Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Technology Assessment 2013 Vol. 17 No. 1161. Department of Health (DoH). Tariff information: confirmation of payment by results (PbR)arrangements for 2009–10. London: DoH; 2011.162. Stuart RJ, Jr, Ellestad MH. National survey of exercise stress testing facilities. Chest 1980;77:94–7.163. Stein SC, Hurst RW, Sonnad SS. Meta-analysis of cranial CT scans in children. A mathematical modelto predict radiation-induced tumors. Pediatr Neurosurg 2011:44:448–57.164. Shehadi WH. Adverse reactions to intravascularly administered contrast media. A comprehensivestudy based on a prospective survey. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1975;124:145–52.165. Cashman JD, McCredie J, Henry DA. Intravenous contrast media: use and associated mortality. MedJ Aust 1991;155:618–23.166. Johnson LW, Krone R. Cardiac catheterization 1991: a report of the Registry of the Society forCardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;28:219–20.167. Atthappan G, Habib M, Ponniah T, Jeyaseelan L. Multi-detector computerized tomographyangiography for evaluation of acute chest pain: a meta analysis and systematic review of literature.Int J Cardiol 2010;141;132–40.168. Savino G, Herzog C, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. 64 slice cardiovascular CT in the EmergencyDepartment: concepts and first experiences. Emerg Radiol 2006;111:481–96.169. Gallagher MJ, Ross MA, Raff GL, Goldstein JA, O’Neill WW, O’Neil B. The diagnostic accuracy of64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging inemergency department low-risk chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49:125–36.170. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F, Pena A, Ferencik M, Chae CU, et al. Coronary multidetectorcomputed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation2006;114:2251–60.171. White CS, Kuo D, Keleman M, Jain V, Musk A, Zaidi E, et al. Chest pain evaluation in theemergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? AJR Am J Roentgenol2005;185:533–40.172. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, Schliamser JE, Yaniv N, Ammar R, et al. Usefulness of 64-slicemultidetector computed tomography in diagnostic triage of patients with chest pain and negativeor nondiagnostic exercise treadmill test result. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:925–9.173. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CAG, Mollet NR, Pugliese F, Weustinck AC, van Pelt N, et al. 64-slicecomputed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretestprobability of significant coron artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1469–75.174. Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP, Mitchell JD, Villines TC. Prognostic value of cardiaccomputed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol2011;57:1237–47.175. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Guide to the methods of technology appraisals.London: NICE; 2008. URL: www.nice.org.uk/media/B52/A7/TAMethodsGuideUpdatedJune2008.pdf.© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2013. This work was produced by Goodacre et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of Statefor Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton SciencePark, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.131