Should the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong>, as a whole, not considerthere to be justification for improvement to the processes<strong>and</strong> procedures <strong>of</strong> determining the composition, functioning<strong>and</strong> powers <strong>of</strong> the Governing Council (note to be read asequivalent to the “committee” as per the Act) that is a matterfor the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong> as a whole to determine.The existing Rules refer to a “Council” <strong>and</strong> although thatterm is not defined in the existing Rules the expression“Council” is used throughout the Rules <strong>and</strong>, in particular,Rule 16(a) with the intention <strong>of</strong> referring to that group <strong>of</strong>persons who would have the same powers, functions <strong>and</strong>obligations as those persons who comprise the “committee”referred to in the Act.Therefore, the expression “Governing Council” has beenchosen in communication material <strong>and</strong> in the proposed draftnew Rules so as to enable a distinction to be made between,<strong>and</strong> avoid confusion with, the functions, powers <strong>and</strong> role <strong>of</strong>persons serving on the “Executive Committee” as that termis referred to in the Rules <strong>and</strong> from all other references in theexisting Rules to the various other “committees” that can <strong>and</strong>have been formed by the “Council” from time to time.Hence, all references to the expression “committee” in theAct should be read <strong>and</strong> construed as referring to the“Governing Council” for the purposes <strong>of</strong> communication<strong>and</strong> interpreting the proposed draft amended Rules.The expression “committee” is defined in the Act to mean:“In relation to an association, means the committee <strong>of</strong> theassociation established under Section 60(1).”Section 16(d) <strong>of</strong> the Act specifies matters that are requiredto take place in order for an association to become incorporatedunder the Act, which states: “An association or a group<strong>of</strong> five or more persons proposing to form <strong>and</strong> incorporate an associationmay, by resolution: (d) appoint at least 3 members <strong>of</strong>the association or <strong>of</strong> the group proposing to form <strong>and</strong> incorporatean association to be the inaugural members <strong>of</strong> the committee <strong>of</strong>the incorporated association if the application is successful.”Hence, by virtue <strong>of</strong> section 16(d), in order for an associationor group <strong>of</strong> 5 or more persons to validly incorporate underthe Act <strong>and</strong> indeed to remain incorporated under the Act,there must have been a resolution (ie a recorded vote)to approve the appointment <strong>of</strong> at least 3 members to formthe inaugural committee (ie in this case the GoverningCouncil).Section 60 <strong>of</strong> the Act states:“(1) An incorporated association must have a committee <strong>of</strong> atleast 3 members <strong>of</strong> the association.(2) The committee <strong>of</strong> an incorporated association has themanagement <strong>of</strong> the association.”Section 61 <strong>of</strong> the Act provides:“The inaugural members <strong>of</strong> the committee <strong>of</strong> an association incorporatedunder this Act are, unless the rules <strong>of</strong> the associationotherwise provide, taken to be:(a) For an incorporated association under section 19 – thepersons appointed under section 16(d):......”Therefore, by virtue <strong>of</strong> Section 16(d) <strong>and</strong> Section 61, it isa pre-condition that the composition <strong>of</strong> the committee(ie under the Rules, the “Governing Council”) at theestablishment <strong>of</strong> incorporation <strong>of</strong> the association <strong>and</strong> at alltimes thereafter by virtue <strong>of</strong> Section 60 be comprised <strong>of</strong> thosemembers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong> who have been appointed by a validresolution <strong>of</strong> the members (ie by election). Any changes to thecomposition <strong>of</strong> the ‘committee’ (ie Governing Council) mustbe notified to the registrar-general pursuant to Section 62.The existing Rules provide for a complex <strong>and</strong> difficult interpretativeprocedure for the election <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the‘Divisions’, ‘Specialist Groups’ or ‘Branches’, however, do notprovide any Rules for the nomination <strong>and</strong> election <strong>of</strong> membersto Governing Council (ie ‘committee’ as read in the Act).Hence regardless <strong>of</strong> what the Act provides, having a set <strong>of</strong>Rules for the election <strong>of</strong> members to each Division <strong>and</strong>Specialist Group without rules for the election <strong>of</strong> personsto the Governing Council (again read as referring to ‘committee’)is <strong>of</strong> itself justification requiring correction at least.Although there is no requirement under the Act forparticipants <strong>of</strong> the Divisions, Specialist Groups or Branchesto have been elected, given that the existing Rules alreadydo so, the proposed draft Rules provide for the participants<strong>of</strong> each Division to elect by simple majority resolution anominee <strong>of</strong> that Division as the Divisional Representativeon the Governing Council <strong>and</strong> such nomination is requiredto be endorsed by the <strong>Society</strong> in General Meeting.It is important to point out that it is the ratification <strong>of</strong> aparticular Division to have representation on the GoverningCouncil for the term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice set out in the Rules ratherthan the individual who is a participant in that Divisionso as to enable the particular Division to have differentparticipants <strong>of</strong> that Division representing the Division onthe Governing Council throughout the term.The purpose <strong>of</strong> the model proposed for the composition<strong>of</strong> the Governing Council is to provide <strong>and</strong> ensure equalvoice, equal representation, clear transparency <strong>and</strong> objectivityfor the broad membership <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong> <strong>and</strong> notthose comprising the greatest in number <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> aparticular Division or Specialist Group to the disadvantage<strong>of</strong> smaller Divisions or smaller Specialist Groups.On behalf <strong>of</strong> the Governance CommitteeJim Ross, Brad Pillans, Laurie Hutton,Chris Yeats <strong>and</strong> Sue FletcherTAG September 2012| 11
<strong>Society</strong> UpdateFrom the AJES Hon Editor’s deskAJES Impact Factor 2011The two-year impact factor for AJES is 1.417 with a ranking<strong>of</strong> 80 out <strong>of</strong> 150 in the Geosciences Multidisciplinarysubject category. Although there has been some volatilityin AJES impact factors over the last 15 years, this is the thirdhighestimpact factor for this period. The two-year impact factorhas been greater than 1.0 every year since 1999.New simplified access to online AJESSeveral members have had difficulty accessing AJES online sowe have been working with Taylor <strong>and</strong> Francis publishers toprovide an easier process. The model we are moving to is<strong>Society</strong> Member access. We envisage starting the roll-out <strong>of</strong>this access model in early October. Retired members are likelyto be contacted first. This model relies on each memberindividually authenticating their identity once <strong>and</strong> once only.After that is done, as long as a member is financial there willbe no interruption to online access.The GSA will communicate directlywith members during the roll-out <strong>of</strong>this different model.Upcoming in AJESTwo big thematic issues 59/5 (Archean evolution — YilgarnCraton: Guest editors Kevin F Cassidy <strong>and</strong> Stephen Wyche) <strong>and</strong>59/6 (Evolution <strong>and</strong> geodynamics <strong>of</strong> the Indo-<strong>Australia</strong>n plate:Guest editors Myra Keep <strong>and</strong> Wouter P Schellart) were recentlypublished in time for the IGC. Issues 7 <strong>and</strong> 8 will includeresearch papers <strong>and</strong> discussion <strong>and</strong> replies although they willbe reduced in length to make up for the extra pages used inearlier issues. Early in 2013 we will publish an issue ongeological CO 2 storage, edited by Alex Golab <strong>and</strong> Sue Golding,with an introduction by Peter Cook. Some <strong>of</strong> the papers fromthis volume are already available on the AJES.AWARDSFollowing from the June issue (TAG 163), the remainingcitation for the DI Groves Award for volume 58 <strong>and</strong> forthe AB Edwards Awards for volumes 57 <strong>and</strong> 58 arepresented here. The FL Still<strong>well</strong>, DI Groves <strong>and</strong> AB EdwardsAwards were presented at the GSA Awards Presentation atthe IGC in Brisbane in August.AB Edwards Medal winnersIn the June issue (TAG 163), we announced the AB Edwards Medalfor the best paper in AJES Vol. 57 (2010) — A guide formineral exploration through the regolith in the Yilgarn Craton,Western <strong>Australia</strong>, by Ravi An<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Charles Butt. We alsoannounced the winning paper in AJES Vol. 58 (2011) — A criticalreview <strong>of</strong> genesis modelling for the Hamersley BIF-hosted iron ores<strong>of</strong> Western <strong>Australia</strong>, by Richard Morris <strong>and</strong> Malcolm Kneebone. Inthis issue we publish the background to all the award winners <strong>and</strong>to An<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Butt’s paper.Ravi An<strong>and</strong>The Yilgarn Craton is one <strong>of</strong> the world’s principal mineral provinces,with considerable resources <strong>of</strong> gold, nickel, bauxite <strong>and</strong> iron ore, as<strong>well</strong> as lesser amounts <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> other commodities.As such, it is a major target for exploration. However, as most <strong>of</strong> thecraton has been exposed to subaerial conditions since at least theLate Proterozoic, it has had a long history <strong>of</strong> weathering <strong>and</strong> erosionunder a wide variety <strong>of</strong> climatic conditions. This has resulted in awidespread <strong>and</strong> complex regolith cover. This diverse <strong>and</strong> extensiveregolith cover poses considerable difficulties for exploration — as<strong>well</strong> as opportunities in terms <strong>of</strong> different sample media <strong>and</strong> thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> resources within the regolith itself. The development<strong>of</strong> appropriate geochemical exploration procedures has been thesubject <strong>of</strong> considerable research by government, universities <strong>and</strong>industry for nearly 50 years. This guide attempts to summarise theresults <strong>of</strong> this research in a single, st<strong>and</strong>-alone document to assistmineral explorers. It provides a synthesis <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>and</strong>evolution <strong>of</strong> the Yilgarn l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> advice on appropriate strategies<strong>and</strong> techniques for exploring through different types <strong>of</strong> cover,based on current knowledge <strong>and</strong> best practice. Because broadly similardeeply weathered regolith-dominated terrains occur elsewherein <strong>Australia</strong> <strong>and</strong>, indeed, in other continents, many <strong>of</strong> the principlesdiscussed here can be more widely applied.12 |TAG September 2012