<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Cornea</strong>Commercial Relationships: Ricardo Nose, None; Fabio B. Daga,None; Adriana S. Forseto, None; Gustavo Victor, None; Sidney J.Sousa, None; Walton Nose, None; Niro Kasahara, NoneProgram Number: 3892 Poster Board Number: D0136Presentation Time: 2:45 PM - 4:30 PMEffect of human albumin in combination of blood derivatives richin growth factors in the wound healing capability of cornealepithelial cellsNoelia Andollo 1 , Vanesa Freire 1, 4 , Arturo E. Grau 3 , JaimeEtxebarria 1, 5 , Juan A. Duran 2, 4 , Maria-Celia Morales 5 . 1 CellBiology And Histology, University of The Basque Country,BioCruces Health Research Institute, Leioa, Spain; 2 Ophthalmology,University of the Basque Country, BioCruces Health ResearchInstitute, Leioa, Spain; 3 Hospital Sótero del Rio, Santiago, Chile; 4 R& D Dept., Instituto Clínico-Quirúrgico de Oftalmología, Bilbao,Spain; 5 University Hospital of Cruces, BioCruces Health ResearchInstitute, Barakaldo, Spain.Purpose: Blood derivatives rich in growth factors are goodpromoters of corneal wound healing. Our aim is to test in vitro thecapability of human albumin as a synergic compound combined witha blood derivative rich in growth factors to improve the healing rateof corneal epithelial cells.Methods: In vitro proliferation and wound healing experiments wereperformed using the human corneal epithelial HCE cell line. Westudied the following treatments: 1) 20% Serum of Plasma Rich inGrowth Factors (s-PRGF) 2) 50% s-PRGF 3) 10% Human serumalbumin (albumin) 4) 20% s-PRGF+10% albumin 5) 50% s-PRGF+10% albumin 6) 10% FBS and 7) 1% bovine serum albumin(BSA) as control. To manufacture s-PRGF whole blood was collectedby venipuncture from healthy volunteers.Results: The results show that human albumin induces highlysignificant higher proliferation of HCE cells than any dose of s-PRGFafter 72 hours of treatment. Moreover, no significant differences arefound among human albumin, 20% s-PRGF+albumin and 50% s-PRGF+albumin. Conversely, 20% and 50% s-PRGF treatmentsimprove cell migration with respect to the rest of the treatments, withstatistically significant differences. Treatments of albumin, 20% s-PRGF+albumin and 50% s-PRGF+albumin do not show significantdifferences among them.Conclusions: Human albumin by itself induces higher proliferationof epithelial corneal cells but lower cell migration, compared with theeffect of the blood derivative s-PRGF. In addition, combination ofboth does not improve proliferation and affects negatively migration.Commercial Relationships: Noelia Andollo, None; Vanesa Freire,None; Arturo E. Grau, None; Jaime Etxebarria, bioftalmik (C);Juan A. Duran, None; Maria-Celia Morales, NoneProgram Number: 3893 Poster Board Number: D0137Presentation Time: 2:45 PM - 4:30 PMCryopreservation Preserves the Structural Integrity, BiochemicalComponents and Biologic Function of Amniotic MembraneTissueEk Kia Tan 1, 2 , Marissa T. Cooke 3 , Christian Mandrycky 3 , Hua He 1, 2 ,Julie O'Connell 4 , Todd C. McDevitt 3, 5 , Scheffer C. Tseng 1, 2 . 1 OcularSurface Research and Education Foundation, Miami, FL; 2 Researchand Development, TissueTech, Inc., Miami, FL; 3 Wallace H. CoulterDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute ofTechnology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA; 4 Amniox Medical,Marietta, GA; 5 Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering andBioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.Purpose: The therapeutic potential of amniotic membrane (AM) hasbeen examined in a variety of clinical indications, particularly inophthalmology where AM has been used extensively for indicationssuch as pterygium, conjuntivochalasis, and corneal defects. To date,there has been no comprehensive study comparing cryopreservedamniotic membrane processed with the CryoTek method and freshAM.Methods: Fresh AM, either thin or thick, and fresh amniochorionwere compared to CryoTek processed thin and thick AM andamniochorion. Histological properties were assessed by hematoxylinand eosin, Masson’s Trichrome, and Safranin O staining.Biochemical properties were measured by contents of protein,albumin, and hyaluronan (HA) with their molecular weight spectrum.Functional assays compared macrophage viability and proliferation,and human corneal fibroblast TGF-β1 induction.Results: Histochemical staining confirmed that the cryopreservationprocess did not alter the tissue architecture or collagen andglycosaminoglycan content. Biochemically, cryopreservation reducedtotal protein and human serum albumin contents, but retained highmolecular weight hyaluronan species including HC-HA complex,known to exert anti-inflammatory and anti-scarring effects. Bothfresh and cryopreserved AM water-soluble extracts similarlysuppressed viability and proliferation of RAW264.7 macrophages,and dose-dependently inhibited the TGF-β1 promoter activity inhuman corneal fibroblasts.Conclusions: These results collectively indicate thatcryopreservation by the CryoTek method effectively preserveshistological, biochemical and functional components of the AMtissue.Commercial Relationships: Ek Kia Tan, TissueTech, Inc. (E);Marissa T. Cooke, None; Christian Mandrycky, None; Hua He,TissueTech, Inc. (E); Julie O'Connell, None; Todd C. McDevitt,Amniox Medical (C); Scheffer C. Tseng, NIH, NEI (F), TissueTech,Inc. (F), TissueTech, Inc. (E), TissueTech, Inc. (P)Support: Research Alliance Venture Lab Grant #398, Atlanta, GAand a research grant from TissueTech, Inc., Miami, FL.Program Number: 3894 Poster Board Number: D0138Presentation Time: 2:45 PM - 4:30 PMBiological Differences between Cryopreserved and DehydratedAmniotic Membrane Tissue GraftsLorraine S. Chua 1, 2 , Marissa T. Cooke 3 , Christian Mandrycky 3 , EkKia Tan 1, 2 , Julie O'Connell 4 , Scheffer C. Tseng 1, 2 , Todd C.McDevitt 3, 5 . 1 Ocular Surface Research & Education Foundation,Miami, FL; 2 Research & Development, TissueTech, Inc., Miami, FL;3 Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, GeorgiaInstitute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA;4 Amniox Medical, Marietta, GA; 5 Parker H. Petit Institute forBioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology,Atlanta, GA.Purpose: Amniotic membrane (AM) processing methods candramatically impair both the structural integrity, and biologicalactivity, of critical matrix cell signaling factors essential for theintended use of the product. To analyze the effect of different AMavailable commercially for the ophthalmology market on conservingthe therapeutic potential of the tissue, we compared cryopreserved(CryoTek) and dehydrated (Purion®) processed tissue grafts inphysical and biochemical assays.Methods: Cryopreserved thin (CT-Thin) and thick (CT-Thick)tissues were compared to dehydrated, (EF) and (AF) AM tissuegrafts. Structural properties of cryopreserved and dehydrated AMwere assessed by histological staining while biochemical propertieswere measured in soluble tissue extracts by comparing hyaluronan(HA) content and molecular weight (MW) spectrum; and criticalproteoglycan (HC-HA) and protein (PTX3) signaling factors.©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.
<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Cornea</strong>Results: Histochemical staining demonstrated dehydrated tissueshaving a more compact extracellular matrix compared to thecryopreserved tissues even after the prescribed hydration duration.HA quantity was highest in CT-Thick, and although content wasrelatively similar in CT-Thin and EF/AF, the MW analysis revealedall cryopreserved samples contained high MW HA, while thedehydrated samples contained low MW HA. Essential signalingproteins, HC-HA and PTX3 detected by western blots were present incryopreserved samples but were either compromised, or completelyabsent, in dehydrated tissues.Conclusions: The cryopreservation process better preserves thestructural integrity and biochemistry of AM tissue grafts incomparison to dehydrated grafts, and suggests the therapeutic benefitof dehydrated AM may be compromised as a result.Commercial Relationships: Lorraine S. Chua, TissueTech Inc.(E); Marissa T. Cooke, None; Christian Mandrycky, None; EkKia Tan, TissueTech, Inc. (E); Julie O'Connell, None; Scheffer C.Tseng, NIH, NEI (F), TissueTech, Inc. (F), TissueTech, Inc. (E),TissueTech, Inc. (P); Todd C. McDevitt, Amniox Medical (C)Support: Research Alliance Venture Lab Grant #398, Atlanta, GAand a research grant from TissueTech, Inc., Miami, FL.Program Number: 3895 Poster Board Number: D0139Presentation Time: 2:45 PM - 4:30 PMCovalently immobilized epidermal growth factor acceleratesproliferation of human corneal epithelial cellsShin Ae Park 1 , Vijaykrishna K. Raghuanthan 1 , Sara M. Thomasy 1 ,Christopher J. Murphy 1, 2 . 1 Department of Surgical and RadiologicalSciences, UC Davis, Davis, CA; 2 Department of Ophthalmology &Vision Science, UC Davis, CA, CA.Purpose: <strong>Cornea</strong>l wound healing involves the coordination of anumber of complex processes including cell migration, cellproliferation, re-stratification, as well as matrix deposition and tissueremodeling. Cell migration and proliferation are greatly influencedby the presence of growth factors and delivery of cytoactive factorsin a corneal wound remains a difficult challenge. Here, weinvestigated an in vitro model for the covalent immobilization ofepidermal growth factor (EGF) to enhance corneal epithelial cellproliferation.Methods: Unmodified glass coverslips or those modified with thiosilaneor propyl silane were used as stimulants of a corneal woundbed. Disulfide bonds were reduced to expose sulfhydryl (-SH) groupsusing 10μM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP). Humanrecombinant EGF, modified with a heterobifunctional crosslinker(sulfo-SMCC) was covalently linked to the -SH groups of the silane.The cytoactivity of the covalently limmobilized EGF wasinvestigated by measuring proliferation of human immortalizedcorneal epithelial cells (hTCEpi) using the MTT assay over days.Cytotoxicity of the reducing agent, TCEP, was also determined byMTT assay over a differential dose range (1 nM to 1 mM).Results: Proliferation of hTCEpi cells was significantly greater (>2fold) when EGF was covalently linked to the surface in comparisonwith the non treated control groups (p < 0.05). TCEP was determinedto be non-toxic for doses 0.05).Conclusions: Our data strongly demonstrate that TCEP canpotentially be used as a safe reducing agent for covalentimmobilization of cytoactive factors. Importantly, we successfullydemonstrate that covalent immobilization of EGF (30 ng) potentlyenhances proliferation of hTCEpi cells in vitro. Covalent integrationof EGF into corneal wounds, is a unique strategy to promote reepithelializationusing significantly less cyctoactive factor and dosefrequency than topical application.Commercial Relationships: Shin Ae Park, None; Vijaykrishna K.Raghuanthan, None; Sara M. Thomasy, None; Christopher J.Murphy, Ocular Services On Demand (I), Ocular Services OnDemand (C), Platypus Technologies LLC (I), Imbed LLC (I), EyeKorLLC (I), Allergan (C), Genentech (C), Sarcode (C), Covance (C)Support: NIH Grant 1K08EY021142Program Number: 3896 Poster Board Number: D0140Presentation Time: 2:45 PM - 4:30 PMSubstrate topography enhances corneal epithelial cell electrotaxisBrian Reid 1 , Jing Gao 1 , Vijaykrishna K. Raghuanthan 2 , PaulRussell 2 , Christopher J. Murphy 2, 3 , Min Zhao 1, 3 . 1 Dermatology,University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; 2 Surgical andRadiological Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA;3 Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California, Davis,Davis, CA.Purpose: <strong>Cornea</strong>l epithelial cells (CECs) attach to the underlyingstroma via a 3D extracellular matrix basement membrane (BM) thatpossesses intrinsic biophysical (topography, stiffness) andbiochemical cues (chemoattractants, growth factors, soluble factors).Cellular behavior can be significantly modulated by these factorsduring wound healing. An important yet grossly under-studied factorin corneal wound healing is the role of electric fields (EFs). <strong>Cornea</strong>wounds generate significant EFs which cells respond to bydirectional migration. Here, for the first time, we investigated theimpact of simultaneous presentation of topographic cues and EFs onCEC migration.Methods: Immortalized human CECs were cultured on unpatterned,stochastically patterned (mimicking the stochastic arrangement on theBM) or anisotropically patterned polymeric substrates (biomimeticscale 400 to 4000nm pitches; pitch = ridge width + groove width)coated with fibronectin. EFs (0-150 mV/mm) were applied to cellsacross an electrotaxis chamber for 3h. Single cell migration, cellmigration as a monolayer across a simulated wound, and alterationsin the gene expression of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), andcytoskeletal regulator ROCK1 were determined.Results: In the absence of an EF, cells migrated faster on stochasticsubstrates than on flat surfaces (21.14µm/h vs. 18.44µm/hrespectively, P
- Page 2 and 3:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 4 and 5:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 6 and 7:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 8 and 9:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 10:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 13 and 14:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 16 and 17:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 18 and 19:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 20 and 21:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 22 and 23:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 24 and 25:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 26 and 27:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 28 and 29:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 30 and 31:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 32 and 33:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 34 and 35:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 36 and 37:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 38 and 39:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 40 and 41:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 42 and 43:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 44 and 45:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 46 and 47:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 48 and 49:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 50 and 51:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 52 and 53:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 54 and 55:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 56 and 57:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 58 and 59:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 60 and 61:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 62 and 63:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 64 and 65:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 66 and 67:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 68 and 69:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 70 and 71:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 72 and 73:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 74 and 75:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 76 and 77:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 78 and 79:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 80 and 81:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 82 and 83:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 84 and 85:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 86 and 87:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 88 and 89:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 90 and 91:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 92 and 93:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 94 and 95:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 96 and 97:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 98 and 99:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 100 and 101:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 102 and 103:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 104 and 105:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 106 and 107:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 108 and 109:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 110 and 111:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 112 and 113:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 114 and 115:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 116 and 117:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 118 and 119:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 120 and 121:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 122 and 123:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 124 and 125:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 126 and 127:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 128 and 129:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 130 and 131:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 132 and 133:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 134 and 135:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 136 and 137:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 138 and 139:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 140 and 141:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 142 and 143:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 144 and 145:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 146 and 147:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 148 and 149:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 150 and 151:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 152 and 153:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 154 and 155:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 156 and 157:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 158 and 159:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 160 and 161:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 162 and 163:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 164 and 165:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 166 and 167:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 168 and 169:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 170 and 171:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 172 and 173:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 174 and 175:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 176 and 177:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 178 and 179:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 180 and 181:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 182 and 183:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 184 and 185:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 186 and 187:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 188 and 189:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 190 and 191:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 192 and 193:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 194 and 195:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 196 and 197:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 198 and 199: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 200 and 201: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 202 and 203: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 204 and 205: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 206 and 207: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 208 and 209: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 210 and 211: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 212 and 213: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 214 and 215: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 216 and 217: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 218 and 219: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 220 and 221: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 222 and 223: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 224 and 225: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 226 and 227: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 228 and 229: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 230 and 231: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 232 and 233: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 234 and 235: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 236 and 237: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 238 and 239: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 240 and 241: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 242 and 243: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 244 and 245: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 246 and 247: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 250 and 251: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 252 and 253: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 254 and 255: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 256 and 257: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 258 and 259: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 260 and 261: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 262 and 263: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 264 and 265: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 266 and 267: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 268 and 269: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 270 and 271: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 272 and 273: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 274 and 275: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 276 and 277: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 278 and 279: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 280 and 281: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 282 and 283: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 284 and 285: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 286 and 287: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 288 and 289: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 290 and 291: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 292 and 293: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 294 and 295: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 296 and 297: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 298 and 299:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 300 and 301:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 302 and 303:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 304 and 305:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 306 and 307:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 308 and 309:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 310 and 311:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 312 and 313:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 314 and 315:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 316 and 317:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 318 and 319:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 320 and 321:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 322 and 323:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 324 and 325:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 326 and 327:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 328 and 329:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 330 and 331:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 332 and 333:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 334 and 335:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 336 and 337:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 338 and 339:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 340 and 341:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 342 and 343:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 344 and 345:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 346 and 347:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 348 and 349:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 350 and 351:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 352 and 353:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 354 and 355:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 356 and 357:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 358 and 359:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 360 and 361:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 362 and 363:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 364 and 365:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 366 and 367:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 368 and 369:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 370 and 371:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 372 and 373:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 374 and 375:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 376 and 377:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 378 and 379:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 380 and 381:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 382 and 383:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts