10.07.2015 Views

Proposed Renovation of Former Jacinto Building - Clark Freeport Zone

Proposed Renovation of Former Jacinto Building - Clark Freeport Zone

Proposed Renovation of Former Jacinto Building - Clark Freeport Zone

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

draft/guarantee, or irrevocable letter <strong>of</strong> credit from other banks certifiedby the BSP as authorized to issue such financial statement.18.2. The bid security should be valid for the period specified in the BDS.Any bid not accompanied by an acceptable bid security shall berejected by the Procuring Entity as non-responsive.18.3. No bid securities shall be returned to bidders after the opening <strong>of</strong> bidsand before contract signing, except to those that failed or declared aspost-disqualified, upon submission <strong>of</strong> a written waiver <strong>of</strong> their right t<strong>of</strong>ile a motion for reconsideration and/or protest. Without prejudice onits forfeiture, Bid Securities shall be returned only after the bidder withthe Lowest Calculated Responsive Bid has signed the contract andfurnished the Performance Security, but in no case later than theexpiration <strong>of</strong> the Bid Security validity period indicated in ITB Clause18.2.18.4. Upon signing and execution <strong>of</strong> the contract, pursuant to ITB Clause31, and the posting <strong>of</strong> the performance security, pursuant to ITBClause 32, the successful Bidder’s Bid security will be discharged, butin no case later than the Bid security validity period as indicated in ITBClause 18.2.18.5. The bid security may be forfeited:(a)if a Bidder:(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)withdraws its Bid during the period <strong>of</strong> Bid validityspecified in ITB Clause 17;does not accept the correction <strong>of</strong> errors pursuant to ITBClause 27.3 (b);fails to submit the requirements within the prescribedperiod, or a finding against their veracity, as stated inITB Clause 28.2.;submission <strong>of</strong> eligibility requirements containing falseinformation or falsified documents;submission <strong>of</strong> bids that contain false information orfalsified documents, or the concealment <strong>of</strong> suchinformation in the bids in order to influence the outcome<strong>of</strong> eligibility screening or any other stage <strong>of</strong> the publicbidding;allowing the use <strong>of</strong> one’s name, or using the name <strong>of</strong>another for purposes <strong>of</strong> public bidding;22<strong>Clark</strong> Development CorporationSection II Instructions to Bidders<strong>Proposed</strong> <strong>Renovation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Former</strong> <strong>Jacinto</strong> <strong>Building</strong>(Motorpool, Records, Warehouses and Maintenance Area)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!