The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

10.07.2015 Views

78 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic Symptoms10), and their satisfaction with their therapists with a mean score of 9.0 (SD = 1.2).Eighty-one percent reported a large impact on their daily functioning, 81% thought theparticipant-therapist contact to be personal, and 71% indicated they had not missedface-to-face contact. At follow-up, these aspects were rated similarly. Participantswere also asked to rate the degree to which they would recommend the treatment toothers, on a 10-point scale ranging from 1 (No) to 10 (Yes). The average score on thisitem was M = 8.9 (SD = 1.5).Progress during treatment. During treatment, after each treatment phase, participantsrated the degree to which their panic symptoms impaired daily functioning. Asshown by Figure 4.2, impairment declined over the course of treatment, with an effectsize of d = 1.2 between the first and last measure. Noticeable improvement occurredonly after the cognitive restructuring phase. Post-hoc, we tested mean impairmentvalues before this phase with mean impairment values after this phase. This contrastwas highly significant (z = 8.2, P < .001).Predictors of outcome. Using post-treatment PDSS-SR scores and attack frequencyas the outcome variables of interest, we tested several predictors of posttreatmentsymptomatology through two separate multiple regression analyses. Specifically, wetested the significance of pre-treatment symptom severity, agoraphobic avoidance(MI-AAL), gender, education level (low/high), pretest medication status (no/yes), andtime of measurement (posttest/follow-up). Further, we explored interaction effects ofImpairment2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5●●●●●●●Awareness Relaxation Cognitions Relapse Prev.Monitoring Exposure 1 Exposure 2Treatment PhaseFigure 4.2: Change in impairment during treatment.

4.4. Discussion 79the time variable and the other variables, i.e. time by pre-treatment symptom severity,by gender, by education, MI-AAL, and by medication status.With regard to the PDSS-SR, none of the interaction terms were significant. Hence,the model was simplified to include only the main effects. In this model, medicationstatus [t(50) = 2.0; P = .05] and education [t(50) = 0.3; P = .76] had no effects.However, PDSS-SR pretest scores [t(50) = 5.7; P < .001] and gender [t(50) = 3.0; P= .019] predicted post-treatment symptoms significantly. Post treatment scores werehigher for females, and for those displaying higher symptoms levels at pretest.With regard to attack frequency, only the interaction of time and pre-treatmentseverity was significant [t(50) = 3.8; P < .001], signalling a significant larger declinein the number of panic attacks at follow-up compared to the posttest in those experiencingmore attacks at pretest. In the reduced model, in which we retained only thisinteraction and the main effects, none of the variables predicted post-treatment scoressignificantly, including gender and pre-treatment agoraphobic avoidance (MI-AALscores).Given the regression results, we further explored the effect of pretest symptomseverity. Based upon the PDSS-SR baseline score, we split the sample into two groups(based on the PDSS-SR cut-off of 8) and determined the effect size for each groupon this measure. This revealed considerable higher effects in the group with higherpretest levels (posttest d = 2.1; follow-up d = 2.3).4.4 DiscussionIn comparison to a waiting-list, web-based therapist-assisted CBT induced moderate tolarge reductions in panic symptoms and general psychopathology in a heterogeneouscommunity sample of clients suffering from chronic symptoms of panic disorder.Treated participants were six times more likely to experience a reduction in panicattacks of at least 50%. Client satisfaction was high. After three years, even thoughthe participants never met their therapist, 80% returned for follow-up measurements.On the long term, improvements were found to be more pronounced.

4.4. Discussion 79the time variable <strong>and</strong> the other variables, i.e. time by pre-treatment symptom severity,by gender, by education, MI-AAL, <strong>and</strong> by medication status.With regard to the PDSS-SR, none <strong>of</strong> the interaction terms were significant. Hence,the model was simplified to include only the main effects. In this model, medicationstatus [t(50) = 2.0; P = .05] <strong>and</strong> education [t(50) = 0.3; P = .76] had no effects.However, PDSS-SR pretest scores [t(50) = 5.7; P < .001] <strong>and</strong> gender [t(50) = 3.0; P= .019] predicted post-treatment symptoms significantly. Post treatment scores werehigher for females, <strong>and</strong> for those displaying higher symptoms levels at pretest.With regard to attack frequency, only the interaction <strong>of</strong> time <strong>and</strong> pre-treatmentseverity was significant [t(50) = 3.8; P < .001], signalling a significant larger declinein the number <strong>of</strong> panic attacks at follow-up compared to the posttest in those experiencingmore attacks at pretest. In the reduced model, in which we retained only thisinteraction <strong>and</strong> the main effects, none <strong>of</strong> the variables predicted post-treatment scoressignificantly, including gender <strong>and</strong> pre-treatment agoraphobic avoidance (MI-AALscores).Given the regression results, we further explored the effect <strong>of</strong> pretest symptomseverity. Based upon the PDSS-SR baseline score, we split the sample into two groups(based on the PDSS-SR cut-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> 8) <strong>and</strong> determined the effect size for each groupon this measure. This revealed considerable higher effects in the group with higherpretest levels (posttest d = 2.1; follow-up d = 2.3).4.4 DiscussionIn comparison to a waiting-list, web-based therapist-assisted <strong>CBT</strong> induced moderate tolarge reductions in panic symptoms <strong>and</strong> general psychopathology in a heterogeneouscommunity sample <strong>of</strong> clients suffering from chronic symptoms <strong>of</strong> panic disorder.Treated participants were six times more likely to experience a reduction in panicattacks <strong>of</strong> at least 50%. Client satisfaction was high. After three years, even thoughthe participants never met their therapist, 80% returned for follow-up measurements.On the long term, improvements were found to be more pronounced.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!