<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Cornea</strong>determine storage capability, one duplicate was stained immediatelyand the other after 30 days. To demonstrate the feasibility of the useof the SOP for a multicenter clinical trial, clinicians from out-of-statewere trained to collect IC samples which were shipped to New Yorkfor processing and analysis by a masked independent observer. ICand HLA-DR quantification were incorporated into a maskedrandomized clinical trial of DE.Results: The validity/viability of the SOPs was established: 1)sufficient numbers of cells can be collected via IC (average: 6,677 ±6,302 cells/filter (normal: 8,511 ± 7,743, n = 114, range: 1,389 −101,031; DED: 5,414 ± 5,128, n = 252, range: 1,032 − 58,892). 2)relative biomarker expression quantified in samples isprecise/repeatable (mean difference: −0.12%, p = 0.23; 95% limits ofagreement for splits: −0.82%, +0.58%); 3) personnel at distant sitescan be taught to collect, store and ship samples; 4) samples can bestored until processing can be performed without affecting results[mean difference for HLA-DR%: 0.31% (ie, Day 30 values were onaverage higher by 0.31%; p = 0.11); 95% limits of agreement were(−0.91%, +1.53%)]; 5) a large number of masked samples can bereliably tracked.Conclusions: We demonstrated the repeatability and effects ofstorage, ability to train/gather samples from distant sites and thefeasibility of use in a randomized clinical trial. HLA-DR expressionas determined from IC samples can serve as a minimally invasiveobjective metric of inflammation for efficacy and mechanism ofaction in randomized clinical trials of ocular surface disease.Commercial Relationships: Penny A. Asbell, RPS (F); Seth P.Epstein, Rapid Pathogen Screening, Inc (F); Neha Gadaria-Rathod,None; Yi Wei, None; Maureen G. Maguire, InspirePharmaceuticals (F), Amakem (F), IDx LLC (F), Merck (C)Support: Supported in part by the National Eye Institute (R34-EY017626-01) as well as by The Martin and Toni SosnoffFoundation, New York, New York.Program Number: 5438 Poster Board Number: A0137Presentation Time: 8:30 AM - 10:15 AMCytokine tear film expression in patients with primary andrecurrent pterygiumVictor M. Bautista, Nayeli Rangel-Acosta, Nadia Luz López-Espinosa, Angel Nava-Castañeda. Microbiology and OcularProteomics, Inst de Ophthal Conde de Valenciana, Mexico, Mexico.Purpose: Pterygium is an overgrowth of fibrovascular tissue, oftenwith a wing-like appearance, from the conjuctiva over the cornea.Although the pathogenesis of pterygium is not clearly understood,certain findings concerning common features in pterygium andneoplasia have been proposed, raising the possibility that a pterygiumis a neoplastic-like growth disorder. There is much debate surroundthe pathogenesis of pterygium and a number of theories have beenput forward including genetic instability, cellular proliferation,inflammatory influence, degeneration of connective tissue,angiogenesis, aberrant apoptosis or wound healing process and stemcell dysfunction. Treatment of pterygia entails its surgical excision,however in some cases they aggressively recur. The aim of this studywas to analyze the cytokine tear film expression in patients withprimary and recurrent pterygium.Methods: Tear samples from patient diagnosed with primary andrecurrent pterygium, and tears from patients without pterygiumdiagnostics were taken as a control were analyzed. Cytokine proteinarrays were performed to know relative units of 36 cytokines, withthe Profiler Array Membrane (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA)according to the manufacturer instructions. Densitometric analysis ofthe dot blot was performed with Diversity and GeneTools. Weconsidered cytokines with differential expression more or less thantwo times.Results: When we analyzed cytokine tear film expression amongprimary pterygium patients and controls, we found that GROa,Sicam-1, IL-8, IL-16, I-TAC, MCP-1 and MIP-1b wereoverexpressed; meanwhile IP-10, MIF and Serpin E1 weredownregulated. Cytokine tear film expression comparison amongcurrent pterigion patients and controls showed that C5/C5a, IL-16,IL-17, IL-32a and IP-10 were overexpressed; none cytokine showeddownregulation. Finally, cytokine tear film expression comparisonamong recurrent and primary pterygium exhibited a greatoverexpression of IP-10 and MIF, and MCP-1 was downregulated.Conclusions: Cytokine tear film expression in primary pterygiumsuggests an inflammatory response mediated by chemokines. Inrecurrent pterygium tear film, results showed an overexpression ofinflammatory cytokines. Comparison among primary and recurrentpterygium exhibited a MIF and IP-10 overexpression, suggesting achronic inflammatory process.Commercial Relationships: Victor M. Bautista, None; NayeliRangel-Acosta, None; Nadia Luz López-Espinosa, None; AngelNava-Castañeda, NoneProgram Number: 5439 Poster Board Number: A0138Presentation Time: 8:30 AM - 10:15 AMEffectiveness and safety of intralesional injection of 0.01 mgMitomycin C one month prior to bare sclera excision forpterygium treatmentBrian Tieu, Manuj Kapur. UTMB, Galveston, TX.Purpose: Mitomycin C (MMC) is an anti-metabolite withradiomimetic properties that is used as an adjuvant in pterygiumexcisions to reduce recurrence; however, it can cause many sideeffects particularly at high doses. Previous studies have shown thatinjection of 0.15 to 0.2 mg/mL MMC one month prior to bare scleraexcision results in low recurrence rates, but may result in somecomplications. The purpose of this study was to determine if thelowest effective concentration of 0.1 mg/ml MMC injectedintralesionally can maintain low recurrence rates and be potentiallysafer.Methods: A retrospective case review was performed of patientswho underwent bare sclera pterygium excision one month afterintralesional injection of 0.01 mg MMC. The cases were evaluatedfor complications including dellen, persistent corneal epithelial orconjunctival defect, intraocular pressure spikes, scleral thinning, andrecurrence of disease, which was defined as re-growth offibrovascular tissue greater than 1 mm past the limbus. Surgicalspecimens also were reviewed for significant changes.Results: Eleven patients underwent this procedure and were followedpost-operatively for at least 6 months. No recurrences have beennoted nor major complications. Histopathological analysis of theexcised tissue showed less vascularization.Conclusions: Intralesional injection of a lower dose of MMC onemonth prior to bare sclera excision may be as or more effective thanhigher doses, but possibly safer overall with exposure to less of theanti-metabolite.Commercial Relationships: Brian Tieu, None; Manuj Kapur,NoneProgram Number: 5440 Poster Board Number: A0139Presentation Time: 8:30 AM - 10:15 AMExtended Soft Bandage Contact Lenses Therapy for OcularGraft-Versus-Host DiseaseYichen Sun 1, 4 , Yoshihiro Inamoto 3 , Joseph P. Sheehan 1 , Peng Li 2 ,Ruikang K. Wang 1, 2 , Stephanie Lee 3 , Tueng T. Shen 1, 2 .1 Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.
