10.07.2015 Views

alive and well - Geological Society of Australia

alive and well - Geological Society of Australia

alive and well - Geological Society of Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Should the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong>, as a whole, not considerthere to be justification for improvement to the processes<strong>and</strong> procedures <strong>of</strong> determining the composition, functioning<strong>and</strong> powers <strong>of</strong> the Governing Council (note to be read asequivalent to the “committee” as per the Act) that is a matterfor the members <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong> as a whole to determine.The existing Rules refer to a “Council” <strong>and</strong> although thatterm is not defined in the existing Rules the expression“Council” is used throughout the Rules <strong>and</strong>, in particular,Rule 16(a) with the intention <strong>of</strong> referring to that group <strong>of</strong>persons who would have the same powers, functions <strong>and</strong>obligations as those persons who comprise the “committee”referred to in the Act.Therefore, the expression “Governing Council” has beenchosen in communication material <strong>and</strong> in the proposed draftnew Rules so as to enable a distinction to be made between,<strong>and</strong> avoid confusion with, the functions, powers <strong>and</strong> role <strong>of</strong>persons serving on the “Executive Committee” as that termis referred to in the Rules <strong>and</strong> from all other references in theexisting Rules to the various other “committees” that can <strong>and</strong>have been formed by the “Council” from time to time.Hence, all references to the expression “committee” in theAct should be read <strong>and</strong> construed as referring to the“Governing Council” for the purposes <strong>of</strong> communication<strong>and</strong> interpreting the proposed draft amended Rules.The expression “committee” is defined in the Act to mean:“In relation to an association, means the committee <strong>of</strong> theassociation established under Section 60(1).”Section 16(d) <strong>of</strong> the Act specifies matters that are requiredto take place in order for an association to become incorporatedunder the Act, which states: “An association or a group<strong>of</strong> five or more persons proposing to form <strong>and</strong> incorporate an associationmay, by resolution: (d) appoint at least 3 members <strong>of</strong>the association or <strong>of</strong> the group proposing to form <strong>and</strong> incorporatean association to be the inaugural members <strong>of</strong> the committee <strong>of</strong>the incorporated association if the application is successful.”Hence, by virtue <strong>of</strong> section 16(d), in order for an associationor group <strong>of</strong> 5 or more persons to validly incorporate underthe Act <strong>and</strong> indeed to remain incorporated under the Act,there must have been a resolution (ie a recorded vote)to approve the appointment <strong>of</strong> at least 3 members to formthe inaugural committee (ie in this case the GoverningCouncil).Section 60 <strong>of</strong> the Act states:“(1) An incorporated association must have a committee <strong>of</strong> atleast 3 members <strong>of</strong> the association.(2) The committee <strong>of</strong> an incorporated association has themanagement <strong>of</strong> the association.”Section 61 <strong>of</strong> the Act provides:“The inaugural members <strong>of</strong> the committee <strong>of</strong> an association incorporatedunder this Act are, unless the rules <strong>of</strong> the associationotherwise provide, taken to be:(a) For an incorporated association under section 19 – thepersons appointed under section 16(d):......”Therefore, by virtue <strong>of</strong> Section 16(d) <strong>and</strong> Section 61, it isa pre-condition that the composition <strong>of</strong> the committee(ie under the Rules, the “Governing Council”) at theestablishment <strong>of</strong> incorporation <strong>of</strong> the association <strong>and</strong> at alltimes thereafter by virtue <strong>of</strong> Section 60 be comprised <strong>of</strong> thosemembers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong> who have been appointed by a validresolution <strong>of</strong> the members (ie by election). Any changes to thecomposition <strong>of</strong> the ‘committee’ (ie Governing Council) mustbe notified to the registrar-general pursuant to Section 62.The existing Rules provide for a complex <strong>and</strong> difficult interpretativeprocedure for the election <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the‘Divisions’, ‘Specialist Groups’ or ‘Branches’, however, do notprovide any Rules for the nomination <strong>and</strong> election <strong>of</strong> membersto Governing Council (ie ‘committee’ as read in the Act).Hence regardless <strong>of</strong> what the Act provides, having a set <strong>of</strong>Rules for the election <strong>of</strong> members to each Division <strong>and</strong>Specialist Group without rules for the election <strong>of</strong> personsto the Governing Council (again read as referring to ‘committee’)is <strong>of</strong> itself justification requiring correction at least.Although there is no requirement under the Act forparticipants <strong>of</strong> the Divisions, Specialist Groups or Branchesto have been elected, given that the existing Rules alreadydo so, the proposed draft Rules provide for the participants<strong>of</strong> each Division to elect by simple majority resolution anominee <strong>of</strong> that Division as the Divisional Representativeon the Governing Council <strong>and</strong> such nomination is requiredto be endorsed by the <strong>Society</strong> in General Meeting.It is important to point out that it is the ratification <strong>of</strong> aparticular Division to have representation on the GoverningCouncil for the term <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice set out in the Rules ratherthan the individual who is a participant in that Divisionso as to enable the particular Division to have differentparticipants <strong>of</strong> that Division representing the Division onthe Governing Council throughout the term.The purpose <strong>of</strong> the model proposed for the composition<strong>of</strong> the Governing Council is to provide <strong>and</strong> ensure equalvoice, equal representation, clear transparency <strong>and</strong> objectivityfor the broad membership <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Society</strong> <strong>and</strong> notthose comprising the greatest in number <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> aparticular Division or Specialist Group to the disadvantage<strong>of</strong> smaller Divisions or smaller Specialist Groups.On behalf <strong>of</strong> the Governance CommitteeJim Ross, Brad Pillans, Laurie Hutton,Chris Yeats <strong>and</strong> Sue FletcherTAG September 2012| 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!