The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard
The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard
98 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic SymptomsBetween-group comparisons. Table 5.3 shows the results of the primary hypothesistests of between-group differences. At posttest, binge eating frequency, purgingfrequency and global eating disorder symptom severity (EDE-Q) was significantlyless in the online CBT group, compared to the bibliotherapy group and the waitinglistgroup (P geq .04; pooled between-group effect size: d = .9 , range: .7 < d
5.4. Discussion 99LOCF-ITT may be overly liberal if attrition is unbalanced across experimentalgroups, or if posttest data is carried forward to impute missing follow-up data(Molenberghs et al., 2004). Therefore, we reran analyses using available data only(posttest: n = 83; follow-up: n = 41). In terms of statistical significance, results ofthe ITT analyses and the available data analyses were similar.5.3.4 Abstinence and reliable clinically significant changeAs shown in Table 5.4, participants in the online CBT group were more likely to beabstinent from purging in comparison to control group participants at post-test (OR:7.2; P = .02), and more likely to achieve reliable clinically significant change withrespect to EDE-Q (OR: 4.5; P = .01). At follow-up, differences between the onlineCBT group and the bibliotherapy group were not significant (OR: 1.0 to 1.4; P = .99).5.3.5 Client satisfaction with online CBTParticipants following online CBT completed a post-test evaluation questionnaire (n= 51; including those participants who started treatment at a later time). On a 1to 10 point scale, they rated the overall value of treatment with an average of 7.5(SD = 1.3) and the contact with their therapists with an average of 8.6 (SD = 1.9).Seventy-six percent of the participants indicated they had not missed face-to-facecontact, and 94% stated that they would recommend the treatment to others.5.4 DiscussionAs hypothesised, posttest reductions in bulimic symptoms were substantially greaterwith online CBT, in comparison to bibliotherapy and a waiting list. One year aftertreatment, differences between online CBT and bibliotherapy were no longer significant,due to improvements in the bibliotherapy group. Participants allocated toonline CBT reported large, clinically relevant and stable reductions in bulimic symptoms.Notwithstanding the absence of face-to-face contact, treatment dropout wasacceptable, and client satisfaction was high.Results provide further support for the hypothesis that therapist support is a criticaldeterminant of treatment efficacy and adherence in internet-delivered treatment
- Page 56 and 57: 48 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 58 and 59: 50 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 60 and 61: 52 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 62 and 63: 54 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 64 and 65: 56 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 66 and 67: 58 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 68 and 69: Ruwaard, J., Broeksteeg, J., Schrie
- Page 70 and 71: 62 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 72 and 73: 64 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 74 and 75: 66 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 76 and 77: 68 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 78 and 79: 70 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 80 and 81: 72 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 82 and 83: 74 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 84 and 85: 76 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 86 and 87: 78 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 88 and 89: 80 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 90 and 91: 82 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 92 and 93: Ruwaard, J., Lange, A., Broeksteeg,
- Page 94 and 95: 86 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 96 and 97: 88 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 98 and 99: 90 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 100 and 101: 92 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 102 and 103: 94 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 104 and 105: 96 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 108 and 109: 100 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimi
- Page 110 and 111: 102 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimi
- Page 112 and 113: Ruwaard, J., Lange, A., Schrieken,
- Page 114 and 115: 106 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 116 and 117: 108 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 118 and 119: 110 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 120 and 121: 112 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 122 and 123: 114 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 124 and 125: 116 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 126 and 127: 118 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 128 and 129: 120 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 130 and 131: 122 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 133 and 134: Chapter 7General DiscussionPrevious
- Page 135 and 136: 7.1. Key Findings 1277.1.2 The effe
- Page 137 and 138: 7.1. Key Findings 129Work−related
- Page 139 and 140: 7.2. Strengths and limitations 1317
- Page 141 and 142: 7.2. Strengths and limitations 133s
- Page 143 and 144: 7.3. Implications for clinical prac
- Page 145 and 146: 7.4. Suggestions for future researc
- Page 147: 7.5. Conclusion 139Post-treatment b
- Page 150 and 151: 142 Summaryof the introduction prov
- Page 152 and 153: 144 Summarythat face-to-face contac
- Page 154 and 155: 146 Summarycomplex, routine practic
5.4. Discussion 99LOCF-ITT may be overly liberal if attrition is unbalanced across experimentalgroups, or if posttest data is carried forward to impute missing follow-up data(Molenberghs et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong>refore, we reran analyses using available data only(posttest: n = 83; follow-up: n = 41). In terms <strong>of</strong> statistical significance, results <strong>of</strong>the ITT analyses <strong>and</strong> the available data analyses were similar.5.3.4 Abstinence <strong>and</strong> reliable clinically significant changeAs shown in Table 5.4, participants in the online <strong>CBT</strong> group were more likely to beabstinent from purging in comparison to control group participants at post-test (OR:7.2; P = .02), <strong>and</strong> more likely to achieve reliable clinically significant change withrespect to EDE-Q (OR: 4.5; P = .01). At follow-up, differences between the online<strong>CBT</strong> group <strong>and</strong> the bibliotherapy group were not significant (OR: 1.0 to 1.4; P = .99).5.3.5 Client satisfaction with online <strong>CBT</strong>Participants following online <strong>CBT</strong> completed a post-test evaluation questionnaire (n= 51; including those participants who started treatment at a later time). On a 1to 10 point scale, they rated the overall value <strong>of</strong> treatment with an average <strong>of</strong> 7.5(SD = 1.3) <strong>and</strong> the contact with their therapists with an average <strong>of</strong> 8.6 (SD = 1.9).Seventy-six percent <strong>of</strong> the participants indicated they had not missed face-to-facecontact, <strong>and</strong> 94% stated that they would recommend the treatment to others.5.4 DiscussionAs hypothesised, posttest reductions in bulimic symptoms were substantially greaterwith online <strong>CBT</strong>, in comparison to bibliotherapy <strong>and</strong> a waiting list. One year aftertreatment, differences between online <strong>CBT</strong> <strong>and</strong> bibliotherapy were no longer significant,due to improvements in the bibliotherapy group. Participants allocated toonline <strong>CBT</strong> reported large, clinically relevant <strong>and</strong> stable reductions in bulimic symptoms.Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing the absence <strong>of</strong> face-to-face contact, treatment dropout wasacceptable, <strong>and</strong> client satisfaction was high.Results provide further support for the hypothesis that therapist support is a criticaldeterminant <strong>of</strong> treatment efficacy <strong>and</strong> adherence in internet-delivered treatment