10.07.2015 Views

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.4. Discussion 29<strong>The</strong> effects on anxiety appeared to be small. However, after three-years the (uncontrolled)effects were large on all outcome measures. Participants were highly satisfiedwith their treatment <strong>and</strong> their therapists.2.4.1 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> effect size<strong>The</strong> substantial improvement <strong>of</strong> the participants in the waiting list control group considerablydeflated the effects between treatment <strong>and</strong> control group. <strong>The</strong> improvementobserved in the waiting-list control group is comparable to that observed in otherstudies (Lange, van de Ven, & Schrieken, 2003; Zetterqvist et al., 2003). Zetterqvistet al. (2003) provided several explanations for these improvements, including thebeneficial effects <strong>of</strong> pretesting <strong>and</strong> the prospect <strong>of</strong> treatment. In the current study,the recruiting article <strong>and</strong> the website provided psycho-education that may have hadbeneficial effects. Possibly, the participants in the control condition benefited from theinformation they received, combined with the knowledge that they would start theactive treatment in the near future. However, these explanations remain speculative.<strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> control groups may shed light on the source <strong>of</strong> the effectsin the control group.Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing the improvement in the control group, the observed betweengroup effects are similar to those reported in the literature. <strong>The</strong> (controlled) effects onstress (d = .6) <strong>and</strong> depression (d = .4) compare well with the effects <strong>of</strong> face-to-face<strong>CBT</strong> (d = .7 <strong>and</strong> d = .3 respectively; van der Klink et al., 2001). In addition, theresults corroborate results obtained by Zetterqvist et al. (2003) in an RCT <strong>of</strong> anInternet-driven stress-reduction program. In that study, the effect sizes were high,but intention-to-treat analyses failed to reveal statistically significant between effects.In contrast, all between effects in the present study were significant on an intentionto-treatbasis. This was perhaps due to the larger sample size <strong>and</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> a morepowerful statistical technique.2.4.2 Maintenance<strong>The</strong> uncontrolled three-year follow-up showed a high impact <strong>of</strong> the treatment withlarge effect sizes after three years, on stress <strong>and</strong> depression, <strong>and</strong> on emotional exhaustion<strong>and</strong> anxiety. This is consistent with our findings in the study on posttraumatic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!