10.07.2015 Views

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix 9Clinical diagnosis <strong>of</strong> NSTEMI, according to the universal definition <strong>of</strong> MI [5], is based upon an elevation <strong>of</strong>cardiac biomarkers (preferably troponin) above the 99th percentile <strong>of</strong> the upper reference limit. Patientswith an elevated troponin have an increased risk <strong>of</strong> adverse outcome <strong>and</strong> can benefit from hospitaladmission <strong>and</strong> treatment. However, troponin does not achieve optimal sensitivity for MI until several hoursafter the symptoms <strong>of</strong> MI [6] so guidelines typically recommend delaying sampling until 10–12 h aftersymptom onset. Most patients with suspected ACS present to hospital within a few hours <strong>of</strong> symptomonset, so delaying blood sampling usually incurs costs <strong>of</strong> hospital observation <strong>and</strong>/or admission. Earlierblood sampling is cheaper but may miss cases <strong>of</strong> MI, so the timing <strong>of</strong> sampling <strong>and</strong> tests used involve atrade-<strong>of</strong>f between cost <strong>and</strong> accuracy.Diagnosis <strong>of</strong> underlying CADMany patients with suspected ACS are known to have CAD <strong>and</strong> are receiving secondary preventativetreatment. However, a substantial proportion <strong>of</strong> patients have not previously been investigated forCAD. Once MI has been ruled out these patients may be investigated for underlying CAD by eitherprovocative cardiac testing to identify symptoms <strong>of</strong> CAD induced by exertional or pharmacological stressor anatomical imaging <strong>of</strong> the coronary arteries. Identification <strong>of</strong> CAD allows treatment with aspirin,statins <strong>and</strong> angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors to be commenced <strong>and</strong> consideration <strong>of</strong> coronaryrevascularisation for high-risk cases.Unstable anginaInvestigation <strong>of</strong> suspected ACS also involves identification <strong>and</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with unstable angina.These patients have CAD <strong>and</strong> worsening symptoms but no evidence <strong>of</strong> cardiac damage. Previously theyconstituted the majority <strong>of</strong> patients with suspected ACS. However, the increasing sensitivity <strong>of</strong> biochemicaltests for myocardial damage, <strong>and</strong> the redefinition <strong>of</strong> MI to include all patients with evidence <strong>of</strong> myocardialdamage, means that patients with unstable angina <strong>and</strong> no myocardial damage are fewer in number<strong>and</strong> have a relatively low risk <strong>of</strong> adverse outcome. Furthermore, in the absence <strong>of</strong> ECG changes there aresubstantial difficulties defining which patients have unstable angina, since the diagnosis is based uponunreliable clinical features. These factors make it difficult to define the population with unstable angina<strong>and</strong> estimate any benefits from treatment, beyond secondary prevention for underlying CAD.Uncertainties in the investigation <strong>of</strong> suspected ACSThere have been many published guidelines for the investigation <strong>of</strong> suspected ACS. Most recently theNational Institute for Health <strong>and</strong> Clinical Excellence (NICE) has issued draft guidance for the management<strong>of</strong> patients with acute chest pain due to possible ACS [1]. These guidelines have identified areas <strong>of</strong>uncertainty where further research is required. These are:1. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> new, high sensitivity troponin assay methods in low, medium <strong>and</strong> high-risk groups withacute chest pain, <strong>and</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> other putative biomarkers in comparison with the diagnostic <strong>and</strong>prognostic performance <strong>of</strong> the most clinically effective <strong>and</strong> cost-effective troponin assays.2. Investigation <strong>of</strong> the cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> multislice CT coronary angiography as a first-line test forruling out obstructive CAD in patients with suspected troponin-negative acute coronary syndromes.Evaluation <strong>of</strong> new troponin assays <strong>and</strong> other biomarkersThe draft NICE guidelines recommend measurement <strong>of</strong> troponin levels at 10–12 h after the onset <strong>of</strong>symptoms to accurately identify cases <strong>of</strong> MI. This is based upon evidence that troponin levels predictsubsequent risk <strong>of</strong> adverse outcome [7] <strong>and</strong> response to treatment [8], but do not achieve optimalsensitivity until 10–12 h after symptom onset [6]. However, delaying blood testing until 10–12 h aftersymptom onset is inconvenient for patients <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten incurs additional health-care costs associatedwith hospital admission <strong>and</strong>/or observation. Various alternative strategies have been proposed for earlierdiagnosis <strong>of</strong> MI using combinations <strong>of</strong> biomarkers, measuring biomarker gradients <strong>and</strong> using newer, moresensitive troponin assays.178NIHR Journals Library

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!