Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Technology Assessment 2013 Vol. 17 No. 1Appendix 4 Studies excluded from the computedtomographic coronary angiography and exerciseelectrocardiography review1. Achenbach S, Daniel WG. Cardiac imaging in the patient with chest pain: coronary CT angiography.Heart 2010;96:1241–6.2. Al-Mallah M, Alqaisi F, Arafeh A, Lakhdar R, Al-Tamsheh R, Ananthasubramaniam K. Long termfavorable prognostic value of negative treadmill echocardiogram in the setting of abnormaltreadmill electrocardiogram: a 95 month median duration follow-up study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr2008;21:1018–22.3. Bamberg F, Truong QA, Blankstein R, Nasir K, Lee H, Rogers IS, et al. Usefulness of age andgender in the early triage of patients with acute chest pain having cardiac computed tomographicangiography. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1165–70.4. Beigel R, Oieru D, Goitein O, Chouraqui P, Konen E, Shamiss A, et al. Usefulness of Routine Useof Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography in the “Fast Track” Evaluation of Patients WithAcute Chest Pain. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:1481–6.5. Bokhari S.Shahzad. Superiority of exercise myocardial perfusion imaging compared with the exerciseECG in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis 2008;19:399–404.6. Budoff MJD. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector Row coronary computed tomographicangiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary arterydisease. Results from the Prospective Multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary ComputedTomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) Trial. J AmColl Cardiol 2008;52:1724–32.7. Butler J, Shapiro M, Reiber J, Sheth T, Ferencik M, Kurtz EG, et al. Extent and distribution ofcoronary artery disease: A comparative study of invasive versus noninvasive angiography withcomputed angiography. Am Heart J 2007;153:378–84.8. Carrascosa PM, Capunay CM, Parodi JC, Padilla LT, Johnson P, Carrascosa JM, et al. General utilitiesof multislice tomography in the cardiac field. Herz 2003;28:44–51.9. Chang AM, Shofer FS, Weiner MG, Synnestvedt MB, Litt HI, Baxt WG, et al. Actual financialcomparison of four strategies to evaluate patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. AcadEmerg Med 2008;15:649–55.10. Chang SA, Il Choi S, Choi EK, Kim HK, Jung JW, Chun EJ, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multidetectorcomputed tomography as an initial diagnostic approach in patients with acute chest pain. AmHeart J 2008;156:375–83.11. Chen LC, Ding PYA, Chen JW, Wu MH, Liu JC, Lan GY, et al. Coronary artery calcium determinedby electron beam computed tomography for predicting angiographic coronary artery disease inmoderate- to high-risk Chinese patients. Cardiology 2001;95:183–9.12. Chow BJ, Wells GA, Chen L, Yam Y, Galiwango P, Abraham A, et al. Prognostic value of 64-slicecardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and leftventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1017–28.13. Coles D, Wilde P, Rogers C, Oberhoff M, Karsch K, Baumbach A. The diagnostic accuracy of noninvasivemultislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients presenting with asuspected acute coronary syndrome. Circulation 2005;112(17S):U743.© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2013. This work was produced by Goodacre et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of Statefor Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton SciencePark, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.151