10.07.2015 Views

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.2. Method 413.2.2 ParticipantsEnrollment. <strong>The</strong> recruitment procedure, which targeted people from the generalpopulation with mild to moderate depression, started with the publication <strong>of</strong> an articlein a national Dutch newspaper announcing the study. <strong>The</strong> article referred readers toa website, which provided psycho-education regarding depression <strong>and</strong> its treatment,explained the purpose <strong>and</strong> design <strong>of</strong> the study, <strong>and</strong> contained an application form.Screening. Respondents were screened by means <strong>of</strong> web-administered self-reportquestionnaires. <strong>The</strong> following exclusion criteria were applied: a score less than10 (no depression) or more than 29 (severe depression) on the Beck DepressionInventory (BDI-IA: Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock, & Erbaugh, 1961; Beck et al., 1979),age under 18 years, heightened risk <strong>of</strong> dissociation or psychosis, suicidal ideation,drug <strong>and</strong> alcohol abuse, use <strong>of</strong> neuroleptic medication, unstable dosages <strong>of</strong> otherpsychiatric medication, concurrent psychotherapy, high anxiety levels, or a prevailingposttraumatic stress disorder or panic disorder. Finally, eligible respondents wererequired to download, print, <strong>and</strong> return a signed Informed Consent form. Respondentswith severe depression (BDI-IA>29) were referred to a concurrent clinical trial <strong>of</strong> aface-to-face treatment for severe depression (Dekker et al., 2007). Other excludedrespondents were referred to their GPs or received information concerning mentalhealth centres in their vicinity.Risk <strong>of</strong> dissociation was assessed using the five-item Somat<strong>of</strong>orm DissociationQuestionnaire (SDQ-5; Nijenhuis1997), using a cut-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> 8. Respondents who scoredabove this cut-<strong>of</strong>f also completed the longer, more specific Dissociation-Questionnaire(DIS-Q; Nijenhuis, Spinhoven, van Dyck, van der Hart, & V<strong>and</strong>erlinden, 1998).Risk <strong>of</strong> psychosis was attributed to respondents who scored above the cut-<strong>of</strong>f value<strong>of</strong> 5 on the Hallucination scale <strong>of</strong> the Screening Device for Psychotic Disorder (SDPD;Lange, Schrieken, et al., 2000). Suicidal ideation was measured using an inventorysimilar to that <strong>of</strong> Joiner et al. (2003). Respondents with suicidal plans or a history <strong>of</strong>recent suicide attempts (within the past 3 years) were excluded. High anxiety levelswere detected using the Anxiety <strong>and</strong> Stress subscales <strong>of</strong> the Depression Anxiety StressScales (described below in the Outcome Measures section). Prevailing posttraumaticstress or panic disorder was inferred in respondents who either scored higher than

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!