<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Cornea</strong>Purpose: Keratoconus (KC) is a corneal disease, which ischaracterized by corneal thinning leading to loss of visual acuitythrough ectasia and irregular astigmatism. Clinically, the symptomsof KC can be highly variable and in part, depend on the stage of theprogression of the disorder as well as associated eye-rubbing, itching,etc. There is currently no effective management for KC, nor anyadequate biomarkers to predict the outcome of clinical severity of thedisease. Furthermore, there is considerable confusion in the fieldregarding the pathophysiology of the disease and key involvement ofinflammation. To that end, this study was designed to address thesequestions.Methods: We correlated the clinical features associated with KC in acohort of 54 patients with tear proteomic profiles. This noninterventionalstudy was approved by the Narayana Nethralaya IRB.Clinical grades and associated symptoms were graded as per theAmsler-Krumeich classification (Grade I: 32 patients, Grade II: 14patients, Grade III: 8 patients). Quantitative Proteomic analysis wascarried out using iTRAQ with nanoLC-MS/MS on 25μg total tearprotein from each patient and pooled healthy control subjects (n = 12)for comparison.Results: We observed that eye-rubbing correlated with increasingclinical grades and morbidity of KC. In total, over 1000 tear proteins(< 1% false discovery rate) were identified from the whole study.Quantitative proteomic results from a group of up-regulated anddown-regulated proteins (ratio for KC/control > 1.5, or < 0.67)revealed a positive correlation between several tear proteins (LCN1,PLA2G2A, SCGB2A1, MSLN and CRYAB) and KC clinical grades(Grade I, II and III). A negative correlation between a group of tearproteins (ALB, IGHG2 & G3, A2M, complement factors C3, C4A,C6 & H, ORM1, KNG1, PRDX1, SERPIN-F1, GSN) and KC clinicalgrades was also observed.Conclusions: These proteins could be used alone or in combinationas biomarkers for predicting the progression or severity ofkeratoconus. These proteins also shed light on the underlyingderegulation of important inflammatory and immunomodulatorypathways that may be key drivers of KC pathophysiology.Commercial Relationships: Arkasubhra Ghosh, None; RohitShetty, None; Lei Zhou, Singapore Eye Research Institute (P);Sharon D'Souza, None; Roger W. Beuerman, Allergan (F), SERI(P), Santen (R)Clinical Trial: J0002GQQProgram Number: 929 Poster Board Number: B0234Presentation Time: 1:00 PM - 2:45 PMSeveral Tear Protein Levels Of Breast Cancer Patients Differfrom Healthy Participants: A Microarray StudyKsenia Keller 1, 2 , Julia Pieter 2 , Daniel Boehm 2 , Norbert Pfeiffer 3 ,Franz H. Grus 1 . 1 Experimental Ophthalmology, University MedicalCenter, Mainz, Germany; 2 Gynecology and Obstetrics, UniversityMedical Center, Mainz, Germany; 3 Ophthalmology, UniversityMedical Center, Mainz, Germany.Purpose: Currently no molecular biomarkers for early detection ofbreast cancer (BC) are available. The explorations of cancerproteome revealed several new findings according significant levelchanges of proteins. Even in the distant body fluids like tears wereported over 20 de- or increased proteins in pooled BC and healthy(CTRL) samples in our previous study. Here we report our additionalstudy regarding individual tear protein profiling using high sensitiveantibody-microarray plattformMethods: Tear fluid was obtained from 38 women, whereas 19 ofthem were diagnosed with primary non-metastasized BC, with thehelp of Schirmer test. Tear proteins were eluted overnight with 0.1%n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside. Proteins were precipitated and theirconcentration was determined. 5 µg of labeled proteins from eachparticipant were incubated on microarrays with antibodies againstcomplement proteins, other immune components and high abundanttear proteins. After signal visualization a semi-quantitativecomparison of protein levels was performedResults: We detected several significantly different distributedproteins in BC and CTRL groups. For example, the interleukins IL2and IL1beta were decreased in BC samples (p=0.025 and p=0.017,respectively). Furthermore we used the artificial neuronal networks totest the discrimination ability of the putative biomarkers. Thus thebest combination of biomarkers revealed the sensitivity of 89% andspecificity of 100%. An area under the curve of 0.91 was achievedConclusions: This pilot study provides more findings to our previoustear protein profiling investigations. Obviously also in other bodyfluids besides serum and tumor microenvironment several proteinderegulations occur leading perhaps to changed signal cascades andaberrant reactions. This study also shows the immediate involvementof immune system, whereas its component levels are changed incomparison to CTRL subjects. Further explorations are ongoing forthe verifying the results in a larger study population for establishmentof putative BC biomarkersCommercial Relationships: Ksenia Keller, None; Julia Pieter,None; Daniel Boehm, None; Norbert Pfeiffer, Sensimed AG (F),Sensimed AG (R), MSD (F), MSD (R), Alcon (F), Allergan (F),Novartis (F), Novartis (R), Bayer (F), Heidelberg Engineering (F),Bausch&Lomb (F), Boehringer-Ingelheim (F), Carl Zeiss Meditech(F), Chibret (F), Nidek (F), Pfizer (F), Santen (F), Santen (R),Topcon (F), Ivantis Inc (F), Ivantis Inc (R); Franz H. Grus, NoneSupport: partly founded by MAIFORProgram Number: 930 Poster Board Number: B0235Presentation Time: 1:00 PM - 2:45 PMMethod development for analysis of tear proteins using selectedreaction monitoringSimin Masoudi 1, 2 , Ling Zhong 3 , Mark Raftery 3 , Mark D. Willcox 2 .1 Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2 School ofOptometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales,Sydney, NSW, Australia; 3 Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility,University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.Purpose: Previous studies of dry eye and contact lens (CL) relateddry eye have shown qualitative differences in lactoferrin, lysozyme,lipocalin 1, prolactin-induced protein and proline rich protein 4. Theaim of this study was to develop a method for simultaneous detectionand accurate quantification of these five proteins in human tearsusing selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry.Methods: Basal tears were collected from normal subjects (male=1,female=6, CL=3, No CL=4).Tears were processed as describedbefore with modifications. SRM transitions from two peptidesrepresenting each protein were selected using Skyline software thenanalyzed using nano-flow liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.Calibration standards were generated using unlabelled synthetizedpeptides diluted to a range of 1 to 1000fmol/µL in the presence of afixed amount of stable-isotopically labelled peptides (50fmol/µL).The ratios of the peak areas of the unlabelled/labelled peptides wereplotted against the concentrations of the corresponding unlabelledpeptides. The concentration of endogenous proteins (µg/µL) in tearsamples was deduced using the peak area ratio of the endogenouspeptides to labelled peptides.Results: The limits of quantification for the selected peptides werebelow 50pg/μl. The recovery of peptides from spiked digested tearswas ≥56% and the coefficient of variation values were ≤16% whichshow good precision of the method. For lactoferrin(1.20±0.77μg/μL), lysozyme (2.11±1.50μg/μL) and lipocalin-1©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.
