The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard
The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard
78 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic Symptoms10), and their satisfaction with their therapists with a mean score of 9.0 (SD = 1.2).Eighty-one percent reported a large impact on their daily functioning, 81% thought theparticipant-therapist contact to be personal, and 71% indicated they had not missedface-to-face contact. At follow-up, these aspects were rated similarly. Participantswere also asked to rate the degree to which they would recommend the treatment toothers, on a 10-point scale ranging from 1 (No) to 10 (Yes). The average score on thisitem was M = 8.9 (SD = 1.5).Progress during treatment. During treatment, after each treatment phase, participantsrated the degree to which their panic symptoms impaired daily functioning. Asshown by Figure 4.2, impairment declined over the course of treatment, with an effectsize of d = 1.2 between the first and last measure. Noticeable improvement occurredonly after the cognitive restructuring phase. Post-hoc, we tested mean impairmentvalues before this phase with mean impairment values after this phase. This contrastwas highly significant (z = 8.2, P < .001).Predictors of outcome. Using post-treatment PDSS-SR scores and attack frequencyas the outcome variables of interest, we tested several predictors of posttreatmentsymptomatology through two separate multiple regression analyses. Specifically, wetested the significance of pre-treatment symptom severity, agoraphobic avoidance(MI-AAL), gender, education level (low/high), pretest medication status (no/yes), andtime of measurement (posttest/follow-up). Further, we explored interaction effects ofImpairment2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5●●●●●●●Awareness Relaxation Cognitions Relapse Prev.Monitoring Exposure 1 Exposure 2Treatment PhaseFigure 4.2: Change in impairment during treatment.
4.4. Discussion 79the time variable and the other variables, i.e. time by pre-treatment symptom severity,by gender, by education, MI-AAL, and by medication status.With regard to the PDSS-SR, none of the interaction terms were significant. Hence,the model was simplified to include only the main effects. In this model, medicationstatus [t(50) = 2.0; P = .05] and education [t(50) = 0.3; P = .76] had no effects.However, PDSS-SR pretest scores [t(50) = 5.7; P < .001] and gender [t(50) = 3.0; P= .019] predicted post-treatment symptoms significantly. Post treatment scores werehigher for females, and for those displaying higher symptoms levels at pretest.With regard to attack frequency, only the interaction of time and pre-treatmentseverity was significant [t(50) = 3.8; P < .001], signalling a significant larger declinein the number of panic attacks at follow-up compared to the posttest in those experiencingmore attacks at pretest. In the reduced model, in which we retained only thisinteraction and the main effects, none of the variables predicted post-treatment scoressignificantly, including gender and pre-treatment agoraphobic avoidance (MI-AALscores).Given the regression results, we further explored the effect of pretest symptomseverity. Based upon the PDSS-SR baseline score, we split the sample into two groups(based on the PDSS-SR cut-off of 8) and determined the effect size for each groupon this measure. This revealed considerable higher effects in the group with higherpretest levels (posttest d = 2.1; follow-up d = 2.3).4.4 DiscussionIn comparison to a waiting-list, web-based therapist-assisted CBT induced moderate tolarge reductions in panic symptoms and general psychopathology in a heterogeneouscommunity sample of clients suffering from chronic symptoms of panic disorder.Treated participants were six times more likely to experience a reduction in panicattacks of at least 50%. Client satisfaction was high. After three years, even thoughthe participants never met their therapist, 80% returned for follow-up measurements.On the long term, improvements were found to be more pronounced.
- Page 36 and 37: 28 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 38 and 39: 30 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 40 and 41: 32 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 42 and 43: Ruwaard, J., Schrieken, B., Schrijv
- Page 44 and 45: 36 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 46 and 47: 38 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 48 and 49: 40 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 50 and 51: 42 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 52 and 53: 44 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 54 and 55: 46 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 56 and 57: 48 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 58 and 59: 50 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 60 and 61: 52 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 62 and 63: 54 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 64 and 65: 56 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 66 and 67: 58 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 68 and 69: Ruwaard, J., Broeksteeg, J., Schrie
- Page 70 and 71: 62 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 72 and 73: 64 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 74 and 75: 66 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 76 and 77: 68 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 78 and 79: 70 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 80 and 81: 72 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 82 and 83: 74 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 84 and 85: 76 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 88 and 89: 80 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 90 and 91: 82 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 92 and 93: Ruwaard, J., Lange, A., Broeksteeg,
- Page 94 and 95: 86 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 96 and 97: 88 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 98 and 99: 90 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 100 and 101: 92 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 102 and 103: 94 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 104 and 105: 96 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 106 and 107: 98 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 108 and 109: 100 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimi
- Page 110 and 111: 102 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimi
- Page 112 and 113: Ruwaard, J., Lange, A., Schrieken,
- Page 114 and 115: 106 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 116 and 117: 108 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 118 and 119: 110 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 120 and 121: 112 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 122 and 123: 114 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 124 and 125: 116 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 126 and 127: 118 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 128 and 129: 120 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 130 and 131: 122 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 133 and 134: Chapter 7General DiscussionPrevious
- Page 135 and 136: 7.1. Key Findings 1277.1.2 The effe
4.4. Discussion 79the time variable <strong>and</strong> the other variables, i.e. time by pre-treatment symptom severity,by gender, by education, MI-AAL, <strong>and</strong> by medication status.With regard to the PDSS-SR, none <strong>of</strong> the interaction terms were significant. Hence,the model was simplified to include only the main effects. In this model, medicationstatus [t(50) = 2.0; P = .05] <strong>and</strong> education [t(50) = 0.3; P = .76] had no effects.However, PDSS-SR pretest scores [t(50) = 5.7; P < .001] <strong>and</strong> gender [t(50) = 3.0; P= .019] predicted post-treatment symptoms significantly. Post treatment scores werehigher for females, <strong>and</strong> for those displaying higher symptoms levels at pretest.With regard to attack frequency, only the interaction <strong>of</strong> time <strong>and</strong> pre-treatmentseverity was significant [t(50) = 3.8; P < .001], signalling a significant larger declinein the number <strong>of</strong> panic attacks at follow-up compared to the posttest in those experiencingmore attacks at pretest. In the reduced model, in which we retained only thisinteraction <strong>and</strong> the main effects, none <strong>of</strong> the variables predicted post-treatment scoressignificantly, including gender <strong>and</strong> pre-treatment agoraphobic avoidance (MI-AALscores).Given the regression results, we further explored the effect <strong>of</strong> pretest symptomseverity. Based upon the PDSS-SR baseline score, we split the sample into two groups(based on the PDSS-SR cut-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> 8) <strong>and</strong> determined the effect size for each groupon this measure. This revealed considerable higher effects in the group with higherpretest levels (posttest d = 2.1; follow-up d = 2.3).4.4 DiscussionIn comparison to a waiting-list, web-based therapist-assisted <strong>CBT</strong> induced moderate tolarge reductions in panic symptoms <strong>and</strong> general psychopathology in a heterogeneouscommunity sample <strong>of</strong> clients suffering from chronic symptoms <strong>of</strong> panic disorder.Treated participants were six times more likely to experience a reduction in panicattacks <strong>of</strong> at least 50%. Client satisfaction was high. After three years, even thoughthe participants never met their therapist, 80% returned for follow-up measurements.On the long term, improvements were found to be more pronounced.