10.07.2015 Views

histofthought1

histofthought1

histofthought1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

226 Economic thought before Adam Smithcareer came when, to all his other posts, was added governor of the mightyEast India Company, chartered in 1600 with a monopoly of all trading to theEast Indies.7.5 Enserfdom in eastern EuropeWhat happened in eastern Europe was even worse than mercantilism. There,absolutism by the kings and the feudal nobility was so rampant and uncheckedthat they decided to crush nascent capitalism. Former serfs, nowfree, had been moving from the rural lands to the towns and cities, there towork for higher wages and better opportunities in emerging capitalist productionand industry. By the beginning of the fifteenth century, eastern Europe,specifically Prussia, Poland and Lithuania, had a freed peasantry. Towns andmonetary exchange flourished, and clothmaking and manufacturing grew andprospered. In the sixteenth century, however, the state and the nobility ofeastern Europe reasserted themselves and re-enserfed the peasantry. In particular,a rise in the price of grain (mainly rye) in Europe in the earlysixteenth century made grain farming more profitable, spurring the socializingof cheap labour in service of the noble landlords. The peasants wereforced back on to the land, and compelled to remain there, and were alsocoerced into corvees (periodic forced labour for the nobility). The peasantswere forced into large manorial estates owned by the nobles, since largeestates meant cheaper costs of supervising and coercing peasant labour on thepart of the nobility. In addition, in Poland, the nobles induced the state to passfurther laws, severely restricting the activities· of urban merchants. Polishmerchants now had to pay higher tolls for shipping produce on the VistulaRiver than did landlords, and Polish merchants were prohibited from exportingdomestic products. Moreover, the repression of the formerly free peasantrygreatly lowered their money income for purchasing goods. These policiescombined to destroy the Polish towns, the urban economy, and theinternal market for Polish goods. As Professor Miskimin writes, 'Out of selfinterestthe nobles successfully contrived to crush Polish economic developmentin order to reserve for themselves the rich grain trade and to assureadequate supplies of agricultural labor for the maximum exploitation of theirestates' .8In Hungary, a similar process of re-enserfment occurred, but in the serviceof cattle-raising and wine-growing rather than rye production. In the laterMiddle Ages, rents by the peasantry had been converted from payments inkind to monetary payments. Now, in the sixteenth century, the nobles markedlyincreased the rents and reconverted them into payments in kind. Taxeson peasants were raised substantially and the burden of forced corvee labourwas increased greatly in one area ninefold from seven days per year to 60.The lords got themselves granted a tight monopoly of wine sales, as well as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!