<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Cornea</strong>(1.751±0.99μg/μL) the findings were consistent with findings fromprevious ELISA studies. Tear levels of prolactin-induced protein(0.09± 0.06μg/μL) and proline rich 4 (0.80±0.50μg/μL) are reportedhere for the first time.Conclusions: SRM method can be used for simultaneous detectionand quantification of the five selected proteins in low volume humantear samples (2.5µl per sample) without prior purification of eachprotein component or need for antibodies.Commercial Relationships: Simin Masoudi, None; Ling Zhong,None; Mark Raftery, None; Mark D. Willcox, Allergan Inc (C),Allergan Inc (R), Brien Holden Vision Institute (P), Bausch + Lomb(C), Basuch + Lomb (R)Program Number: 931 Poster Board Number: B0236Presentation Time: 1:00 PM - 2:45 PMDry Eye and Systemic DiseasesClaudia Henrich, Esen K. Akpek. <strong>Cornea</strong>, The Wilmer Eye Instituteat Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD.Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence of associated inflammatorysystemic diseases in a cohort of patients with dry eye syndrome.Methods: Medical records of patients who presented to the WilmerEye Institute Ocular Surface Diseases and Dry Eye Clinic with dryeye symptomatology during a period of two years (January 2010 toDecember 2011) were reviewed retrospectively. Patients weredivided into two groups: patients with clinically significant dry eyedisease (defined as Schirmer test result without topical anesthesia≤10 mm at 5 minutes in either eye or bulbar conjunctival stainingwith lissamine green scored based on Oxford scale ≥1 in either eye)and patients with dry eye symptomatology but without the clinicalfindings.Results: A patient list of 326 patients was generated electronicallyusing a diagnostic code of ICD 375.15. Sixty two patients wereexcluded as they presented primarily with other ocular surfaceproblems and dry eye was a secondary diagnosis. Two hundred andsixty four patients with a primary diagnosis of dry eye were includedin the analysis. The majority of the patients (215/264, 81.4%) werefemale. Two hundred and seventeen (217/264; 82.2%) had clinicallysignificant dry eye. About half of the patients (121/264, 45.8%) hadan underlying inflammatory systemic disease on presentation. Onehundred and nine of them (109/121, 90.1%) had a clinicallysignificant dry eye. Thirty one patients (31/264, 11.7%) had primarySjögren Syndrome, 38 (38/264; 14.4%) had thyroid disease (eitherhypothyroidism, Graves disease or Hashimotos thyroiditis), 13(13/264, 4.9%) had rheumatoid arthritis, 42 (42/264, 15.9%) hadother rheumatic diseases.In 50 patients (50/143, 35.0%) without a previously known systemicdisease (regardless of the severity of the dry eye) a further work upwas performed based on review of systems. In 12 patients (12/50,24.0%) a diagnosis based on the work up was established: 10 patients(10/50, 20.0%) were diagnosed with thyroid eye disease, 2 patients(2/50, 4.0%) were diagnosed with Sjögren syndrome or presumedSjögren syndrome, one (1/50, 2.0%) was diagnosed with a mixedconnective tissue disease.Conclusions: Dry eye is a very common condition. Although usuallya local disease with a benign course, prevalence of systemic diseaseassociation seems to be significant. Based on clinical suspicion andreview of systems, further diagnostic testing might uncover some ofthese previously undiagnosed conditions.Commercial Relationships: Claudia Henrich, None; Esen K.Akpek, Alcon (F), Allergan (F), Baush & Lomb (C)FODE Highlights Impression Based Mucin Defects on the OcularSurface in Dry Eye Patients: Kinetics and Retrieval by TearLipocalinPo-Ting Yeh 1, 2 , Ben J. Glasgow 2, 3 , Richard Casey 2 . 1 Ophthalmology,National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;2 Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School ofMedicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; 3 Pathology and LaboratoryMedicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles,CA.Purpose: A fluorescent probe was used to identify mucin depletedareas on the ocular surface and test the hypothesis that tear lipocalin,retrieves lipids from the eyes of normal and dry eye subjects.Methods: Fluorescein labeled octadecyl ester, FODE, wascharacterized by mass spectrometry and absorbancespectrophotometry. The use of FODE to define mucin defects wasstudied with impression membranes under conditions that selectivelydeplete mucin. The kinetics of FODE removal from the ocularsurface was analyzed by sampling tears from control and dry eyepatients at various times. The tear protein-FODE complexes wereisolated by gel filtration and ion exchange chromatographies,monitored with absorption and fluorescent spectroscopies andanalysed by gel electrophoresis. Immunoprecipitation verified FODEcomplexed to tear lipocalin.Results: FODE exhibits an isosbestic point at 473nm, pKa of 7.5,and red shift relative to fluorescein. The low solubility of FODE inbuffer is enhanced with 1% Tween 80 and ethanol. FODE adheres tothe ocular surface of dry eye patients. FODE produced visiblestaining at the contact sites of membranes, which correlated withremoval of mucin. Despite the fact that tear lipocalin was reduced indry eye patients, FODE removal followed similar rapid exponentialdecay functions for all subjects. The majority of FODE was elutedbound to tear lipocalin.Conclusions: Tear lipocalin retrieves lipid rapidly from the humanocular surface in mild to moderate dry eye disease and controls. Withimprovements in solubility, FODE may have potential as afluorescent probe to identify mucin depleted areas.FPLC of tear samples from dry eye subjects. (●) Absorbance at 280nm (○) Fluorescence intensity (λem=511 nm). Inset left, coomasssiestainedtricine-SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, fx 4-6. Lane 2, fx 8-10. Lane 3,fx 14-16. Lane 4, fx 21-23. Lane 5, fx 26-28. Lane M, molecularweight markers. Lactoferrin (Lf), lysozyme (Ly) and tear lipocalin(TL) are indicated at left. Inset right, fluorescence of anion exchangechromatography performed on fractions 21-23 of control subjects.Fluorescence was seen only in the elution buffer (high salt) fractions.Gel filtration chromatography of control sample was nearly identicalto that of dry eye.Program Number: 932 Poster Board Number: B0237Presentation Time: 1:00 PM - 2:45 PM©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.