<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Cornea</strong>2 Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; 3 FredHutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; 4 Graduate Instituteof Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.Purpose: Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) is a majorcomplication of allogenic tissue/hematopoietic stem celltransplantation. 60% of GVHD patients have ocular involvementwith significant compromise in quality of life due to ocular symptoms(such as severe photophobia, pain and decreased visual acuity). Wereport the outcome of extended soft bandage contact lens (BCL)treatment for symptomatic relief and ocular surface protection inGVHD patients.Methods: Prospective Phase II clinical trial. IRB approval of theclinical protocol was first obtained. Patients (age 18-99) withdiagnosis of chronic GVHD as defined by the NIH criteria and ocularsymptoms of NIH eye score 2 or greater are selected for the studywith written informed consent. Extended soft bandage contact lenseswere applied to the GVHD-affected eyes with antibiotic coverageduring the two week period. Ocular exam, anterior segment OCT(AS-OCT) and patient survey are obtained. Patients are followed forone month. Clinical outcomes, such as visual acuity, cornealpresentations (abrasion, punctate epithelial erosion and filament) arecorrelated with symptomatic survey findings as well as OCTfindings.Results: 20 patients with ocular GVHD will be included in the study.Ocular manifestations of GVHD observed by clinical exam are alsocharacterized by AS-OCT. First six including patients are all shownwith improving symptoms/signs and without any occurrence ofcomplications. Symptomatic changes with the BCL therapy arecorrelated with ocular exams as well as AS-OCT.Conclusions: BCL can offer significant symptomatic relief forpatients with ocular GVHD. AS-OCT can be a feasible method tocharacterize pathological changes related to ocular GVHD. Inaddition, wearing of extended soft bandage contact lens can diminishthe attrition of cornea from eyelid and provide symptomatic relief forpatients with ocular GVHD.Commercial Relationships: Yichen Sun, None; YoshihiroInamoto, None; Joseph P. Sheehan, None; Peng Li, None;Ruikang K. Wang, National Institutes of Health (F), W.H. CoulterFoundation Translational Research Partnership Program (F),Research to prevent blindness (F), Oregon Health & ScienceUniversity (P), University of Washington (P); Stephanie Lee, None;Tueng T. Shen, NoneSupport: CA163438Clinical Trial: NCT01616056Program Number: 5441 Poster Board Number: A0140Presentation Time: 8:30 AM - 10:15 AMThree-dimensional volumetric reconstruction of the mousediabetic corneaDanielle M. Robertson 1 , Matthew Petroll 1 , Meifang Zhu 1 , VindhyaKoppaka 1, 2 . 1 Ophthalmology, Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr,Dallas, TX; 2 Pharmacy, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO.Purpose: Mouse models of diabetes are routinely used to investigatethe effects of hyperglycemia in vivo. The purpose of this project wasto investigate the use of three-dimensional volumetric imaging of thesubbasal nerve plexus and associated corneal epithelial nerve fibersto allow for quantitative assessment of corneal nerve changes in adiabetic mouse model; and to correlate alterations in corneal nerveswith total and sublayer thickness changes in vivo.Methods: Type I diabetes was induced in male C57BL/6 mice usingthe Animal Models of Diabetic Complications Consortium high dosestreptozotocin (150 mg/kg body weight) protocol. Mice wereevaluated for corneal nerve and epithelial changes at 6 and 12 weeks.Age-matched vehicle treated mice were used as controls. Serumglucose levels and body weight were assessed at 6 and 12 weeks. Aserum glucose level greater than 300 mg/dl was diagnostic ofdiabetes. Total corneal and sublayer thickness changes were assessedusing quantitative three-dimensional in vivo confocal microscopy(q3D-IVCM). <strong>Cornea</strong>s were then excised and stained with anti-betatubulinIII and labeled with a FITC-conjugated secondary antibody.Nuclei were counter-stained with propidium iodide. Whole mountcorneas were imaged on a laser scanning confocal microscope. Imagestacks were reconstructed three-dimensionally and analyzed usingMetaMorph and IMARIS software.Results: Using q3D-IVCM, mean corneal thickness in control micewas 111.5 ± 11.2 µm. Sublayer thickness values were 73.2 ± 5.2 µmand 38.3 ± 6.5 µm, for the stroma and epithelium, respectively.Volumetric reconstruction of corneal nerves demonstrated thatepithelial nerve fibers extending from the subbasal plexus turn andcourse horizontally between superficial epithelial cell layers prior totermination with occasional branching and anastomoses detected. InSTZ-treated mice, significant changes in serum glucose levels andbody weight were evident. Alterations in corneal epithelial nervesand the subbasal nerve plexus were seen as early as 6 weeks.Conclusions: Three-dimensional volumetric reconstruction of themouse cornea allows for quantitative assessment of corneal tissue andnerve changes and represents a novel technique for assessingdiabetic-induced changes in the mouse cornea.Commercial Relationships: Danielle M. Robertson, None;Matthew Petroll, None; Meifang Zhu, None; Vindhya Koppaka,NoneSupport: NIH RO1 EY018219 (DMR), NIH P30 EY020799,OneSight Research Foundation, Dallas, TX (DMR), and a CareerDevelopment Award (DMR) and an unrestricted grant from Researchto Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, NYProgram Number: 5442 Poster Board Number: A0141Presentation Time: 8:30 AM - 10:15 AMRat Exorbital Lacrimal Gland Ducts Have Gastrin ReceptorsMortimer Lorber 1 , Eva C. Permaul 2 , Supti Sen 2 , Deborah Berry 2 .1 Pharmacology & Physiology, Georgetown Univ School of Medicine,Washington, DC; 2 Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center,Georgetown Univ School of Medicine, Washington, DC.Purpose: In <strong>ARVO</strong> 2009, we showed that these ducts bind thecommon C-terminal pentapeptide of both Gastrin andCholecystokinin, indicating that lacrimal ducts bind one or both ofthem. This abstract reports that they bind gastrin. The possibility thatthey also bind cholecystokinin has not yet been studied.Methods: One exorbital lacrimal gland was excised from four femaleadult rats and fixed in buffered formalin. Immunohistochemistry wasperformed using a rabbit polyclonal antibody against the gastrinreceptor, CCKBR. This demonstrated reactivity against rat tissues. A1:500 dilution in phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4 with 1% bovineserum albumin and 0.025% sodium azide, was made.The antibodywas by Alamone Labs in Jerusalem. The positive control was the ratstomach whose HCl producing parietal cells were stained. Thenegative control omitted the primary antibody.Results: In all specimens essentially all nuclei of the intercalated,intra- and interlobular, and collecting ducts were strongly positive.Their cytoplasm was negative. The nuclei and cytoplasms of acinarand myoepithelial cells were negative. The lumens of some of thelarger ducts had nuclear and cytoplasmic debris originating fromductal cytoplasmic blebs and the turnover of duct nuclei. Thismaterial enters the tears and passes through the nasolacrimal ducts tomix with nasopharyngeal secretions to enter the alimentary tract.Conclusions: The duct nuclei of rat exorbital lacrimal glands contain©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.
- Page 2 and 3:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 4 and 5:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 6 and 7:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 8 and 9:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 10:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 13 and 14:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 16 and 17:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 18 and 19:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 20 and 21:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 22 and 23:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 24 and 25:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 26 and 27:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 28 and 29:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 30 and 31:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 32 and 33:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 34 and 35:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 36 and 37:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 38 and 39:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 40 and 41:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 42 and 43:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 44 and 45:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 46 and 47:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 48 and 49:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 50 and 51:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 52 and 53:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 54 and 55:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 56 and 57:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 58 and 59:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 60 and 61:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 62 and 63:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 64 and 65:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 66 and 67:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 68 and 69:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 70 and 71:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 72 and 73:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 74 and 75:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 76 and 77:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 78 and 79:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 80 and 81:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 82 and 83:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 84 and 85:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 86 and 87:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 88 and 89:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 90 and 91:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 92 and 93:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 94 and 95:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 96 and 97:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 98 and 99:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 100 and 101:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 102 and 103:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 104 and 105:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 106 and 107:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 108 and 109:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 110 and 111:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 112 and 113:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 114 and 115:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 116 and 117:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 118 and 119:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 120 and 121:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 122 and 123:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 124 and 125:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 126 and 127:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 128 and 129:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 130 and 131:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 132 and 133:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 134 and 135:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 136 and 137:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 138 and 139:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 140 and 141:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 142 and 143:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 144 and 145:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 146 and 147:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 148 and 149:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 150 and 151:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 152 and 153:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 154 and 155:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 156 and 157:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 158 and 159:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 160 and 161:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 162 and 163:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 164 and 165:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 166 and 167:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 168 and 169:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 170 and 171:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 172 and 173:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 174 and 175:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 176 and 177:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 178 and 179:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 180 and 181:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 182 and 183:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 184 and 185:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 186 and 187:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 188 and 189:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 190 and 191:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 192 and 193:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 194 and 195:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 196 and 197:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 198 and 199:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 200 and 201:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 202 and 203:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 204 and 205:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 206 and 207:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 208 and 209:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 210 and 211:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 212 and 213:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 214 and 215:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 216 and 217:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 218 and 219:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 220 and 221:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 222 and 223:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 224 and 225:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 226 and 227:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 228 and 229:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 230 and 231:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 232 and 233:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 234 and 235:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 236 and 237:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 238 and 239:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 240 and 241:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 242 and 243:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 244 and 245:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 246 and 247:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 248 and 249:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 250 and 251:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 252 and 253:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 254 and 255:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 256 and 257:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 258 and 259:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 260 and 261:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 262 and 263:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 264 and 265:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 266 and 267:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 268 and 269:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 270 and 271:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 272 and 273:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 274 and 275:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 276 and 277:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 278 and 279:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 280 and 281:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 282 and 283:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 284 and 285:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 286 and 287: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 288 and 289: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 290 and 291: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 292 and 293: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 294 and 295: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 296 and 297: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 298 and 299: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 300 and 301: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 302 and 303: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 304 and 305: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 306 and 307: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 308 and 309: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 310 and 311: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 312 and 313: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 314 and 315: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 316 and 317: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 318 and 319: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 320 and 321: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 322 and 323: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 324 and 325: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 326 and 327: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 328 and 329: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 330 and 331: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 332 and 333: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 334 and 335: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 338 and 339: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 340 and 341: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 342 and 343: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 344 and 345: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 346 and 347: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 348 and 349: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 350 and 351: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 352 and 353: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 354 and 355: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 356 and 357: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 358 and 359: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 360 and 361: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 362 and 363: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 364 and 365: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 366 and 367: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 368 and 369: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 370 and 371: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 372 and 373: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 374 and 375: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 376 and 377: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 378 and 379: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 380 and 381: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 382 and 383: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts