<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Cornea</strong>(pHCEC). Conjunctival epithelial cells cover more than 90% of theocular surface. However, the role of conjunctival epithelial cells indry eye pathogenesis, where hyperosmolar stress may be important.Methods: For NGF transcription and production levels, RT-PCR andELISA were assessed with pHCECs in normal osmolar medium (307mOsm/L) or higher-osmolarity media, 350, 400, and 450 mOsm/L.For apoptosis analysis, pHCEC were cultured in normal- or 400mOsm/L osmolar medium with NGF neutralizing antibody orrecombinant human NGF for 6 hours and analysed by FACSCaliburflow cytometer. Bcl-xL, Bax, phospho-JNK, and cleaved caspase-3expression were detected by Western blotting. Inflammatorycytokine, IL-6 was analyzed using ELISA.Results: NGF levels in cultured pHCECs were up-regulated duringhyperosmolar conditions. Positive apoptotic cells significantly wereincreased in hyperosmolar-induced cells and NGF neutralizingantibody-added cells. When recombinant human NGF is added in 400mOsm/L osmolar medium, apoptotic cells were decreased andphospho-JNK, Bax, and cleaved caspase-3 expression were downregulatedbut Bcl-xL expression was increased. Upon hyperosmoticstress, IL-6 level increased and recombinant human NGF reduced IL-6 level.Conclusions: Our results suggest that hyperosmolarity inducesapoptosis of pHCECs by JNK signaling pathway. Up-regulated NGFunder hyperosmolar condition may contribute, at least in part, toreduce apoptosis of pHCEC and may be beneficial in recoveringconjunctival damage due to chronic hyperosmolar stress.Commercial Relationships: Hungwon Tchah, None; Soon-SukKang, None; Eun-Soon Kim, None; Jae-yong Kim, NoneSupport: NRF-2012R1A1A2003278Program Number: 2128 Poster Board Number: D0355Presentation Time: 11:00 AM - 12:45 PMUse of Evicel as a Fibrin Adhesive in Pterygium SurgeryLena Dixit 1, 2 , Todd R. Shepler 2 . 1 Baylor College of Medicine,Houston, TX; 2 University of Texas Southwestern at Austin, Austin,TX.Purpose: To evaluate Evicel as a safe and effective fibrin adhesivefor amniotic membrane graft fixation during pterygium surgery.Evicel is derived from pooled human plasma, whereas the goldstandardfibrin adhesive used in ophthalmology, Tisseel, containshuman and synthetic components. Tisseel requires extensivepreparation and handling prior to its use. Evicel may be equal ormore effective than Tisseel during pterygium surgery without thesame preparation and handling. Previous literature has shown thatEvicel’s clot integrity is mechanically superior to Tisseel’s whichmay be advantageous when fibrin glue is utilized as an adhesiverather than a hemostatic agent.Methods: Consecutive cases of 96 patients who underwent primarypterygium surgery with amniotic membrane placement from 1 weekto 8 months in the postoperative period were included in this study.Of these patients, 59 were treated with Evicel and 37 were treatedwith Tisseel to adhere an amniotic membrane graft to the sclera afterpterygium excision. Post-operative complications of recurrence,pyogenic granuloma, and conjunctival cysts were clinically assessed.Proportions of each complication were calculated and analyzed withstatistical significance at p < 0.05.Results: Mean patient age was 46 ± 12 (SD) (range 18-70) in theEvicel group, and 46 ± 11 (SD) (range 27-74) in the Tisseel group. Inthe Evicel group, 6.8% of patients developed a recurrent pterygium,6.8% developed a pyogenic granuloma, and 3.4% developed aconjunctival cyst. In the Tisseel group, 2.7% developed a recurrentpterygium, 2.7% developed a pyogenic granuloma, and 2.7%developed a conjunctival cyst. An unpaired two-sample t-testbetween proportions showed there was no difference in the rates ofpterygium recurrence (t value = 0.97, degrees of freedom = 93.9,two-tailed p value = 0.33), no difference in formation of pyogenicgranuloma (t value = 0.97, degrees of freedom = 93.9, two-tailed pvalue = 0.33), and no difference in formation of conjunctival cyst (tvalue = 0.2, degrees of freedom = 89.9, two-tailed p value = 0.84).Conclusions: There is no difference in the development ofpostoperative complications between Evicel and Tisseel when used asan adhesive during pterygium surgery. Evicel is a safe and effectivefibrin adhesive for amniotic membrane graft fixation after pterygiumexcision.Commercial Relationships: Lena Dixit, None; Todd R. Shepler,NoneProgram Number: 2129 Poster Board Number: D0356Presentation Time: 11:00 AM - 12:45 PMHLA-DR expression/mobilization on the conjunctival epithelialcells exposed to hyperosmolarity and desiccative stressChristophe Roubeix 1, 2 , Luisa Riancho 1, 2 , Christophe Baudouin 1, 3 ,Francoise Brignole-Baudouin 1, 4 . 1 Institut de la Vision, Paris, France;2 INSERM/UPMC Univ Paris 06, PARIS, France; 3 Quinze-VingtsNational Hospital of Ophthalmology, PARIS, France; 4 ParisDescartes University, Toxicology Department, PARIS, France.Purpose: To characterize the effects of two in vitro models of dryeye on the expression/mobilization of HLA-DR known as abiomarker of dry eye. We investigated the effect of hyperosmolarity(HO) and desiccation stress (DS) on the membrane expression andthe induction of HLA-DR mRNA as a first step to inflammation indry eye disease in correlation with other inflammatory biomarkerssuch as IL-6, IL-8.Methods: Hyperosmolar (HO) and desiccative stresses (DS) wereinduced on conjunctival cells (Wong-Kilbourne-derived of ChangConjunctiva, WKD). WKD were exposed either to NaCl-induced HOconditions (500mOsm) for 24h or to desiccating conditions byseeding them on transwell membranes (d: 2.4cm, pore 0.4 μm) andincubated in a drying chamber (relative humidity: 17±3%) for 6hafter cell culture medium removal from the upper side of thetranswell. We evaluated the effect of HO or DS on IL-6, IL-8 andHLA-DR mRNA expression by qRT-PCR. IL-6 and IL-8 weremeasured for each stress condition using ELISA assay. HLA-DR cellwas investigated using flow cytometry and immunofluorescenceanalyses.Results: Both HO and DS induced an increase of IL-6 and IL-8mRNA in WKD cells and a production of IL-6 and IL-8 in thesupernatant. HO and DS induced a mild increase of the HLA-DRmRNA synthesis and a translocation of the cytoplasmic HLA-DR tothe cell membrane confirmed by flow cytometry when compared tobasal conditions.Conclusions: By using these two in vitro dry eye models, weconfirmed the proinflammatory profile induced by hyperosmolar ordesiccating conditions on conjunctival cells. These conditions couldtrigger HLA-DR translocation at the cell membrane without thepresence of IFNγ released by immune cell infiltration. Theseobservations revealed the existence of a preliminary step in thechronic dry eye inflammation process.Commercial Relationships: Christophe Roubeix, laboratoiresTHEA (R); Luisa Riancho, None; Christophe Baudouin, None;Francoise Brignole-Baudouin, NoneSupport: Laboratoires THEAProgram Number: 2130 Poster Board Number: D0357Presentation Time: 11:00 AM - 12:45 PM©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.
<strong>ARVO</strong> 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts by Scientific Section/Group - <strong>Cornea</strong>Conjunctival Melanoacanthoma: A New Pigmented ConjunctivalEntitySaeed F. Al Wadani 1, 3 , Michael J. Mines 1, 2 , L. David Monroe 4 ,Charles Eberhart 1 . 1 Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University,Baltimore, MD; 2 Dept of Surgery, Ophthalmology Div, UniformedServices University, Bethesda, MD; 3 Ophthalmology, King SaudUniversity, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4 Eye and Laser Institute, BocaRaton, FL.Purpose: A range of pigmented conjunctival lesions have beendescribed, but the nomenclature used to classify these tumors varies,and understanding of their underlying pathobiology is limited. Wereport the clinical and pathological features of a conjunctival lesionwith both melanocytic and epithelial components that does notclearly fit into the current classification scheme of pigmentedconjunctival entities. Rather, it has features similar to those of oralmelanoacanthoma, benign lesions which to our knowledge have notbeen previously reported on the ocular surface.Methods: Histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation ofthe lesion was performed in the Johns Hopkins surgical pathologylaboratory using standard techniques.Results: The lesion arose on the perilimbal conjunctiva of a 48 yearold African American man as a solitary, well defined, reddishmovable plaque concerning for malignancy. On microscopicexamination, the lesion was characterized by thickened epitheliumwith downward growth of epithelial nests and strands highlighted bycytokeratin immunostains. Dense chronic inflammation was presentbelow the lesion. Diffusely admixed with the epithelial elements werean increased number of melanocytes immunoreactive for MITF,MART-1, S100 and HMB-45. Many of these appeared bland,dendritic and localized to the epithelial base, but pagetoid spread andmore compact cells were also noted. Ki67 revealed proliferation inboth the epithelial and melanocytic components.Conclusions: The microscopic features of this case do not clearlyconform to the existing classification of pigmented conjunctivallesions. It thus challenges current understanding of thepathophysiology of this class of entities, and raises questionsregarding appropriate clinical care. Interestingly, the lesion appearshighly similar to oral melanoacanthoma, a rare benign pigmentedlesion of the oral mucosa generally seen in black patients, andcharacterized by proliferation of both keratinocytes and HMB-45immunoreactive dendritic melanocytes. To our knowledge,conjunctival melanoacanthoma have not been previously reported.Melanoacanthoma are benign, but our conjunctival lesion hasfeatures which overlap with primary acquired melanosis with atypiaor melanoma in situ. Recognizing the potential of melanoacanthomato arise on the bulbar conjunctiva therefore may alter the diagnosisand treatments of patients with these lesions.Conjunctival MelanoacanthomaCommercial Relationships: Saeed F. Al Wadani, None; MichaelJ. Mines, None; L. David Monroe, None; Charles Eberhart, NoneSupport: Research to Prevent BlindnessMonday, May 06, 2013 2:45 PM-4:30 PMTCC 303 Paper SessionProgram #/Board # Range: 2189-2195Organizing Section: <strong>Cornea</strong>Program Number: 2189Presentation Time: 2:45 PM - 3:00 PMFully Functional Bioengineered Lacrimal Gland Regeneration asan Organ Replacement Regenerative TherapyMasatoshi Hirayama 1 , Miho Ogawa 2 , Masamitsu Oshima 3 , TetsuyaKawakita 1 , Shigeto Shimmura 1 , Takashi Tsuji 2, 3 , Kazuo Tsubota 1 .1 Ophthalmology, Keio Univ School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;2 Organ Technologies Inc., Tokyo, Japan; 3 Research Institute forScience and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Chiba, Japan.Purpose: Tear secreted from lacrimal gland plays a multifaceted roleto maintain a homeostatic microenvironment for ocular surface. Dryeye is an important public health problem, and it is expected todevelop a novel therapeutic treatment for the restoration of thelacrimal gland functions. Here, we report a successful fullyfunctioning lacrimal gland replacement achieved though thetransplantation of bioengineered lacrimal gland germ in adult mouse.Methods: The care and handling of animals were performed inaccordance with NIH guidelines. Protocols were approved by theAnimal Care and Use Committee. We had successfully demonstratedthe bioengineered lacrimal gland germ regeneration by organ germmethod (<strong>ARVO</strong>2012). We regenerated the bioengineered lacrimalgland germ and harderian gland germ, and transplanted them to adultlacrimal gland defect model mouse. The development ofbioengineered glands, histological structure including expression ofaquapolin-5 (AQP5), lactoferrin and lipids, tear secretion ability andocular surface protection effect were analyzed.Results: The bioengineered lacrimal gland germ and harderian glandgerm successfully achieved correct gland structure including acini,myoepithelial cells and nerve, followed by successful ductintegration. AQP5 and lactoferrin in the bioengineered lacrimalgland, and lipids in the bioengineered harderian gland werehistologically detected. The bioengineered lacrimal gland receivedappropriate neural control and had a secretion ability equivalent tothat of natural lacrimal gland. Tear from the bioengineered glandshad appropriate tear components such as lactoferrin. The ocularsurface status including fluorescein staining and corneal epithelialthickness was significantly improved in the bioengineered lacrimalgland transplantation mouse compared with that in the lacrimal glanddefect model mouse.Conclusions: We demonstrated that bioengineered lacrimal glandand harderian gland, which had the correct gland structure, couldproduce the tear followed by successful duct integration and restorethe lacrimal gland physiological functions in response to nervousstimulations, and could protect the ocular surface. This study thusrepresents a substantial advance and demonstrates the possibility ofnovel therapeutic approach for dry eye as a future organ replacementregenerative therapy.Commercial Relationships: Masatoshi Hirayama, None; MihoOgawa, None; Masamitsu Oshima, None; Tetsuya Kawakita,None; Shigeto Shimmura, None; Takashi Tsuji, None; KazuoTsubota, AcuFocus, Inc (C), Allergan (F), Bausch Lomb Surgical(C), Functional visual acuity meter (P), JiNS (P), Kissei (F), Kowa(F), Santen, Inc. (F), Otsuka (F), Pfizer (C), Thea (C), Echo Denki(P), Nidek (F), Ophtecs (F), Wakasa Seikatsu (F), CEPT Company(P)Support: None in the Support282 Dry Eye and Lacrimal Gland IIProgram Number: 2190©2013, Copyright by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Go to iovs.org to access the version of record. For permissionto reproduce any abstract, contact the <strong>ARVO</strong> Office at arvo@arvo.org.
- Page 2 and 3:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 4 and 5:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 6 and 7:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 8 and 9:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 10:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 13 and 14:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 16 and 17:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 18 and 19:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 20 and 21:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 22 and 23:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 24 and 25:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 26 and 27:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 28 and 29:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 30 and 31:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 32 and 33:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 34 and 35:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 36 and 37:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 38 and 39:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 40 and 41:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 42 and 43:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 44 and 45:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 46 and 47:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 48 and 49:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 50 and 51:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 52 and 53:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 54 and 55:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 56 and 57:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 58 and 59:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 60 and 61:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 62 and 63:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 64 and 65:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 66 and 67:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 68 and 69:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 70 and 71:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 72 and 73:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 74 and 75:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 76 and 77:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 78 and 79:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 80 and 81:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 82 and 83:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 84 and 85:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 86 and 87:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 88 and 89:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 90 and 91:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 92 and 93:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 94 and 95:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 96 and 97:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 98 and 99:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 100 and 101:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 102 and 103:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 104 and 105:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 106 and 107: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 108 and 109: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 110 and 111: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 112 and 113: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 114 and 115: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 116 and 117: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 118 and 119: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 120 and 121: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 122 and 123: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 124 and 125: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 126 and 127: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 128 and 129: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 130 and 131: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 132 and 133: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 134 and 135: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 136 and 137: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 138 and 139: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 140 and 141: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 142 and 143: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 144 and 145: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 146 and 147: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 148 and 149: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 150 and 151: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 152 and 153: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 154 and 155: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 158 and 159: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 160 and 161: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 162 and 163: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 164 and 165: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 166 and 167: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 168 and 169: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 170 and 171: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 172 and 173: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 174 and 175: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 176 and 177: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 178 and 179: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 180 and 181: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 182 and 183: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 184 and 185: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 186 and 187: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 188 and 189: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 190 and 191: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 192 and 193: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 194 and 195: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 196 and 197: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 198 and 199: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 200 and 201: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 202 and 203: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 204 and 205: ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 206 and 207:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 208 and 209:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 210 and 211:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 212 and 213:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 214 and 215:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 216 and 217:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 218 and 219:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 220 and 221:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 222 and 223:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 224 and 225:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 226 and 227:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 228 and 229:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 230 and 231:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 232 and 233:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 234 and 235:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 236 and 237:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 238 and 239:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 240 and 241:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 242 and 243:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 244 and 245:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 246 and 247:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 248 and 249:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 250 and 251:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 252 and 253:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 254 and 255:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 256 and 257:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 258 and 259:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 260 and 261:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 262 and 263:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 264 and 265:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 266 and 267:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 268 and 269:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 270 and 271:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 272 and 273:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 274 and 275:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 276 and 277:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 278 and 279:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 280 and 281:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 282 and 283:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 284 and 285:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 286 and 287:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 288 and 289:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 290 and 291:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 292 and 293:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 294 and 295:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 296 and 297:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 298 and 299:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 300 and 301:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 302 and 303:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 304 and 305:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 306 and 307:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 308 and 309:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 310 and 311:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 312 and 313:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 314 and 315:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 316 and 317:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 318 and 319:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 320 and 321:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 322 and 323:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 324 and 325:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 326 and 327:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 328 and 329:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 330 and 331:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 332 and 333:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 334 and 335:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 336 and 337:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 338 and 339:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 340 and 341:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 342 and 343:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 344 and 345:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 346 and 347:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 348 and 349:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 350 and 351:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 352 and 353:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 354 and 355:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 356 and 357:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 358 and 359:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 360 and 361:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 362 and 363:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 364 and 365:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 366 and 367:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 368 and 369:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 370 and 371:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 372 and 373:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 374 and 375:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 376 and 377:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 378 and 379:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 380 and 381:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts
- Page 382 and 383:
ARVO 2013 Annual Meeting Abstracts