Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 445. Laufer E, Wahi S, Lim YL. Cost-effectiveness and accuracy of exercise stress echocardiography in thenon-invasive diagnosis of coronary heart disease. Aust NZ J Med 2000;30:660–7.46. Lazoura O, Kanavou T, Vassiou K, Gkiokas S, Fezoulidis IV, Lazoura O, et al. Myocardial bridgingevaluated with 128-multi detector computed tomography coronary angiography. Surg Radiol Anat2010;32:45–50.47. Lee HY, Yoo SM, White CS. Coronary CT angiography in emergency department patients with acutechest pain: triple rule-out protocol versus dedicated coronary CT angiography. Int J CardiovascImaging 2009;25:319–26.48. Lehman SJ, Schlett CL, Bamberg F, Lee H, Donnelly P, Shturman L, et al. Assessment of coronaryplaque progression in coronary computed tomography angiography using a semiquantitative score.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:1262–70.49. Lehman SJ, Abbara S, Cury RC, Nagurney JT, Hsu J, Goela A, et al. Significance of cardiac computedtomography incidental findings in acute chest pain. Am J Med 2009;122:543–9.50. Leischik R, Dworrak B, Littwitz H, lker H, Leischik R, Dworrak B, et al. Prognostic significance ofexercise stress echocardiography in 3329 outpatients (5-year longitudinal study). Int J Cardiol2007;119:297–305.51. Leschka S, Scheffel H. Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of64-MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1583–90.52. Leschka S, Koepfli P, Husmann L, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Gaemperli O, et al. Myocardial bridging:Depiction rate and morphology at CT coronary angiography: comparison with conventionalcoronary angiography. Radiology 2008;246:754–62.53. Lessick J, Mutlak D, Rispler S, Ghersin E, Dragu R, Litmanovich D, et al. Comparison of multidetectorcomputed tomography versus echocardiography for assessing regional left ventricular function. AmJ Cardiol 2005;96:1011–15.54. Lewandowski MS. Searching for the optimal strategy for the diagnosis of stable coronary arterydisease. Cost-effectiveness of the new algorithm. Cardiol J 2007;14:544–51.55. Lewandowski MS. The implication of probability analysis for diagnosis of stable coronary arterydisease. Comparison of non-invasive diagnostic tests. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2004;111:171–82.56. Lin FY, Zentko SE, Min JK. The Prognostic Value of Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography.Cardiol Clin 2009;27:573.57. Ling Z-QZ. The application and advantages of multi-slice CT in the diagnosis of myocardial bridging.Chin J Radiol 2008;42:498–502.58. Lorenzoni R, Cortigiani L, Magnani M, Desideri A, Bigi R, Manes C, et al. Cost-effectivenessanalysis of noninvasive strategies to evaluate patients with chest pain. J Am Soc Echocardiogr2003;16:1287–91.59. Lu GM, Zhang LJ, Guo H, Huang W, Merges RD, Lu GM, et al. Comparison of myocardial bridgingby dual-source CT with conventional coronary angiography. Circ J 2008;72:1079–85.60. Maffei E, Palumbo A. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography in ahigh risk symptomatic population. Ateneo Parmense Acta Biomed 2010;81:47–53.61. Marangelli V, Iliceto S, Piccinni G, Demartino G, Sorgente L, Rizzon P. Detection of coronary-arterydisease by digital stress echocardiography: comparison of exercise, transesophageal atrial-pacingand dipyridamole-echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:117–24.62. Mark D. Contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis ofcoronary artery stenosis or for evaluation of acute chest pain. Rockville, MD: Blue Cross and BlueShield Association, Technology Evaluation Center, AHRQ; 2006. p. 18.154NIHR Journals Library
DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Technology Assessment 2013 Vol. 17 No. 163. Marwick TH, Nemec JJ, Pashkow FJ, Stewart WJ, Salcedo EE. Accuracy and limitations of exerciseechocardiography in a routine clinical setting. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:74–81.64. Marwick TH, Shaw L, Case C, Vasey C, Thomas JD. Clinical and economic impact ofexercise electrocardiography and exercise echocardiography in clinical practice. Eur Heart J2003;24:1153–63.65. Marwick THA. Exercise echocardiography is an accurate and cost-efficient technique for detectionof coronary artery disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:335–41.66. Matsumoto N, Nagao K, Hirayama A, Sato Y. Non-Invasive assessment and clinical strategy of stablecoronary artery disease by magnetic resonance imaging, multislice computed tomography andmyocardial perfusion SPECT. Circ J 2010;74:34–40.67. Matsumoto N, Sato Y, Yoda S, Nakano Y, Kunimasa T, Matsuo S, et al. Prognostic value of nonobstructiveCT low-dense coronary artery plaques detected by multislice computed tomography.Circ J 2007;71:1898–903.68. May JM, Shuman WP, Strote JN, Branch KR, Mitsumori LM, Lockhart DW, et al. Low-risk patientswith chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography mayreduce length of stay and hospital charges. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:150–4.69. Medina HMR. What is the value of CT angiography for patients with acute chest pain? Curr TreatOptions Cardiovasc Med 2010;12:10–20.70. Meijboom WB. 64-Slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high,intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol2007;50:1469–75.71. Meijboom WBM. 64-Slice CT coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation acutecoronary syndrome. Heart 2007;93:1386–92.72. Mikheev NN, Zharikova MV. Value of various criteria of assessment of a test in stressEchocardiography in diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Kardiologiya 2006;46:15–19.73. Min JK, Hachamovitch R, Rozanski A, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Gibbons R, et al. Clinical benefits ofnoninvasive testing: coronary computed tomography angiography as a test case. JACC CardiovascImaging 2010;3:305–15.74. Min JK, Gilmore A, Budoff MJ, Berman DS, O’Day K. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiographyversus myocardial perfusion SPECT for evaluation of patients with chest pain and no knowncoronary artery disease. Radiology 2010;254:801–8.75. Min JK, Kang N, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, Robinson M, Lin F, et al. Costs and clinical outcomesafter coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease:comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT (Provisional abstract). Radiology 2008;249:62–70.76. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Gilmore A, Kang N, Min JK, et al. Costs and clinical outcomes inindividuals without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographicangiography from an analysis of Medicare category III transaction codes. Am J Cardiol2008;102:672–8.77. Min JK, Robinson M, Shaw LJ, Lin F, Legorreta AP, Gilmore A, et al. Differences in episode-basedcare costs for multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus myocardialperfusion imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Med Econ 2008;11:327–40.78. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, Okin PM, Weinsaft JW, Russo DJ, et al. Prognostic value ofmultidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. JAm Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1161–70.© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2013. This work was produced by Goodacre et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of Statefor Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton SciencePark, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.155
Page 1:
Health Technology AssessmentVOLUME
Page 7:
DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Techno
Page 10 and 11:
ContentsAppendix 5 Expected discoun
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19:
Page 22 and 23:
BackgroundTABLE 1 Hospital admissio
Page 24 and 25:
Background2. investigation of the c
Page 26 and 27:
BackgroundComputed tomographic coro
Page 28 and 29:
Research questionsiii. the diagnost
Page 30 and 31:
Assessment of diagnostic and progno
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124: DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Techno
Page 125: DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Techno
Page 128 and 129: Discussionspecificity were 62% (95%
Page 130 and 131: Discussionneed for revascularisatio
Page 132 and 133: Discussionchanges in sensitivity an
Page 134 and 135: Discussionuncertainty about these p
Page 136 and 137: Discussiontroponin assays have bett
Page 138 and 139: ConclusionsSuggested research prior
Page 154 and 155: Appendix 144. heart-type fatty acid
Page 156 and 157: Appendix 1135. interleukin 33.mp. (
Page 158 and 159: Appendix 147. 37 and 45 (529)48. li
Page 164 and 165: Appendix 313. Fernandez Portales JG
Page 166 and 167: Appendix 346. Luscher MS, Ravkilde
Page 168 and 169: Appendix 316. Rao SV, Ohman EM, Gra
Page 198 and 199: Appendix 9Clinical diagnosis of NST
Page 200 and 201: Appendix 9respectively. Exercise EC
Page 202 and 203: Appendix 93. Two reviewers will mak
Page 204 and 205: Appendix 9The methodology used in t
Page 206 and 207: Appendix 9ES (Information Resources
Page 208: Appendix 923. Westwood ME, Whiting
show all

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?