Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References144. Kerns JR, Shaub TF. Emergency cardiac stress testing in the evaluation of emergency departmentpatients with atypical chest pain. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:794–8.145. Kirk JD, Turnipseed S, Lewis WR, Amsterdam EA. Evaluation of chest pain in low-risk patientspresenting to the emergency department: the role of immediate exercise testing. Ann Emerg Med1998;32:1–7.146. Lewis WR, Amsterdam EA. Utility and safety of immediate exercise testing of low-risk patientsadmitted to the hospital for suspected acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74:987–90.147. Polananczyk CA, Johnson PA, Hartley LH, Walls RM, Shaykevich S, Lee TH. Clinical correlates andprognostic significance of early negative exercise tolerance test in patients with acute chest painseen in the hospital emergency department. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:288–92.148. Ramakrishna G, Milavetz JJ, Zinmeister AR, Farkouh ME, Evans RW, Allison TG, et al. Effect ofexercise treadmill testing and stress imaging on the triage of patients with chest pain. Mayo ClinProc 2005;80:322–9.149. Sarullo FM, Di Pasquale P, Orlando G, Buffa G, Cicero S, Schillaci AM. Utility and safety of immediateexercise testing of low-risk patients admitted to hospital with acute chest pain. Int J Cardiol2000;75:239–43.150. Tsakonis JS, Shesser R, Rosenthal R, Bittar GD, Smith M, Wasserman AG. Safety of immediatetreadmill testing in selected emergency department patients with chest pain: A preliminary report.Am J Emerg Med 1991;9:557–9.151. Laudon DA, Behrenbeck TR, Wood CM, Bailey KR, Callahan CM, Breen JF, et al. Computedtomographic coronary artery calcium assessment for evaluating chest pain in the emergencydepartment: long-term outcome of a prospective blind study. Mayo Clinic Proc 2010;85:314–22.152. Goldman L, Cook EF, Brand DA, Lee TH, Rouan GW, Weisberg MC, et al. A computer protocol topredict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain. N Engl J Med1988;318:797–803.153. Goodacre SW, Bradburn M, Cross E, Collinson PO, Gray A, Hall AS. The Randomised Assessmentof Treatment using Panel Assay of Cardiac Markers (RATPAC) trial: a randomised controlled trial ofpoint-of-care cardiac markers in the emergency department. Heart 2011;97:190–6.154. Keller T, Zeller T, Ojeda FM, Tzikas S, Lillpopp L, Sinning CR, et al. Serial changes in highly sensitivetroponin I assay and early diagnosis of myocardial infarction. JAMA 2011;306:2684–93.155. Mills NL. Implementation of a sensitive troponin I assay and risk of recurrent myocardial infarctionand death in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 2011;305:1210–16.156. Polanczyk CA, Kuntz KM, Sacks DB, Johnson PA, Lee TH. Emergency department triage strategies foracute chest pain using creatine kinase-MB and troponin I assays: a cost-effectiveness analysis. AnnIntern Med 1999;131:909–18.157. Ward S, Lloyd JM, Pandor A, Holmes M, Ara R, Ryan A, et al. A systematic review and economicevaluation of statins for the prevention of coronary events. Health Technol Assess 2007;11(14).158. Office for National Statistics (ONS). Interim Life Tables 2006–08. London: ONS; 2008.159. Ara R, Brazier J. Health related quality of life by age, gender or history of cardiovascular disease:results from the Health Survey for England (2003 and 2006). Discussion paper 09/12. Sheffield:University of Sheffield; 2009.160. Fitzgerald P, Goodacre SW, Cross E, Dixon S. Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care biomarkerassessment for suspected myocardial infarction: the randomized assessment of treatment usingpanel assay of cardiac markers (RATPAC) Trial. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:488–95.130NIHR Journals Library
DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Technology Assessment 2013 Vol. 17 No. 1161. Department of Health (DoH). Tariff information: confirmation of payment by results (PbR)arrangements for 2009–10. London: DoH; 2011.162. Stuart RJ, Jr, Ellestad MH. National survey of exercise stress testing facilities. Chest 1980;77:94–7.163. Stein SC, Hurst RW, Sonnad SS. Meta-analysis of cranial CT scans in children. A mathematical modelto predict radiation-induced tumors. Pediatr Neurosurg 2011:44:448–57.164. Shehadi WH. Adverse reactions to intravascularly administered contrast media. A comprehensivestudy based on a prospective survey. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1975;124:145–52.165. Cashman JD, McCredie J, Henry DA. Intravenous contrast media: use and associated mortality. MedJ Aust 1991;155:618–23.166. Johnson LW, Krone R. Cardiac catheterization 1991: a report of the Registry of the Society forCardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;28:219–20.167. Atthappan G, Habib M, Ponniah T, Jeyaseelan L. Multi-detector computerized tomographyangiography for evaluation of acute chest pain: a meta analysis and systematic review of literature.Int J Cardiol 2010;141;132–40.168. Savino G, Herzog C, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. 64 slice cardiovascular CT in the EmergencyDepartment: concepts and first experiences. Emerg Radiol 2006;111:481–96.169. Gallagher MJ, Ross MA, Raff GL, Goldstein JA, O’Neill WW, O’Neil B. The diagnostic accuracy of64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging inemergency department low-risk chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49:125–36.170. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F, Pena A, Ferencik M, Chae CU, et al. Coronary multidetectorcomputed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation2006;114:2251–60.171. White CS, Kuo D, Keleman M, Jain V, Musk A, Zaidi E, et al. Chest pain evaluation in theemergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? AJR Am J Roentgenol2005;185:533–40.172. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, Schliamser JE, Yaniv N, Ammar R, et al. Usefulness of 64-slicemultidetector computed tomography in diagnostic triage of patients with chest pain and negativeor nondiagnostic exercise treadmill test result. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:925–9.173. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CAG, Mollet NR, Pugliese F, Weustinck AC, van Pelt N, et al. 64-slicecomputed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretestprobability of significant coron artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1469–75.174. Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP, Mitchell JD, Villines TC. Prognostic value of cardiaccomputed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol2011;57:1237–47.175. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Guide to the methods of technology appraisals.London: NICE; 2008. URL: www.nice.org.uk/media/B52/A7/TAMethodsGuideUpdatedJune2008.pdf.© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2013. This work was produced by Goodacre et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of Statefor Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton SciencePark, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.131
Page 1:
Health Technology AssessmentVOLUME
Page 7:
DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Techno
Page 10 and 11:
ContentsAppendix 5 Expected discoun
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19:
Page 22 and 23:
BackgroundTABLE 1 Hospital admissio
Page 24 and 25:
Background2. investigation of the c
Page 26 and 27:
BackgroundComputed tomographic coro
Page 28 and 29:
Research questionsiii. the diagnost
Page 30 and 31:
Assessment of diagnostic and progno
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100: DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Techno
Page 125: DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Techno
Page 128 and 129: Discussionspecificity were 62% (95%
Page 130 and 131: Discussionneed for revascularisatio
Page 132 and 133: Discussionchanges in sensitivity an
Page 134 and 135: Discussionuncertainty about these p
Page 136 and 137: Discussiontroponin assays have bett
Page 138 and 139: ConclusionsSuggested research prior
Page 154 and 155: Appendix 144. heart-type fatty acid
Page 156 and 157: Appendix 1135. interleukin 33.mp. (
Page 158 and 159: Appendix 147. 37 and 45 (529)48. li
Page 164 and 165: Appendix 313. Fernandez Portales JG
Page 166 and 167: Appendix 346. Luscher MS, Ravkilde
Page 168 and 169: Appendix 316. Rao SV, Ohman EM, Gra
Page 198 and 199: Appendix 9Clinical diagnosis of NST
Page 200 and 201:
Appendix 9respectively. Exercise EC
Page 202 and 203:
Appendix 93. Two reviewers will mak
Page 204 and 205:
Appendix 9The methodology used in t
Page 206 and 207:
Appendix 9ES (Information Resources
Page 208:
Appendix 923. Westwood ME, Whiting
show all

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?