaurantsName DevelopmentBrand/Concept IdentityEnvironmental GraphicsCharlotte, NCBank of AmericaBrand Identity forDistrict ProgramCharlotte, NCHarris Teeter SupermarketsEnvironmental DesignMatthews, NCJanuary 4, 2012 50

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesPersonnel - Retail ConsultantRetail ConsultingMatthew WinnSenior Managing Director, Retail ServicesMatthew Winn, Senior Managing Director of Cushman & Wakefield’s U.S. Retail Services division, is a retail real estate professional and advisor tomajor retailers and institutional landlords. Mr. Winn will coordinate with counterparts throughout the Americas, Europe and Asia, work closely withthe U.S. Retail Services team, the Corporate Occupier & Investor Services group and other service lines to help guide strategic initiatives for retailtenants and institutional owners. He has a broad range of experience in strategic planning, branding, investment, development and managementfocused on commercial real estate. He has also completed a variety of transactions including acquisition and underwriting, deal structuring,financing, development, leasing, management and sales. His experience and client relationships offer important insight into the factors influencingsite selection and merchandising decisions today.At Cushman & Wakefield, Mr. Winn has led initiatives including a national portfolio rationalization and real estate strategy for Lacoste in the U.S. aswell as market level analyses for clients like Nike and Ann Taylor. An expert in multi-market transactions, he will remain the single-point-of-contactfor the international expansion of Nike and for the national site acquisition program of Tanger Outlet Centers. In 2009, Mr. Winn crafted the strategyfor Cushman & Wakefield’s lease renegotiation teams and led the nationwide effort to reduce occupancy costs for Cushman & Wakefield clients inover 3,500 locations. He will remain involved in these assignments in a supervisory role in addition to his new duties.Mr. Winn graduated with honors from Wesleyan University with a Bachelor of Arts in Art and Architectural History. He is a member of theInternational Council of Shopping Centers, the Urban Land Institute and the National Association of Realtors and is a licensed real estate salesmanin New York, Georgia, Alabama and North Carolina. Winn is an active member of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society’s Team in Training program.He recently completed the Big Sur International Marathon and is a candidate for the 2011 Man of The Year in the non profit’s Georgia Chapter.Cushman & Wakefield is the world’s largest privately held commercial real estate services firm. Founded in 1917, it has 221 offices in 58 countriesand more than 15,000 employees. The firm represents a diverse customer base ranging from small businesses to Fortune 500 companies. It offersa complete range of services within four primary disciplines: Transaction Services, including tenant and landlord representation in office, industrialand retail real estate; Capital Markets, including property sales, investment management, valuation services, investment banking, debt and equityfinancing; Client Solutions, including integrated real estate strategies for large corporations and property owners, and Consulting Services, includingbusiness and real estate consulting. A recognized leader in global real estate research, the firm publishes a broad array of proprietary reportsavailable on its online Knowledge Center at www.cushmanwakefield.com.51 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Personnel - Retail ConsultantRetail ConsultingCharles Warren, PhDDirector, Retail Portfolio StrategiesCharles Warren is a trusted strategist who translates complex data and databases into real estate solutions, with an extensive background inGeographic Information Science (“GIS”). Dr. Warren currently works with C&W’s Global Business Consulting group as director of geo-demographicmodeling of demand for retail and business-to-business customers. His team uses point-of-sale and customer records to create behavioral modelsthat can predict the effect of location on branch performance and revenue.Dr. Warren’s primary responsibilities include: building and executing sales forecasting models; evaluating existing portfolios and making strategic recommendationsfor store opening or closure; and assisting in the initial design and siting of new retail concepts. The analyses and models are utilizedby C&W clients such as Lacoste, Nike, Ann Taylor, and Crate & Barrel to make key strategic decisions on store location and market penetration.Prior to joining C&W, Dr. Warren served as GIS Analyst at Robert K Futterman Associates, a boutique retail brokerage firm in New York City. He wastrained in retail site selection and sales forecasting methods by an alumnus of Thompson Associates. While at RKF, he assisted with the generationand implementation of national expansion strategies for clients such as Swarovski, H&M, and Dolce & Gabbana.Dr. Warren holds a PhD in City and Regional Planning from the University of California at Berkeley, as well as a Master of Arts degree from NewYork University in Urban Studies. His doctoral research examined effects of evolving land use and zoning ordinances on real estate development.Dr. Warren resides in Brooklyn and is a member of the Urban Land Institute and American Planning Association.Retail ConsultingJalna SilversteinRetail Practice GroupJalna Silverstein is a specialist in strategic planning, experienced in building statistical and predictive models utilizing advanced methods in spatialanalytics. Ms. Silverstein’s background in urban planning and engineering makes her a unique member of C&W’s Global Business Consulting Group,where her skill set is redeployed in service of retail and other customer-facing industries.Ms. Silverstein’s primary responsibilities include: analyzing sales records to create custom retail and business-to-business customer profiles; demographicand shopping behavioral research; strategic advice on store location and portfolio management; and the application of Geographic InformationScience (GIS) to marketing segmentation data. Major retail clients have included Lacoste, Ann Taylor, and Crate & Barrel.Prior to joining C&W, Ms. Silverstein was an Urban Planner at Jacobs Engineering, a global engineering firm, where she concentrated in environmental,transportation and land use planning. Her work experience included travel throughout North America as well as residence in Scotland andthe United Kingdom. Ms. Silverstein was trained in transportation and traffic analyses involving revenue forecasting modeling, environmental impactassessment and sustainable design solutions for specialized planning projects worldwide.Ms. Silverstein holds a Masters of Urban Planning in Urban Design from the City College of New York and a B.A. in Urban Planning Systems &Geography from McGill University. Ms. Silverstein is a member of the American Planning Association and a certified LEED GA by the U.S. GreenBuilding Council.January 4, 2012 52

Firm ProfileGREENMAN-PEDERSEN, INC.Hurley Square - Worcester, MAFor more information or to schedule apresentation, please contact:STONEHAM, MA OFFICEChrister Ericsson, P.E.Regional Branch ManagerWillow Street - Reading, MASparks Avenue Roundabout - Nantucket, MAMilford Upper Charles Trail - Milford, MA105 Central Street, Suite 4100Stoneham, MA 02180p: (781) 279-5500f: (781) 279-5501e: cericsson@gpinet.comOther New England Offices:Southbridge, MA Portsmouth, NHGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. (GPI) is a leading,multi-disciplined engineering firm that hasbeen providing professional design, planning,construction and inspection services to alllevels of government and industry throughoutthe eastern United States for over 45 years.Since its founding in 1966, GPI Engineers/Planners have relied upon the reputation andcombined experience of our officers and staff tosuccessfully handle projects ranging in size andcomplexity, some with individual constructionbudgets reaching $300 million. During this time,GPI has grown from a two-man consulting firm toa corporation with over 1,000 employees and haswon numerous awards for our work throughoutthe country.The New England Division of GPI is headquarteredin Stoneham, Massachusetts andspecializes in delivering quality services in CivilEngineering, Traffic Engineering, TransportationPlanning, Structural Engineering, Survey,Construction Inspection and Protective Coatings.GPI has numerous years of professionalexperience serving state, municipal, private andindustrial clients throughout New England. Ourprofessional staff has the knowledge, experienceand state-of-the-art resources to perform avariety of demanding tasks in response to theclient’s individualized needs. GPI utilizes bothAuto-CAD and Microstation-based computerworkstations for our civil, structural and trafficengineering projects. GPI also maintains afull library of PC-based engineering softwarefor structural and traffic engineering, trafficsimulation and planning, geometric design, utilitydesign, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling andsurvey.Our high level of client acceptance has beenachieved through professional expertiseand conscientious performance, by criticallyanalyzing client needs and by reaching solutionsto problems within regulatory and budgetrequirements. Our success has been achievedby the establishment of personal relationshipsbetween GPI staff and clients through the reviewof every project by senior members of GPI andby the availability of in-house experts in almostall planning and engineering disciplines.GPI is proud of the reputation we have earnedfor successfully completing projects on timeand within budget. Clients continuously turn toGPI because they are satisfied with the resultsof previous projects and are confident of equallysuperior performance on new assignments.Strong working relationships have developedwith clients to the extent that 85% of GPI’sbusiness is from repeat clients.A responsive, quality-driven team ofprofessionals strive to provide effectivesolutions in the following areas:Civil/Highway Engineering• Roadway Design• Recreational Trails• Peer Reviews• Cost EstimatingTraffic Engineering• Traffic Signal Design/ITS• Traffic Calming• Traffic Management• Inventories• Signal Turn-On/Fine-TuningTransportation Planning• Site Evaluations• Feasibility Studies• Traffic Impact Reports• Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions• New Urbanism• Agency LiaisonStructural Engineering• Complex Bridge Design/Ratings• Bridge Inspection• Condition Assessment & Evaluations• Asset ManagementSurvey• Topographic Survey• Right-of-Way/Alteration Plans• Photogrammetry• Precision Mapping• Construction StakeoutsConstruction Inspection/Protective Coatings• Expert Consulting• Environmental Compliance• Training• Resident Engineering/Inspection• Construction Management• Constructability ReviewGPI is ranked asone of the “Top 100National Design Firms”by Engineering NewsRecord (2011).

BUSINESS HISTORYGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. (GPI)GPI is a leading, multi-disciplined engineering firm that has been providing professional design,architecture, planning and construction inspection services to all levels of government and industrythroughout the eastern United States for 45 years. Since its founding, GPI has relied upon thereputation and combined experience of its officers and staff to successfully handle projects ranging insize and complexity, some with individual construction budgets reaching half a billion dollars. Duringthis time, GPI has grown from a two-man consulting firm to a corporation with over 1,000 employeesand is included among the top 100 of “Engineering News Record's” largest 500 national design firms. Assuch, GPI has a solid financial backing that stands firmly behind its employees, providing the training andresources needed to satisfy the needs of the clients we serve.The New England division of GPI is located in Stoneham, Massachusettswith offices in Portsmouth, New Hampshire and Southbridge,Massachusetts. GPI specializes in delivering quality services in Civil, Siteand Highway Engineering, Transportation Planning, Traffic Engineering,Traffic Signal Design, Traffic Calming, Survey and Right-of-Way, Bridge andStructural Engineering, Asset Management, Permitting, ConstructionServices, Technical Reviews and Expert Testimony. GPI has numerousyears of professional experience serving state, municipal, private andindustrial clients throughout New England. Our professional staff has theknowledge, experience and state-of-the-art resources to perform a varietyof demanding tasks in response to the client’s individualized needs. GPIWe bring the Town ofLondonderry therequired resources withextensive experience intraffic analysis andengineering, as well as aproven track record ofrepeat business withexisting clients.maintains a full library of PC-based engineering software for structural and traffic engineering, trafficsimulation and planning, geometric design, utility design, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling and survey.The New England office has fifty-three (53) employees, including fifteen (15) who are registeredprofessionals, and can assure our clients that their projects will receive the top quality support that isrequired.Our high level of client acceptance has been achieved through professional expertise and conscientiousperformance, by critically analyzing client needs and by reaching solutions to problems within regulatoryand budget requirements. Our success has been achieved by the establishment of personalizedrelationships between GPI staff and clients, through the review of every project by senior members ofthe Management Team and by the availability of in-house experts in almost all planning and engineeringdisciplines.GPI is proud of the reputation we have earned for successfully completing projects on time and withinbudget. We are recognized industry leaders in civil engineering, structural engineering, trafficengineering, highway engineering, transportation planning, intelligent transportation systems,construction administration and inspection, survey and right-of-way. Clients continuously turn to GPIbecause they are satisfied with the results of previous projects and are confident of equally superiorperformance on new assignments. Strong working relationships have developed with clients to theextent that 85% of GPI’s business is from repeat clients.Town of LondonderryPlanning & Engineering Review Services for Woodmont Commons PUD

PROJECT TEAMOrganizationGPI’s project organization was developed to achieve the project objectives and to be responsive to theTown of Londonderry’s goals by providing an integrated Team that will be immediately available uponreceipt of an NTP from the Town and available throughout the length of the contract. The proposedTeam members were selected based on successes on previous projects and knowledge similar projects.Mr. Jason Plourde, P.E., will serve as the Project Director. Mr. Plourde is an Assistant Vice Presidentwith GPI and is the Director of Transportation Planning in the New England Branch. Mr. Plourde will beresponsible for the management of the contract and serve as a primary representative and liaison to theTown of Londonderry. Mr. Plourde will be responsible for overseeing the planning and analysiselements of the project. Mr. Plourde has been with GPI for 11 years and has over 15 years ofexperience, in the preparation of Traffic Studies and Environmental Impact Reports involving the designof site access and off-site roadway improvements. He has extensive knowledge in the procedures andpolitics of governmental permitting throughout New England and the approval of land developments andtransportation improvements. Most recently, Mr. Plourde was the Project Manager for the Town ofStratham Town Center project. Mr. Plourde is experienced in traffic projections and intersectioncapacity analyses and their utilization in developing and implementing design improvements in roadwaygeometry and traffic control. He has been involved with numerous traffic studies, environmental impactreports, and functional design reports for a wide variety of private development projects. He haseffectively presented transportation plans and projects in public hearings and other forums. In addition,he has provided technical and peer review services to a number of local municipalities. Mr. Plourde is aRegistered Professional Engineer (P.E.) in New Hampshire.Mr. John W. Diaz, P.E., P.T.O.E. will serve as the Vice President/Technical Advisor. Mr. Diaz is a VicePresident with GPI and is the Director of Traffic Engineering in the New England Branch He has over 18years experience in the in all areas of transportation and traffic engineering. His experience in acting asa peer review engineer for various municipalities throughout Massachusetts, including Framingham,Reading, Lynnfield, Quincy, Barnstable and Nantucket affords Mr. Diaz the experience to understand theneeds of local municipalities. Mr. Diaz has also provided technical assistance in evaluating trafficengineering and traffic calming plans, evaluating and fine-tuning traffic signals, and assisting withconstruction inspection for various state and municipal agencies including; MassDOT, New HampshireDOT, Town of Dedham, Town of Framingham, Town of Barnstable, Town of Reading, City of Waltham,City of Quincy and Town of Plymouth.Mr. Diaz is currently representing GPI as the Project Manager of the on-call Traffic Engineering contractwith the City of Waltham. In this role, not only does Mr. Diaz oversee a wide variety of traffic issues,but he also acts as the City’s Traffic Engineer under the direction of the Traffic Commission. Mr. Diazand GPI are responsible for the review of any development project seeking a Special Permit from theCity Council. These reviews involve a comprehensive evaluation of the proposed land use, sight accessand circulation, trip generation, traffic projections and distributions and capacity and queuing analysis.Mr. Diaz will also meet with project proponents to discuss potential mitigation measures that should beincluded in the studies. Additional projects Mr. Diaz and GPI have been involved in are typical issuescommon to many cities including traffic calming, neighborhood “cut through” traffic and complaints ofhigh speeds, pedestrian and bike access and accommodations, traffic signal malfunctions as well as finetuningand coordination of traffic signals.As a Project Manager, Mr. Diaz works closely with local towns and community groups to developcontext sensitive designs that enhance the transportation infrastructure for all users including motorists,Town of Londonderry Professional Traffic Engineering Peer Review Services G

