92 Chapter 5. <strong>Online</strong> <strong>CBT</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulimic SymptomsNauta, Hospers, Kok, & Jansen, 2000). Secondary outcome measure was the BodyAttitude Test (BAT; Probst, V<strong>and</strong>ereycken, Van Coppenolle, & V<strong>and</strong>erlinden, 1995;Probst, van Coppenolle, & V<strong>and</strong>ereycken, 1998).EDE-Q <strong>The</strong> EDE-Q is a 30-item self-report list assessing the severity <strong>of</strong> behavioural,emotional <strong>and</strong> cognitive symptoms <strong>of</strong> eating disorder over the past 28 days. Twentytwoitems <strong>of</strong> the EDE-Q assess symptoms on a 7-point Likert-scale, scored from 0to 6, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. We used the mean score<strong>of</strong> these items as a global indicator <strong>of</strong> eating disorder severity (Cronbach’s α = .9;330-day test-retest reliability: r = .79; Mond, Hay, Rodgers, Owen, & Beumont,2004a; Peterson et al., 2007). At a cut-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> 2.3, this indicator identifies patientswith eating disorders with a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 83% <strong>and</strong> a specificity <strong>of</strong> 96% (Mond, Hay,Rodgers, Owen, & Beumont, 2004b). EDE-Q contains eight additional items thataddress key behavioral aspects <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> eating disorders. From these, wechose the objective bulimic episodes item to assess the frequency <strong>of</strong> binge eating, <strong>and</strong>the sum <strong>of</strong> the self-induced vomiting <strong>and</strong> laxative misuse items to assess the frequency<strong>of</strong> purging episodes. EDE-Q does not assess fasting <strong>and</strong> the extent to which exerciseis compensatory. In addition, the reliability <strong>and</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> EDE-Q items assessingnon-purging compensatory behaviors is not clear (Berg et al., 2011). Hence, changein non-purging compensatory behavior was not assessed in this study.BAT <strong>The</strong> BAT is a 20-item self-report survey assessing body dissatisfaction. Items arescored on a 6-point Likert-scale, with higher scores indicating more dissatisfaction.We used the total score, ranged 20-120, as a global indicator <strong>of</strong> body dissatisfaction.At a cut-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> 36, this indicator has a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 69% <strong>and</strong> a specificity <strong>of</strong> 80% in thedetection <strong>of</strong> people with an eating disorder (Probst, Pieters, & V<strong>and</strong>erlinden, 2008).5.2.6 AnalysesStatistical significance <strong>and</strong> effect size. Between-group differences at posttest <strong>and</strong>follow-up were examined using two-tailed ANCOVA’s, using pretest scores as a singlecovariate <strong>and</strong> Holm-Bonferroni adjustments to to maintain the family-wise significancelevel α at .05 (Holl<strong>and</strong> & DiPonzio Copenhaver, 1988). Follow-up comparisons did not
5.3. Results 93include data <strong>of</strong> the waiting-list, because the participants in this group provided followupdata at a later time. Binge eating <strong>and</strong> purging frequency data were highly skewed.Consequently, we reverted to rank-score ANCOVA (Conover & Iman, 1982; LaVange& Koch, 2006) to assess group differences with these data, <strong>and</strong> chose to summarizethese variables as medians <strong>and</strong> interquartile ranges. Analyses included all participants,irrespective <strong>of</strong> treatment adherence <strong>and</strong> attrition. Missing values were h<strong>and</strong>ledthrough last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) data imputation. Within-group gainscores <strong>and</strong> between-group differences were st<strong>and</strong>ardized to Cohen’s d, using thepooled st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> the pretest scores as the st<strong>and</strong>ardizer (J. Cohen, 1988).Confidence intervals around d were approximated from the central t-distribution(Robey, 2004).Clinical significance. We tested the differential probability <strong>of</strong> a clinically relevantoutcome after online treatment compared to both control groups with two-sidedFisher’s exact tests, <strong>and</strong> expressed this difference as odds ratios (OR; Hillis & Woolson,2002). For binge eating <strong>and</strong> purging, we defined abstinence (i.e., a frequency <strong>of</strong> 0)as the clinically relevant outcome. With regard to EDE-Q <strong>and</strong> BAT, we applied theprinciples <strong>of</strong> reliable clinically significant change (RCSC; Jacobson & Truax, 1991).We used the reliable change index to determine how many scale points a participanthad to change to rule out measurement error (EDE-Q: 1.1 points; BAT: 18.5 points).RCSC was defined as reliable change from a pretest score above the clinical cut-<strong>of</strong>f(EDE-Q: < 2.3; BAT: < 36) to a posttest score below the cut-<strong>of</strong>f .5.3 Results5.3.1 ParticipantsRecruitment resulted in 273 respondents. Of these, 91 (33%) did not complete thescreening. Of the remaining 182 respondents, 105 (58%) met inclusion criteria (cf.Figure 5.1). As shown in Table 5.1, baseline characteristics were equally distributedacross the three experimental groups. Participants were female (n = 104; 99%)<strong>and</strong> about 31 years old. Self-reported illness history indicated chronic symptoms(the average duration <strong>of</strong> symptoms was M = 11 years, SD = 9), for which 62%
- Page 1:
The Efficacy andEffectiveness ofOnl
- Page 4 and 5:
The studies in this thesis were sup
- Page 6 and 7:
Promotiecommissie:Promotores: Prof.
- Page 8 and 9:
6 Online CBT in Routine Clinical Pr
- Page 10 and 11:
2 Chapter 1. General Introductionps
- Page 12 and 13:
4 Chapter 1. General Introductiongr
- Page 14 and 15:
6 Chapter 1. General Introduction1.
- Page 16 and 17:
8 Chapter 1. General Introductiontr
- Page 18 and 19:
Ruwaard, J., Lange, A., Bouwman, M.
- Page 20 and 21:
12 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 22 and 23:
14 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 24 and 25:
16 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 26 and 27:
18 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 28 and 29:
20 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 30 and 31:
22 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 32 and 33:
24 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 34 and 35:
26 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 36 and 37:
28 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 38 and 39:
30 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 40 and 41:
32 Chapter 2. Online CBT of Work-Re
- Page 42 and 43:
Ruwaard, J., Schrieken, B., Schrijv
- Page 44 and 45:
36 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 46 and 47:
38 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 48 and 49:
40 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 50 and 51: 42 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 52 and 53: 44 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 54 and 55: 46 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 56 and 57: 48 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 58 and 59: 50 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 60 and 61: 52 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 62 and 63: 54 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 64 and 65: 56 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 66 and 67: 58 Chapter 3. Online CBT of Depress
- Page 68 and 69: Ruwaard, J., Broeksteeg, J., Schrie
- Page 70 and 71: 62 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 72 and 73: 64 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 74 and 75: 66 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 76 and 77: 68 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 78 and 79: 70 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 80 and 81: 72 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 82 and 83: 74 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 84 and 85: 76 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 86 and 87: 78 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 88 and 89: 80 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 90 and 91: 82 Chapter 4. Online CBT of Panic S
- Page 92 and 93: Ruwaard, J., Lange, A., Broeksteeg,
- Page 94 and 95: 86 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 96 and 97: 88 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 98 and 99: 90 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 102 and 103: 94 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 104 and 105: 96 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 106 and 107: 98 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimic
- Page 108 and 109: 100 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimi
- Page 110 and 111: 102 Chapter 5. Online CBT of Bulimi
- Page 112 and 113: Ruwaard, J., Lange, A., Schrieken,
- Page 114 and 115: 106 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 116 and 117: 108 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 118 and 119: 110 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 120 and 121: 112 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 122 and 123: 114 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 124 and 125: 116 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 126 and 127: 118 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 128 and 129: 120 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 130 and 131: 122 Chapter 6. Online CBT in Routin
- Page 133 and 134: Chapter 7General DiscussionPrevious
- Page 135 and 136: 7.1. Key Findings 1277.1.2 The effe
- Page 137 and 138: 7.1. Key Findings 129Work−related
- Page 139 and 140: 7.2. Strengths and limitations 1317
- Page 141 and 142: 7.2. Strengths and limitations 133s
- Page 143 and 144: 7.3. Implications for clinical prac
- Page 145 and 146: 7.4. Suggestions for future researc
- Page 147: 7.5. Conclusion 139Post-treatment b
- Page 150 and 151:
142 Summaryof the introduction prov
- Page 152 and 153:
144 Summarythat face-to-face contac
- Page 154 and 155:
146 Summarycomplex, routine practic
- Page 157 and 158:
SamenvattingIn 1997 ontwikkelden on
- Page 159 and 160:
Samenvatting 151startten direct met
- Page 161 and 162:
Samenvatting 153up-metingen suggere
- Page 163 and 164:
Samenvatting 155ongeveer gelijk zou
- Page 165 and 166:
ReferencesAben, I., Verhey, F., Lou
- Page 167 and 168:
References 159Bickel, R. (2007). Mu
- Page 169 and 170:
References 161apy Research, 1(2), 8
- Page 171 and 172:
References 163Hay, P. P., Bacaltchu
- Page 173 and 174:
References 165for bulimia nervosa:
- Page 175 and 176:
References 167Mond, J. M., Hay, P.
- Page 177 and 178:
References 169(2003). The developme
- Page 179 and 180:
References 171of change in psycholo
- Page 181 and 182:
DankwoordAlleen mijn naam staat op
- Page 183:
Dankwoord 175en Janneke Broeksteeg
- Page 186 and 187:
178 Curriculum VitaeLange, A., & Ru