Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

DOI: 10.3310/hta17010 Health Technology Assessment 2013 Vol. 17 No. 1129. Sato Y, Matsumoto N, Ichikawa M, Kunimasa T, Iida K, Yoda S, et al. Efficacy of multislice computedtomography for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Circ J2005;69:1047–51.130. Tsai IC, Lee T, Lee WL, Tsao CR, Tsai WL, Chen MC, et al. Use of 40-detector row computedtomography before catheter coronary angiography to select early conservative versus earlyinvasive treatment for patients with low-risk acute coronary syndrome. J Comput Assist Tomogr2007;31:258–64.131. Goldstein JAG. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography forevaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:863–71.132. Hollander JE, Chang AM, Shofer FS, McCusker CM, Baxt WG, Litt HI. Coronary computedtomographic angiography for rapid discharge of low-risk patients with potential acute coronarysyndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2009;53:295–304.133. Hollander JE, Chang AM, Shofer FS, Collin MJ, Walsh KM, McCusker CM, et al. One-year outcomesfollowing coronary computerized tomographic angiography for evaluation of emergencydepartment patients with potential acute coronary syndrome. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16:693–8.134. Miller AH, Pepe PE, Peshok R, Bhore R, Yancy CY, Xuan L, et al. Is Coronary Computed TomographyAngiography a Resource Sparing Strategy in the Risk Stratification and Evaluation of Acute ChestPain? Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:458–67.135. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, Jaffe R, Karkabi B, Flugelman MY, et al. Usefulness of 64-slicecardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes andpredicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin.Circulation 2007;115:1762–8.136. Schlett CL, Banerji D, Siegel E, Bamberg F, Lehman SJ, Brady TJ, et al. Prognostic value ofCT angiography for major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain from theemergency department: 2-year outcomes of the ROMICAT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Imag2011;4:481–91.137. Shuman WP, May JM, Branch KR, Mitsumori LM, Strote JN, Green DE, et al. Negative ECG-gatedcardiac CT in patients with low-to-moderate risk chest pain in the emergency department: 1-yearfollow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:923–7.138. Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Diercks DB, Lewis WR, Turnipseed SD. Immediate exercise testing toevaluate low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. J Am CollCardiol 2002;40:251–6.139. deFilippi CR, Rosanio S, Tocchi M, Parmar RJ, Potter MA, Uretsky BF, et al. Randomized comparisonof a strategy of predischarge coronary angiography versus exercise testing in low-risk patients in achest pain unit: in-hospital and long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2042–9.140. Diercks DB, Gibler B, Liu T, Sayre MR, Storrow AB. Identification of patients at risk by graded exercisetesting in an emergency department chest pain center. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:289–92.141. Gomez MA, Anderson JL, Karagounis LA, Muhlestein JB, Mooers FB. An emergency departmentbasedprotocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: resultsof a randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:25–33.142. Goodacre S, Locker T, Arnold J, Angelini K, Morris F. Which diagnostic tests are most useful in achest pain unit protocol. BMC Emerg Med 2005:5:6.143. Jeetley P, Burden L, Senior R. Stress echocardiography is superior to exercise ECG in the riskstratification of patients presenting with acute chest pain with negative Troponin. Eur JEchocardiogr 2006;7:155–64.© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2013. This work was produced by Goodacre et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of Statefor Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journalsprovided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should beaddressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton SciencePark, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.129