The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

10.07.2015 Views

98 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic SymptomsBetween-group comparisons. Table 5.3 shows the results of the primary hypothesistests of between-group differences. At posttest, binge eating frequency, purgingfrequency and global eating disorder symptom severity (EDE-Q) was significantlyless in the online CBT group, compared to the bibliotherapy group and the waitinglistgroup (P geq .04; pooled between-group effect size: d = .9 , range: .7 < d

5.4. Discussion 99LOCF-ITT may be overly liberal if attrition is unbalanced across experimentalgroups, or if posttest data is carried forward to impute missing follow-up data(Molenberghs et al., 2004). Therefore, we reran analyses using available data only(posttest: n = 83; follow-up: n = 41). In terms of statistical significance, results ofthe ITT analyses and the available data analyses were similar.5.3.4 Abstinence and reliable clinically significant changeAs shown in Table 5.4, participants in the online CBT group were more likely to beabstinent from purging in comparison to control group participants at post-test (OR:7.2; P = .02), and more likely to achieve reliable clinically significant change withrespect to EDE-Q (OR: 4.5; P = .01). At follow-up, differences between the onlineCBT group and the bibliotherapy group were not significant (OR: 1.0 to 1.4; P = .99).5.3.5 Client satisfaction with online CBTParticipants following online CBT completed a post-test evaluation questionnaire (n= 51; including those participants who started treatment at a later time). On a 1to 10 point scale, they rated the overall value of treatment with an average of 7.5(SD = 1.3) and the contact with their therapists with an average of 8.6 (SD = 1.9).Seventy-six percent of the participants indicated they had not missed face-to-facecontact, and 94% stated that they would recommend the treatment to others.5.4 DiscussionAs hypothesised, posttest reductions in bulimic symptoms were substantially greaterwith online CBT, in comparison to bibliotherapy and a waiting list. One year aftertreatment, differences between online CBT and bibliotherapy were no longer significant,due to improvements in the bibliotherapy group. Participants allocated toonline CBT reported large, clinically relevant and stable reductions in bulimic symptoms.Notwithstanding the absence of face-to-face contact, treatment dropout wasacceptable, and client satisfaction was high.Results provide further support for the hypothesis that therapist support is a criticaldeterminant of treatment efficacy and adherence in internet-delivered treatment

5.4. Discussion 99LOCF-ITT may be overly liberal if attrition is unbalanced across experimentalgroups, or if posttest data is carried forward to impute missing follow-up data(Molenberghs et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong>refore, we reran analyses using available data only(posttest: n = 83; follow-up: n = 41). In terms <strong>of</strong> statistical significance, results <strong>of</strong>the ITT analyses <strong>and</strong> the available data analyses were similar.5.3.4 Abstinence <strong>and</strong> reliable clinically significant changeAs shown in Table 5.4, participants in the online <strong>CBT</strong> group were more likely to beabstinent from purging in comparison to control group participants at post-test (OR:7.2; P = .02), <strong>and</strong> more likely to achieve reliable clinically significant change withrespect to EDE-Q (OR: 4.5; P = .01). At follow-up, differences between the online<strong>CBT</strong> group <strong>and</strong> the bibliotherapy group were not significant (OR: 1.0 to 1.4; P = .99).5.3.5 Client satisfaction with online <strong>CBT</strong>Participants following online <strong>CBT</strong> completed a post-test evaluation questionnaire (n= 51; including those participants who started treatment at a later time). On a 1to 10 point scale, they rated the overall value <strong>of</strong> treatment with an average <strong>of</strong> 7.5(SD = 1.3) <strong>and</strong> the contact with their therapists with an average <strong>of</strong> 8.6 (SD = 1.9).Seventy-six percent <strong>of</strong> the participants indicated they had not missed face-to-facecontact, <strong>and</strong> 94% stated that they would recommend the treatment to others.5.4 DiscussionAs hypothesised, posttest reductions in bulimic symptoms were substantially greaterwith online <strong>CBT</strong>, in comparison to bibliotherapy <strong>and</strong> a waiting list. One year aftertreatment, differences between online <strong>CBT</strong> <strong>and</strong> bibliotherapy were no longer significant,due to improvements in the bibliotherapy group. Participants allocated toonline <strong>CBT</strong> reported large, clinically relevant <strong>and</strong> stable reductions in bulimic symptoms.Notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing the absence <strong>of</strong> face-to-face contact, treatment dropout wasacceptable, <strong>and</strong> client satisfaction was high.Results provide further support for the hypothesis that therapist support is a criticaldeterminant <strong>of</strong> treatment efficacy <strong>and</strong> adherence in internet-delivered treatment

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!