icyclist and pedestrians. Mr. Diaz has been the Project Manger and primary contact with the City ofCambridge in the most recent Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering On-Call Contract (2007-2010). During this period, Mr. Diaz managed approximately 30 assignments valued at nearly $400,000.GPI’s contract with the City was renewed in both 2008 and 2009 for the maximum 3 year duration ofthe contract.Mr. Diaz is also a registered Professional Traffic Operations Engineer (PTOE). Started in 1999, thePTOE is a voluntary, peer-developed and administered program initiated by and affiliated with theInstitute of Transportation Engineers (ITE).Mr. Diaz is also certified with the International Municipal Signal Association (IMSA) as an AssociateTraffic Signal Technician Level I, a Traffic Signal Electrician Level II, a Work Zone Safety Specialist and aTraffic Signal Inspector.Mr. Diaz’s most recent work as a Peer Review Consultant includes:Technical StaffCity of Waltham – Redevelopment of Waltham Ford SiteCity of Waltham – 1019 Trapelo Road – Mixed Use DevelopmentCity of Waltham – 36 River Street, 200 Condominium DevelopmentReview of Traffic Signal Mitigations Modifications to the Hancock Street at Quincy Shore Drive(2007)Town of Lynnfield – Proposed Meadow Walk Lifestyle Center Peer Traffic Review (2007)Mr. Joseph Johnson, P.E., P.T.O.E. will serve as a Lead Traffic Engineer for the project, responsible forconceptual design development. Mr. Johnson has worked at GPI for 11 years and has 12 years ofexperience in transportation engineering including design, as well as modeling existing and future trafficoperations. He is the project engineer on the Washington Street, Hudson project, which includes thedesign of approximately 1.5 miles of roadway reconstruction, five traffic signals and a multi-laneroundabout which replaces an existing signalized location. Mr. Johnson designed and oversawconstruction of the signal installation at the intersection of Route 11 at Little Falls Bridge Road inRochester. Mr. Johnson also worked with the City of Portsmouth to implement phasing and timingchanges at the intersection of Route 33 at Peverley Hills Road. Mr. Johnson is a registered ProfessionalEngineer in New Hampshire, a Professional Traffic Operations Engineer (P.T.O.E.) and has certificationswith IMSA as an Associate Traffic Signal Technician Level I, a Work Zone Safety Specialist and a TrafficSignal Electrician Level II.Ms. Heather Monticup, E.I.T. will also serve as a Traffic/Transportation Engineer for the project,responsible for analysis and projected operations. Ms. Monticup has a Bachelor’s Degree in CivilEngineering and has been with GPI for 11 years. Ms. Monticup has thirteen years of experience in trafficengineering, transportation planning, and traffic signal design. For this assignment, she will be responsiblefor the analysis, review and evaluation of the project traffic data, as well as the development ofoperations and design alternatives. She has extensive knowledge in computer analyses and modeling oftraffic operations including simulations for public hearings and demonstrations utilizing softwareprograms such as Synchro/SimTraffic, HCS, aaSIDRA, Paramics, and VISSIM. She has a workingknowledge of the field operations of traffic signals and is certified with IMSA as an Associate TrafficSignal Technician Level I and a Work Zone Safety Specialist.Town of Londonderry Professional Traffic Engineering Peer Review Services G

Mr. Geoffrey Howie, P.E. shall be available to address any Civil/Roadway issues that may develop as partof the peer review process. Mr. Howie is a Civil Highway and Transportation Engineer with over 23years of experience in the design of numerous roadway reconstruction and highway design projects.These design projects involve roadways ranging from local facilities to major highway and freeway typefacilities. Mr. Howie is thoroughly familiar with all facets of roadway and sidewalk design includinggeometry, grading, drainage, utility coordination and traffic management. Clients for these variousprojects have included MassDOT, municipalities and private developers.Mr. Howie is a Vice President at GPI and also holds the position of Project Director of the Civil andHighway Group. As such, he has extensive experience in staffing and managing these types of projects.He has directed and supervised all phases of design including studies, design review, plan development,specifications and estimates. A specialist in project control and schedule, as well as adherence tobudget, he also has extensive experience in public speaking and community participation havingmoderated and presented at public hearings, community meetings and workshops. Mr. Howie will beavailable to assist Mr. Diaz in any peer review projects requiring additional expertise in civil/roadwayengineering. Mr. Howie and the entire Civil/Highway Group will at the disposal of the Town.Mr. James Noyes shall serve as Senior Technical Advisor on this project. As a Vice President ofGPI, Mr. Noyes is responsible for overall management of private development projects as well as publicagency projects. For the past 25 years, he has provided these services to both the public and privatesectors. Mr. Noyes has extensive experience acting as a Peer Review Consultant and has representedPlanning Boards and Zoning Boards throughout New England. His reviews have included traffic studiesand Site Plans prepared for Comprehensive Permit (40b) and 40r Smart Growth Program housingprojects, large-scale retail developments and construction documents for infrastructure improvementprojects. Included in this work is the preparation of supporting documentation and attendance at localPlanning Board and Zoning Boards of Appeal meetings. He has represented the towns of Billerica,Bolton, Berlin, Mansfield and West Bridgewater, MA and has also provided peer review services inKingston, Norton, Framingham and Rochester, MA.Mr. Noyes is also intimately familiar with the operations and procedures of local Planning Boards and iscurrently an active member of the West Bridgewater Planning Board. This combined knowledge of anexperienced Civil/Traffic Engineer as well as an acting Planning Board member will provide a uniqueinsight into the development of technically sound and fair reviews of various projects on behalf of theTown.Town of Londonderry Professional Traffic Engineering Peer Review Services G

RELEVANT PROJECTSTown of Framingham – Planning Board Peer Review ServicesClient:Framingham Planning BoardJohn W. GrandePlanning Board Director(508) 532-5450Jay.Grande@framinghamma.orgGPI has acted as the expert traffic consultant for the Framingham Planning Board since 1996. For over adecade, GPI staff has assisted the Planning Board, providing peer review services on a variety ofdevelopment projects. GPI representatives regularly attend Planning Board meetings to providetechnical findings in both written form and verbal presentation to the Board. One of the criticalelements GPI has assisted the Planning Board with is to develop and maintain a Matrix of Projects in theTown. This matrix allows Town Officials and GPI to evaluate, not only the individual impacts of eachproject on the Town’s infrastructure, but more importantly, to examine the compounded impacts ofeach project. This is an effective tool to determine appropriate mitigation measures and funding levels.GPI also follows each project through construction and represents the Town at any final inspection andor fine-tuning of traffic signals, as may be required.Some of the projects reviewed by GPI for the Town include:Natick Mall Review Lowes/Rte. 30 Review Credit Union ReviewPlanned UseDevelopment (PUD) –525 Mixed UseDr. Harvey Cushing Wayand Dudley Road SignalWarrant AnalysisWal-Mart Meetings andFollow-On Services andPlan ReviewResidential UnitsJordan's Furniture PeerReviewBose CorporationExpansion ReviewRoute 9 at TempleStreet Design ReviewGenzyme CorporationCommunity Healthcare CVS Plan ReviewReviewReviewThe Villages at Danforth Dennison ParkingVillage at Farm PondFarmGarageDunkin' Donuts Review Target Review Genzyme ReviewTJX Plan Review Health Center Review The ArcadeWayside CampusReviewDanforth Green PUDRoute 30 LowesMost recently, GPI completed the transportation peer review of the proposed Danforth Green PlannedUnit Development (PUD) to be located off Riverpath Drive in Framingham, MA. GPI reviewed theTraffic Impact and Access Study prepared by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB) for the development,which consists of 732 housing units. This total includes 472 townhomes/condominiums, 140 apartments,84 senior housing units, 36 single-family homes, and a limited amount of ancillary retail development (upto 4,000 square feet). As part of this proposal, GPI reviewed the information received from the countsconducted for the twenty-three (23) intersections included in the study, of which seven of theintersections were located in Wayland, Massachusetts. The review determined if the study sufficientlyaddresses the impacts of the project, or whether additional information was required. In addition, thereview assessed the impact of the project on the overall study area and determined if all measures hadbeen taken to minimize the impact of the development, or if additional mitigation was required.Town of LondonderryPlanning & Engineering Review Services for Woodmont Commons PUD

The review started in July 2002. Due to the downturn in the economy, the project continues to changeand is still under review by this office.GPI also reviewed the Lowes Retail Center on Route 30 on behalf of the Town’s Planning Board. Thisproject involved the review proposed modifications and mitigation at three existing signalizedintersections along the Route 30 corridor, including; Route 30 at Beacon Street, Route 30 at Route 126and Route 30 at the Lowes Site Drive. GPI was responsible for ensuring that the proposed mitigationwas feasible with the existing equipment in the field as well as ensuring that the proposed mitigationresulted in improvements to safety and capacity at the intersections. GPI attended meetings with TownOfficials as well as with the proponent’s engineers to discuss and resolve concerns throughout theprocess. The result was a mitigation plan that addressed the concerns of the Planning Board, addressedthe impacts of the projects and improved the capacity and safety at the intersections along the corridor.City of Waltham – On-Call Traffic Engineer Consultant to the Traffic CommissionClient:City of Waltham Traffic CommissionMs. Lisa GerlachAssistant to the Transportation DirectorTransportation Department119 School StreetWaltham, MA(781) 314-3402lgerlach@city.waltham.ma.usGPI was selected by the City of Waltham to function as the City’s Traffic Engineer and provide technicalassistance on a wide variety of traffic and transportation issues in the City. These tasks include; trafficcalming, addressing cut-thru traffic, evaluating, upgrading and fine tuning traffic signals, evaluating theneed for additional traffic control such as traffic signals, STOP sign or other traffic control devices, peerreview of Traffic Impact Studies, and overall engineering advice.Some of the assignments to date have included:Peer Reviews – GPI has provided technical peer review of several Traffic Impact and Access Studies forproposed development, including:455 Totten Pond Road - Residential Apartment Development1019 Trapelo Road – Mixed Use Commercial/Retail DevelopmentConnors Pool – Upgrade of the DCR Pool and FacilitiesRiver Street at Farwell Street – Residential Apartment DevelopmentMain Street Market Place – Retail DevelopmentReservoir Woods - Office DevelopmentTotten Pond Road - Retail Gas Station with Convenience StoreBarbara Road at Chaffee Avenue - Review of the intersection of Barbara Road and Chaffee Avenue forconsideration of the construction of accessible pedestrian ramps, sidewalk, crosswalks and/or STOPsigns at the intersection.Berkley Street at Copeland Street/Brewster Road - Evaluation of the present 4-way STOP condition atthe intersection of Berkley Street and Copeland Street/Brewster Road. Presentation to residence andCity officials to discuss findings and potential solutions.Town of LondonderryPlanning & Engineering Review Services for Woodmont Commons PUD

Totten Pond Road Crosswalk -Evaluation and Peer Review of a proposed passive crossing device alongTotten Pond Road at Veteran’s Rink.Trapelo Road at Pine Vale Road - Review of the crosswalk location at the intersection of Trapelo Roadat Pine Vale Road for feasibility of installing an illuminated pedestrian crossing device at the crosswalk.GPI also recommended upgrading wheelchair ramps to conform to ADA standards.Miscellaneous Traffic Signal Modifications – GPI has reviewed the operations, recommendedmodifications and implemented signal timing modifications at several intersections throughout the City,including:Moody Street at Carter StreetMoody Street at Crescent StreetMain Street at Prospect StreetElm Street at Carter StreetLexington Street at Totten Pond RoadLexington Street at Ridge Lane and Lionel AvenueLexington Street at Stearns Hill RoadLexington Street at Trapelo RoadSouth Street at the Stanley SchoolWinter Street at First AvenueWinter Street at Second AvenueMain Street Signals – GPI examined operations of the traffic signals along Main Street and reestablishedcommunications to update the Closed Loop Signal System. GPI developed and implemented revisedsignal times and phasing to improve vehicle progression along this critical arterial through the center ofthe City.Data Collection – GPI has conducted several traffic observations throughout the City to collect Dailyand Peak Hour Traffic Counts, Travel Speeds and Sight Distance Measurements.Town of Reading – Various Peer Review ServicesClient:Town of ReadingMr. Peter I. HechenbleiknerTown Manager(781) 942-9043townmanager@ci.reading.ma.usGPI worked with the Town of Reading as an expert traffic engineer providing peer review services onseveral projects. These projects included residential developments, retail developments, and large scalemixed use Lifestyle Centers. GPI examined the proponent’s traffic study and conducted an independentanalysis of the existing and future conditions to evaluate the proponent’s conformance to standardengineering practices. GPI provided formal review letters to the Town’s Boards and met with Townofficials, the proponent’s engineers, and any other interested parties to ensure that all concerns wereaddressed. GPI also attended Board of Selectmen’s Meetings and various other Town meetings toprovide written and verbal presentations and answer any project related questions from the Boardmembers and/or public community. GPI followed the projects through construction and assisted theTown with final inspection and/or fine-tuning of traffic signals. Copies of relevant comment and reviewTown of LondonderryPlanning & Engineering Review Services for Woodmont Commons PUD

letters pertaining to the Park Square Lifestyle Center are attached in Section G. Some of the recentprojects reviewed on behalf of the Town of Reading include:Longwood Estates 40B Comprehensive Permit Peer ReviewReading Spence Farm 40B Comprehensive Permit Peer ReviewStop & Shop ReviewReading Walkers Brook Drive Retail Center ReviewReading Park Square Lifestyle ReviewMassachusetts Department of Transportation – Highway Division (MassDOT)Client:MassDOTMr. Gautam Sen 617-973-7879Project Manager(617) 973-7879Gautam.Sen@state.ma.usGPI has a long standing relationship with MassDOT (formerly MassHighway). Currently GPI has severalopen-ended on-call contracts including three contracts dedicated to Civil, Highway and StructuralEngineering. On the most recent contract (2010) GPI ranked first out of over 40 firms submittingproposals to MassDOT. While these contracts include preparation of complex engineeringconstruction documents, one of the assignments continually requested by MassDOT of GPI is toprovide Peer Review Services to assist MassDOT’s Contracts Section in advertising projects. This peerreview is a comprehensive review of the Plans, Specifications and Items list to ensure completecompliance with MassDOT’s design and bidding standards. To date, GPI has completed approximately25 technical peer reviews.City of Cambridge – On-Call Traffic EngineeringClient:City of Cambridge Community Development DepartmentMr. Juan P. AvendanoTraffic Calming Project Manager(617) 349-4655javendano@cambridgema.govGPI was awarded the On-Call Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Services contract with theCity originally in 2007 and had the contract renewed in both 2008 and 2009. The three-year contractended in December of 2010. Over the past three (3) years, GPI has provided an array of services to theCity including transportation planning, traffic engineering, traffic calming, and complete civil/roadwaydesigns.Several of the projects included comprehensive traffic data collection, capacity and queuing analysis, andan assessment of traffic distributions over the city roadways. GPI completed a comprehensiveevaluation of the recently completed reconstruction projects at Porter Square and Lafayette Square todetermine if the recent construction addressed the initial planning goals and desires of the City. Inaddition, GPI developed conceptual and construction level plans to enhance ADA and bike accessibilityas well as to explore various traffic calming measures to reduce vehicle speeds and volumes. The entireGPI staff was available to the City to ensure immediate and timely responses to the City’s needs. Ourtrack record with the City and renewal of the contract for two successive years is a testament to GPI’scommitment and responsiveness to the City.Town of LondonderryPlanning & Engineering Review Services for Woodmont Commons PUD

