Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...
Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...
Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Technology Assessment 2013 Vol. 17 No. 1Appendix 2 Methodology checklist: the modifiedQUADAS tool for studies <strong>of</strong> diagnostic test accuracyChecklist completed by:Circle one option for each questionWas the spectrum <strong>of</strong> participants representative <strong>of</strong> the patients who willreceive the test in practice? (i.e. patients presenting to the emergency servicesor department with chest pain <strong>and</strong> suspected ACS)Was the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard likely to classify the target condition correctly? (i.e.was it based on the universal definition <strong>of</strong> MI?)Was the period between performance <strong>of</strong> the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> the indextest short enough to be reasonably sure that the target condition did notchange between the two tests? (i.e. were the two tests both conducted withinthe 12-hour time frame required for the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard?)Did the whole sample or a r<strong>and</strong>om selection <strong>of</strong> the sample receive verificationusing the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard?Did participants receive the same reference st<strong>and</strong>ard regardless <strong>of</strong> the indextest result?Was the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard independent <strong>of</strong> the index test? (i.e. the index testdid not form part <strong>of</strong> the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard)Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> thereference st<strong>and</strong>ard?Were the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard results interpreted without knowledge <strong>of</strong> theresults <strong>of</strong> the index test?Yes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AWere uninterpretable, indeterminate or intermediate test results reported? a Yes No Unclear N/AN/A, not applicable.a This criterion was included in the quality assessment <strong>of</strong> the CTCA/ETT studies, as there was a risk <strong>of</strong> uninterpretableresults from imaging in this <strong>review</strong>, which did not apply to the biomarkers <strong>review</strong>.Adapted from Whiting et al. 28© Queen’s Printer <strong>and</strong> Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2013. This work was produced by Goodacre et al. under the terms <strong>of</strong> a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary <strong>of</strong> Statefor Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes <strong>of</strong> private research <strong>and</strong> study <strong>and</strong> extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in pr<strong>of</strong>essional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made <strong>and</strong> the reproduction is not associated with any form <strong>of</strong> advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials <strong>and</strong> Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University <strong>of</strong> Southampton SciencePark, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.141