- Page 2 and 3: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 4 and 5: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 6 and 7: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 8 and 9: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 10: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 13 and 14: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 16 and 17: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 18 and 19: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 20 and 21: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 22 and 23: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 24 and 25: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 26 and 27: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 28 and 29: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 30 and 31: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 32 and 33: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 34 and 35: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 36 and 37: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 38 and 39: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 40 and 41: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 42 and 43: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 44 and 45: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 48 and 49: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 50 and 51: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 52 and 53: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 54 and 55: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 56 and 57: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 58 and 59: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 60 and 61: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 62 and 63: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 64 and 65: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 66 and 67: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 68 and 69: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 70 and 71: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 72 and 73: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 74 and 75: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 76 and 77: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 78 and 79: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 80 and 81: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 82 and 83: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 84 and 85: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 86 and 87: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 88 and 89: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 90 and 91: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 92 and 93: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 94 and 95: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 96 and 97:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 98 and 99:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 100 and 101:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 102 and 103:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 104 and 105:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 106 and 107:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 108 and 109:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 110 and 111:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 112 and 113:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 114 and 115:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 116 and 117:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 118 and 119:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 120 and 121:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 122 and 123:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 124 and 125:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 126 and 127:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 128 and 129:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 130 and 131:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 132 and 133:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 134 and 135:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 136 and 137:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 138 and 139:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 140 and 141:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 142 and 143:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 144 and 145:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 146 and 147:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 148 and 149:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 150 and 151:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 152 and 153:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 154 and 155:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 156 and 157:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 158 and 159:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 160 and 161:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 162 and 163:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 164 and 165:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 166 and 167:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 168 and 169:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 170 and 171:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 172 and 173:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 174 and 175:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 176 and 177:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 178 and 179:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 180 and 181:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 182 and 183:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 184 