10.07.2015 Views

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Technology Assessment 2013 Vol. 17 No. 1Appendix 2 Methodology checklist: the modifiedQUADAS tool for studies <strong>of</strong> diagnostic test accuracyChecklist completed by:Circle one option for each questionWas the spectrum <strong>of</strong> participants representative <strong>of</strong> the patients who willreceive the test in practice? (i.e. patients presenting to the emergency servicesor department with chest pain <strong>and</strong> suspected ACS)Was the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard likely to classify the target condition correctly? (i.e.was it based on the universal definition <strong>of</strong> MI?)Was the period between performance <strong>of</strong> the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> the indextest short enough to be reasonably sure that the target condition did notchange between the two tests? (i.e. were the two tests both conducted withinthe 12-hour time frame required for the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard?)Did the whole sample or a r<strong>and</strong>om selection <strong>of</strong> the sample receive verificationusing the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard?Did participants receive the same reference st<strong>and</strong>ard regardless <strong>of</strong> the indextest result?Was the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard independent <strong>of</strong> the index test? (i.e. the index testdid not form part <strong>of</strong> the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard)Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> thereference st<strong>and</strong>ard?Were the reference st<strong>and</strong>ard results interpreted without knowledge <strong>of</strong> theresults <strong>of</strong> the index test?Yes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AYes No Unclear N/AWere uninterpretable, indeterminate or intermediate test results reported? a Yes No Unclear N/AN/A, not applicable.a This criterion was included in the quality assessment <strong>of</strong> the CTCA/ETT studies, as there was a risk <strong>of</strong> uninterpretableresults from imaging in this <strong>review</strong>, which did not apply to the biomarkers <strong>review</strong>.Adapted from Whiting et al. 28© Queen’s Printer <strong>and</strong> Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2013. This work was produced by Goodacre et al. under the terms <strong>of</strong> a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary <strong>of</strong> Statefor Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes <strong>of</strong> private research <strong>and</strong> study <strong>and</strong> extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in pr<strong>of</strong>essional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made <strong>and</strong> the reproduction is not associated with any form <strong>of</strong> advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials <strong>and</strong> Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University <strong>of</strong> Southampton SciencePark, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!