10.07.2015 Views

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Technology Assessment 2013 Vol. 17 No. 1<strong>analysis</strong> to determine if CTCA provided additional prognostic value beyond routine assessment with ECG<strong>and</strong> biomarkers.Table 28 summarises the results <strong>of</strong> the prognostic studies <strong>of</strong> CTCA. It was not always clear whetherpatients with positive CTCA had been followed up <strong>and</strong> whether there had been any events in thesepatients. MACE rates were generally very low in patients with a negative CTCA. The only adverse event in apatient with negative CTCA was a death in the long-term follow-up cohort <strong>of</strong> Holl<strong>and</strong>er et al. 132 However,these low event rates may reflect selection <strong>of</strong> low-risk patients rather than accurate risk stratificationby CTCA. Most <strong>of</strong> the events reported in patients with positive CTCA findings were process events [i.e.percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)], which in an unblindedstudy may simply reflect physicians acting upon CTCA findings. No patient with positive or intermediateTABLE 27 Quality assessment <strong>of</strong> CTCA <strong>and</strong> CAC scoring prognostic studiesStudy Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7Goldstein 2007 131 Y Y Y Y Y N NHoll<strong>and</strong>er 2009 132 N Y Y Y Y N NHoll<strong>and</strong>er 2009 133 N Y Y Y Y N NLaudon 2010 151 N Y Y Y Y N NMiller 2011 134 Y Y N Y Y N NRubinshtein 2007 135 N Y Y Y Y N NSchlett 2011 136 Y Y Y Y Y Y YShuman 2010 137 N Y Y Y Y N NN, no; U, unclear; Y, yes.Questions:Q1 Are inclusion criteria defined?Q2 Are characteristics described (age <strong>and</strong> sex)?Q3 Is a MACE defined in the methods section?Q4 Is a MACE identification <strong>and</strong> definition independent <strong>of</strong> the index test?Q5 Is a MACE outcome recorded for at least 80% <strong>of</strong> the cohort from baseline episode?Q6 Was a multivariate <strong>analysis</strong> undertaken?Q7 Was troponin measured <strong>and</strong> included in the multivariate <strong>analysis</strong>?TABLE 28 Outcomes summary for prognostic studies <strong>of</strong> CTCAPaper Positive CTCA a CTCA aIntermediateNegative CTCA aGoldstein 2007 131 0/8 0/24 0/67Holl<strong>and</strong>er 2009 132 NR NR 1/481 (death)Holl<strong>and</strong>er 2009 133 0/13 0/41 0/508Shuman 2010 137 NR NR 0/70Rubinshtein 2007 135 13/23 (two MI, eight PCI, three CABG) 1/20 (PCI) 0/15Miller 2011 134 0/18 – 0/10Schlett 2011 136 20/68 b 5/117 b 0/183a See Table 25 for definitions.b The 25 MACEs included 12 MIs, 23 revascularisations <strong>and</strong> no cardiac deaths.© Queen’s Printer <strong>and</strong> Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2013. This work was produced by Goodacre et al. under the terms <strong>of</strong> a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary <strong>of</strong> Statefor Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes <strong>of</strong> private research <strong>and</strong> study <strong>and</strong> extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in pr<strong>of</strong>essional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made <strong>and</strong> the reproduction is not associated with any form <strong>of</strong> advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials <strong>and</strong> Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University <strong>of</strong> Southampton SciencePark, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!