10.07.2015 Views

Sophus Lie, the mathematician

Sophus Lie, the mathematician

Sophus Lie, the mathematician

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

whereas this work had to be written in an analytic formulation. Thiscaused problems for both geometers and analysts, and understanding of<strong>Lie</strong>'s work suffered. <strong>Lie</strong> was aware of this communication problem andtried to cope with it by publishing more and more, faster and faster(in <strong>the</strong> interest of faster publication he started with G. O. Sars andW. Miiller a new journal "Archiv for Ma<strong>the</strong>matik og Naturvidenskab")but <strong>the</strong>se efforts hardly had <strong>the</strong> intended effect. Thus he turned againto geometric questions in 1876. He did considerable work on minimalsurfaces and translation surfacesx = a(t) + A(s), y = b(t) + B(s), z = c(t) + C(s).and later on managed to determine all minimal surfaces which can berealized as translation surfaces in several ways. This turned out tohave an interesting connection with earlier work of Abel in 4th degreealgebraic curves.During <strong>the</strong> years 1873-1876 <strong>Lie</strong> was completely absorbed in transformationgroup questions and worked extremely hard. For example hestruggled with bare hands and relatively primitive methods at determiningall local transformation groups in two variables. Mountains ofpaper piled up but later <strong>Lie</strong> accomplished <strong>the</strong> same with more effectivemethods. <strong>Lie</strong> did his classification for two complex variables; <strong>the</strong> extensionto <strong>the</strong> classification of <strong>Lie</strong> algebras of vector fields in <strong>the</strong> real planehas only been completed ra<strong>the</strong>r recently, in work [13] of Gonzalez-Lopez,Kamran and Olver. They come up with 28 cases.Having visited Paris in 1882 and noticing some work of Halphenbeing included in his own general <strong>the</strong>ories <strong>Lie</strong> turns again to transformationgroups and applications to differential equations, regretting thatthis work of his in <strong>the</strong>se areas seems overlooked. In a letter to AdolfMayer 1884 he writes: "If only I knew how to get ma<strong>the</strong>maticians interestedin transformation groups and <strong>the</strong>ir applications to differentialequations. I am certain, absolutely certain, that <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>ories willsome time in <strong>the</strong> future be recognized as fundamental. When I wishsuch a :recognition sooner, it is partly because <strong>the</strong>n I could accomplishten times more."Being aware of <strong>Lie</strong>'s isolation in Christiania, F. Klein and A. Mayerarrange for Klein's student in Leipzig, Friedrich Engel (<strong>the</strong>n 22) to go<strong>the</strong>re to work with <strong>Lie</strong>. <strong>Lie</strong> receives him with open arms, and Engelrefers later to this year in. collaboration with <strong>Lie</strong> in Christiania as <strong>the</strong>14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!