Colony Place Commerce Way Reconstruction - Plymouth, MassachusettsClient:Mr. Don SmithSaxon Real Estate Partners, LLC200 Oak Point DriveMiddleborough, MA 02346Tel: (508) 947-3535Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. (GPI) was responsible for providing traffic-engineering and design services forthe Colony Place retail development located in the southwest quadrant of the new Route 44 andCommerce Way interchange in Plymouth, MA. The project consists of approximately 1,115,000 squarefeet of retail and restaurant space.The first phase of the project included preparation of a Traffic Impact and Access Study of the area. GPIalso prepared Draft and Final Environmental Impact Reports for the project that were reviewed andapproved by the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) office, the Massachusetts Departmentof Transportation (MassDOT) and the Town of Plymouth. Presentations to the public were made byGPI staff, with the final approval being granted by the State and Town.The second phase included preparation of construction documents for roadway and traffic signalimprovements to Commerce Way at four locations. This also included the design and implementationof a closed loop coordination system for the four signals. The design also included modifications to thebridge deck over Route 44 to extend the left-turn lane. GPI prepared and obtained all of the permitsrequired for construction by MassDOTAdditional Peer Review Services, Various MunicipalitiesTown of Maynard – Proposed Mix Use Development ReviewGPI provided traffic peer review services to the Town of Maynard Planning Board for a proposedgas/service station expansion and bank development located at 170 Main Street, in Maynard, MA. GPIcompleted an independent assessment of the traffic impacts and provided written comments to theBoard.City of Quincy – Hancock Street at Newport Avenue Extension Peer ReviewGPI was retained by the City of Quincy Department of Public Works (DPW) to review the proposedmitigation plans for modifications to the Hancock Street at Newport Avenue Extension. The mitigationinvolved modifications to the signal operations, timing and phasing as well as minor geometric alterationsand revisions to the signing and pavement markings. GPI reviewed the plans for consistency with theManual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as well as generally accepted traffic engineeringprinciples. As part of the review, GPI suggested alternative signal phasing that would betteraccommodate the existing and proposed pedestrian and vehicle demands.Town of Nantucket – Harbor House Peer ReviewGPI has completed, or is currently under contract for, several projects throughout the Island ofNantucket. These projects include the design of the island’s first modern roundabout, completion of theMid Island Traffic Study and the design of two bike paths, the Cliff Road Path and the In-Town Bike Path.With our familiarity with the island community, GPI was retained by the Nantucket PlanningTown of LondonderryPlanning & Engineering Review Services for Woodmont Commons PUD

Department as a peer review consultant to evaluate the proposed Harbor House VillageRedevelopment. As part of the review, GPI acted as the Town’s traffic expert and reviewed theproponent’s reports, plans and proposed mitigation for conformance with the Towns Standards and By-Laws as well as generally accepted traffic engineering practices. GPI appeared before the Planning Boardto address any concerns of the Board.C.N. Brown Peer Review, Peterborough, NHGPI recently conducted a peer review of a traffic study for the proposed C.N. Brown convenience storeto be located in Peterborough, NH. GPI reviewed the study and prepared a written comment letteroutlining the concerns with the project. The project was the conversion of an existing gasoline/servicestation into a gasoline/convenience store with Dunkin’ Donuts walk-in store inside.Harper Project Peer Review, Nashua, NHGPI recently prepared a peer review for the proposed Harper Development project to be located inNashua, NH. The project proposed to utilize existing and proposed buildings and structures todevelopment approximately 358 residential units, 6,100 sf of residential amenity space, 37,100 sf of retailspace, and 791 parking spaces. A second development project is also proposed in this area by aseparate applicant. The Stabile project proposes to replace existing warehouse/industrial space on FrontStreet with approximately 160-200 residential condominiums. GPI reviewed all reports andcorrespondence prepared by VHB and summarized its findings in a letter to the Town.The Village at White Farms, Norton, MAGPI is providing the Town of Norton Planning Board with Traffic Peer Review services relative to aproposed residential development to be known as “The Village at White Farms”, which will consist of42 residential condominium units located off East Main Street between Leonard Street and VillageEstates.Stoneham Executive Center - Traffic Study Peer Review, Stoneham, MAGPI provided a Peer Review of a traffic impact study performed for the proposed development of theStoneham Executive Center in the Town of Stoneham. GPI provided technical assistance, reviewing thereport, and making alternative recommendations. GPI also prepared a final review report summarizingthe findings and appeared at a Town meeting to provide information relative to the peer review.Barnstable Soccer Field TIAS, Barnstable, MAGPI, as part of an ongoing general service contract, reviewed the study prepared by the Cape CodCommission and the study prepared by John T. Gillon Associates and provided a non-biased impactanalysis of the proposed soccer field development along Old Falmouth Road.The Villages at River Run, Berlin, MAGPI provided peer review of a Technical Memorandum prepared by Abend Associates for a 32 singlefamilyhome development in the Town, being developed as a 40B project to provide affordable housingin the Town.Princeton at Boston Road, Billerica, MAGPI was requested by the Billerica Zoning Board of Appeals to provide Traffic Peer Review servicesrelative to a proposed 156-unit apartment complex to be known as “Princeton at Boston Road todetermine the adequacy of the traffic data within the Traffic Impact Study, review the sight distancerequirements and provisions for parking and internal circulation.Bourne Fire Station No. 3, Bourne, MATown of LondonderryPlanning & Engineering Review Services for Woodmont Commons PUD

GPI was asked to provide Peer Review services for Structural Drawings, Technical Specifications andCalculations associated with the demolition of a 3-story fire station for reconfiguration of the SagamoreRotary.Alexander Estates, Billerica, MAGPI was asked by the Billerica, MA Zoning Board of Appeals to provide traffic peer review servicesrelative to the construction of twenty-two (22) residential homes in a development to be known as“Alexander Estates to determine the adequacy of the study based on standard traffic engineeringpractice and state requirements.Villas 2, Billerica, MAGPI was asked by the Billerica, MA Zoning Board of Appeals to provide traffic peer review servicesrelative to the construction of 144 units of affordable housing known as Villas 2 to determine theadequacy of the study based on standard traffic engineering practice and state requirements.Town of LondonderryPlanning & Engineering Review Services for Woodmont Commons PUD

Town of LondonderryPlanning & Engineering Review Services for Woodmont Commons PUD

RESUMEJason R. Plourde, P.E.Senior EngineerEDUCATION:BS/1995/Civil EngineeringREGISTRATION:2006/Professional Engineer/NHYEARS WITH FIRM: 11YEARS WITH OTHER FIRMS: 4PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) –Transportation Planning Council, MemberTraffi c Engineering Council, MemberInternational Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC),AssociateCongress for the New Urbanism – New EnglandChapter (CNU NE), MemberGreenBiz Intelligence PanelPlan NH, MemberProfessional ProfileMr. Plourde has over 15 years of experience in the permitting of landdevelopment projects through the preparation of transportation studiesinvolving transportation planning, traffi c engineering, and the designof site access and off-site highway/roadway improvements. He hasextensive knowledge in the procedures and politics of governmentalpermitting throughout New England and the approval of developmentprojects and transportation improvements.Mr. Plourde is also experienced in transportation data collection,transportation projections, and intersection capacity analyses andtheir utilization in developing and implementing design improvementsin roadway geometry and traffi c control. He has been involved withnumerous traffi c studies, transportation feasibility and site sizing studies,transportation corridor studies, traffi c calming studies, traffi c signalwarrant analyses, parking evaluation studies for a wide variety ofland development projects. He has effectively presented transportationplans and projects in public hearings and other forums to governmentaland public groups. In addition, he has provided technical andpeer review services to a number of local municipalities.Project ExperienceTRAFFIC STUDIESMr. Plourde has prepared numerous transportation studies necessaryfor permitting throughout New England. Some projects required permittingthrough the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA)process, the New Hampshire Department of Transportation (NHDOT)process, the Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT) process,the Connecticut State Traffi c Commission (STC) process, andthe Rhode Island Department of Transportation (RIDOT) process. InMassachusetts, these projects typically involved the preparation of EnvironmentalNotifi cation Forms (ENFs), Environmental Impact Reports(EIRs), and Functional Design Reports (FDRs), and MassachusettsDepartment of Transportation (MassDOT) Section 61 Findings andHighway Access Permit applications. Some of these projects include:Current Assignment: Tuscan Market, Salem, NH; 5/11–2011. ProjectManager. This project consists of expanding the Craftmania warehouseto contain the Tuscan Market commercial space associatedwith the adjacent Tuscan Kitchen restaurant on Main Street betweenRoute 39 and the Depot. Responsibilities involve the preparation ofa Trip-Generation and Assessment letter. These services include coordinatingwith Town of Salem and NHDOT offi cials. Client: Joe FaroCurrent Assignment: Retail Motor Fuel Outlet, Manchester, NH;5/11–2011. Project Manager. This project consists of constructing aretail motor fuel outlet on the east side of Route 3A between BrownAvenue and the relocated Pettingill Road. Responsibilities involvethe preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study. These servicesinclude coordinating with City of Manchester and NHDOT offi cials.Client: Volume, Inc.Current Assignment: Merrimack Valley Baptist Church Parking Expansion,Merrimack, NH; 5/11–2011. Project Manager. This projectGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22131

RESUMEJason R. Plourde, P.E.Senior Engineerconsists of razing a residential home and constructing an additional parking lot associated with the existing Merrimack Valley BaptistChurch to be located on the east side of Boston Post Road. Responsibilities involve the preparation of a Transportation Assessment.These services include coordinating with Town of Merrimack and NHDOT offi cials. Client: Merrimack Valley Baptist ChurchCurrent Assignment: CVS/pharmacy, Wakefield, MA; 4/11–2011. Project Manager. This project consists of razing the Verizon Wirelesswarehouse and constructing a CVS/pharmacy on the southwest corner of the Main Street and Water Street intersection. Responsibilitiesinvolve the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study. These services include coordinating with Town of Wakefield and MassDOT offi cials. Client: R.J. O’Connell & Associates, Inc.Current Assignment: Cumberland Farms Expansion, Portland, ME; 2/11–2011. Project Manager. This project consists of expandingthe existing Cumberland Farms convenience store and gasoline facility on the northeast corner of the Route 26 and Route 9intersection. Responsibilities involve the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study. These services include coordinating withCity of Portland and MaineDOT offi cials. Client: Cumberland Gulf Group of CompaniesCurrent Assignment: Nashua Community College, Nashua, NH; 10/10–2011. Project Manager. This project consists of constructinga new driveway for Nashua Community College on Route 101A. Access is provided via two driveways on Thornton Road and a newright-turn in/right turn out only driveway is proposed on a Route 101A at the western end of the property. Responsibilities involve thepreparation of a Site Access Evaluation letter. These services include coordination with City of Nashua and NHDOT offi cials. Client:Denis Mines, P.A. The ArchitectsCurrent Assignment: Healthcare Facility Expansion, Hudson, NH; 3/10–2011. Project Manager. This project consists of combiningtwo parcels and expanding the existing Fairview Healthcare facility located at 203 Lowell Road with additional assisted living unitsand healthcare beds. Responsibilities involve the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study and a Supplemental Traffi c Assessment.These services include coordinating with Town of Hudson and NHDOT offi cials. Client: Merrimac Real Estate Investors,LLCCurrent Assignment: Walmart and Meineke Car Care Center Expansions and Lowe’s Home Improvement Warehouse, Salem,MA; 2/10–2011. Project Manager. This project consists of expanding the existing Walmart, expanding the existing Meineke, andconstruction a Lowe’s Home Improvement Warehouse at 440 Highland Avenue. Responsibilities involve the preparation of a Traffi cImpact and Access Study with an Expanded ENF and a Draft EIR. These services include coordinating with the City of Salem, Cityof Lynn, North Shore Transportation Management Association, Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC), Massachusetts BayTransit Authority, MassRIDES, MassDOT, and MEPA offi cials and with neighborhood groups. Client: Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc. &Bohler EngineeringCurrent Assignment: Affordable Housing Development, Danvers, MA; 1/10–2011. Project Manager. This project consists of constructingan affordable housing development to be located off Conifer Hill Drive between I-95 and Route 1. Responsibilities involvethe preparation of a Traffi c and Parking Assessment Letter, a Traffi c Impact and Access Study, and MEPA and MassDOT Requestsfor Determination Letters. These services include coordinating with Town of Danvers, MAPC, MassDOT, and MEPA offi cials and withneighborhood groups. Client: Kavanagh Advisory GroupCurrent Assignment: Walmart Expansion, Tilton, NH; 5/09–2011. Project Manager. This project consists of expanding the existingWalmart located on Route 3 west of the I-93 Exit 20 interchange. Responsibilities involve the preparation of a Traffi c Impact andAccess Study and a NHDOT Access Permit Application. These services include coordinating with the Town of Tilton and NHDOToffi cials and with neighborhood groups. Client: Bohler EngineeringCurrent Assignment: Ira Automobile Dealership, Danvers, MA; 12/07–2011. Project Manager. This project consists of redevelopingthe Ira automobile dealership located on Route 114 across from Brooksby Village Drive. Responsibilities involve the preparation of aGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22132

RESUMEJason R. Plourde, P.E.Senior EngineerDesign Justifi cation Report, a Driveway Layout Conceptual Plan, and a MassDOT Access Permit Application. These services includecoordinating with Town of Danvers, MassDOT, and MEPA offi cials. Client: Group 1 Automotive, Inc.Commercial/Office Developments:Norton Commerce Center, Norton, MA; 1/11–2/11. Project Manager. This project consisted of expanding an existing warehouse at45 Commerce Way to include additional warehouse and offi ce space for Horizon Beverage. Responsibilities involved the preparationof a MassDOT Request for Determination Letter and a Trip-Generation Letter for submittal with an ENF. Approvals and permits wererequired from the Town of Norton, MassDOT, and MEPA. Client: C&A Engineering Services, LLCIndoor Sports Arena, Danvers, MA; 11/09–10/10. Project Manager. This project consisted of constructing an indoor sports arenato be located on Route 114 west of Garden Street. Responsibilities involved the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study, aMEPA Request for Determination Letter, and a MassDOT Access Permit Application. Approvals and permits were required from theTown of Danvers, MassDOT, and MEPA. These services include coordinating with Town of Danvers, MAPC, MassDOT, and MEPAoffi cials. Client: Mark MsciszHingham Shipyard Retail, Hingham, MA; 4/09–7/10. Project Manager. These projects consisted of constructing a TD Bank and aCVS/pharmacy on the Weber Dodge automobile dealership and overfl ow storage lots within the Hingham Shipyard on the northwestand northeast corners of the Route 3A and HMS Essington Drive intersection. Responsibilities involved the preparation of a Traffi cImpact Assessment, a Traffi c Impact and Access Study, a MEPA Request for Determination Letter, a Notice of Project Change, andMassDOT Access Permit Applications. These services included coordinating with Town of Hingham, MAPC, MassDOT, and MEPAoffi cials. Approvals and permits were required from the Town of Hingham, MassDOT, and MEPA. Client: Atlantic Development andR.J. O’Connell & Associates, Inc.Rutland Commons, Rutland, VT; 8/08–11/10. Project Manager. This project consisted of constructing the Rutland Commons ShoppingCenter on Route 417 opposite the Diamond Run Mall. Responsibilities involved the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and AccessStudy and a Request for Break in Limited-Access Letter. These services included coordination with the Town of Rutland, Sate ofVermont Transportation Board, and Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) offi cials. Approvals and permits were required fromthe Town of Rutland, the State of Vermont Transportation Board, and VTrans. Client: Mid-Vermont Properties, LLCBest Buy Distribution Center, Bellingham, MA; 7/08–10/08. Project Manager. This project consisted of constructing a Best BuyDistribution Center on Depot Street. Responsibilities involved the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study. These servicesincluded coordinating with Town of Bellingham, MAPC, MassDOT, and MEPA offi cials and with neighborhood groups. Approvals andpermits were required from the Town of Bellingham. Client: National DevelopmentIra Toyota of Milford, Milford, MA; 1/06–2/08. Project Manager. These projects consisted of constructing an automobile dealershipon Fortune Boulevard and a subsequent parking and storage area expansion on an adjacent parcel to the automobile dealership.Responsibilities involved the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study with an ENF, a Notice of Project Change, a MassDOTAccess Permit Application, and evaluating vehicular and pedestrian interaction between the two parcels by way of a cross-connection.These services included coordinating with Town of Milford, MAPC, MassDOT, and MEPA. Approvals and permits were requiredfrom the Town of Milford, MassDOT, and MEPA. Client: Advantage Construction, Inc.Mansfield Crossing, Mansfield, MA; 4/03–6/07. Project Manager. This project consisted of constructing a shopping center to includeretail and restaurant space and a hotel on School Street at the Route 140/I-495 north interchange. Responsibilities involvedthe preparation of a Draft EIR, a Final EIR, a MassDOT Section 61 Finding, FDRs, and evaluating the site to create a more compactwalkable and sustainable development. These services included coordinating with Town of Mansfi eld, SRPEDD, GATRA, MassDOT,and MEPA offi cials and with neighborhood groups. Approvals and permits were required from the Town of Mansfi eld, MassDOT, andMEPA. Client: W/S Development Associates, LLCGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22133

