4 EDUARDO MARTÍNEZBy a kind <strong>of</strong> linearization <strong>of</strong> the given nonlinear connection, we can define a linearconnection on the pullback bundle pr 1 : π ∗ 10T E → J 1 π. The associated covariantderivative is given byD Z X = κ([P H Z, Y V ]) + j([P V Z, Y H ]) + P H (Z)〈Y, dt〉T ,where Z is a vectorfield on J 1 π, Y is a vectorfield along π 10 (i.e. a section <strong>of</strong>π10T ∗ E), P H and P V are the horizontal and vertical projectors <strong>of</strong> the nonlinearconnection, Y H and Y V are the horizontal and vertical lifting <strong>of</strong> Y , and κ is theconnection map κ: T (J 1 π) → π10(Ver(π)), ∗ defined by the relation ξ V ◦ κ = P V .See [5, 4] for the details.The curvature <strong>of</strong> this connection was also studied in [5]. In particular, most <strong>of</strong>the components <strong>of</strong> the curvature tensor are determined in terms <strong>of</strong> the so calledJacobi endomorphism, Φ defined byΦ(X) = R(T , X),where R is the curvature <strong>of</strong> the nonlinear connection. Its coordinate expression isΦ = Φ i j (dxj − v j dt) ⊗ ∂∂qwithiΦ i j = − ∂f i∂x j − Γi kΓ k j − Γ(Γ i j).We remark that in general, for any connection on J 1 π, the horizontal lift <strong>of</strong> T isa sode on J 1 π, but it is to be noticed that the connection defined by this sode isnot the original one. This is the case only when the connection is a sode-connectionas above. Notice also that not every connection is the sode-connection for somesode.Proposition. A linear connection on π ∗ 10(T E) is the linear connection defined bysode if and only if it is torsionless, i.e.D X H Y − D Y H X = [X, Y ]for every pair <strong>of</strong> basic vectorfields X, Y ∈ X(E).The torsionless condition can be equivalently written in the form [X H , Y V ] −[Y H , X V ] = [X, Y ] V for every pair <strong>of</strong> basic vectorfields X, Y .In the local base {Γ, H i , V i } <strong>of</strong> vectorfields in J 1 π, where V i = ∂/∂v i , and thelocal base {T , ∂/∂x i } <strong>of</strong> vect<strong>of</strong>ields along π 10 the linear connection is determinedby( ) ∂D Vi∂x j = 0, D Vi T = ∂∂x i ,D Hi( ∂∂x j )= ∂Γk i∂v j∂∂x k , D H iT = 0,( ) ∂D Γ∂x j = Γ k ∂j∂x k , D ΓT = 0.In particular, from this expressions it is clear that D restricts to a connection onπ ∗ 10(Ver(π)): if Y is vertical over R, then the expression <strong>of</strong> the covariant derivativesimplifies toD Z X = κ([P H Z, Y V ]) + j([P V Z, Y H ]).
<strong>PARALLEL</strong> <strong>TRANSPORT</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>DECOUPLING</strong> 5In what follows, to simplify as much as possible, we will consider the restriction <strong>of</strong>the connection to π ∗ 10(Ver(π)). Therefore, we will consider only vertical vectorfieldsalong π 10 .4. Parallel transportThe parallel transport map associated to the linear connection defined abovewas interpreted in the case <strong>of</strong> the autonomous formalism by Crampin in [6], andextended to the non-autonomous case in [10]. In this section this interpretation ispresented (in a slightly different way).Let X be a vector field on E and X H ∈ X(J 1 π) its horizontal lift with respectto the given connection. Denote by ϕ t the flow <strong>of</strong> X and by φ t the flow <strong>of</strong> X H .When the connection is linear, then φ t is a linear map in the tangent bundle T E,which is but the parallel transport map along the integral curves <strong>of</strong> X. Whenthe connection is nonlinear, we can linearize the flow obtaining a linear bundlemap Ψ t : π10(Ver(π)) ∗ → π10(Ver(π)) ∗ over φ t as follows. We take p ∈ J 1 π andv ∈ Ver(π), over the same point m ∈ E, so that (p, v) ∈ π10(Ver(π)). ∗ Then weconsider the linearization z = d ds φ t(p + sv) ∣ s=0. This is a vector at the point φ t (p)which is vertical, since X H is projectable and thus π 10 ◦ φ t = ϕ t ◦ π 10 . Therefore,there exists a vector P t (p, v) ∈ Ver(π) ϕs(m) whose vertical lifting to the pointφ t (p) is the above vector z, i.e. z = ξ V (φ t (p), P t (p, v)). Then we have the mapΨ t (p, v) = (φ t (p), P t (p, v)), which is the parallel transport map along the flow <strong>of</strong>X H (and hence along horizontal curves).In other words, if we consider the inverse κ: Ver(π 10 ) → π10(Ver(π)) ∗ <strong>of</strong> thevertical isomorphism ξ V : π10(Ver(π)) ∗ → Ver(π 10 ) ⊂ T (J 1 π), then the map Ψ t isdefined byΨ t = κ ◦ T φ t ◦ ξ V .Therefore, it follows that for every vectorfield Y ∈ X(E) vertical over R, we haveD X H Y = d dt (Ψ t ◦ Y ◦ φ t ) ∣ ∣t=0,which is equivalent to the relation D X H Y = κ([X H , Y V ]).For parallel transport along vertical curves we can prescribe a complete parallelismrule as follows. Let γ : [a, b] → J 1 π be a curve in the fibre π10 −1 (m), i.e.π 10 (γ(t)) = m, and let p i = γ(a) and p f = γ(b) the endpoints <strong>of</strong> the curve. We takean element <strong>of</strong> our bundle z ∈ π10(Ver(π)) ∗ at the initial point p i , that is z = (p i , v)for some v ∈ Ver(π) m . Then the parallel transport <strong>of</strong> z from p i to p f along thecurve γ is Pp γ i,p f(p i , v) = (p f , v). It is clear that parallel transport is independent<strong>of</strong> the curve γ that joins the point p i and p f as long as this curve is vertical, and itis in this sense that we speak about complete parallelism.5. Parallel distributions are integrableThe relation between parallel transport and Lie transport that we have seen inthe last section, suggests that there must be some relation between the propertiesfor a distribution <strong>of</strong> being parallel and being invariant under Lie transport by theflows in the distribution, which is known to be equivalent to the integrability <strong>of</strong> thedistribution. In the case we are considering (the case <strong>of</strong> the sode-connection) withthe help <strong>of</strong> the torsion-free condition we can see that parallel distributions alongπ 10 are integrable. The precise meaning <strong>of</strong> this terminology is as follows.