10.07.2015 Views

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Assessment <strong>of</strong> cost-effectiveness evidencepatients managed in those locations, whereas patients with suspected ACS were likely to incur the sametrue costs regardless <strong>of</strong> their location within the hospital.The cost <strong>of</strong> index admission <strong>and</strong> treatment for MI <strong>and</strong> the costs <strong>of</strong> reinfarction were estimated as one<strong>of</strong>fcosts <strong>of</strong> £3587, based on national tariff for non-elective acute MI without complications. Length <strong>of</strong>hospital stay was determined from appropriate data sources, such as the RATPAC trial. 160Lifetime costs <strong>of</strong> survivors were estimated according to their age <strong>and</strong> sex, whether or not they had MI, <strong>and</strong>whether or not they suffered reinfarction . The lifetime costs for MI patients are estimated using the annualcosts from Ward et al. 157 <strong>and</strong> the discounted life expectancy <strong>of</strong> patients with MI were captured fromPolanczyk et al. 156 The cost <strong>of</strong> reinfarction was estimated as a one-<strong>of</strong>f cost <strong>of</strong> £3587, based on nationaltariff for non-elective acute MI without complications. 161 The costs are outlined in Tables 38 <strong>and</strong> 39.Modelling methodologyA model was developed using SIMUL8 s<strong>of</strong>tware (SIMUL8 Corporation, Boston, MA, USA) to explore thecosts <strong>and</strong> health outcomes associated with different diagnostic strategies. The <strong>analysis</strong> was conducted forpatients aged 40–75 years when presenting to the ED. The model takes a lifetime horizon with mean lifeexpectancy based on UK interim lifetables. 158 The <strong>economic</strong> perspective <strong>of</strong> the model is the NHS in Engl<strong>and</strong><strong>and</strong> Wales with the structure <strong>of</strong> the model shown in Figure 35. Figure 36 shows the diagnostic pathwayassociated with the 10-hour troponin test in the model, whereas Figure 37 shows the pathway associatedwith the combination <strong>of</strong> presentation biomarkers <strong>and</strong> 10-hour troponin testing.Model stabilityThe number <strong>of</strong> model runs determines the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the results for estimating the optimal managementstrategy. This uncertainty is a result <strong>of</strong> the r<strong>and</strong>om nature <strong>of</strong> some events (reinfarction <strong>and</strong> death) <strong>and</strong>accuracy can only be achieved by having sufficient numbers <strong>of</strong> model runs to account for these r<strong>and</strong>omoccurrences. We ran the model 100 times to estimate the costs <strong>and</strong> QALYs along with their 95% CIs foreach diagnostic strategy.TABLE 38 Cost estimates used in the modelStrategy Source Estimate (£) 95% CI (£)Admission for MI or reinfarctiontreatmentHospital stay (per hour) for testingNHS reference costs 161 3587 3000 to 4000NHS reference costs for general medical 22 20 to 30ward 161Troponin RATPAC 160 20 18 to 25Other biomarkers RATPAC 160 20 18 to 25TABLE 39 Lifetime costs <strong>of</strong> patients with MIAge (years) MI cost (£)30–44 4012.545–54 311555–64 221565–74 1530> 75 80088NIHR Journals Library

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!