RESUMEJason R. Plourde, P.E.Senior EngineerNew Bedford Business Park, New Bedford, MA; 3/03–9/04. Project Manager. This project consisted of the construction of additionaldevelopment within the New Bedford Business Park by way of a Public Works and Economic Development (PWED) grant forthe construction of a new roadway and the extension of an existing roadway that would accommodate this additional development.Responsibilities involved the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study with an ENF, a Draft EIR, a Final EIR, and a MassDOTSection 61 Finding. These services included coordinating with Town of New Bedford, SRPEDD, MassDOT, and MEPA offi cials. Approvalsand permits were required from the Town of New Bedford, MassDOT, and MEPA. Client: Epsilon Associates, Inc.Stoughton Technology Center, Stoughton, MA; 1/03–12/05. Project Manager. These projects consisted of replacing MEPA approvedoffi ce space with a furniture store, restaurants, and retail space within the Stoughton Technology Center. Responsibilitiesinvolved the preparation of Notices of Project Change, MassDOT Access Permit Applications, Section 61 Findings, and calculatinga square footage exchange between approved and proposed space. These services included coordinating with Town of Stoughton,MAPC, Brockton Area Transit Authority (BAT), MassDOT, and MEPA offi cials. Approvals and permits were required from the Town ofStoughton, MassDOT, and MEPA. Client: Condyne, LLC and Client: KGI PropertiesNorthwoods Crossing, Taunton, MA; 6/01–11/10. Project Manager. This project consisted of constructing a commercial developmentin the southeast quadrant of the I-495/Bay Street interchange and a subsequent expansion to the commercial development.Responsibilities involved the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study with an ENF, a Single EIR, Notices of Project Change,a FDR, a MassDOT Access Permit Application, a MassDOT Section 61 Finding, Transportation Monitoring Studies, and evaluatingpotential connectivity with the existing public transportation system. These services include coordinating with City of Taunton,SRPEDD, GATRA, MassDOT, and MEPA. Client: KGI Properties, LLCGasoline Station/Convenience Stores:Mobil Gasoline Station/Convenience Store/Car Wash, Manchester, NH; 6/05–1/07. Project Manager. This project consistedof constructing a gasoline station, a convenience store, and a car wash at the South Main Street and Second Street intersection.Responsibilities involved the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study and establishing a Traffi c Signal Agreement betweenthe City of Manchester and the Town of Bedford. These services included coordinating with City of Manchester, Town of Bedford,Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission (SNHPC), and NHDOT offi cials. Approvals and permits were required from the Cityof Manchester, the Town of Bedford, and NHDOT. Client: Trammell Crow CompanyTriple Play Car Wash, Attleboro, MA; 6/05–5/06. Project Manager. This project consisted of razing the Ski Market Undergroundand constructing a convenience store with gasoline pumps, a donut shop with a drive-through window, a tunnel car wash, an in-baycar wash, an automobile lubrication facility, and an automobile detailing facility to be located on Route 1. Responsibilities involvedthe preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study with an ENF, a MEPA Request for Determination Letter, and a Project ChangeMemorandum. These services included coordinating with City of Attleboro, SRPEDD, MassDOT, and MEPA offi cials. Approvals andpermits were required from the City of Attleboro, MassDOT, and MEPA. Client: Terrance ElderRestaurants:Tuscan Kitchen, Salem, NH; 6/10–11/10. Project Manager. This project consisted of razing an existing apartment building andredeveloping the existing DeVito’s Restaurant to provide the Tuscan Kitchen Restaurant on Main Street between Route 39 and theDepot. Responsibilities involved preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study and evaluation of interim improvement measuresprior to the implementation of The Depot improvement project. These services included coordination with Town of Salem and NHDOToffi cials. Approvals and permits were required form the Town of Salem. Client: Joe FaroTaco Bell, Manchester, NH; 3/07–7/07. Project Manager. This project consisted of razing the Bickford’s Family Restaurant andconstructing a Taco Bell restaurant located at the South Main Street and Second Street intersection. Responsibilities involved thepreparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study. These services included coordinating with City of Manchester offi cials, SNHPC officials, and NHDOT offi cials. Approvals and permits were required from the City of Manchester and NHDOT. Client: Yum! Brands, Inc.Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22134

RESUMEJason R. Plourde, P.E.Senior EngineerResidential Developments:Residential Development, Grafton, MA; 10/09–4/10. Project Manager. This project consisted of constructing a residential developmentto be located on Institute Road south of Route 30. Responsibilities involved the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and Access Study.These services included coordinating with Town of Grafton and Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission (CMRPC)offi cials; and evaluating and recommending operational and safety improvement measures. Client: Guerriere & Halnon, Inc.TRAFFIC MONITORING/DESIGN STUDIESMr. Plourde has prepared several Traffi c Monitoring Studies that identify post-development transportation conditions and comparethe results to the estimates made during the permitting process. Traffi c Monitoring Studies are often required as part of local andstate conditions for approval of land development projects. Mr. Plourde has also been involved with the design of site access and offsitehighway/roadway improvements for land development projects that he permitted. He is knowledgeable in the design of roadwaywidening and geometric modifi cations, traffi c control signals and systems, and signing and pavement markings.Stratham Town Center District, Stratham, NH; 9/10–11/10. Project Manager. This project consisted of preparing a PreliminaryDesign Report to assist the Town with its Master Plan. The report provided vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volumes; operations;and potential roadway geometric improvements within the Town Center District to address safety and intersection capacity needs.Conceptual alternatives were developed and the impacts of each alternative were evaluated in terms of capacity, safety, right-of-wayneeds, and construction and maintenance cost, while aiming to maintain the historic character of the Town Center District by improvingpedestrian and bicycle mobility balanced with improving vehicular operations. These services involved coordinating with Town ofStratham, Rockingham Planning Commission, and NHDOT offi cials. Client: Town of StrathamVillage School Transportation Operations Evaluation, Marblehead, MA; 7/09–10/09. Project Manager. This project consistedof evaluating the access/egress/traffi c circulation for the Village School. The objective of the study was to observe vehicle and pedestrianoperations, identify concerns, and recommend measures to address the student drop-off/pick-up operations as well as aproposed Loop Road. Conceptual alternatives were developed and the impacts of each alternative were evaluated in terms of safety,right-of-way needs, and construction and maintenance cost. These services involved coordinating with Town of Marblehead andMassDOT offi cials. Client: Symmes Maini & McKee Associates, Inc.Lafayette Square Post-Construction Evaluation, Cambridge, MA; 7/09–10/09. Project Manager. This project consisted of evaluatingthe recently completed reconstruction of Lafayette Square (as part of the Massachusetts Avenue Rehabilitation project), whichis formed by the intersection of Massachusetts Avenue, Main Street, Columbia Street, and Sidney Street. The objective of the studywas to provide a “before and after” comparison of transportation operations within the Lafayette Square area. The study evaluatedthe operations of the traffi c signals, signage, and pavement markings after the construction project and compared the use of the areaby vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians. These services involved coordinating with City of Cambridge, MAPC, and MassDOT offi cials.Client: City of CambridgeTRAFFIC REVIEWSMr. Plourde has conducted several reviews of traffi c studies prepared by other consultants. Such reviews are typically at the requestof municipalities who often require third-party reviews of development applications for accuracy, completeness, and compliance withlocal regulations.TRAFFIC FEASIBILITY AND SITE SIZING STUDIESMr. Plourde has conducted numerous preliminary evaluation studies for potential land development projects to identify expectedtransportation impacts and likely traffi c mitigation measures during the initial stages of the development process. The feasibility studiesoften take the form of site sizing studies at locations where transportation impact and capacity are the constraining factors. Thesite sizing studies identify the maximum level of site development within the constraints of the surrounding roadway infrastructure.These studies typically provide preliminary construction cost estimates for potential transportation mitigation measures and identifythe approval process likely to be required for the project.Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22135

RESUMEJohn W. Diaz, P.E., P.T.O.EVice President / Director of Traffic EngineeringEDUCATION:MS/1993/Civil EngineeringBS/1991/Civil EngineeringUniversity of Massachusetts – AmherstREGISTRATION:1998/Professional Engineer/MA #404362005/Professional Traffi c Operations Engineer/#1632IMSA Work Zone Safety Specialist/#ZZ_59654IMSA Traffi c Signal Technician Level I,/#AA_59654IMSA Traffi c Signal Technician Level II,/#BE_59654IMSA Traffi c Signal Inspector/#SI-59654IMSA Traffi c Signal Level III Field Electrician/#CE_59654YEARS WITH FIRM: 14YEARS WITH OTHER FIRMS: 5PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), AssociateMemberInternational Municipal Signal Association, AssociateMemberAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)COURSE WORK:Roundabout Design Workshop - Northeast Area RoundaboutsAdaptive Control System Operations - Electric LightCompanyTraffi c Responsive and Adaptive Control - Highway TechEthernet Communications for Closed Loop Systems andSupplementary Equipment - Highway TechWorkshop on Planning and Designing Bicycle Accommodations- Northeastern UniversityProfessional ProfileAs Vice President and Project Director, Mr. Diaz is responsible for themanagement of GPI’s New England Traffi c Engineering Departmentand oversees and coordinates all facets of transportation projects.His client base includes state agencies, public municipalities and privatedevelopers and he has completed numerous PS&E submittals invarious towns and cities throughout Massachusetts. Mr. Diaz has alsoworked closely with many municipalities and the Massachusetts Departmentof Transportation (MassDOT) to inventory and assess publicassets including traffi c signals and signs.Recently, Mr. Diaz oversaw and coordinated a comprehensive inventoryand assessment of all traffi c signals in the Town of Concord. Aspart of this project, Mr. Diaz also recommended short and long-termimprovement options and developed construction plans and bid documentsfor full reconstruction of Sudbury Road and Thoreau Street intersection.Mr. Diaz is also currently assisting the Town of Concordby providing professional peer review services on a variety of traffi cplanning and/or traffi c calming projects in the Town.Project ExperienceCurrent Assignment: MassDOT On-Call Contracts, Statewide, MA;2006–2013. Project Manager on several assignments under Mass-DOT’s statewide on-call contracts. These assignments include complextraffi c signal designs projects, civil roadway geometric modifi -cations and safety improvements. Additional projects include traffi ccalming, traffi c studies and peer review services. The following projectsinvolve traffi c design:• Weymouth Route 53/Middle Street - Safety, capacity, traffi c signals,and geometric improvements• Plymouth Manomet Point - Safety, capacity, traffi c signals, and geometricimprovements• Duxbury Route 53/Winter Street - Safety and geometric improvementsand traffi c calming/roundabout design• Northborough Route 20 - Safety, capacity and geometric improvementsand traffi c signal coordination• Westborough Route 9/Lyman Street - Safety, capacity and geometricimprovements and traffi c signal coordinationCurrent Assignment: On-Call Traffic Engineering, Cambridge, MA;2007–2010. Project Manger. This project involves providing varioustraffi c engineering services to the City of Cambridge on an on-call basis.Mr. Diaz is responsible for overall project management coordinationwith the city. Assignments to date have included:• Concord Road at Blanchard Road - Conceptual Plans and Analysisprovided to explore potential impacts of modern roundabout.• Concord Road Pedestrian Improvements - Provided conceptualplans for improved pedestrian and bike access along corridor.Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22131

RESUMEJohn W. Diaz, P.E., P.T.O.EVice President / Director of Traffic Engineering• Brattle Street Reconstruction - Provided full Construction Plans for the resurfacing and rehabilitation of Brattle Street.• Cameron Ave - Design and grading of raised crosswalk.• Porter Square Study - Prepared a Traffi c Memorandum documenting the operations of the Porter Square intersection uponcompletion of recent construction improvements.• 2008 & 2010 Bike Count Programs - Oversaw the data collection effort to document bike usage, volumes and ridership trends at17 locations throughout the City. The data was summarized and presented in graphical format to document volumes and compliancewith traffi c laws (i.e. riding with/against traffi c, running red lights, etc.)• Spring Street, Wathehouse Street, Linnaean Street, More Street and Davis Street - Design plans for sidewalk and roadway enhancementsincluding curb extensions, raised crosswalks, raised intersection and ADA compliant wheelchair ramps.• Library Grading/Reconstruction - Prepared grading and construction plans for all southwest areas surrounding the roundabout.• Upland Road - Prepared construction plans for roadway and sidewalk upgrades.• Cottage Park - Provided construction plans for curb relocation and bus stop.• Porter Square - Evaluation and assessment report.• Lafayette Square - Evaluation and assessment report.Current Assignment: City of Waltham Traffic Consultant; 2010–present. Project Manager representing GPI in supporting the cityas their in-house traffi c engineer. Providing technical expertise to the city’s Traffi c Commission and responsible for overseeing anytraffi c related concerns brought before the Commission. To date have assisted in pedestrian crosswalk requests, Stop sign studies,traffi c signal retiming and troubleshooting, peer reviews and conceptual designs. Client: City of WalthamCurrent Assignment: Route 28 Intersection Improvements, Falmouth, MA; 2010-2011. Project Manager. GPI is providing completeplanning and design Services for the reconstruction of 2 locations along Route 28 in Falmouth: Route 28 at Jones Road andRoute 28 at Davisville Road. The project involves complete intersection modifi cations including new fully actuated traffi c signals,pedestrian and bicycle enhancements, lane modifi cations, landscaping/streetscaping and development of construction plans in accordancewith MassDOT standards. Client: Town of FalmouthCurrent Assignment: Route 3A at Manomet Point Road, Plymouth, MA; 2003–2011. Project Engineer. As part of our ongoingGeneral Services contract with MassDOT, this assignment consists of examining the operations of the intersection of State Road(Route 3A) at Manomet Point Road and Standish Avenue in Plymouth. The scope of work involved the exploration of numerous conceptualimprovement plans including installation of a fully-actuated traffi c signal under the existing geometric confi guration, potentialclosing or realigning Standish Avenue, potential one-way confi guration of Standish Avenue and the potential for the installation of aroundabout. GPI provided 25% Design Plans, a Functional Design Report and held the Design Public Hearing. Client: MassDOTCurrent Assignment: Roundabout Design, Edgartown-Vineyard Haven Road at Barnes Road and Airport Road, Oak Bluffs,MA; 2006-2012. Project Manager. This project involves planning and design services for a modern roundabout at the intersection ofEdgartown-Vineyard Haven Road at Barnes Road and Airport Road. Work also entailed providing assistance in the public presentationof the modern roundabout concept to local residents and assistance in the preparation of a traffi c study comparing the safetyand operational capacity of the roundabout to other traffi c control measures. The project considers both peak summer as well asoff-peak traffi c levels and the interaction of pedestrian and bicycle access and safety at the roundabout. Client: Town of Oak BluffsCurrent Assignment: Northborough Center Traffic Improvements, Northborough, MA; 2007-2011. Project Manager. This projectinvolves providing design services for traffi c improvements to the center of Northborough. The primary focus of the project is toimprove the traffi c fl ow and progression along the Route 20 corridor through the downtown area. The project includes evaluatingthe operations and replacing the existing signalized intersections of Route 20 with Church Street and Route 20 with South Street.Updates consist of providing all new, state-of-the art traffi c signal hardware and software, new modern controllers capable of fi reand rail preemption as well as coordination and inclusion in a Closed Loop Signal System. Client: Town of Northborough/MassDOTGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22132

