22.11.2012 Views

A beel thicky infested with water hyacinth

A beel thicky infested with water hyacinth

A beel thicky infested with water hyacinth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to upper zone. Density of plankton in the <strong>beel</strong> of uppa zone varied bctwem nil to 84<br />

dl. PhytoplPnkton pup WM genaally nprescnted by Chlorophyeae,<br />

Baclllariophyceae and Myxophyceae.<br />

Zooplanliters were rcpwmtad by Osrracoda, Copepoda, Cladocera and<br />

Rorrjcra. Generic repmentation under various gmq~ also found to be very poor. The<br />

Omracode were found only in Mota <strong>beel</strong> under Tinsukia district as a unique occurrence.<br />

Domination of one group over the other cannot be generalised, however, in many cases<br />

phytoplankton dominated over zooplankton. In some stray cases, poor representation of<br />

phytoplankton community was observed indicating low productivity. The possible<br />

reasons are low temperature causing poor nutrient load as indicated by poor<br />

conductivity and nitrate nitrogen and phosphate in <strong>water</strong> phase.<br />

Beels in the central Assam zone showed higher plankton count. Phytoplankton<br />

density in this zone varied between nil to 948 dl. Phytoplankton groups were well<br />

represented by good number of genera under Chloroph.vceae. Bacillarioph~~ceue,<br />

M!:rophvceoe, Dlnoph,vceae and Euglenophyceae. The striking feature of this zone IS<br />

the appearance of Euglenophyceae which was not found in the <strong>beel</strong>s of upper Assam<br />

7me. Zoo plankters were represented by Rotifera. Copepoda. Cladocera and Prorozocr.<br />

In the central zone phytoplankters dominated over zooplankters as general trend.<br />

Plankton density was relatively richer in the beds of lower Assam zone too, the density<br />

ranging between nil to 8180 dl. Generic representation was found to be similar to that<br />

of central Assam <strong>beel</strong>s. Beels in the Barak valley, <strong>with</strong> low productive <strong>water</strong> and soil<br />

quallty, had plankton in moderate numben, ranging between 9 and 406 uil.<br />

In general, productivity in terns of phytoplankton density was poor in all the <strong>beel</strong>s<br />

of Assam. Although low pH, transparency and conductivity are attributable to th~s, low<br />

plankton concentration. the predominant factor is the competition <strong>with</strong> macrophytes In<br />

garnering sunlight and nutrients. Moderate to high level of infestation of various<br />

categories (emergent, submerged, floating, ere.) of macrovegetation were always<br />

associated <strong>with</strong> low plankton count. The relatively high plankton count in Central and<br />

lower Assam bcels is attributable to the low altitude <strong>with</strong> sloppy gradient of the<br />

Brahmaputra. In these regions, riverine flow slows down leading to the settling of<br />

nutrients. Relatively high temperature also favoured production of plankton.<br />

Distribution of plankton in diffmt beds of Assam is presented in Table 10.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!