10.07.2015 Views

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20 Chapter 2. <strong>Online</strong> <strong>CBT</strong> <strong>of</strong> Work-Related Stress2.2.4 Measures<strong>The</strong> primary outcome measure was the Stress subscale from the Depression AnxietyStress Scales (DASS-42: Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995; Dutch version: de Beurs, vanDyck, Marquenie, Lange, & Blonk, 2001). Secondary measures were the Depression<strong>and</strong> Anxiety subscales from the DASS <strong>and</strong> the Emotional Exhaustion subscale <strong>of</strong> theDutch version <strong>of</strong> the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (MBI-GS: Maslach,Jackson, & Leiter, 1996; Dutch version by Schaufeli & van Dierendonck, 2000).DASS. <strong>The</strong> DASS is a self-report instrument that assesses depressive symptoms,physical anxiety (fear), <strong>and</strong> mental stress (nervous tension). It contains 42 items,14 per subscale, that relate to the experience <strong>of</strong> symptoms in the past week. <strong>The</strong>items are measured on a 4-point scale ranging between 0 (”did not apply to me”)to 3 (”applied to me very much, or most <strong>of</strong> the time”). Higher scores denote lessfavourable conditions.All subscales <strong>of</strong> the Dutch adaptation are characterized by good internal consistencies(Cronbach’s α between .94 <strong>and</strong> .97, present sample: .86 to .92). Test-retestreliabilities for the Depression, Anxiety <strong>and</strong> Stress scale are r = .75, r = .89 <strong>and</strong> r =.79, respectively (de Beurs et al., 2001) . Clinical cut-<strong>of</strong>f scores <strong>of</strong> c = 12 <strong>and</strong> c = 5 fordepression <strong>and</strong> anxiety are recommended by Nieuwenhuijsen, de Boer, Verbeek, Blonk,<strong>and</strong> van Dijk (2003). <strong>The</strong> corresponding percentile score <strong>of</strong> stress (14) observed in alarge (N = 1771) non-clinical sample in the UK (Crawford & Henry, 2003) was usedas the clinical cut-<strong>of</strong>f in this study.MBI-GS Emotional Exhaustion. <strong>The</strong> MBI-GS is a self-report questionnaire to assessburnout across pr<strong>of</strong>essional occupations. <strong>The</strong> Emotional Exhaustion subscale assessesemotional fatigue, i.e., the feeling <strong>of</strong> being ”worn-out”. <strong>The</strong> scale contains five itemsthat are measured on a 7-point scale scored from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicatehigher levels <strong>of</strong> emotional exhaustion. <strong>The</strong> internal consistency <strong>of</strong> the subscale rangesbetween .84 ≤ α ≤ .90 (present sample: α = .84). <strong>The</strong> 8-month test-retest reliabilityis satisfactory (.58 ≤ r ≤ .85). Well-established clinical cut-<strong>of</strong>f scores are unavailablefor the Exhaustion scale. To indicate burnout, Brenninkmeijer <strong>and</strong> Van Yperen (2003)recommend a cut-<strong>of</strong>f score <strong>of</strong> 2.67, which was used in the present study. With this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!