RESUMEJohn W. Diaz, P.E., P.T.O.EVice President / Director of Traffic EngineeringCurrent Assignment: Route 53 at Middle Street and Winter Street, Weymouth MA; 2008-2011. Project Manager. This projectinvolves reevaluating the traffi c signal operations and design plan confi guration for the Route 53 at Middle Street and Winter Streetintersection in Weymouth, MA. Based on the traffi c analysis and review of the plans, GPI will develop a detailed Man Hour Estimateand Scope of Work to provide final Construction Bid Documents. Client: MassDOTCurrent Assignment: Route 53 at Winter Street, Duxbury, MA; 2008-2012. Project Manager. This project involves the design andconstruction of a modern single lane roundabout at the intersection of Route 53 at Winter Street. The project builds on the previouswork at this location to explore the potential for the installation of traffic signals at the intersection. Based on traffi c levels at theintersection, it was determined that a traffi c signal was not appropriate, however, due to the safety problems at the intersection andthe high number of crashes, including at least one fatality, the alternative of a roundabout was recommended. Client: MassDOTTraffic Signal Inventory and Analysis, Portsmouth, NH; 2009-2010. Project Manager. This project involved the inventory of traffi csignals at various locations throughout the city. The project area consisted of 22 intersections and 4 school zone areas. The projectincluded performing detailed inventories of all existing city-maintained signal systems, including intersection geometry, pavementmarkings, type and condition of signal equipment, roadway condition, and signage. GPI evaluated the condition of each intersectionand signal equipment for conformance with current Manual on Uniform Traffi c Control Devices, American Association of StateHighway and Transportation Offi cials (AASHTO) Geometric Design of Highway and Streets, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),and local/state laws. Additionally, GPI provided a safety evaluation of each intersection based on recent accident records. Client:City of Portsmouth DPWLake Ave/Oak Buffs Ave Reconstruction, Oak Bluffs, MA; 2006-2008. Project Manager. GPI examined the traffi c circulation andinteraction between vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles in the heart of the Oak Bluffs historic downtown area. The project involvedreconstruction of Oak Bluffs Avenue to explore the potential to reduce the number of travel lanes and to provide additional sidewalksand enhancements for pedestrians and bicycles. The overall goal of the project was to “resurface the roadways and construct sidewalksin the downtown waterfront area to improve accessibility and safety for pedestrians and bicyclists.” The project involved aninventory of the existing peak traffi c periods and analysis of the traffi c, pedestrian and bicycle operations as well as the infl uence ofthe Hy-Line Ferry terminal on the downtown Oak Bluffs area. The roadway and infrastructure improvements proposed for the areawere consistent with the “island” character and designed in a context sensitive manner to enhance the historic and tourist nature ofthe downtown area. Client: Town of Oak BluffsCambridge Street at Southbridge, Worcester, MA; 2002-2008. Project Manager. GPI was contacted by MassDOT to developintersection and corridor improvements at the Cambridge Street at Southbridge Street intersection in Worcester. The project involvesupgrading the geometric confi guration of Southbridge Street to provide a 5-lane cross-section with dedicated turning lanes at theintersection. As part of the project, all signal equipment at the Cambridge Street/Southbridge Street intersection will be updated andnew signals will be installed at the Southbridge Street/River Street intersection. The two signals will be coordinated and provide fullvehicle detection, as well as emergency vehicle pre-emption. The project involves close coordination with MassDOT, the City andabutters to minimize the right-of-way impacts and incorporate streetscaping where possible. Client: MassDOTRoute 107 Closed Loop System, Salem, MA; 1998-2007. Senior Project Manager. This project involves upgrading seven signalizedintersections along State Route 107. The majority of the work involves upgrading the signal equipment to provide a closed loopcoordinated, fully actuated traffi c responsive signal system. Responsibilities include the overall design and project management thatincludes project budgeting, scheduling, and coordinating with the MHD. Construction cost: $750,000. Client: MassDOTWayland Route 20 and 27/126 Reconstruction, Wayland, MA; 2001-2005. Lead Traffi c Engineer for the reconstruction of theRoute 20 corridor through the Town Center and the intersection of Route 20 with 27/126 including widening for turning lanes andbicycle accommodations, right-of-way, traffi c improvements and signalization upgrades, drainage upgrades, wetland replication,fl ood loss compensation, signing and pavement markings and several enhancements including pavers and plantings to enhance thehistoric character of the Town. Client: MassDOT and Town of Wayland.Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22133

RESUMEJohn W. Diaz, P.E., P.T.O.EVice President / Director of Traffic EngineeringRoute 125 Signal Upgrade and Corridor Improvements, Plaistow, NH; 2002-2003. Project Manager. This project included traffi canalyses of fi ve existing signalized locations and evaluating the benefi ts of upgrading the operation to a closed-loop signal system.The project included a mix of both hard-wire interconnect and the use of spread-spectrum radio to communicate between the fi veindividual controllers along this 1.5 mile stretch of Route 125. The majority of the work involved the signal equipment and interconnectdesign. Responsibilities included the overall design, project QA/QC, supervision of fi eld equipment inventory and coordinatingwith the NHDOT. Construction cost: $450,000. Client: New Hampshire Department of TransportationRoute 3A, Hooksett, NH; 2001-2002. Traffi c Signal Engineer. This project involved design improvements to Quality Drive and StateRoute 3A from the I-93 interchange to the Quality Drive intersection. The work included upgrading the existing signalized intersectionsto a fully actuated (closed loop) coordinated system, as well as widening portions of Route 3A and Quality Drive and providing anew fully-actuated traffi c signal at the intersection of Route 3A and Quality Drive. Responsibilities included design review of the traffi csignal plans, fi nal signal inspection services and working with NHDOT to fi ne tune the signal timing and coordination programming.Client: Great Island Development Group, Inc.Bearses Way, Barnstable, MA; 2000–2001. Project Manager. GPI oversaw and coordinated the complete design of Bearses Way.The project involved the resurfacing and reconstruction of Bearses Way from Pitchers Way to Route 28, the installation of sidewalksalong the easterly portion of Bearses Way and the installation of a fully vehicle actuated traffi c signal at the intersection of BearsesWay and Enterprise Road. The project also involved minor modifi cations at the intersection of Bearses Way at the Route 28 intersection,comprising of the provision of a right turn lane southbound along Bearses Way and modifi cations to the signal phasing. Client:Town of BarnstableMain Street at Seat Street and High School Road, Barnstable, MA; 1998-2005. Senior Project Manager. GPI had been involvedwith the redesign of the traffi c signal along Main Street in Barnstable for a number of years. The fi rst project consisted of upgradingfour signals in the downtown Hyannis area. The project also included both geometric and signal upgrades at South Street and SeaStreet as well as coordination with the North Street/High School Road signal. Responsibilities included the overall project coordinationand administration, including design personnel, budget management, project scheduling, and communications with local authorities.The project later involved developing a coordination plan for the entire Main Street corridor, provisions for accessible pedestriansignals (audio/tactile pedestrian push buttons) and count down pedestrian signal displays. Estimated construction cost: $4 million.Client: Town of BarnstablePioneer Valley Signal Improvement Project, Various Locations; 2001-2002. Senior Project Manager. This is a unique projectin that GPI teamed with David R. Northup Electric Company to provide the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission with a full packageDesign-Build team. The project involves the evaluation of eight (8) existing signalized intersections in various towns in westernMassachusetts. The goal of the project was to engineer and implement short-term modifi cations that would result in improved intersectioncapacity and safety. GPI conducted a fi eld inventory and evaluation of each intersection and worked closely with the signalcontractor to develop cost-effective improvements to the existing intersections. Client: Pioneer Valley Planning CommissionPlymouth Signal Inventory, Plymouth, MA; 1999-2003. Project Manager. This project involved the inventory of all existing traffi ccontrol signal equipment in the Town of Plymouth. The inventory also included an assessment of the condition and workability of allstreet hardware. In addition, the inventory assessed the sequence and timing, signing and pavement markings, geometric layout,and conformance with federal and state guidelines (i.e. Manual on Uniform Traffi c Control Devices (MUTCD) and the AASHTO GreenBook). Any existing signal permits or as-built signal plans were researched. The inventories were compiled and presented in a boundreport. The intersections were categorized into groups based on proximity, operational relationship, and geographical location. Basedon the physical inventory, GPI identifi ed short-term, low-cost improvements that the town could implement immediately to improvesafety, reduce congestion, improve air quality and operational effi ciency and upgrade the existing traffi c signal equipment. GPI thenimplemented the recommendations by performing the necessary fi eld changes of the traffi c signal timing and overseeing the implementationof other recommendations as performed by the traffi c signal contractor. Client: Town of PlymouthGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22134

RESUMEJoseph P. Johnson, P.E., P.T.O.E.Senior EngineerEDUCATION:BS/1998/Civil EngineeringBA/1998/Liberal ArtsREGISTRATION:2005/Professional Engineer/NH #115542009/Professional Traffi c Operations Engineer, #2726IMSA Traffi c Signal Technician Level I #AA_82078IMSA Work Zone Safety Specialist #ZZ_82078IMSA Traffi c Signal Electrician Level II #BE_82078YEARS WITH FIRM: 12YEARS WITH OTHER FIRMS: 1PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), AssociateMemberProfessional ProfileMr. Johnson has thirteen years of diverse experience in both traffi cand highway design. He has been responsible for traffi c signal design,traffi c calming, construction phase services, intersection capacityanalyses, traffi c management, quantity and cost estimating, supplementalspecifi cation preparation, and simulation projects. Mr. Johnsonhas also gained experience presenting existing and future traffi cmodeling at public hearings, has been involved in the design of severalintersection improvement projects from both a traffi c and highwaydesign perspective, and has been involved in every aspect of a traffi cimpact study from data collection to authorizing text.Project ExperienceCurrent Assignment: Route 53 at Winter Street, Duxbury, MA; 2008-2011. Traffi c Engineer. This project involves the design and constructionof a modern single lane roundabout at the intersection of Route53 at Winter Street. The project builds on the previous work at thislocation to explore the potential for the installation of traffi c signalsat the intersection. Based on traffi c levels at the intersection, it wasdetermined that a traffi c signal is not appropriate, however, there is asafety problem at the intersection and high number of crashes, includingat least one fatality. Client: MassDOTCurrent Assignment: Northborough Center Traffic Improvements,Northborough, MA; 2007-2011. Traffi c Engineer. This project involvesproviding design services for traffi c improvements to the centerof Northborough. The primary focus of the project is to improve thetraffi c fl ow and progression along the Route 20 corridor through thedowntown area. The project includes evaluating the operations andreplacing the existing signalized intersections of Route 20 with ChurchStreet and Route 20 with South Street. Updates consist of providing allnew, state-of-the art traffi c signal hardware and software, new moderncontrollers capable of fi re and rail preemption as well as coordinationand inclusion in a Closed Loop Signal System. Client: Town of Northborough/MassDOTCurrent Assignment: Samoset Street Reconstruction, Plymouth,MA; 2006–2012. Traffi c Engineer. This project involves the reconstructionof Samoset Street (Route 44) from the intersection of RoyalStreet to just east of the intersection with Court Street (Route 3A). Thework involves the reconstruction of the roadway and sidewalks alongthe corridor, the signalization of the intersections of Samoset Street atStandish Ave, Samoset Street at Oak Street, Samoset Street at AllertonStreet and an upgrade of the signal equipment at the intersectionof Samoset Street at Court Street. Additional work is anticipated toinclude improvements to the stormwater drainage system while alsoinvestigating the implementation of various BMP strategies, miscellaneousutility relocation and adjustments, and traffi c management duringconstruction. Client: Town of PlymouthCurrent Assignment: Route 85 (Washington Street) Reconstruction,Hudson, MA; 2007–2011. Traffi c Engineer. This project involvesthe reconstruction of approximately 1.5 miles of Route 85 (WashingtonGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22131

