10.07.2015 Views

Food Act Report 2009/2010 - SA Health - SA.Gov.au

Food Act Report 2009/2010 - SA Health - SA.Gov.au

Food Act Report 2009/2010 - SA Health - SA.Gov.au

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix 10Follow up <strong>Act</strong>ivitiesFor each sample that reported a marginal or unsatisfactory result, a warning letter was sent to the bakery concernedand the local Council was also informed of results within their area for follow up.The results were also discussed at a professional forum for Environmental <strong>Health</strong> Officers (EHOs) and at, theEnvironmental <strong>Health</strong> Australia <strong>Food</strong> Special Interest Group meetings.<strong>SA</strong> <strong>Health</strong> is encouraging EHOs to use a high risk baked foods checklist in addition to the standard Australian <strong>Food</strong>Safety Assessment (AF<strong>SA</strong>) <strong>Food</strong> Business Inspection Checklist when undertaking routine inspections of bakeries.For the purposes of identification of foods that require temperature control, EHOs have been asked to reference theNSW <strong>Food</strong> Authority’s document Potentially Hazardous <strong>Food</strong>s (September 2008).Additionally, the <strong>Food</strong> Policy and Programs Branch is in the process of preparing a food industry bulletin fordistribution to local council and industry with a specific focus on the issues identified in this study. This report willalso be forwarded to local councils.ConclusionFifty sweet bakery food products were sampled from a total of twenty six bakeries and examined for microbiologicalsafety. Compared with the 2006–07 survey, compliance for Salmonella spp and Staphylococcus <strong>au</strong>reus, has beenmaintained, however, 54% of businesses surveyed reported marginal or unsatisfactory results when their productswere assessed against the Guidelines for the Microbiological Examination of Ready-to-Eat <strong>Food</strong>s.This study has identified that additional control measures such as improved hygiene and temperature control may bebeneficial for manufacturers of potentially hazardous sweet bakery products.Despite actions taken by <strong>SA</strong> <strong>Health</strong> to follow up the 2006–07 survey, the results indicate the need to continueeducating the food industry about the risks and control measures required for high risk baked foods. <strong>Food</strong> premisesinspections require a more specific focus on high risk activities, followed by an additional survey by <strong>SA</strong> <strong>Health</strong> to verifythe effectiveness of increased surveillance.<strong>SA</strong> <strong>Health</strong> is developing guidance documents to further support the food industry and local councils to addressthis issue.References<strong>Food</strong> Standards Australia New Zealand, Guidelines for the microbiological examination of ready-to-eat foods,December 2001.<strong>Food</strong> Standards Australia New Zealand, <strong>Food</strong> Standards Code, Standard 3.2.2 <strong>Food</strong> Practices and GeneralRequirements.NSW <strong>Food</strong> Authority, Potentially hazardous foods: <strong>Food</strong>s that require temperature control for safety, September 2008.Schmedemann, E. Sweet Baked Goods, a survey of the microbiological quality of sweet baked goods, in the <strong>Food</strong> Policyand Programs Branch, Public <strong>Health</strong> Division, Department of <strong>Health</strong>’s <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Act</strong> <strong>Report</strong> , year ending June 2007.<strong>Food</strong> <strong>Act</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Year ending 30 June <strong>2010</strong> page 88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!