10.07.2015 Views

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Assessment <strong>of</strong> diagnostic <strong>and</strong> prognostic accuracyStudy RT NT RC NC RRTsakonis 1991 150 0 4 0 19 6.97 (0.64 to 24.13)Lewis 1994 146 1 34 0 59 7.17 (0.91 to 23.42)Gomez 1996 141 0 3 0 41 7.63 (0.77 to 26.24)Kirk 1998 145 6 83 0 118 9.16 (2.71 to 32.96)Polanczyk 1998 147 12 81 4 195 7.48 (2.96 to 16.91)Sarullo 2000 149 1 79 0 111 7.25 (0.84 to 24.86)Amsterdam 2002 138 23 306 1 582 12.85 (5.74 to 50.49)Goodacre 2005 142 9 37 4 385 12.57 (5.74 to 35.79)Ramakrishna 2005 148 3 37 0 88 8.66 (2.01 to 33.19)Jeetley 2006 143 20 106 0 39 8.96 (2.72 to 32.07)Overall 8.45 (3.09 to 17.27)FIGURE 32 Meta-<strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> prognostic studies <strong>of</strong> exercise ECG: positive <strong>and</strong> inconclusive vs negative.Study RT NT RC NC RRTsakonis 1991 150 0 4 0 19 5.06 (0.28 to 29.22)Lewis 1994 146 1 12 0 81 7.75 (1.15 to 45.44)Gomez 1996 141 0 2 0 42 6.13 (0.33 to 38.91)Kirk 1998 145 6 28 0 173 17.36 (5.22 to 121.21)Sarullo 2000 149 1 57 0 133 5.98 (0.74 to 34.53)deFilippi 2001 139 5 9 1 110 17.18 (5.89 to 76.78)Amsterdam 2002 138 16 114 8 774 11.20 (5.59 to 24.42)Jeetley 2006 143 9 27 11 118 3.86 (1.71 to 9.86)Overall 8.00 (2.31 to 22.74)FIGURE 33 Meta-<strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> prognostic studies <strong>of</strong> exercise ECG: positive vs inconclusive <strong>and</strong> negative.0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.000.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.0080NIHR Journals Library

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!