RESUMEJoseph P. Johnson, P.E., P.T.O.E.Senior EngineerStreet). The work includes new ADA compliant sidewalks, a widening of the roadway from two to fi ve lanes (for a portion of the project),the installation of four new traffi c signals, the upgrade of two existing traffi c signals, the removal of an existing traffi c signal, theinstallation of a two-lane roundabout, the installation of a closed loop traffi c signal system, the installation of new drainage facilitiesand new or improved signing and pavement markings. Construction Cost: $8,430,000. Client: Town of HudsonCurrent Assignment: Route 12 (North Main St./Water St.) Reconstruction, Leominster/Fitchburg, MA; 2001-2011. Project Engineer.Project includes the widening and rehabilitation of Route 12 to a four-lane cross section, two new traffi c signal locations andone rehabilitated traffi c signal location. Responsibilities include intersection capacity analysis, traffi c modeling, report preparation,traffi c signal design, traffi c signal coordination, signing and striping design and maintenance of traffi c during construction. ConstructionCost: $4,100,000. Client: MassDOTCurrent Assignment: Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA; 2005-2011. Project Engineer. Project involves the design and preparationof contract documents for reconstruction of Massachusetts Avenue. This project includes roadway reconstruction, replacementof existing traffi c signal equipment, street lighting, landscaping and extensive coordination with a variety of special interest groupsfrom within the project area. Maintenance of traffi c during construction will be critical so as not to disrupt this heavily travelled roadway.Construction Cost: $13,000,000. Client: City of BostonCurrent Assignment: Route 150 Rehabilitation, Amesbury, MA; 1999-2011. Traffi c Engineer. Project includes roadway reconstruction,drainage design, and traffi c signal design. In addition, project includes a drainage study to design a new pond outletstructure and to evaluate downstream impacts of both the outlet and roadway drainage design. Responsibilities include projectmanagement, budget and billing, workload assignments, and project engineering. Client: Town of AmesburyCurrent Assignment: Route 128 Add-a-Lane, Dedham-Westwood, MA; 2003-2011. Traffi c Engineer. Design a new interchangeat Route 109 and I-95 (Route 128) as part of the MassDOT Route 128 Add-a-Lane program. Design includes mainline widening,ramps, two bridge replacements, stormwater management, construction staging, lighting and maintenance and protection of traffi c,coordination and construction. Client: Louis Berger Group, Inc.Current Assignment: Milford Upper Charles Trail, Phase 1 and 2, Milford, MA; 1998-2011. Traffi c Engineer for design of approximately6.4 miles of new bike path from East Main Street through town forest land and connecting to future bike trails in theneighboring towns of Holliston and Hopkinton along abandoned railbeds, town land, private property and shared roadway. Specifi cwork includes public involvement, parking lots, right-of-way, alteration and easement plans for recording, rights-of-entry, connectionsto abutting activity centers, fencing and barriers, site amenities such as scenic overlooks, entrance treatments, descriptive bouldersand benches, traffi c signs and pavement markings, signalization, two pedestrian bridges, and retaining walls. Client: Town of MilfordLake Ave/Oak Buffs Ave Reconstruction, Oak Bluffs, MA; 2006-2008. Traffi c Engineer. GPI examined the traffi c circulation andinteraction between vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles in the heart of the Oak Bluffs Historic Downtown area. The project involvedreconstruction of Oak Bluffs Avenue to explore the potential to reduce the number of travel lanes and to provide additional sidewalksand enhancements for pedestrians and bicycles. The overall goal of the project was to “resurface the roadways and construct sidewalksin the downtown waterfront area to improve accessibility and safety for pedestrians and bicyclists”. The project involved aninventory of the existing peak traffi c periods and analysis of the traffi c, pedestrian and bicycle operations as well as the infl uence ofthe Hy-Line Ferry terminal on the Downtown Oak Bluffs area. The roadway and infrastructure improvements proposed for the areawere consistent with the “island” character and designed in a context sensitive manner to enhance the historic and tourist nature ofthe downtown area. Client: Town of Oak BluffsConcord Avenue/Blanchard Road Roundabout, Cambridge, MA; 2008–2008. Traffi c Engineer. This project involved the conceptualdesign of a single lane roundabout at the intersection of Concord Avenue and Blanchard Road. Limited right-of-way andthe presence of heavy vehicles required unconventional geometric design at this location while accommodating pedestrians andbicyclists. Client: City of CambridgeGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22132

RESUMEJoseph P. Johnson, P.E., P.T.O.E.Senior EngineerConcord Signal Inventory, Concord, MA; 2008-2010 Traffi c Engineer. This project involves providing a detailed inventory of theTown of Concord’s eight (8) signalized intersections. The work includes a comprehensive fi eld inventory and conditions analysis, astructural analysis of the signal equipment, traffi c capacity analysis, conceptual design of signal improvements and upgrades, developmentof construction documents, construction assistance and inspection as well as public meetings and coordination with theTown Boards and offi cials. The project was further expanded to include preparation of construction plans and bid documents fortraffi c improvements at the intersection of Sudbury Road at Thoureau Street and development of a traffi c study of the proposed traffi ccontrol changes at Monument Square. Client: Town of ConcordWashington Street Discontinuance, Dedham, MA; 2001-2010. Traffi c Engineer. The project involves the reconstruction of WashingtonStreet from Providence Highway, extending northerly approximately 1,130 meters, the reconstruction of 60 meters of IncineratorRoad, 110 meters of Eastbrook Road, and 100 meters of Lower East Street. In addition, the project includes the signalization ofthe following intersections: Washington Street at Incinerator Road / East Street / Eastbrook Road and Washington Street at CurveStreet / Lower East Street. Construction Cost: $5,000,000. Client: Town of DedhamBruce Freeman Rail Trail - Phase 2A, Acton/Westford/Carlisle, MA; 2007–2010. Project Engineer. This project involves the constructionof a 4.8-mile multi-use recreational trail along a former railroad line. The project includes seven at-grade roadway crossingsand one grade separated crossing. Multiple options were explored for the trail crossing of Route 2A in Acton. The alternatives includeda signalized intersection, a single lane roundabout, an underpass and an overpass. All at-grade trail/roadway crossings will utilizea passively actuated fl ashing warning beacon system. Construction Cost: $7,685,000. Client: Towns of Acton/Westford/CarlisleVFW Highway and Bridge Street, Lowell, MA; 2008-2009. Traffi c Engineer. This project involved developing the preferred conceptplan for the safety improvements at the intersection of Bridge Street and VFW Highway in Lowell. Presently this location is the numberone High Accident location in the state. The project involved coordination with MassDOT to develop multiple design concepts,which may include the elimination of Lakewood Avenue from the intersection. Client: MassDOTTraffic Engineering, Leominster, MA; 2006-2008. Project Engineer. GPI provided general Engineering Consulting and DesignServices for various traffi c engineering assignments for the City of Leominster. The scope of work included traffi c signal optimization,traffi c calming and traffi c studies. Five specifi c locations were initially identifi ed for immediate attention due to traffi c concerns. Oneof the tasks explored the installation of a single lane roundabout at the intersection of West Street and Pond Street. Client: City ofLeominsterNH Route 125 Traffic Signal Improvement/Coordination Project, Plaistow, NH; 2002-2004. Engineer. This project involvedthe evaluation of fi ve signalized intersections and recommendation for future traffi c signal coordination. Responsibilities includedintersection capacity analysis, accident analysis, traffi c modeling, report preparation, traffi c signal design, wheelchair ramp design,collecting inventory of existing traffi c signal equipment, traffi c signal coordination and signing and striping design. Construction Cost:$450,000. Client: New Hampshire Department of TransportationThe Central Artery/Tunnel Project: I-93 Southbound and Surface Artery (400 Ft. south of Kneeland Street to CongressStreet), Contract #D018A, Boston, MA; 2001-2006. Engineer. Project involved designing traffi c management plans, traffi c signalplans and pavement marking and signing plans for the construction phases and the fi nal alignment. The design of the fi nal conditionpavement marking plans for the tunnel was also included. Responsibilities included client coordination, construction phase services,traffi c signal design, signing and striping design and quantity estimates. Client: MassDOT. Subconsultants to Edwards and Kelcey,Inc.Maplewood Avenue/Middle Street Improvements, Portsmouth, NH; 2004-2005. Project Engineer. This CMAQ project involvedthe upgrade of four existing signalized intersections and the implementation of traffi c signal coordination. Project included replacementof existing traffi c signal equipment, the installation of hard wire interconnect for coordination, new emergency preemptionequipment, and the redesign of existing sidewalk ramps. Responsibilities included the development of varying coordination patternsto be implemented within the proposed closed-loop system, traffi c signal design, capacity analysis, traffi c modeling, sidewalk rampGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22133

RESUMEJoseph P. Johnson, P.E., P.T.O.E.Senior Engineerdesign, the preparation of bid documents/special provisions for the project, a review of mast arm calculations and the compilation ofan engineer’s cost estimate for the project. Construction Cost: $750,000. Client: NHDOT/City of Portsmouth.Little Falls Bridge Road, Rochester, NH; 2004-2005. Project Engineer. This project included the development of three conceptualimprovement plans for the unsignalized intersection of NH Route 11 at Little Falls Bridge Road. An interim improvement to signalize/coordinate the intersection was advanced to fi nal design for immediate construction. Responsibilities included intersection capacityanalyses, fi nal design plans, cost estimating, preparation of contract documents/special provisions, shop drawing review and constructioninspection. This project included the hard-wire coordination with an adjacent traffi c signal at the intersection of NH Route11 and Wal-Mart. Construction Cost: $150,000. Client: City of Rochester.Intersection Improvements to Routes 119 (Boston Road) and 225, Groton, MA; 2002-2004. Engineer. Project involved substantialgeometric improvements, incorporating access to an adjacent major private development and the installation of a traffi csignal to increase capacity and improve safety at the intersection of Route 119 and Route 225. Responsibilities included projectmanagement, intersection capacity analysis, report preparation, traffi c signal design and signing and striping design. ConstructionCost: $1,400,000. Client: Town of GrotonGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22134

RESUMEHeather L. Monticup, P.E.Project EngineerEDUCATION:BS/1997/Civil and Environmental EngineeringREGISTRATION:2011/Professional Engineer/MACERTIFICATIONS:IMSA Work Zone Safety Specialist/#ZZ_68289IMSA Traffi c Signal Technician Level I/#AA_68289IMSA Traffi c Signal Field Electrician Level II/#BE_68289YEARS WITH FIRM: 12YEARS WITH OTHER FIRMS: 2PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), MemberWomen’s Transportation Seminar (WTS), MemberCOURSE WORK:MassDOT Design Manual Class – MassDOTSignal Timing for the Development of Traffi c SignalTiming Plans – ITEAdvanced Signal Timing Concepts Course – ITE IntersectionSafety and Geometric Design: Sight Distance– ITERoundabouts: Intersections Designed for Safety –FHWAOverview of Safe Routes to School Program – ITERoundabouts: Planning, Design Principles and CurrentPractices – Lorman Education ServicesUpdate on Trip Generation Research Efforts – ITEMA Safe Routes to School Net Conference – Mass-RIDESHCM 2010 Workshop - McTransProfessional ProfileMs. Monticup has over eleven years of experience in the area of traffic engineering, planning, and design. From a planning perspective,she develops future traffi c forecasts and assesses corridor needs interms of lane capacity and traffi c controls. She provides input on thedecision-making process for new traffi c signal installations, roadwaywidening and geometric improvements for intersections and roadwaylinks.Ms. Monticup is experienced in traffi c data collection, traffi c projectionsand intersection capacity analyses and their utilization in developingand implementing design improvements in roadway geometryand traffi c control, sign and pavement marking design, traffi c signaldesign, coordinated/closed loop traffi c signal system design, traffi cmanagement design, highway design, and local/state permitting. Shehas prepared design plans, construction cost estimates and specifi cations,functional design and traffi c reports, and environmental impactreports for a wide variety of private development projects. In addition,she has provided technical and peer review services to local municipalities.Project ExperienceROADWAY AND INTERSECTION DESIGN/DESIGN DOCUMENTSMs. Monticup has been responsible for the preparation of designdocuments including functional design reports, design plans, accesspermits, cost estimates, and project specifi cations. These projectsinclude design of roadway widening and geometric modifi cations, traffic control signals and systems, signing and pavement markings, andtraffi c management during construction. Ms. Monticup has been involvedwith design projects through local and state agencies in Massachusetts,New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. Some of the projectsinclude:Liberty Drive By-Pass Shoulder, Construction Documents, Londonderry,NH; August 2011. Project Manager. Client: Volume, Inc.Route 44 at Orchard Street and Route 24 Northbound Ramps,MassDOT Project # 605668, Functional Design Report, Raynham,MA; August 2011. Project Engineer. Client: MassDOTSuperstructure Replacement and Substructure Repairs (R-05-016) Revere Beach Parkway over Blue Line and State Road,MassDOT Project # 605508, Functional Design Report, Revere,MA; June 2011. Project Engineer. Client: MassDOTIntersection Improvement Project East Falmouth Highway (Route28) at Davisville Road and Old Meeting House Road, MassDOTProject # 605671, Functional Design Report, Falmouth, MA; June2011. Project Engineer. Client: MassDOTIntersection Improvement Project Teaticket Highway and DavisStraits (Route 28) at Jones Road and Worcester Court, MassDOTGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22131

RESUMEHeather L. Monticup, E.I.T.Project EngineerProject # 605661, Functional Design Report, Falmouth, MA; May 2011. Project Engineer. Client: MassDOTProposed Off-Site Improvement Plan, Garden Street, Danvers, MA; October 2010. Project Manager. Client: Bohler EngineeringRoute 28 (Broadway), Construction Documents, Salem, NH/Methuen, MA; March 2008. Project Engineer. Client: W/S StatelineLLCRoute 246 (Charles Street), Signal Coordination Plans, Providence, RI; March 2008. Project Engineer. Client: Bohler Engineering,P.C.Garden Road at Route 125 (Plaistow Road), Construction Documents, Plaistow, NH; February 2008. Project Engineer. Client:Bohler Engineering, P.C.Seven Locations, Construction Documents, Worcester, MA; February 2008. Project Engineer. Client: Bohler Engineering, P.C.Plain Street, Construction Documents, Lowell, MA; January 2008. Project Engineer. Client: R.J. O’Connell and Associates, Inc.Route 1 (Lafayette Road) at Route 1A (Beach Road), Construction Documents, Salisbury, MA; January 2008. Project Engineer.Client: Salisbury Ventures, LLCRoute 28 By-Pass (Londonderry Turnpike) at Tsienneto Road, Construction Documents, Derry, NH; April 2004. Project Engineer.Client: Irving Oil CorporationTRAFFIC IMPACT AND ACCESS STUDIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTSMs. Monticup has prepared numerous traffi c studies necessary for permitting through the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act(MEPA) process, the New Hampshire Dept. of Transportation (NHDOT), the New York State Department of Transportation (NYS-DOT), the Connecticut Department of Transportation (ConnDOT), and the Rhode Island Department of Transportation (RIDOT). InMassachusetts, these projects typically involve the preparation of Environmental Notifi cation Forms (ENF), Draft and Final EnvironmentalImpact Reports (DEIR and FEIR), Notice of Project Change (NPC), and Massachusetts Highway Dept. (MassHighway)Section 61 Findings and Highway Access Permits. In New Hampshire, Rhode Island, New York, and Connecticut, these projectsinvolve the preparation of Traffi c Impact and Access Studies in conformance with applicable guidelines and close coordination withthe respective Departments of Transportation in securing permits for access to state highways. Some of these projects include:Taco Bell, TIAS, Danvers, MA; June 2011. Project Manager. Responsible for the preparation of the Traffi c Impact and AccessStudy for local approval. Client: Taco Bell of America, Inc.Residential Subdivision, TIAS, Hudson, NH; April 2011. Project Manager. Responsible for the preparation of the Traffi c ImpactReport for local approval. Client: K&M DevelopersRoute 125 (Plaistow Road) at Westville Road Traffic Assessment; December 2010. Project Manager. Responsible for thepreparation a Traffi c Assessment for local and state approval. Client: Town of PlaistowProposed Olive Garden Restaurant, Trip-Generation Letter, Danvers, MA; July 2010. Project Manager. Responsible for thepreparation a Trip Generation letter for local approval. Client: Bohler EngineeringTaco Bell, TIR, Orange, CT; April 2010. Project Manager. Responsible for the preparation of the Traffi c Impact Report for local andstate approval. Client: Taco Bell of America, Inc.Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22132

RESUMEHeather L. Monticup, E.I.T.Project EngineerTaco Bell, TIS, East Hartford, CT; April 2010. Project Manager. Responsible for the preparation of the Traffi c Impact Study for localapproval as well as the State Traffi c Commission Application for Certifi cate for state approval. Client: Taco Bell of America, Inc.Wal-Mart Expansion, TIAS, Tilton, NH; April 2009 - Present. Project Engineer. Responsible for the preparation of a Traffi c Impactand Access Study for local and state approval and recommended off-site mitigation measures. Client: Bohler EngineeringVillage School, Marblehead, MA; June 2009. Project Engineer. Responsible for observing drop-off and pick-up operations at theVillage School, access and egress to and from the school, and recommending traffi c improvements to improve safety and site circulation.Client: Symmes Maini & McKee AssociatesCrossroads Corporate Center (125 Pennsylvania Avenue), Framingham, MA; March 2010. Project Engineer. Responsible forthe review of a traffi c impact and access study and supporting documentation prepared by Vanasse & Associates, Inc. for the proposeddevelopment, which involved the preparation of traffi c review letters. This service included a summary of the concerns withthe proposed development as it applied to standard engineering practices and town of Framingham’s traffi c study guidelines. Client:Framingham Planning BoardSelf-Storage Facility, NPC, Stoneham, MA; October 2008. Project Engineer. Responsible for the preparation of the traffi c sectionof the Notice of Project Change for local and state approval. Client: The Richmond CompanyWalgreens Pharmacy, TIAS, East Greenwich, RI; October 2008. Project Engineer. Responsible for the preparation of a Traffi cImpact and Access Study for local and state approval. Client: Arista DevelopmentLowe’s Home Improvement Warehouse, TIAS, Salem, NH; March 2008. Project Engineer. Responsible for the preparation ofthe Traffi c Impact and Access Study submitted for local and state approval and recommended off-site mitigation measures. Client:W/S Stateline LLCColony Place, NPC and Supplemental EIR, Plymouth, MA; May 2007/February 2008. Project Engineer. Responsible for thepreparation of the traffi c section of both the Notice of Project Change and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for local andstate approval and recommended off-site mitigation measures. Prepared MassHighway Access Permit. Client: Saxon Realty Partners,LLCRite Aid Pharmacy and Specialty Retail, TIAS, Plaistow, NH; October 2007. Project Engineer. Responsible for the preparationof a Traffi c Impact and Access Study for local and state approval. Client: Newland Development AssociatesAdvance Auto Parts, TIAS, Seabrook, NH; January 2006. Project Engineer. Responsible for the preparation of a Traffi c Impactand Access Study for local and state approval. Client: Primax PropertiesHome Depot, TIAS, Plaistow, NH; April 2003. Project Engineer. Responsible for the preparation of a Traffi c Impact and AccessStudy for local and state approval and recommended off-site mitigation measures. Determined roadway geometric and signal improvementconcept plans to mitigate the traffi c impact of the project. Prepared driveway access permit. Client: Eastern DevelopmentDunkin’ Donuts, TIAS, Londonderry, NH; June 2002. Transportation Engineer. Responsible for the preparation of a Traffi c Impactand Access Study for local and state approval and recommended off-site mitigation measures. Determined roadway geometricimprovement concept plans to mitigate the traffi c impact of the project. Prepared driveway access permit. Client: TFMoran, Inc.Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22133

RESUMEGeoffrey J. Howie, P.E.Vice PresidentEDUCATION:BS/1987/Civil EngineeringREGISTRATION:1992/Professional Engineer/NY #069750YEARS WITH FIRM: 21YEARS WITH OTHER FIRMS: 2PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:American Society of Civil EngineersProfessional ProfileMr. Howie is Director of Transportation at GPI New England and isresponsible for overseeing and coordinating all roadway design projects.Mr. Howie has served as both Project Manager and Senior Civil/Highway Engineer on numerous projects. His experience includesall facets of highway design and transportation engineering. He hasbeen involved in the preparation and development of contract documents,plans, specifi cations and estimates on many large transportationprojects. Clients for these projects have included the MassachusettsDepartment of Transportation (formerly MassHighway), the NewYork and New Jersey Transportation Departments, municipalities andprivate developers.Project ExperienceCurrent Assignment: Reconstruction of Route 109, Medway, MA;2011-2013. Project Manger. This project involves the rehabilitation ofRoute 109 (Main Street) in the Town of Medway, MA. The rehabilitationinvolves the installation of new granite curbing and cement concretesidewalks along both sides of the roadway with the provisionfor a grass buffer strip, improvements to the existing closed drainagesystem, the upgrade and capacity improvements at the signalized intersectionsof Route 109 at Milford Street and Franklin Street at thewestern limit of the project and Route 109 at Holliston Street at theeastern limit of the project, and the planting of shade trees and theplacement of street lights and other streetscape appurtenances alongthe corridor. Access and egress issues at the numerous curb cutsalong the three lane business district section of Route 109 betweenPond Street and Holliston Street will be investigated as part of thisproject and improvements proposed. This project will also result inthe improvement to both the horizontal and vertical geometry of Route109 where needed to meet the latest standards. GPI will provide thedesign and prepare the Preliminary and Final plans, Specifi cationsand Estimate meeting the latest requirements from the MassDOTProject Development and Design Guide (PDDG) and furnish adviceand other essential engineering services during the project’s eventualconstruction phase. Client: Town of MedwayCurrent Assignment: Faunce Corner Road Over I-95, Dartmouth,MA; 2008-2014. Project Manager responsible for the overall managementand highway design for the Faunce Corner Road over I-195Project in Dartmouth, MA. The services to be performed under thiscontract consist of the design and preparation of the fi nal plans, specifications and estimates and furnishing advice during construction inconnection with the replacement of the Faunce Corner Road Bridgeover I-195 in the Town of Dartmouth. This project involves the wideningof the Faunce Corner Road corridor, including the constructionof safety improvements. Other work may entail modifi cations to theexisting roadway approaches, interchange ramps, traffi c signalization.An ENF and Traffi c Management Plans will be required, as well asextensive right-of-way services including land taking and easementplans, layout plans and written instruments. The total project length isapproximately 4000 feet. Client: MassDOTGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22131

RESUMEGeoffrey J. Howie, P.E.Vice PresidentCurrent Assignment: Route 150 Rehabilitation, Amesbury, MA; 1999-2011 Project Manager. This project involves design servicesfor the reconstruction of approximately one-mile section of Route 150 leading into the downtown area. Work includes roadwayreconstruction, drainage design, and traffi c signal design. In addition, project includes a drainage study to design a new pond outletstructure and to evaluate downstream impacts of both the outlet and roadway drainage design. Responsibilities include project management,budget and billing, workload assignments, and project engineering. Client: Town of AmesburyCurrent Assignment: Route 85 Reconstruction, Hudson, MA; 2007-2011. Project Manager. This project involves the design ofa 2-mile section of Route 85 (Washington Street) in Hudson, MA. The work will involve roadway widening, traffi c signalization andsidewalk improvements. The project is part of a State Highway Discontinuance. Client: Town of HudsonCurrent Assignment: Elm Street Reconstruction, Hubbardston, MA; 2006-2011. Project Manager. This project involves completingthe design for the reconstruction of Elm Street, Parsons Road and Barre Road Cutoff. GPI performed the required fi eld survey andprepared the necessary plans, specifi cations and estimate to reconstruct this roadway. The work includes the widening and full depthreclamation of Elm Street, the addition of a closed drainage system and the installation of curb and sidewalk along the north side ofthe roadway. Extensive coordination with National Grid concerning the relocation of utility poles was required. Also responsible forpresenting the project at a number of public hearings and preparing bid documents to assist the town in advertising this project. Client:Town of HubbardstonCurrent Assignment: Elm Street Discontinuance, Amesbury, MA; 2007-2011. Project Manager. This project involves providingthe engineering design services for the reconstruction of Elm Street from Market Square to the intersection with Route 110, an approximatelength of 8,600 liner feet (1.6 miles). The work includes the reconstruction of Elm Street along with a length of each ofthe side streets and the provision of new curbing, sidewalk and drainage facilities along Elm Street within the aforementioned limits.The drainage improvements include the construction of treatment areas at locations along the project. The work impacts existingwetlands at locations along the corridor; therefore it is anticipated that a Notice of Intent will be required. The work also includes therehabilitation of a portion of the bridge over the Back River since the existing sidewalk that currently crosses the river has essentiallycollapsed. A traffi c signal warrant will be performed at various intersections along the corridor to determine if there is a need for anew traffi c signal at any locations. Client: Town of AmesburyCurrent Assignment: Collins Street, Danvers, MA; 1998-2010. Project Manager. Responsible for the design and preparation ofcontract documents for the reconstruction of Collins Street. Work on this project includes full-depth roadway reconstruction, improvementsto horizontal and vertical alignments, revised drainage, new water main installation with services, one new traffi c signal installationand environmental permitting. Responsible for coordinating all project work and will be providing construction phase servicesClient: Town of DanversCurrent Assignment: West Street Reconstruction, Reading, MA; 2005–2011. Project Manager. This project involves the preparationof the 25% Design Package for West Street for submission to MassDOT and the coordination and attendance the Public Hearingthat follows the 25% review. The town provided the basemapping, so GPI is responsible for preparing all plans, estimates, permitsand other required documents that MassDOT requires for a standard 25% Design. The town is also in the process of securing thenecessary funds to complete the design. Client: Town of ReadingWashington Street Discontinuance, Dedham, MA; 2001-2010. Project Manager. The project involves the reconstruction of WashingtonStreet from Providence Highway, extending northerly approximately 1,130 meters, the reconstruction of 60 meters of IncineratorRoad, 110 meters of Eastbrook Road, and 100 meters of Lower East Street. In addition, the project includes the signalization ofthe following intersections: Washington Street at Incinerator Road / East Street / Eastbrook Road and Washington Street at CurveStreet / Lower East Street. Responsibilities include project management, client coordination, environmental permitting, technicalsupport in completing plans, specifi cations and estimates (PS&E) design submission in the following areas: construction plans andprofi les, curb-tie plans, signing and pavement marking plans, drainage plans and profi les and cross sections. In addition, this projectwill require extensive coordination with the MassDOT, the Dedham Board of Selectman, the Dedham Civic Pride, and local residents.Client: Town of DedhamGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22132

RESUMEGeoffrey J. Howie, P.E.Vice PresidentWaterline Replacements, Amesbury, MA; 2008-2009. Project Manager. This project involved the preparation of the necessaryplans, specifications and estimates for the replacement of the existing waterlines along Elm Street and Route 150 and HighlandStreet in the Town of Amesbury in preparation of the reconstruction of Route 150. GPI is currently preparing the roadway reconstructionplans for Route 150 for eventual advertisement and construction by MassDOT. The design documents for the waterline replacementswere prepared to meet the SRF (State Revolving Fund) Guidelines. Client: Town of AmesburyRoute 146 & McKeon Road Interchange, Hurley Square Area, Worcester, MA; November 1998-2009. Project Manager/ProjectEngineer for this $40-million project to reconstruct approximately one-half mile of existing Route 146 along with the construction ofa new interchange with local roadways in the City of Worcester, MA. Responsible for the supervision of all highway design facets ofthe project which included horizontal and vertical geometry for the mainline, ramps and local roadways, grading of roadways and theinterchange infi eld areas, drainage, utilities, development of cross sections, specifi cations and estimates. Also responsible for thecoordination with the structural group on the design of three of the project bridges and retaining walls as well as coordination with thefour project subconsultants designing all traffi c-related items, construction staging and sequencing, landscaping, sewer and waterfacilities, railroad-related items and the remaining two project bridges. Client: MassDOTEdgell Road at High Street, Framingham, MA; 2002 - 2006. Project Manager for this $500,000.00 project involving the wideningof High Street and the design of traffi c signal improvements at the intersection of High Street with Main Street and Edgell Road in theTown of Framingham, MA. The widening of High Street resulted in the need for new drainage, curbing, sidewalks, pavement markings,signing, and street lighting. This work also required steep slope stabilization along the wooded area between High Street andFramingham State College. Responsible for overall project management, staffi ng, budget and billing, workload assignments, projectengineering, and coordination with MassDOT and the town. Client: Town of Framingham Planning BoardReconstruction of Waverly Street (Route 135), Framingham, MA; 2000–2003. Project Manager. GPI completed design of this reconstructionproject in July 2000. The town then requested that GPI perform the construction services. These tasks included adviceduring construction, attendance at coordination meetings, occasional site visits and traffi c signal coordination. The construction ofthis 2.5-mile roadway reconstruction through downtown Framingham was completed at the end of 2003. Client: Town of FraminghamPlanning BoardRoute 119 (Boston Road) at Route 225 and Sandy Pond Road, Groton, MA; 2001-2004. Project Manager for this $1.75 millionproject involving the realignment and signalization of this four-way intersection to provide much needed safety improvements at thisheavily congested location in the Town of Groton, MA. This project also included drainage and water improvements, extensive privateutility coordination, and coordination with a private developer to construct the Boston Road Marketplace Retail Development at thesouthwest corner of the intersection. The early stages of this project included multiple public meetings with simulated operations ofthe preferred options. As Project Manager, responsible for the supervision of all design elements of the project, and coordination withMassDOT, the town, the developer and the private utilities. Client: Town of Groton Board of SelectmanReconstruction of Beaver Street at Forest Street, Waltham, MA; 2001-2003 . Project Manager for this $850,000.00 projectinvolving the reconstruction and signalization of the intersection of Beaver Street at Forest Street in the City of Waltham, MA. Thisproject included safety and capacity improvements four intersections along the corridor, including the intersection with John FitchHighway. This project also included extensive drainage improvements along the corridor. As Project Manager, responsible for thesupervision of all design elements of the project, coordination with MassDOTand the city, and coordination with the project director onstaffi ng and overall project deliverables. Construction of this project began in the Summer of 2004. Client: City of WalthamRehabilitation of Summer Street, Fitchburg, MA; 2000-2003. Project Manager for this $2.0 million project involving the reconstructionof approximately a one-mile section of Summer Street in the City of Fitchburg, MA. This project included safety and capacityimprovements at four intersections along the corridor, including the intersection with John Fitch Highway. This project also includedextensive drainage improvements along the corridor. As Project Manager, responsible for the supervision of all design elements ofthe project, coordination with MassDOT and the city, and coordination with the project director on staffi ng and overall project deliverables.Client: City of FitchburgGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22133

