Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Appendix 445. Laufer E, Wahi S, Lim YL. Cost-effectiveness and accuracy of exercise stress echocardiography in thenon-invasive diagnosis of coronary heart disease. Aust NZ J Med 2000;30:660–7.46. Lazoura O, Kanavou T, Vassiou K, Gkiokas S, Fezoulidis IV, Lazoura O, et al. Myocardial bridgingevaluated with 128-multi detector computed tomography coronary angiography. Surg Radiol Anat2010;32:45–50.47. Lee HY, Yoo SM, White CS. Coronary CT angiography in emergency department patients with acutechest pain: triple rule-out protocol versus dedicated coronary CT angiography. Int J CardiovascImaging 2009;25:319–26.48. Lehman SJ, Schlett CL, Bamberg F, Lee H, Donnelly P, Shturman L, et al. Assessment of coronaryplaque progression in coronary computed tomography angiography using a semiquantitative score.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:1262–70.49. Lehman SJ, Abbara S, Cury RC, Nagurney JT, Hsu J, Goela A, et al. Significance of cardiac computedtomography incidental findings in acute chest pain. Am J Med 2009;122:543–9.50. Leischik R, Dworrak B, Littwitz H, lker H, Leischik R, Dworrak B, et al. Prognostic significance ofexercise stress echocardiography in 3329 outpatients (5-year longitudinal study). Int J Cardiol2007;119:297–305.51. Leschka S, Scheffel H. Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of64-MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1583–90.52. Leschka S, Koepfli P, Husmann L, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Gaemperli O, et al. Myocardial bridging:Depiction rate and morphology at CT coronary angiography: comparison with conventionalcoronary angiography. Radiology 2008;246:754–62.53. Lessick J, Mutlak D, Rispler S, Ghersin E, Dragu R, Litmanovich D, et al. Comparison of multidetectorcomputed tomography versus echocardiography for assessing regional left ventricular function. AmJ Cardiol 2005;96:1011–15.54. Lewandowski MS. Searching for the optimal strategy for the diagnosis of stable coronary arterydisease. Cost-effectiveness of the new algorithm. Cardiol J 2007;14:544–51.55. Lewandowski MS. The implication of probability analysis for diagnosis of stable coronary arterydisease. Comparison of non-invasive diagnostic tests. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2004;111:171–82.56. Lin FY, Zentko SE, Min JK. The Prognostic Value of Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography.Cardiol Clin 2009;27:573.57. Ling Z-QZ. The application and advantages of multi-slice CT in the diagnosis of myocardial bridging.Chin J Radiol 2008;42:498–502.58. Lorenzoni R, Cortigiani L, Magnani M, Desideri A, Bigi R, Manes C, et al. Cost-effectivenessanalysis of noninvasive strategies to evaluate patients with chest pain. J Am Soc Echocardiogr2003;16:1287–91.59. Lu GM, Zhang LJ, Guo H, Huang W, Merges RD, Lu GM, et al. Comparison of myocardial bridgingby dual-source CT with conventional coronary angiography. Circ J 2008;72:1079–85.60. Maffei E, Palumbo A. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography in ahigh risk symptomatic population. Ateneo Parmense Acta Biomed 2010;81:47–53.61. Marangelli V, Iliceto S, Piccinni G, Demartino G, Sorgente L, Rizzon P. Detection of coronary-arterydisease by digital stress echocardiography: comparison of exercise, transesophageal atrial-pacingand dipyridamole-echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:117–24.62. Mark D. Contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis ofcoronary artery stenosis or for evaluation of acute chest pain. Rockville, MD: Blue Cross and BlueShield Association, Technology Evaluation Center, AHRQ; 2006. p. 18.154NIHR Journals Library