10.07.2015 Views

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Online CBT - Jeroen Ruwaard

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.3. Results 93include data <strong>of</strong> the waiting-list, because the participants in this group provided followupdata at a later time. Binge eating <strong>and</strong> purging frequency data were highly skewed.Consequently, we reverted to rank-score ANCOVA (Conover & Iman, 1982; LaVange& Koch, 2006) to assess group differences with these data, <strong>and</strong> chose to summarizethese variables as medians <strong>and</strong> interquartile ranges. Analyses included all participants,irrespective <strong>of</strong> treatment adherence <strong>and</strong> attrition. Missing values were h<strong>and</strong>ledthrough last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) data imputation. Within-group gainscores <strong>and</strong> between-group differences were st<strong>and</strong>ardized to Cohen’s d, using thepooled st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> the pretest scores as the st<strong>and</strong>ardizer (J. Cohen, 1988).Confidence intervals around d were approximated from the central t-distribution(Robey, 2004).Clinical significance. We tested the differential probability <strong>of</strong> a clinically relevantoutcome after online treatment compared to both control groups with two-sidedFisher’s exact tests, <strong>and</strong> expressed this difference as odds ratios (OR; Hillis & Woolson,2002). For binge eating <strong>and</strong> purging, we defined abstinence (i.e., a frequency <strong>of</strong> 0)as the clinically relevant outcome. With regard to EDE-Q <strong>and</strong> BAT, we applied theprinciples <strong>of</strong> reliable clinically significant change (RCSC; Jacobson & Truax, 1991).We used the reliable change index to determine how many scale points a participanthad to change to rule out measurement error (EDE-Q: 1.1 points; BAT: 18.5 points).RCSC was defined as reliable change from a pretest score above the clinical cut-<strong>of</strong>f(EDE-Q: < 2.3; BAT: < 36) to a posttest score below the cut-<strong>of</strong>f .5.3 Results5.3.1 ParticipantsRecruitment resulted in 273 respondents. Of these, 91 (33%) did not complete thescreening. Of the remaining 182 respondents, 105 (58%) met inclusion criteria (cf.Figure 5.1). As shown in Table 5.1, baseline characteristics were equally distributedacross the three experimental groups. Participants were female (n = 104; 99%)<strong>and</strong> about 31 years old. Self-reported illness history indicated chronic symptoms(the average duration <strong>of</strong> symptoms was M = 11 years, SD = 9), for which 62%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!