and 185:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 186 and 187:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 188 and 189:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 190 and 191:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 192 and 193:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 194 and 195:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 196 and 197:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 198 and 199:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 200 and 201:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 202 and 203:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 204 and 205:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 206 and 207:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 208 and 209:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 210 and 211:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 212 and 213:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 214 and 215:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 216 and 217:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 218 and 219:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 220 and 221:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 222 and 223:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 224 and 225:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 226 and 227:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 228 and 229:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 230 and 231:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 232 and 233:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 234 and 235:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 236 and 237:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 238 and 239:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 240 and 241:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 242 and 243:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 244 and 245:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 246 and 247:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 248 and 249:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 250 and 251:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 252 and 253:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 254 and 255:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 256 and 257:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 258 and 259:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 260 and 261:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 262 and 263:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 264 and 265:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 266 and 267:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 268 and 269:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 270 and 271:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 272 and 273:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 274 and 275:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 276 and 277:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 278 and 279:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 280 and 281:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 282 and 283:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 284 and 285:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 286 and 287:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 288 and 289:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 290 and 291:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 292 and 293:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 294 and 295:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 296 and 297:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 298 and 299:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 300 and 301:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 302 and 303:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 304 and 305:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 306 and 307:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 308 and 309:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 310 and 311:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 312 and 313:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 314 and 315:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 316 and 317:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 318 and 319:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 320 and 321:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 322 and 323:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 324 and 325:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 326 and 327:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 328 and 329:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 330 and 331:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 332 and 333:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 334 and 335:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 336 and 337:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 338 and 339:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 340 and 341:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 342 and 343:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 344 and 345:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 346 and 347:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 348 and 349:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 350 and 351:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 352 and 353:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 354 and 355:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 356 and 357:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 358 and 359:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 360 and 361:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 362 and 363:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 364 and 365:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 366 and 367:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 368 and 369:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 370 and 371:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 372 and 373:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 374 and 375:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 376 and 377:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 378 and 379:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 380 and 381:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 382 and 383:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts