<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Cornea</strong>differences between manifest refraction and the three imagingmodalities.Conclusions: Compared with topography and Scheimpflugphotography, OCT better reflects the change in spherical equivalentcorneal refractive change due to LASIK and has less variability. Forastigmatic change, all three modalities were statistically differentfrom the manifest change. However, OCT had the highest correlationand was the only modality with a mean difference less than 0.25 D.OCT provides an improved method to characterize spherical andastigmatic corneal refractive power - as would be needed for cataractsurgery - in the difficult to measure post LASIK population.[1] RP McNabb, F LaRocca, S Farsiu, AN Kuo, and JA Izatt,Biomed. Opt. Express 3, 2050-2065 (2012).[2] N.S Jaffe and HM Clayman, Trans Am Acad OphthalmolOtolaryngol 79, OP615-OP630 (1975)Table 1:Change after LASIK between MRx and 3 imagingmodalities.Commercial Relationships: Ryan P. McNabb, Bioptigen, Inc. (P);Sina Farsiu, Duke University (P); Sandra Stinnett, None; JosephA. Izatt, Bioptigen, Inc. (I), Bioptigen, Inc. (P), Bioptigen, Inc. (S);Anthony N. Kuo, Bioptigen (P)Support: NIH EY020001, EY021522; Coulter TranslationalPartnership Award; Research to Prevent BlindnessProgram Number: 2597 Poster Board Number: D0397Presentation Time: 2:45 PM - 4:30 PMConfocal microscopy: New tool for the follow-up of conjunctivalintraepithelial neoplasiaVitor S. Maduro 1 , Luisa Vieira 1 , Ana Magriço 1 , Arnaldo Santos 1 ,Manuela Martins 2 . 1 Ophthalmology <strong>Cornea</strong>, CHL-ZC, Lisboa,Portugal; 2 Pathology Department, CHL-ZC, Lisboa, Portugal.Purpose: To analyze the contribution of in vivo confocal microscopyfor the diagnosis and follow-up of conjunctival intraepithelialneoplasiaMethods: Retrospective case series of 5 patients with unilateralconjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) submitted to surgery plusadjuvant therapy in a follow-up period of 12 months. All patientswere evaluated before and after surgery with slit-lamp photographyand confocal microscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II, Rostock<strong>Cornea</strong> Module). The authors did a comparative analysis of slit-lampphotographs, confocal microscopy images and histologicalexamination photographs of the same lesions.Results: Five patients (4 males, 1 female) with a mean age of 79,6years, were enrolled in this study. Three were identified as high-gradeintraepithelial neoplasia and two as carcinoma in situ. Thehistological findings correlated well with those seen by confocalmicroscopy: epithelial disorganization with acanthosis, parakeratosis,cellular pleomorphism, high cellular and nuclear reflectivity, highnuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and sometimes binucleation. The lesionis well demarcated and the subbasal corneal nerves were notvisualized in areas affected by CIN. Confocal microscopy hasidentified 1 relapse and was useful to monitor the treatment response.Conclusions: In vivo confocal microscopy may be important notonly in the diagnosis of CIN, but also detecting relapses andmonitoring the treatment response, in a relative non-invasive manner.Commercial Relationships: Vitor S. Maduro, None; Luisa Vieira,None; Ana Magriço, None; Arnaldo Santos, None; ManuelaMartins, NoneProgram Number: 2598 Poster Board Number: D0398Presentation Time: 2:45 PM - 4:30 PMPhenotypic characterization of Reis-Bücklers corneal dystrophyQingfeng Liang 1 , Xuguang Sun 1 , Zhiqiang Pan 1 , Antoine Labbe 1, 2 .1 ophthalmology, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology,Beijing TongrenEye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University,Beijing, China; 2 Ophthalmology, Quinze-Vingts National EyeCenter, Paris and Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University,Versailles, France., Pairs, France.Purpose: To determine the phenotype of Reis-Bücklers cornealdystrophy (RBCD) using biomicroscopy, in vivo confocalmicroscopy (IVCM), anterior segment optical coherence tomography(AS-OCT), and light and electron microscopy.Methods: Five patients from a Chinese family with clinical RBCDand TGFBI gene mutations were evaluated. All patients underwentcomplete ophthalmogic examinations including slit-lampbiomicroscopy, IVCM and AS-OCT analysis. After penetratingkeratoplasty, corneal buttons were examined under light andtransmission electron microscopy.Results: Slit-lamp biomicroscopy showed irregularly ring-shapedand geographic grey-white opacities arranged symmetrically at or justnear the level of Bowman's membrane in all affected eyes. UsingIVCM, Bowman’s membrane was replaced by a granular andirregular hyper-reflective material without any shadows. In theanterior stroma next to the Bowman’s membrane, amyloid-likehyper-reflective material was also observed. AS-OC showed highlyreflective deposits concentrated primarily at the level of Bowman'smembrane. Analysis of corneal buttons under light microscopyrevealed that Bowman's membrane was replaced by a granular tissue,which extended into the anterior corneal stroma. Using electronicmicroscopy, rod-shaped bodies were observed within this granulartissue.Conclusions: Although genetic analysis might facilitate precisediagnosis and corneal dystrophy classification, these results suggestthat IVCM and AS-OCT may be a useful adjunct to slit lampbiomicroscopy for the diagnosis and management of RBCD.Commercial Relationships: Qingfeng Liang, None; Xuguang Sun,None; Zhiqiang Pan, None; Antoine Labbe, NoneProgram Number: 2599 Poster Board Number: D0399Presentation Time: 2:45 PM - 4:30 PMIn Vivo Morphology of the Limbal Palisades of Vogt Correlateswith Progressive Stem Cell Deficiency in Aniridia-RelatedKeratopathyTor P. Utheim 1, 2 , Neil S. Lagali 3 , Ulla Eden 3 , Xiangjun Chen 2 , RuthRiise 4 , Anette Dellby 3 , Per Fagerholm 3 . 1 Avdeling for medisinskbiokjemi, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 2 SynsLaserKirurgi AS, Oslo, Norway; 3 Department of Clinical and ExperimentalMedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences Linköping University,Linköping, Sweden; 4 Department of Ophthalmology, InnlandetHospital, Elverum, Norway.Purpose: To investigate morphologic alterations in the limbalpalisades of Vogt in a cohort of Norwegian patients with congenitalaniridia.Methods: All subjects were examined bilaterally by slit lampbiomicroscopy, and the limbal palisades of Vogt were examined©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.
<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Cornea</strong>microscopically by laser-scanning confocal microscopy (IVCM). Slitlamp biomicroscopy was used to grade the stage of aniridia-relatedkeratopathy (ARK) based on degree of conjunctivalization of theperipheral and central cornea. By IVCM, specific limbal morphologyof epithelial cells, palisade ridges and projections was assessed.Results: Two eyes were found without clinical signs of ARK, and inthese eyes, the limbal palisades had a normal-appearing morphology.In the earliest stages of ARK where conjunctiva extended over thelimbal barrier, recognizable microscopic remnants of palisadestructures were apparent, but no normal-appearing palisade structureswere visible by IVCM. Limbal epithelial cells lost a regular mosaicand conjunctival-type epithelium invaded the limbal space. In all eyeswith later stages of ARK, conjunctivalization of the periphery orentire cornea was observed clinically, while no palisade structureswere present by IVCM. In a control group, normal limbal palisadesof Vogt structures were observed in the superior limbus in all eyes,but in five eyes in the inferior limbus normal palisades structureswere replaced by abnormal features.Conclusions: There appears to be a strong relationship of themicroscopic appearance of the limbal palisades of Vogt in aniridiaand the corresponding clinical degree of conjunctivalization of thecornea, which lends support to the theory that the palisades of Vogtrepresents a stem cell niche. IVCM could be a useful tool to assessearly morphologic changes that accompany stem cell deficiency.Commercial Relationships: Tor P. Utheim, None; Neil S. Lagali,None; Ulla Eden, None; Xiangjun Chen, None; Ruth Riise, None;Anette Dellby, None; Per Fagerholm, NoneSupport: Crown Princess Margareta’s Foundation for the VisuallyImpaired, Carmen and Bertil Regnérs Foundation for Research in EyeDisease, County Council of Östergötland, and Aniridia NorwayProgram Number: 2600 Poster Board Number: D0400Presentation Time: 2:45 PM - 4:30 PMLaser In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Demonstrates Diminishmentof Subbasal Nerve Plexus in Early Stage Fuchs Endothelial<strong>Cornea</strong>l DystrophyShruti Aggarwal, Bernardo M. Cavalcanti, Andrea Cruzat, LauraRegali, Ula V. Jurkunas, Pedram Hamrah. <strong>Cornea</strong>, Ophthalmology,Massachusetts Eye& Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA.Purpose: To evaluate corneal sensation and subbasal nerve plexuschanges using laser in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in early andlate stage Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).Methods: A prospective, cross sectional study was conducted and 33FECD patients (33 eyes) were included. FECD patients wereclassified into early (without edema) and late stage (with edema).Fourteen eyes with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) wereused as positive controls (edematous cornea) and 17 normal agematchedcontrols eyes as negative controls. IVCM (HRT3/RCM) wasperformed in the central cornea. Three representative images wereevaluated by masked 2 observers for density and number of subbasalnerves (NeuronJ), and presence of dendritic immunecells(DC)(ImageJ). Central corneal sensation was assessed byCochet-Bonnet esthesiometer.Results: Eyes with FECD and PBK showed significantly diminishedsubbasal nerves, including total nerve length (11.5±1.3 and2.8±0.7mm/mm2, respectively;p=0.001) and total number of nerves(8.8±1.1 and 2.2±0.4 n/frame;p=0.001), as compared to controls(23.3±8.1 mm/mm2 and 25.9±5.3 n/frame). Decreased nervescorresponded (R = 0.32) to diminished sensation in both FECD(4.9±0.2cm;p=0.045) and PBK (3.6±0.6;p=0.001) as compared tocontrols (5.9±0.04). Both early stage (n=22) and late stage FECD(n=11) showed significant reduction in total nerve density (13.1±1.4;9.9±1.2, respectively;) and number (8.2±2.5; 6.5±2.1), compared tocontrols (p100cells/mm2).Conclusions: IVCM demonstrates profound diminishment ofsubbasal nerves in both FECD and PBK, correlating to decreasedsensation. Interestingly, even early-stage FECD patients haddecreased subbasal nerves. Further, increased DC were found inpatients with FECD, demonstrating subclinical inflammation. Thedata suggests that reduction in subbasal nerves and inflammation maypotentially play a role in FECD. Additional studies are required toinvestigate whether subbasal nerve alterations are directly caused bydecreased endothelial cell density, or potentially lead to loss ofendothelial cells.Commercial Relationships: Shruti Aggarwal, None; Bernardo M.Cavalcanti, None; Andrea Cruzat, None; Laura Regali, None; UlaV. Jurkunas, 61/482,769 (P), Altheos (C); Pedram Hamrah, NoneSupport: Funding: NIH K08-EY020575, Research to PreventBlindness Career Development Award, Falk Medical Research Trust,New England <strong>Cornea</strong>l Transplant Research FundProgram Number: 2601 Poster Board Number: D0401Presentation Time: 2:45 PM - 4:30 PMNew Diagnostic Parameters in Staging Limbal Stem CellDeficiency Using In Vivo Laser Scanning Confocal MicroscopyEric H. Chan 1 , Martin N. Nakatsu 2 , Sophie X. Deng 2 . 1 David GeffenSchool of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; 2 <strong>Cornea</strong> Division,Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA.Purpose: To investigate the changes in corneal cytology andepithelium in different stages of LSCD using in vivo confocalmicroscopy (ICM) to establish a more accurate diagnostic algorithm.Methods: This was a prospective study, in which a total of 33 eyesdiagnosed clinically with LSCD were selected for ICM examinationand analyzed retrospectively. Of those 33 eyes, 20 eyes alsounderwent impression cytology. Ten normal eyes were included ascontrols for ICM examination. Confocal imaging of the centralcornea, the superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal limbus werecollected using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III Rostock<strong>Cornea</strong>l Module. Epithelial layer thickness, basal cell density, andbasal cell diameter were measured in images demonstrating clearepithelial cell morphology. Statistical analysis was evaluated usingANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and two-tailed T-tests.Results: Imaging of epithelial cell morphology in LSCD eyesrevealed prominent nuclei, loss of distinct cell borders, and generalloss of basal cells with and without preservation of subbasal nerves.In normal eyes, the average epithelial thickness measured by ICMwas 47.8 µm, 70.0 µm, 60.2 µm, 58.6 µm, and 62.2 µm in the centralcornea, inferior limbus, nasal limbus, superior limbus, and temporallimbus, respectively. When compared to respective normal limbuslocations, the epithelial thickness in the limbus affected by LSCDdecreased by 27% and 45% in early stage and intermediate stagedisease, respectively. Differences between early and intermediatechanges in epithelial thickness of the limbus were statisticallysignificant (p=0.04). Nine of the 20 eyes were positive for gobletcells on impression cytology. Goblet cells if present were foundirrespective of LSCD stage.Conclusions: Our data show that the limbal epithelium becomesprogressively thinner in advanced LSCD. Additionally, presence ofgoblet cells is not a reliable diagnostic marker of the early andintermediate stages of LSCD.©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.
- Page 2 and 3:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 4 and 5:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 6 and 7:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 8 and 9:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 10:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 13 and 14:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 16 and 17:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 18 and 19:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 20 and 21:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 22 and 23:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 24 and 25:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 26 and 27:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 28 and 29:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 30 and 31:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 32 and 33:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 34 and 35:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 36 and 37:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 38 and 39:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 40 and 41:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 42 and 43:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 44 and 45:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 46 and 47:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 48 and 49:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 50 and 51:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 52 and 53:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 54 and 55:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 56 and 57:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 58 and 59:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 60 and 61:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 62 and 63:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 64 and 65:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 66 and 67:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 68 and 69:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 70 and 71:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 72 and 73:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 74 and 75:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 76 and 77:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 78 and 79:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 80 and 81:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 82 and 83:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 84 and 85:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 86 and 87:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 88 and 89:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 90 and 91:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 92 and 93:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 94 and 95:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 96 and 97:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 98 and 99:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 100 and 101:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 102 and 103:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 104 and 105:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 106 and 107:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 108 and 109:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 110 and 111:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 112 and 113:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 114 and 115:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 116 and 117:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 118 and 119:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 120 and 121:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 122 and 123:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 124 and 125:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 126 and 127:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 128 and 129: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 130 and 131: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 132 and 133: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 134 and 135: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 136 and 137: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 138 and 139: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 140 and 141: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 142 and 143: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 144 and 145: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 146 and 147: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 148 and 149: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 150 and 151: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 152 and 153: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 154 and 155: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 156 and 157: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 158 and 159: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 160 and 161: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 162 and 163: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 164 and 165: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 166 and 167: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 168 and 169: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 170 and 171: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 172 and 173: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 174 and 175: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 176 and 177: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 180 and 181: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 182 and 183: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 184 and 185: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 186 and 187: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 188 and 189: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 190 and 191: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 192 and 193: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 194 and 195: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 196 and 197: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 198 and 199: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 200 and 201: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 202 and 203: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 204 and 205: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 206 and 207: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 208 and 209: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 210 and 211: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 212 and 213: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 214 and 215: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 216 and 217: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 218 and 219: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 220 and 221: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 222 and 223: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 224 and 225: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 226 and 227: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 228 and 229:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 230 and 231:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 232 and 233:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 234 and 235:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 236 and 237:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 238 and 239:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 240 and 241:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 242 and 243:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 244 and 245:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 246 and 247:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 248 and 249:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 250 and 251:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 252 and 253:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 254 and 255:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 256 and 257:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 258 and 259:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 260 and 261:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 262 and 263:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 264 and 265:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 266 and 267:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 268 and 269:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 270 and 271:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 272 and 273:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 274 and 275:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 276 and 277:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 278 and 279:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 280 and 281:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 282 and 283:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 284 and 285:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 286 and 287:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 288 and 289:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 290 and 291:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 292 and 293:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 294 and 295:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 296 and 297:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 298 and 299:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 300 and 301:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 302 and 303:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 304 and 305:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 306 and 307:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 308 and 309:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 310 and 311:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 312 and 313:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 314 and 315:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 316 and 317:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 318 and 319:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 320 and 321:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 322 and 323:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 324 and 325:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 326 and 327:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 328 and 329:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 330 and 331:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 332 and 333:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 334 and 335:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 336 and 337:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 338 and 339:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 340 and 341:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 342 and 343:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 344 and 345:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 346 and 347:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 348 and 349:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 350 and 351:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 352 and 353:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 354 and 355:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 356 and 357:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 358 and 359:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 360 and 361:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 362 and 363:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 364 and 365:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 366 and 367:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 368 and 369:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 370 and 371:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 372 and 373:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 374 and 375:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 376 and 377:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 378 and 379:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 380 and 381:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 382 and 383:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts