- 100 -THESIS SUMMARIESTHE CONTENT AND STRUCTURE OF FRIENDSHIP : AN ANALYSIS OF THE FRIENDSHIPS OF URBAN CAMEROONIANSMaureen FitzGeraZd (Ph .D . Thesis, 1978, Anthropology, Northwestern U .)The systematic study of friendship has been improved by the use of the concepts <strong>and</strong> methods of networkanalysis . However the precision of network methodology for such studies is not useful in <strong>and</strong> of itself .The underst<strong>and</strong>ing of friendship, its processes <strong>and</strong> implications necessitates placing such friendship networksin a larger social context <strong>and</strong> considering them in light of the major social forces of a particularsocial system .The data for this dissertation were collected in 1970 from interviews with 135 individuals living inYaounde, Cameroon, West Africa . They were asked to list all those they considered as friends, to order<strong>and</strong> rank their friends, to talk about the history of the friendships, <strong>and</strong> to give information on which oftheir friends knew each other .The method of path analysis from graph theory was used to describe the structural properties of thesefriendship networks . Close friends tend to be connected friends in the sense that close friends, more th<strong>and</strong>istant friends, are tied into ego's other friends independently of ego . This is shown to be true usingtwo indicators of connectivity : (1) the number of direct connections (defined as knowing) that a particularfriend of ego has with ego's other friends . (2) the position of a particular friends within a network offriends using shortest path analysis .There are two major types of networks . In type I (42% of all networks) each person in the networkis "reachable" by every other person in the network independently of the connection with ego . In type II(44% of all networks) most people are "reachable" but there were in addition, a number of isolated friends .Density, calculated by using only the direct connections of a network exclusive of ego's connection, wasalso calculated for each network . Independent business owners <strong>and</strong> lower level civil servants were thecategories of people who most frequently have connected networks with high density . The most extremelydisconnected networks (neither type I or type II) are confined to workers (especially the marginallyemployed <strong>and</strong> the unemployed) women <strong>and</strong> students . Thus there appears to be a relationship between the needs<strong>and</strong> resources of ones' work <strong>and</strong> the morphology of ones' friendship network .I suggest that the absence of regular access to resources makes it difficult to maintain tight networks .Indeed, a recurring point made in the analysis is that there is an important material component that underliesfriendship . The main emphasis in peoples' concept of friendship is that friendship functions to maintain<strong>and</strong> strengthen a person's material well being as opposed to moral or psychological well being . Thismay or may not be recognized in their ideology about friendship . In the context of Cameroon, rapid social<strong>and</strong> economic change differentiates the population <strong>and</strong> many people live in precarious <strong>and</strong> limited materialcircumstances . Tensions in friendships occur around this resource shortage <strong>and</strong> the exchange of goods <strong>and</strong>services is a highly salient <strong>and</strong> recognized component of friendship .Affect, in the sense of a "liked quality" of the person, is deemphasized in peoples' ideology offriendship . However, affect, as "feelings of closeness", is demonstrated by informants by the ease withwhich they rank friends according to this criterion . Close friends tend to be old friends or at leastfriendships that have developed out of a long acquaintance . Over time relationships accumulate roles sothat close friendships are also more multiplex . Friends are derived out of the contexts of social life .Friends in this context were also workmates, neighbours, kin, schoolmates, team mates or attendants of thesame church . Friendships may involve multiple contexts of association <strong>and</strong> interaction . Work is animportant locus of friendship although seldom so for close friends . Higher civil servants, professionals,managers <strong>and</strong> entrepreneurs tend to have work as a locus in their friendships . It is concluded thatstability of the job was the most important factor in explaining how friendships that were initiated viathe work locus were maintained <strong>and</strong> developed through time <strong>and</strong> often over distance .It is important to underst<strong>and</strong> the way in which work situations mould different patterns of friendship .Barnes used the term "network" to describe ties between "persons who accord approximately equal status toone another, <strong>and</strong> it is these ties that constitute the class system" . These particular eogcentric networksfrom Cameroon also demonstrate status homogeneity, defined by occupational status, that I maintain constitutesan indicator of an emerging class system . The networks also tend to be ethnically homogeneous .Thus in this urban African context, the arena of friendship is segmented <strong>and</strong> friendship choices are limitedby both the ethnic <strong>and</strong> occupational structure of the society .
The problem is not so much with the measurement of homogeneity of sets of friends as with its interpretation. It is important in making an interpretation to first underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> recognize how both ethnicity<strong>and</strong> occupational stratification intersect <strong>and</strong> how both are linked to differential access to power <strong>and</strong>resources . Second, Cameroon is a state in the process of transformation <strong>and</strong> interpersonal relationshipsreflect this . Patronage still intersects with these interpersonal relationships that informants label asfriendship . This is most clearly seen in the friendship sets of those who are involved with small scalebusinesses <strong>and</strong> artisan establishments where interpersonal relationships of clientage <strong>and</strong> apprenticeshipsare crucial . This has to be seen in relationship to the nature <strong>and</strong> scale of the economy <strong>and</strong> the size <strong>and</strong>control of resources of the state bureaucracy .In conclusion, these data corroborated a theory of transformation of interpersonal relationships whichsees the reduction of face-to-face contact between those of different social classes as a society becomesabsorbed into an economic structure based on industrial capitalism .PYRAMIDS OF POWER AND COMMUNION : THE STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF CHARISMATIC COMMUNESRaymond T . Bradley (Ph .D . Thesis, <strong>1979</strong>, Sociology, Columbia U ., New York)This research is concerned with two important sociological ideas : the concept of charisma <strong>and</strong> theconcept of social structure . In linking the two the primary objective has been to contribute to agreater sociological underst<strong>and</strong>ing of charisma . Data from the first wave of a larger three year panelstudy of 57 urban communes, sampled from 6 American cities <strong>and</strong> conducted in 1974 through 1976, havebeen used to identify the distinctive relational characteristics of charismatic situations . As small,bounded, all but total institutions of voluntary membership, communes are a natural strategic researchsite accessible for the systematic study of whole social entities . Consequently, in this study it hasbeen possible, for the first time, to undertake systematic, empirical research aimed at identifyingthe structural features of charismatic situations as global totalities .Previous research has viewed charisma primarily as an attribute of an individual : psychologically,as an unusual set of personality attributes ; <strong>and</strong> sociologically as a special category of social identitythat may also involve a relationship of authority . But the approach pursued in this study starts withthe premise that charisma is a property of the group : authority based on a set of shared beliefs, heldby a collectivity, about the extraordinary powers of a supernatural origin that a particular individualor social position is believed to possess . When such beliefs become the basis upon which the socialrelationships among group members are organized, the relationships have a meaning <strong>and</strong> set of implicationsthat st<strong>and</strong> above the individual members . Thus, the major purpose of this research is to empiricallyassess the utility of a social-structural conception of charisma as a distinctive pattern of socialrelationships that, while it is emergent from the individuals involved, it also has a reality, logic, <strong>and</strong>significance that is independent of their characteristics <strong>and</strong> behavior .A review of the epistemological foundations of the concept of social structure resulted in theidentification of four requirements for the construction of substantive theories of social structurethat are both powerful <strong>and</strong> verifiable . These requirements involve specifying (with the rationale) :the kinds of social positions <strong>and</strong> social relationships involved ; the expected structural propertiesthat emerge from the interrelation of the positions <strong>and</strong> the relations ; the contextual conditions forthe structure's existance ; <strong>and</strong> the structure's propensity for stability or change .After Weber's theory of the "principal characteristics" of charismatic leadership was questionedon theoretical <strong>and</strong> empirical grounds, these criteria were used to guide the construction of analternative theory . This theory postulated that the relational structures of charismatic situationshave two distinguishing characteristics . The first is a pattern of highly interlocking bonds ofintense, positive, emotional affinity connecting all members . Acting on the strong feelings of commonidentity <strong>and</strong> mutual affection, the charismatic leader is a catalyst facilitating a highly volatilecommunion that mobilizes <strong>and</strong> energizes the group . By itself the production of such collective behavioris a threat to group stability <strong>and</strong> survival . But the second characteristic, a clearly defined,transitively ordered power hierarchy, under the control of the charismatic leader, maintains collectivestability by monitoring the group <strong>and</strong> regulating each individual's participation . Power is also involvedin the organization of collective effort to meet the everyday sustenance needs of the members .Within the framework of a multi-methods research design, an extensive body of qualitative <strong>and</strong>quantitative data were systematically collected <strong>and</strong> analyzed at the individual, relational, <strong>and</strong> globallevels of analysis . Of the 57 communes, 28 were classified as charismatic <strong>and</strong> 29 as noncharismaticafter ethnographic materials indicated that leadership was based on shared beliefs about theextraordinary abilities, of a supernatural origin, that an individual or position was believed - topossess . At the individual level, analysis revealed little difference in the backgrounds <strong>and</strong> socialcharacteristics of the charismatic <strong>and</strong> noncharismatic members . But stronger differences were foundwhen global aspects of the communes were compared : the charismatic groups tended to be larger in size,be affiliated with a larger "parent" organization, have a greater degree of ideological consensus, <strong>and</strong>have more formalized patterns of social organization .