10.07.2015 Views

(1979). Social Networks and Psychology. Connections, 2 - INSNA

(1979). Social Networks and Psychology. Connections, 2 - INSNA

(1979). Social Networks and Psychology. Connections, 2 - INSNA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 100 -THESIS SUMMARIESTHE CONTENT AND STRUCTURE OF FRIENDSHIP : AN ANALYSIS OF THE FRIENDSHIPS OF URBAN CAMEROONIANSMaureen FitzGeraZd (Ph .D . Thesis, 1978, Anthropology, Northwestern U .)The systematic study of friendship has been improved by the use of the concepts <strong>and</strong> methods of networkanalysis . However the precision of network methodology for such studies is not useful in <strong>and</strong> of itself .The underst<strong>and</strong>ing of friendship, its processes <strong>and</strong> implications necessitates placing such friendship networksin a larger social context <strong>and</strong> considering them in light of the major social forces of a particularsocial system .The data for this dissertation were collected in 1970 from interviews with 135 individuals living inYaounde, Cameroon, West Africa . They were asked to list all those they considered as friends, to order<strong>and</strong> rank their friends, to talk about the history of the friendships, <strong>and</strong> to give information on which oftheir friends knew each other .The method of path analysis from graph theory was used to describe the structural properties of thesefriendship networks . Close friends tend to be connected friends in the sense that close friends, more th<strong>and</strong>istant friends, are tied into ego's other friends independently of ego . This is shown to be true usingtwo indicators of connectivity : (1) the number of direct connections (defined as knowing) that a particularfriend of ego has with ego's other friends . (2) the position of a particular friends within a network offriends using shortest path analysis .There are two major types of networks . In type I (42% of all networks) each person in the networkis "reachable" by every other person in the network independently of the connection with ego . In type II(44% of all networks) most people are "reachable" but there were in addition, a number of isolated friends .Density, calculated by using only the direct connections of a network exclusive of ego's connection, wasalso calculated for each network . Independent business owners <strong>and</strong> lower level civil servants were thecategories of people who most frequently have connected networks with high density . The most extremelydisconnected networks (neither type I or type II) are confined to workers (especially the marginallyemployed <strong>and</strong> the unemployed) women <strong>and</strong> students . Thus there appears to be a relationship between the needs<strong>and</strong> resources of ones' work <strong>and</strong> the morphology of ones' friendship network .I suggest that the absence of regular access to resources makes it difficult to maintain tight networks .Indeed, a recurring point made in the analysis is that there is an important material component that underliesfriendship . The main emphasis in peoples' concept of friendship is that friendship functions to maintain<strong>and</strong> strengthen a person's material well being as opposed to moral or psychological well being . Thismay or may not be recognized in their ideology about friendship . In the context of Cameroon, rapid social<strong>and</strong> economic change differentiates the population <strong>and</strong> many people live in precarious <strong>and</strong> limited materialcircumstances . Tensions in friendships occur around this resource shortage <strong>and</strong> the exchange of goods <strong>and</strong>services is a highly salient <strong>and</strong> recognized component of friendship .Affect, in the sense of a "liked quality" of the person, is deemphasized in peoples' ideology offriendship . However, affect, as "feelings of closeness", is demonstrated by informants by the ease withwhich they rank friends according to this criterion . Close friends tend to be old friends or at leastfriendships that have developed out of a long acquaintance . Over time relationships accumulate roles sothat close friendships are also more multiplex . Friends are derived out of the contexts of social life .Friends in this context were also workmates, neighbours, kin, schoolmates, team mates or attendants of thesame church . Friendships may involve multiple contexts of association <strong>and</strong> interaction . Work is animportant locus of friendship although seldom so for close friends . Higher civil servants, professionals,managers <strong>and</strong> entrepreneurs tend to have work as a locus in their friendships . It is concluded thatstability of the job was the most important factor in explaining how friendships that were initiated viathe work locus were maintained <strong>and</strong> developed through time <strong>and</strong> often over distance .It is important to underst<strong>and</strong> the way in which work situations mould different patterns of friendship .Barnes used the term "network" to describe ties between "persons who accord approximately equal status toone another, <strong>and</strong> it is these ties that constitute the class system" . These particular eogcentric networksfrom Cameroon also demonstrate status homogeneity, defined by occupational status, that I maintain constitutesan indicator of an emerging class system . The networks also tend to be ethnically homogeneous .Thus in this urban African context, the arena of friendship is segmented <strong>and</strong> friendship choices are limitedby both the ethnic <strong>and</strong> occupational structure of the society .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!