RESUMEJames R. NoyesVice PresidentEDUCATION:BS/1982/Civil EngineeringYEARS WITH FIRM: 19YEARS WITH OTHER FIRMS: 10PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:Institute of Transportation Engineers, Associate MemberEXPERT TESTIMONY:Massachusetts Land CourtPlymouth County Superior CourtBristol County Superior CourtMassachusetts Housing Appeals CommitteeMUNICIPAL BOARDS:West Bridgewater Planning Board, MemberProfessional ProfileAs Vice President of Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. (GPI), Mr. Noyes is responsiblefor overall management of all private development projects.This includes preparation of engineering design documents for roadwayand intersection improvements. For the past 29 years, he hasprovided these services to both the public and private sectors. Theseservices include design of roadway modifi cations, infrastructure improvements,traffi c control signals, signing, pavement markings, andtraffi c management during construction. He has prepared numeroustraffi c studies and environmental impact reports for retail, residentialand offi ce developments throughout Massachusetts. He has also providedexpert witness testimony with regards to traffi c studies in SuperiorCourt and Land Court, as well as to the Massachusetts HousingAppeals Committee.Project ExperienceCurrent Assignment: Traffic Impact and Access Studies, VariousLocations, 1982 – Present. Project Manager. Prepared hundreds ofTraffi c Impact and Access Studies, Speed Zone Studies, and other relateddocuments for a wide variety of land uses including commercial,retail, offi ce and housing developments throughout Massachusettsand the Northeast. The studies have been required by local boardsand commissions, as well as through the Massachusetts EnvironmentalPolicy Act (MEPA) process. Work included presentation before localPlanning and Zoning Boards, as well as providing expert witnesstestimony in legal courts. Clients have included major developers andchain stores, as well as local builders and other engineering fi rmsSample Clients: WalMart, Stop and Shop, Shaw’s Supermarkets,McDonald’s, Papa Gino’s, Dunkin’ Donuts, The Gutierrez Company,Nissan Motors, Donelan’s Supermarkets, Field Engineering, PillingEngineering Group.Current Assignment: Peer Review, Various Municipalities; 2001 –Present. Project Manager. Provided peer review services of traffi cstudies and on-site circulation for various municipal boards. Projectsreviewed included subdivisions, and affordable housing projects developedunder both 40B and 40R programs. Towns represented includeBillerica, Bolton, Berlin, Kingston, Mansfi eld, Norton, Rochester,and West Bridgewater, MA.Sample Clients: Billerica Zoning Board of Appeals, Bolton ZoningBoard of Appeals, Kingston Planning Board, Mansfi eld Zoning Boardof Appeals, Norton Planning Board, Rochester Planning Board, WestBridgewater Board of Selectman.Current Assignment: Central Avenue Reconstruction; Seekonk,MA; 2010 – 2012. Project Director. This project involves the reconstructionof Central Avenue (Route 152) and the Bakers Corner intersectionin Seekonk, MA. Work includes roadway reconstruction;drainage design; traffi c signal design; and sidewalk improvements.GPI took over the task of completing the design after the previousconsultant failed to provide acceptable construction documents tothe Massachusetts Department of Transportation. Responsibilitiesinclude project management, workload assignments, and project engineering.Client: Seekonk Department of Public WorksGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22131

RESUMEJames R. NoyesVice PresidentCurrent Assignment: North Main Street Streetscape Improvements, Randolph, MA; 2009 – 2011. Project Manager. AssistingCecil Group, Inc. with streetscape improvements project on North Main Street between Crawford Square and Warren Street. GPI’sinvolvement includes curb-to-curb improvements, including traffi c calming measures, to provide for a pedestrian-friendly environmentin the downtown Randolph area. Design includes construction and grading plans, and pavement marking and signing details. Client:The Cecil Group, Inc.Current Assignment: Water Street Reconstruction, Williamstown, MA; 2009 – 2013. Project Manager. Assisting Guntlow andAssociates, Inc. with roadway reconstruction project of Water Street. Project includes roadway reclamation, on-street parking design,and sidewalk improvements. GPI’s involvement includes project management and oversight of all contract documents for submittaland approval by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation. Client: Guntlow and Associates, Inc.Current Assignment: Route 79 Relocation, Lakeville, MA; 2008 – 2011. Project Manager. Assisting Field Engineering Co., Inc.with contract documents for the relocation of Route 79 in the town of Lakeville, MA. The project includes realigning Route 79, andwidening Route 105, along with traffi c control signals at the proposed intersection. GPI’s direct involvement included traffi c signalplans, and pavement marking plans, along with project management and oversight of all contract documents for submittal and approvalby the Massachusetts Department of Transportation. Client: Field Engineer Co., Inc.Commerce Way Improvements, Plymouth, MA; 2003 – 2010. Project Manager. Design of improvements including the wideningof Commerce Way and the installation of fi ve traffi c control signals. The work is associated with the Colony Place development locatedat the Route 44 interchange. Current construction includes the installation of a traffi c signal at the Route 44 westbound rampinterchange with Commerce Way, as well as monitoring studies of the development. Client: Saxon Real Estate Partners, Inc.Wall Street Improvements, Burlington, MA; 2008 – 2009. Project Director. The project called for roadway widening and traffi ccalming measures on Wall Street as part of an offi ce development in Burlington, MA. Improvements included the widening of theWall Street approach to Route 3 to add an exclusive right-turn lane, sidewalk reconstruction, and the installation of a raised crosswalkon Wall Street. Traffi c signal interconnection and coordination along Cambridge Street was also implemented through approval bythe former Massachusetts Highway Department. Client: The Gutierrez CompanyHartford Avenue Reconstruction, Bellingham, MA; 2006 – 2008. Project Director. The reconstruction of Hartford Avenue wasa public/private partnership between the developer of a service station and the town of Bellingham. The project included full depthpavement reclamation, and sidewalk and drainage improvements. GPI’s involvement included the preparation of plans, specifi cations,and estimate for the project, as well as review of change orders and construction-related issues. Clients: Town of Bellinghamand Hunter DevelopmentEdgell Road Roadway and Intersection Improvements Project, Framingham, MA; 2004 – 2009. Project Director. This projectinvolved the widening of Edgell Road to provide for a third lane approach to the intersection with Main Street, as well as the installationof ornamental traffi c signals and highway lighting. Improvements also included sidewalk reconstruction, construction of a fi eldstoneretaining wall, roadway overlay, and new pavement markings and signing. GPI provided all contract and bidding documentsfor the project, as well as full-time construction observation services. Client: Town of FraminghamRoute 104 Reconstruction, Raynham, MA; 2003 – 2008. Project Director. The 4-mile Route 104 Reconstruction Project throughthe town of Raynham had been initially designed by another fi rm, and was under construction by the former Massachusetts HighwayDepartment (MassHighway). However, signifi cant cost overruns found during the initial construction phase caused MassHighwayto cancel the construction contract. GPI was requested by the town of Raynham to update the plans, specifi cations and estimate tomeet state standards. Additional details were developed, including curb tie plans, cross sections, pavement design, drainage design,and an updated estimate. GPI was also instrumental in placing the South Main Street portion of the project back on the TransportationImprovement Program (TIP) list in less than a month. The GPI redesign ultimately saved the town and MassHighway nearly$500,000. Client: Town of RaynhamGreenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22132

RESUMEJames R. NoyesVice PresidentDavis Street Improvements, Douglas, MA; 2002 – 2007. Project Manager. The Davis Street Improvements included full depth reconstructionof the roadway, the replacement of a drainage culvert, and other drainage and geometric improvements. GPI preparedthe contract plans, specifi cations and estimate for the project, with construction by the former Massachusetts Highway Department.Improvements also included turning lanes into the town’s high school and middle school, new pavement markings and signs, andother modifi cations. The overall project cost was approximately $1 million. Client: Town of DouglasOff-Site Roadway and Traffic Signal Improvements for WalMart Stores, Various Locations, MA; 1992-2006. Project Manager.Provided project management and engineering for a number of off-site roadway and traffi c signal mitigation projects for WalMartStores, Inc. The work included preparation of plans and specifi cations for construction, permitting, and services during construction,including construction supervision, shop drawing approvals, and fi nal inspections. Locations in Massachusetts included Athol, Dartmouth,Halifax, Hudson, North Adams, Northborough, North Reading, Oxford, Plymouth, Raynham, Sturbridge, Tewksbury, Ware,Westfi eld, and other locations. Client: WalMart Stores, Inc.Middlesex Turnpike Improvements, Bedford, MA; 1998 – 2000. Project Manager. The Middlesex Turnpike Roadway and Traffi cSignal Improvements Project included the widening of Middlesex Turnpike and the installation of traffi c control signals as off-site mitigationfor an offi ce park. The work included an exclusive left-turn lane into the park, roadway reconstruction and overlay. The traffi csignals were designed to include future provisions to widen Middlesex Turnpike. Client: The Gutierrez CompanyRoute 9, Route 30 and Speen Street Improvements, Framingham, MA; 1992 – 2001. Project Manager. As part of the redevelopmentof the Natick Mall and Shoppers World retail malls, off-site improvements were proposed at approximately 30 intersectionswithin the area of the Golden Triangle in Natick and Framingham, MA. Contract documents, including plans and specifi cations, weredeveloped for several separate projects, with construction by both the developers and the former Massachusetts Highway Department(MassHighway). Route 9 and Route 30 were reconstructed and widened at the malls entrances, and several intersections werereconstructed, including Route 30 at Speen Street, Route 9 at Caldor Road, and Route 30 at Route 126. Over 15 locations wereincorporated into a closed loop system operated by MassHighway. Clients: Homart Development Company and General GrowthProperties, Inc.Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. 14 Manchester Square, Suite 245 Portsmouth, NH 03801 (603) 891-22133

Estimated Fees for ServicesThe following represent both Shook Kelley and our consultants best estimate of the fees associated with the Stage 1: Acceptanceand Stage 2: Application reviews. We have also included for each team member the hourly rates that will apply for all activities. Wehave also attached the Conditions of Service for Shook Kelley, which shall apply for all other members of the consultant team.Stage 1: Acceptance Review: Estimated Fee: $17,200Assumptions:• One-day site visit to meet with the Town representatives and others that the Town may identify, and to review the proposed PUD &surrounding area. Will involve a 10 hour day, including travel to and from Londonderry to Charlotte.• Discussions will involve issues and expectations regarding the entire Woodmont Commons project, including a review of theTown’s policies and ordinances. Therefore, issues regarding ALL Stages, and not just Stage 1 activities, will be covered.• All other communication will be via telephone conversations or email.• Hours are generally distributed as follows:Shook KelleyCharles Terry Shook, FAIA 20 hours .................. $4,500Michael Dunning, AIA 40 hours................... $7,000GPIJohn Diaz, PE 15 hours................... $3,450Senior Project Manager 5 hours......................$750•All expenses are included within the estimate. For purposes of this estimate, they are included at the value of $1,500.Stage 2: Application Review: Estimated Fee: $48,125Assumptions:•Two, one-day meetings are included. One will occur at the 50% complete stage in order to check perceptions and understanding ofthe issues and application of relevant policies and law. The other will occur at the 90% completion phase. Both will involve a 10 hourday, including travel to and from Londonderry to Charlotte.•Cushman & Wakefied has a minimum engagement fee of $10,000 for a “Desktop” review, that does not include either a site visit orfield based research. This level of review is included within the above estimate.• Hours are generally distributed as follows:Shook KelleyCharles Terry Shook, FAIA 30 hours .................. $6,750Michael Dunning, AIA 70 hours................... $12,250Tom Goodwin, AIA 15 hours .................. $2,625Jeff Camillo 10 hours................... $1,250GPIJohn Diaz, PE 25 hours................... $5,750Senior Project Manager 30 hours.....................$4,500•All expenses are included within the estimate. For purposes of this estimate, they are included at the value of $5,000.January 4, 2012 53

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesEstimated Fees for Services (continued)Stage 3: Ongoing Services:Assumptions:•Stage 3 includes all tasks that do not fall within either Stage 1 or Stage 2.•By definition, the time involvement for these and other unnamed activities is unknowable at this time. Therefore, no estimates areprovided for these unknowable tasks.•Hourly rates as included herein apply.•Expenses shall be invoiced for all consultants in accordance with the attached Conditions of Service for Shook Kelley— END OF FEES FOR SERVICES —54 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Shook Kelley Conditions of ServiceBASIS OF COMPENSATIONHOURLY RATES:Shook Kelley’s Standard Hourly Rates for services are as follows:• Partners’ time at a fixed rate of Two Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($225.00)/hour.The Partners are:Charles Terry Shook, FAIAKevin Ervin Kelley, AIA• Principals’ time at a fixed rate of One Hundred Seventy-Five Dollars ($175.00)/hour.The Principals are:Frank Stephen Quattrocchi, LEED APStanley Paul Rostas, AIA, IIDA, LEED AP BD+CGregory Scott Long, AIA, LEED AP BD+CThomas Scott Goodwin, AIAJames Michael Dunning, AIA, LEED APMichael William Nicholls, AIA• Senior Design Staff time at a fixed rate of One Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($125.00)/hour.• Designer I time at a fixed rate of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00)/hour.• Designer II time at a fixed rate of Eighty-Five Dollars ($85.00)/hour.• Administrative Staff time at a fixed rate of Fifty-Five Dollars ($55.00)/hour.PROGRESS PAYMENTS FOR BASIC SERVICES: Payment for Basic Services shall be made monthly in proportion to the services performed.COMPENSATION FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES: Shook Kelley shall invoice the Client at a multiple of One and Two-Tenths (1.2) times the actualcost billed to Shook Kelley by its Consultants. Services shall only be provided if authorized in writing by the Client, or confirmed in writing by ShookKelley. If the Client deems that such services are not required, the Client shall give prompt written notice to Shook Kelley.REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES: Reimbursable expenses incurred in the interest of the Project are in addition to fee, and shall be invoiced at One andTwo-Tenths (1.2) times the actual cost to Shook Kelley or its Consultants in order to cover administration and financing. Expenses may include, butare not limited to: photocopies, plotting, (blueline) printing, long distance telephone/fax communication, video conferencing, postage and expressdelivery services, lodging, mileage, travel, computer media, and photographic services.CONDITIONSAGREEMENT: Basis of Agreement shall be AIA Document B101 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect, 2007 edition.INVOICES: Invoices are due and payable upon receipt. Amounts unpaid thirty (30) days after the date of the invoice shall incur an interest charge ofOne and Five-Tenths (1.5%) percent per month, 18% annually, of the outstanding amount due Shook Kelley.DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: A significant portion of Shook Kelley’s annual workload comprises providing design services for various entities acrossthe USA. Shook Kelley shall retain the right to pursue publication of the Work. Also, as a matter of policy, all proprietary information deemed so inwriting by the Client shall be kept confidential by Shook Kelley, unless otherwise approved by the Client.LIMITED LIABILITY: Professional liability on behalf of Shook Kelley is limited to errors and omissions of the officers and employees of Shook Kelleyonly. Errors and omissions attributed to Consultants for Shook Kelley shall reside solely with the Consultant in question, and the Client shall not seekrelief from Shook Kelley for errors and omissions attributed to Consultants. In recognition of the relative risks and benefits of the Project to both theClient and Shook Kelley, the risks have been allocated such that the Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to limit the liability of ShookKelley to the Client and to all construction contractors and subcontractors on the Project for any and all claims, losses, costs, damages of any naturewhatsoever, or claims or expenses from any cause or causes, so that the total aggregate liability of Shook Kelley shall not exceed Shook Kelley’s totalfee for the services rendered on this Project. Such claims and causes include, but are not limited to, negligence, professional errors and omissions,strict liability, or breach of contract.FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITY: The Client confirms that neither the Architect nor any of the Architect’s Consultants has offered any fiduciary serviceto the Client, and no fiduciary responsibility shall be owed to the Client by the Architect or any of the Architect’s Consultants as a consequence of theArchitect’s entering into this Agreement with the Client.ENDJanuary 4, 2012 55

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesGreenman-Pedersen, Inc.2011 STANDARD BILLING RATES:Sr. VP/Branch Manager 230.00$Vice President/Project Director 190.00$Assistant Vice President/Project Director 160.00$Senior Proj. Mgr/Senior Engineer 150.00$Project Manager/Project Engineer 120.00$Senior Inspector 115.00$Engineer/Inspector 90.00$Asst. Engineer/Jr. Inspector 78.00$Sr. Technician 75.00$Technician 58.50$Administration 50.00$*Effective July 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2012ENDCushman & Wakefield2011 STANDARD BILLING RATES:Matthew Winn$450/hrCharles Warren, PhD $330/hrJalna Silverstein$225/hrEND56 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons

Proposal for Planning and Engineering Review ServicesThank You57 The Town of Londonderry Woodmont Commons