10.07.2015 Views

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Technology Assessment 2013 Vol. 17 No. 1Appendix 9 Final project descriptionProject titleCost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> diagnostic strategies for suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Planned investigationResearch objectives1. To estimate the diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction <strong>and</strong> prognostic accuracy for cardiacevents <strong>of</strong> biomarkers used to investigate suspected ACS.2. To estimate the cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> biomarker strategies for investigating suspected ACS.3. To estimate the diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease (CAD) <strong>and</strong> prognostic accuracy forcardiac events <strong>of</strong> multislice CT coronary angiography <strong>and</strong> exercise ECG in patients with suspected ACS.4. To estimate the cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> multislice CT coronary angiography <strong>and</strong> exercise ECG forinvestigating patients with troponin-negative suspected ACS.5. To identify the critical areas <strong>of</strong> uncertainty in the management <strong>of</strong> suspected ACS, where future primaryresearch would produce the most benefit.Existing researchACS typically occurs when a patient with CAD develops obstruction <strong>of</strong> their heart arteries. This can lead tomyocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, arrhythmia, cardiac arrest <strong>and</strong> death. ACS has 6-month mortality<strong>of</strong> up to 20% [2] <strong>and</strong> a fifth <strong>of</strong> patients are rehospitalised within 6 months <strong>of</strong> their initial admission [3].ACS usually presents as chest pain <strong>and</strong> must be differentiated from other common causes <strong>of</strong> chest pain,such as muscular pain, gastro-oesophageal pain <strong>and</strong> anxiety. Differentiation is difficult because clinicalassessment is unreliable <strong>and</strong> the ECG may be normal in the presence <strong>of</strong> ACS. Patients with suspected ACStherefore constitute a large <strong>and</strong> varied population, many <strong>of</strong> whom will not have ACS or CAD, but havenon-cardiac causes for their chest pain. Accurate identification <strong>of</strong> ACS <strong>and</strong> CAD are therefore required toguide subsequent intervention.Suspected ACS represents a substantial health-care problem <strong>and</strong> investigation represents a substantialchallenge. Chest pain is responsible for around 700,000 emergency department attendances in Engl<strong>and</strong><strong>and</strong> Wales [4], with the main reason for attendance being suspected ACS. Hospital Episodes Statistics forEngl<strong>and</strong> (2006–7) showed 158,342 emergency admissions with ischaemic heart disease, accounting foralmost 1 million bed-days. In addition, many <strong>of</strong> the 351,716 emergency admissions classified as ‘signs <strong>and</strong>symptoms involving the circulatory or respiratory system’ will have been due to suspicion <strong>of</strong> ACS.Investigation for suspected ACS has two main elements: (1) diagnosis <strong>of</strong> MI, <strong>and</strong> (2) diagnosis <strong>of</strong>underlying CAD. Diagnosis <strong>of</strong> unstable angina is another consideration but <strong>of</strong> decreasing importance forreasons outlined below.Diagnosis <strong>of</strong> MIThe term MI usually refers to NSTEMI in the context <strong>of</strong> investigating suspected ACS. Although ST-elevationMI is included in the definition <strong>of</strong> ACS it can usually be identified on the presenting ECG <strong>and</strong> thus doesnot form part <strong>of</strong> the typical diagnostic challenge <strong>of</strong> suspected ACS, although ECG interpretation <strong>and</strong>differentiation from other causes <strong>of</strong> ST elevation may present separate challenges.© Queen’s Printer <strong>and</strong> Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2013. This work was produced by Goodacre et al. under the terms <strong>of</strong> a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary <strong>of</strong> Statefor Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes <strong>of</strong> private research <strong>and</strong> study <strong>and</strong> extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in pr<strong>of</strong>essional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made <strong>and</strong> the reproduction is not associated with any form <strong>of</strong> advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials <strong>and</strong> Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University <strong>of</strong> Southampton SciencePark, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!